Development of Stress Model near the Wellbore Using an Iterative Coupling Method
Publication: International Journal of Geomechanics
Volume 17, Issue 2
Abstract
Water-alternating-gas (WAG) injection is increasingly applied globally as the effective enhanced oil recovery (EOR) method in oil wells. High injection pressure or low injection temperature could lead to wellbore failure. The rock stress around the wellbore is a function of the wellbore pressure and temperature, and it should be precisely determined to avoid wellbore failure. This study aimed to develop a wellbore geomechanical model for WAG injection using an iterative coupling method. The parameters of pressure, temperature, saturation, and stress were obtained for the multiphase flow condition using mathematical modeling. The finite-difference method was used to solve pressure, temperature, and saturation, and the finite-volume method was used to solve the rock stresses. Because the values for flow and rock stresses are related by the role of effective stress, the pressure is the key parameter to determine the stress. However, pressure changes with stress because of the change in porosity and permeability. Therefore, an iterative coupling method was employed to improve result accuracy. This paper introduces an improved iterative coupling method between flow and stress models that reduces the processing time of obtaining corrected stress results.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
Abaqus 6.10 [Computer software]. SIMULIA, Providence, RI.
Bataee, M., Irawan, S., and Majidaie, S. (2014). “The effects of geomechanics on the WAG injection model.” Proc., Offshore Technology Conf. Asia, OTC-24706-MS, Offshore Technology Conference, Houston.
Chen, Z., Huan, G., and Ma, Y. (2006). Computational methods for multiphase flows in porous media, Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia.
Chin, L. Y., Thomas, L. K., Sylte, J. E., and Pierson, R. G. (2002). “Iterative coupled analysis of geomechanics and fluid flow for rock compaction in reservoir simulation.” Oil Gas Sci. Tech., 57(5), 485–497.
Du, J., and Wong, R. (2005). “Development of a coupled geomechanics-thermal reservoir simulator using finite element method.” Proc., Canadian International Petroleum Conf., Petroleum Society of Canada, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Irawan, S., and Bataee, M. (2015). “Numerical modeling of flow and temperature distribution in heterogeneous wellbore medium.” SPE Middle East Oil and Gas Show and Conf., Society of Petroleum Engineers, Richardson, TX.
Lewis, R. W., Roberts, P. J., and Schrefler, B. A. (1989). “Finite element modelling of two-phase heat and fluid flow in deforming porous media.” Transp. Porous Media, 4(4), 319–334.
Lewis, R. W., and Schrefler, B. A. (1987). The finite element method in the static and dynamic deformation and consolidation of porous media, Wiley, New York.
Ma, G., Zhou, W., Chang, X. L., and Yuan, W. (2013). “Combined FEM/DEM modeling of triaxial compression tests for rockfills with polyhedral particles.” Int. J. Geomech., 04014014.
MATLAB R2013a [Computer software]. Natick, MA.
Mendes, M. A., Murad, M. A., and Pereira, F. (2012). “A new computational strategy for solving two‐phase flow in strongly heterogeneous poroelastic media of evolving scales.” Int. J. Numer. Anal. Methods Geomech., 36(15), 1683–1716.
Pao, W. K. S., Lewis, R. W., and Masters, I. (2001). “A fully coupled hydro-thermo-poro-mechanical model for black oil reservoir simulation.” Int. J. Numer. Anal. Methods Geomech, 25(12), 1229–1256.
Rahman, M., and Rahman, S. (2013). “Fully coupled finite-element–based numerical model for investigation of interaction between an induced and a preexisting fracture in naturally fractured poroelastic reservoirs: Fracture diversion, arrest, and breakout.” Int. J. Geomech., 390–401.
Rutqvist, J., Vasco, D. W., and Myer, L. (2010). “Coupled reservoir-geomechanical analysis of CO2 injection and ground deformations at In Salah, Algeria.” Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control, 4(2), 225–230.
Settari, A., Walters, D., and Behie, G. (2001). “Use of coupled reservoir and geomechanical modelling for integrated reservoir analysis and management.” J. Can. Pet. Technol., 40(12).
Shen, B., et al. (2012). “Coupling rock-fracture propagation with thermal stress and fluid flow.” Int. J. Geomech., 794–808.
Singh, K. K., Singh, D., and Ranjith, P. (2013). “Simulating flow through fractures in a rock mass using analog material.” Int. J. Geomech., 8–19.
Tran, D., Nghiem, L., and Buchanan, L. (2005). “Improved iterative coupling of geomechanics with reservoir simulation.” SPE Reservoir Simulation Symp., SPE-93244-MS, Society of Petroleum Engineers, Richardson, TX.
Tran, D., Settari, A., and Nghiem, L. (2004). “New iterative coupling between a reservoir simulator and a geomechanics module.” SPE J., 9(3), 362–369.
Yin, S., Dusseault, M. B., and Rothenburg, L. (2009). “Multiphase poroelastic modeling in semi-space for deformable reservoirs.” J. Pet. Sci. Eng., 64(1), 45–54.
Zhang, S., Yin, S., and Yuan, Y. (2013). “Estimation of fracture stiffness, in situ stresses, and elastic parameters of naturally fractured geothermal reservoirs.” Int. J. Geomech., 04014033.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
International Journal of Geomechanics
Volume 17 • Issue 2 • February 2017
Copyright
© 2016 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Jul 14, 2014
Accepted: Mar 28, 2016
Published online: May 13, 2016
Discussion open until: Oct 13, 2016
Published in print: Feb 1, 2017
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.