Technical Papers
Aug 23, 2018

Numerical Investigation of Large-Diameter Monopiles in Sands: Critical Review and Evaluation of Both API and Newly Proposed p-y Curves

Publication: International Journal of Geomechanics
Volume 18, Issue 11

Abstract

Despite the increase in offshore wind turbine (OWT) capacities, the preferred foundations for these marine structures are large-diameter monopiles due to their ease of installation in shallow to medium water depth. The current design methodologies based on p-y curves [the American Petroleum Institute (API) method, for instance] have gained a confirmed recognition in designing slender monopiles, such as those used for supporting offshore gas and oil platforms. However, when applied to large-diameter monopiles, these regulation codes failed to properly address the behavior of these extremely stiff structures, which is why many researchers tried to enhance the p-y method performance by suggesting new p-y formulas incorporating monopile properties. The paper reviews the analytical formulas of the p-y curves adopted by the current offshore guidelines and documents in detail the limitations and the shortcomings inherent to their formulations. The latest versions of p-y curves proposed to improve the performance of the Winkler model were also given. To show how well the finite-element (FE) analysis predicts the lateral response of large-diameter monopiles under horizontal loading on one hand, and how inappropriate the models using p-y curves are in studying this crucial problem on the other hand, two Fortran computer programs were considered. The first program, a computer code called NAMPULAL, combines the FE vertical slices method (VSM) and the hyperbolic model to describe the behavior of cohesionless soils. The second program, called Winkler-ROWKSS, is written using the finite-differences method. In the latter, the original and the newly developed p-y curves were implemented. The comparative study was made by considering two case histories. The first case is a monopile embedded in a multilayer sandy soil, which serves as a support foundation to 5-MW National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) wind turbines, and the second case is a monopile supporting OWTs at Horns Rev in the Danish sector of the North Sea. At the first site, the evolution of the monopile head movements with applied loading provided by the different models of beams on nonlinear Winkler foundations (BNWFs) as well as the FEM was examined and compared. However, at the second site, only the monopile lateral displacement profile was studied.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

Abdel-Rahman, K., and M. Achmus, 2005. “Finite element modeling of horizontally loaded monopile foundations for offshore wind energy converters in Germany.” In Proc., Int. Symp. on Frontiers in Offshore Geotechnics (ISFOG), 391–396. Perth, Australia: CRC Press.
Abed, Y., D. Amar Bouzid, S. Bhattacharya, and M. H. Aissa. 2016. “Static impedance functions for monopiles supporting offshore wind turbines in nonhomogeneous soils-emphasis on soil/monopile interface characteristics.” Earthquakes Struct. 10 (5): 1143–1179. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2016.10.5.1143.
Achmus, M., K.-S. Kuo, and K. Abdel-Rahman. 2009. “Behavior of monopile foundations under cyclic lateral load.” Comput. Geotech. 36 (5): 725–735. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2008.12.003.
Adhikari, S., and S. Bhattacharya. 2011. “Vibrations of wind-turbines considering soil-structure interaction.” Wind Struct. 14 (2): 85–112. https://doi.org/10.12989/was.2011.14.2.085.
Adhikari, S., and S. Bhattacharya. 2012. “Dynamic analysis of wind turbine towers on flexible foundations.” Shock Vib. 19 (1): 37–56. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/408493.
Ahmed, S., and B. Hawlader. 2016. “Numerical analysis of large-diameter monopiles in dense sand supporting offshore wind turbines.” Int. J. Geomech. 16 (5): 04016018. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000633.
Aissa, M. H., D. Amar Bouzid, and S. Bhattacharya. 2017. “Monopile head stiffness for serviceability limit state calculations in assessing the natural frequency of offshore wind turbines.” Int. J. Geotech. Eng. 12 (3): 267–283.
Amar Bouzid, D. 1997. “Analyse semi-analytique par éléments finis des pieux isoles sollicites horizontalement dans un milieu a comportement non-linéaire.” M.S. thesis, École Nationale Polytechnique.
Amar Bouzid, D., B. Tiliouine, and P. A. Vermeer. 2004. “Exact formulation of interface stiffness matrix for axisymmetric bodies under non-axisymmetric loading.” Comput. Geotech. 31 (2): 75–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2004.01.007.
Amar Bouzid, D., P. A. Vermeer, and B. Tiliouine. 2005a. “Finite element vertical slices model: Validation and application to an embedded square footing under combined loading.” Comput. Geotech. 32 (2): 72–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2005.01.001.
Amar Bouzid, D., P. A. Vermeer, B. Tiliouine, and M. Mir. 2005b. “An efficient pseudo three-dimensional finite element model: Presentation and analysis of two soil/foundation interaction problems.” Int. J. Comput. 2 (2): 231–253. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219876205000454.
API (American Petroleum Institute). 2014. Geotechnical and foundation design considerations. API RP 2GEO. Washington, DC: API.
Arany, L., S. Bhattacharya, J. H. G. Macdonald, and S. J. Hogan. 2016. “Closed form solution of Eigen frequency of monopile supported offshore wind turbines in deeper waters incorporating stiffness of substructure and SSI.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 83 (Apr): 18–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2015.12.011.
Arany, L., S. Bhattacharya, J. H. G. Macdonald, and S. J. Hogan. 2017. “Design of monopiles for offshore wind turbines in 10 steps.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 92 (Jan): 126–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2016.09.024.
Ashford, S., and T. Juirnarongrit. 2003. “Evaluation of pile diameter effect on initial modulus of subgrade reaction.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 129 (3): 234–242. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2003)129:3(234).
Ashour, M., and G. Norris. 2000. “Modeling lateral soil-pile response based on soil-pile interaction.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 126 (5): 420–428. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2000)126:5(420).
Augustesen, A. H., K. T. Brodbaek, M. Moller, S. P. H. Sorensen, L. B. Ibsen, T. S. Pedersen, and L. Andersen, 2009. “Numerical modelling of large-diameter steel piles at Horns Rev.” In Proc., Twelfth Int. Conf. on Civil, Structural and Environmental Engineering Computing, edited by B. H. V. Topping, L. F. Costa Neves, and R. C. Barros. Stirlingshire, Scotland: Civil-Comp Press.
Bisoi, S., and S. Haldar. 2015. “Design of monopile supported offshore wind turbine in clay considering dynamic soil–structure-interaction.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 73 (June): 103–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2015.02.017.
Budhu, M., and T. G. Davies. 1987. “Nonlinear analysis of laterality loaded piles in cohesionless soils.” Can. Geotech. J. 24 (2): 289–296. https://doi.org/10.1139/t87-034.
Carswell, W., S. R. Arwade, D. J. DeGroot, and M. A. Lackner. 2015. “Soil-structure reliability of offshore wind turbine monopile foundations.” Wind Energy 18 (3): 483–498. https://doi.org/10.1002/we.1710.
Carter, J., and F. Kulhawy. 1992. “Analysis of laterally loaded shafts in rock.” J. Geotech. Eng. 118 (6): 839–855. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1992)118:6(839).
Davies, T. G., and M. Budhu. 1986. “Non-linear analysis of laterally loaded piles in heavily overconsolidated clays.” Géotechnique 36 (4): 527–538. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1986.36.4.527.
Dickin, E. A., and M. Laman. 2003. “Moment response of short rectangular piers in sand.” Comput. Struct. 81 (30–31): 2717–2729. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-7949(03)00337-7.
DNV (Det Norske Veritas). 2013. Offshore standard: Design of offshore wind turbine structures. DNV-OS-J101. Høvik, Norway: DNV.
Duncan, J., and C. Chang. 1970. “Nonlinear analysis of stress and strain in soils.” J. Soil Mech. Found. Div. 96 (SM5): 1629–1653.
Duncan, J. M., and K. S. Wong. 1999. User’s manual for SAGE. Vol. II—Soil properties manual. Blacksburg, VA: Centre for Geotechnical Practice and Research, Virginia Tech.
Fan, C.-C., and J. H. Long. 2005. “Assessment of existing methods for predicting soil response of laterally loaded piles in sand.” Comput. Geotech. 32 (4): 274–289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2005.02.004.
Galvín, P., A. Romero, M. Solís, and J. Domínguez. 2017. “Dynamic characterisation of wind turbine towers account for a monopile foundation and different soil conditions.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 13 (7): 942–954. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2016.1227342.
Gazetas, G. 1991. “Foundation vibrations.” In Foundation engineering handbook. 2nd ed. Edited by H.-Y. Fang, 553–593. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
Hald, T., C. Mørch, L. Jensen, C. L. Bakmar, and K. Ahle, 2009. “Revisiting monopile design using p-y curves–results from full scale measurements on Horns Rev.” In Proc., of the European Offshore Wind Conf. Stockholm, Sweden: WindEurope.
Higgins, W., C. Vasquez, D. Basu, and D. Griffiths. 2013. “Elastic solutions for laterally loaded piles.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 139 (7): 1096–1103. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000828.
Ibsen, L. B., M. Hansen, T. H. Hjort, and M. Thaarup, 2009. MC-parameter calibration of Baskarp sand No. 15. DCE Technical Rep. No. 62. Aalborg, Denmark: Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Aalborg.
Jâky, J. A. 1944. “Nyugalmi nyomâs tényezöje [The coefficient of earth pressure at rest].” J. Soc. Hungarian Archit. Eng. 355–358.
Janbu, N. 1963. “Soil compressibility as determined by oedometer and triaxial tests.” In Vol. 1 of Proc., European Conf. on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, 19–25. Wiesbaden, Germany: Deutsche Gesellschaft für Erd-und Grundbau.
Jonkman, J., S. Butterfield, W. Musial, and J. Scott, 2009. Reference wind turbine for offshore system development. Technical Rep. No. NREL/TP-500-38060. Golden, CO: National Renewable Energy Laboratory.
Jung, S., S. R. Kim, A. Patil, and L. C. Hung. 2015. “Effect of monopile foundation modeling on the structural response of a 5-MW wind turbine tower.” Ocean Eng. 109 (Nov): 479–488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2015.09.033.
Kallehave, D., C. T. LeBlanc, and M. A. Liingaard, 2012. “Modification of the API p-y formulation of initial stiffness of sand.” In Proc., 7th Int. Conf. on Offshore Site Investigations and Geotechnics, 465–472. Royal Geographical Society, London: Society for Underwater Technology.
Kondner, R. 1963. “Hyperbolic stress-strain response: Cohesive soils.” J. Soil Mech. Found. Div. 89 (SM1): 115–143.
Kondner, R. L., and J. S. Zelako, 1963. “A hyperbolic stress-strain formulation for sands.” In Vol. 1 of Proc., 2nd Pan American Conf. on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, 289–324. Sao Paulo, Brazil: Brazilian Association of Soil Mechanics.
Lombardi, D., S. Bhattacharya, and D. M. Wood. 2013. “Dynamic soil–structure interaction of monopile supported wind turbines in cohesive soil.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 49 (June): 165–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2013.01.015.
Mayne, P., and F. Kulhawy. 1982. “K0-OCR relationships in soil.” J. Geotech. Engrg. Div. 108 (GT6): 851–872.
Michalowski, R. 2005. “Coefficient of earth pressure at rest.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 131 (11): 1429–1433.https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2005)131:11(1429).
O’Neill, M. W., and J. M. Murchison, 1983. An evaluation of p-y relationships in sands. Research Rep. No. GT-DF02-83. Houston: Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Houston.
Otsmane, L., and D. Amar Bouzid. 2018. “An efficient FE model for SSI: Theoretical background and assessment by predicting the response of large diameter monopiles supporting OWECs.” Comput. Geotech. 97 (May): 155–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2017.12.001.
Passon, P. 2006. Memorandum derivation and description of the soil-pile interaction models. IEA-Annex XXIII Subtask 2. Stuttgart, Germany: IEA.
Pender, M. J., D. P. Carter, and S. Pranjoto. 2007. “Diameter effects on pile head lateral stiffness and site investigation requirements for pile foundation design.” J. Earthquake Eng. 11 (1): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632460701280005.
Randolph, M. F. 1981. “The response of flexible piles to lateral loading.” Géotechnique 31 (2): 247–259. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1981.31.2.247.
Reese, L. C. 1977. “Laterally loaded piles: Program documentation: J. Geotech. Engng. Div. ASCE Vol. 103 No. GT4 Proc. Paper 12862 (April 1977) pp 287–305.” Comput.-Aided Des. 10 (3): 210. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-4485(78)90185-9.
Reese, L. C., W. R. Cox, and F. D. Koop, 1974. “Analysis of laterally loaded piles in sand.” In Vol. 2 of Proc., Sixth Annual Offshore Technology Conf., 473–485. Dallas: OTC.
Reese, L. C., and I. Manoliu, 1973. “Analysis of laterally loaded piles by computer.” Buletinul Stiintific 16 (1): 35–65.
Reese, L. C., and W. R. Sullivan, 1980. Documentation of computer program COM624: Parts I and II, Analysis of stresses and deflections for laterally loaded piles including generation of p-y curves. Geotechnical Rep. No. GS80-1. Austin, TX: Univ. of Texas at Austin.
Reese, L. C., and W. F. Van Impe. 2011. Single piles and pile groups under lateral loading. 2nd ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, Taylor and Francis Group.
Shadlou, M., and S. Bhattacharya. 2016. “Dynamic stiffness of monopiles supporting offshore wind turbine generators.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 88 (Sept): 15–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2016.04.002.
Sheil, B., and W. Finnegan. 2017. “Numerical simulations of wave-structure-soil interaction of offshore monopiles.” Int. J. Geomech. 17 (1): 04016024. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000667.
Sherif, M., Y. Fang, and R. Sherif. 1984. “KA and K0 behind rotating and non-yielding walls.” J. Geotech. Eng. 110 (1): 41–56. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1984)110:1(41).
Sørensen, S. P. H. 2012. “Soil-structure interaction for non-slender large-diameter offshore monopoles.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Aalborg Univ.
Sørensen, S. P. H., L. B. Ibsen, and A. H. Augustesen, 2010. “Effects of diameter on initial stiffness of p-y curves for large-diameter piles in sand.” In Proc., 7th Conf. on Numerical Methods in Geotechnical Engineering, 907–912. Trondheim, Norway: Taylor & Francis.
Terzaghi, K. 1955. “Evaluation of coefficients of subgrade reaction.” Géotechnique 5 (4): 297–326. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1955.5.4.297.
Thieken, K., M. Achmus, and K. Lemke. 2015. “A new static p-y approach for piles with arbitrary dimensions in sand.” Geotechnik 38 (4): 267–288. https://doi.org/10.1002/gete.201400036.
Vesic, A. B. 1961. “Bending of beams resting on isotropic elastic solid.” J. Engrg. Mech. Div. 87 (4): 35–51.
Wang, S.-T., and W. M. Isenhower. 2010. LPILE, version 6 user’s manual: A program for the analysis of deep foundations under lateral loads. Austin, TX: ENSOFT, Inc.
Wiemann, J., K. Lesny, and W. Richwien, 2004. “Evaluation of pile diameter effects on soil-pile stiffness.” In Proc., 7th German Wind Energy Conf. (DEWEK). Wilhelmshaven, Germany: Deutsches Windenergie-Institut.
Wong, K. S., and J. M. Duncan, 1974. Hyperbolic stress-strain parameters for non-linear finite element analyses of stresses and movements in soil masses. Rep. No. TE-74-3. Berkeley, CA: Univ. of California.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to International Journal of Geomechanics
International Journal of Geomechanics
Volume 18Issue 11November 2018

History

Received: Sep 13, 2017
Accepted: Feb 2, 2018
Published online: Aug 23, 2018
Published in print: Nov 1, 2018
Discussion open until: Jan 23, 2019

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Djillali Amar Bouzid [email protected]
Professor, Dept. Civil Engineering, Faculty of Technology, Univ. Saad Dahled of Blida, Route de Soumaa, Blida 09000, Algeria. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share