Moisture Reduction Factors for Shear Strength of Unsaturated Reinforced Embankments
Publication: International Journal of Geomechanics
Volume 16, Issue 6
Abstract
This paper describes the construction and testing of six 1-m-high model embankments constructed at three different gravimetric water content (GWC) values to study their performance and to validate a set of moisture reduction factors (MRFs) introduced by the authors in their recent studies. The earlier MRF values were obtained from a series of pullout and interface shear tests on the same soil and reinforcement materials. The MRF in this study is defined as the ratio of soil-reinforcement interface shear strength at an increased GWC value [e.g., optimum moisture content (OMC) + 2%] to the shear strength at OMC − 2% representing construction conditions. Therefore, MRF values can be used to account for an anticipated reduction in the shear strength of the soil-geotextile reinforcement interface caused by wetting in the stability analysis and design of reinforced soil structures constructed with marginal soils. The embankment models were built using a lean clay (CL) at the GWC values ranging between OMC − 2% and OMC + 2%, which included a single-reinforcement layer near the top of the embankment. This provided a horizontal soil-reinforcement interface subjected to shear sliding of an overriding block of soil caused by surcharge loading of the embankment. Two different woven polypropylene geotextile products were used to build the six model embankments. Each model was instrumented with a total of 67 sensors to measure the soil GWC, matric suction and excess pore pressure, reinforcement strains, earth pressure, and deformations of the embankment model and the test box during the test. Results from the embankment tests in this study indicate that the change in the matric suction and GWC could have a significant influence on the soil-geotextile reinforcement interface strength. Wetting of the soil and the soil-geotextile interface during construction or service life of reinforced soil slopes could considerably reduce their shear strength, resulting in lower factors of safety for their stability. The results of the study showed that within the range of GWC values examined (i.e., OMC ± 2%), the embankment model constructed at OMC − 2% yielded the greatest shear strength and stability when subjected to a strip footing load. The MRF values for the model embankments constructed at OMC + 2% were found to be as low as 0.74–0.79 for models that were reinforced with different woven geotextiles of comparable apparent opening size (AOS) but different ultimate strength values. The MRF results presented in this study, although obtained from soils with different as-compacted GWC values, indicate that the loss of soil-reinforcement interface shear capacity as a result of wetting in reinforced soil structures involving marginal fills could be significant and deserve proper attention in the design of these systems.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
The authors acknowledge funding and support from the Oklahoma Department of Transportation (ODOT), the Oklahoma Transportation Center (OkTC), and TenCate Geosynthetics for the study reported in this paper. The contributions of Mr. Michael Schmitz at the Fears Structural Laboratory and undergraduate students Chase W. Iddings, Jeremiah C. Kayiza, and Owen D. Watley in this project are also acknowledged.
References
AASHTO. (2012). “Standard specification for classification of soils and soil-aggregate mixtures for highway construction purposes.” M 145-91, Washington, DC.
ASTM. (2006). “Standard test methods for amount of material in soils finer than No. 200 (75-µm) sieve.” D-1140, West Conshohocken, PA.
ASTM. (2007). “Standard test methods for particle-size analysis of soils.” D-422, West Conshohocken, PA.
ASTM. (2010). “Standard test method for measuring mass per unit area of geotextiles.” D5261, West Conshohocken, PA.
ASTM. (2011a). “Standard practice for classification of soils for engineering purposes (Unified Soil Classification System).” D2487, West Conshohocken, PA.
ASTM. (2011b). “Standard test methods for direct shear test of soils under consolidated drained conditions.” D3080/D3080M, West Conshohocken, PA.
ASTM. (2011c). “Standard test methods for tensile properties of geotextiles by the wide-width strip method.” D4595, West Conshohocken, PA.
ASTM. (2012a). “Standard test methods for determining apparent opening size of a geotextile.” D4751, West Conshohocken, PA.
ASTM. (2012b). “Standard test methods for laboratory compaction characteristics of soil using modified effort (56,000 ft-lbf/ft3 (2,700 kN-m/m3)).” D1557, West Conshohocken, PA.
ASTM. (2014). “Standard test methods for determining the shear strength of soil-geosynthetic and geosynthetic-geosynthetic interfaces by direct shear.” D5321/D5321M, West Conshohocken, PA.
Berg R. B., Christopher, B. R., and Samtani, N. C. (2009). “Design and construction of mechanically stabilized earth walls and reinforced soil slopes.” FHWA-NHI-10-024, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC.
Budhu, M. (2000). Soil mechanics and foundations, John Wiley & Sons, New York.
Elias, V., Christopher, B. R., and Berg, R. R. (2001). “Mechanically stabilized earth walls and reinforced soil slopes-design and construction guidelines.” FHWA-NHI-00-043, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC.
Esmaili, D. (2014). “A study on unsaturated soil-geotextile interface strength using multi-scale laboratory tests.” Ph.D. dissertation, Univ. of Oklahoma, Norman, OK.
Esmaili, D., and Hatami, K. (2015). “Measured performance and stability analysis of large-scale reinforced model embankments at different moisture contents.” Int. J. Geosyn. Ground Eng., 1(3), 1–16.
Esmaili, D., Hatami, K., and Miller G. A. (2014). “Influence of matric suction on geotextile reinforcement-marginal soil interface strength.” Geotext. Geomembr., 42(2), 139–153.
FLAC (Computer software). Fast Lagrangian Analysis of Continua (FLAC), version 6.0, Itasca Consulting Group, Inc., Minneapolis.
Gill, K. S., Choudhary, A. K., Jha, J. N., and Shukla, S. K. (2013). “Large model footing load test on multilayer reinforced coal-ash slope.” Geo-Congress 2013, ASCE, San Diego, 489–498.
Hatami, K., and Esmaili, D. (2015). “Unsaturated soil-woven geotextile interface strength properties from small-scale pullout and interface tests.” Geosyn. Int., 22(2), 161–172.
Hatami, K., Esmaili, D., Chan, E. C., and Miller, G. A. (2014). “Laboratory performance of reduced-scale reinforced embankments at different moisture content.” Int. J. Geotech. Eng., 8(3), 260–276.
Hatami, K., Esmaili, D., Granados, J. E., and Miller, G. A. (2012). “Pullout response of geotextile reinforcement at different matric suctions.” 5th European Geosynthetics Congress, International Geosynthetics Society, Jupiter, FL, Paper #136.
Hatami, K., Granados, J. E., Esmaili, D., and Miller, G. A. (2013). “Reinforcement pullout capacity in mechanically stabilized earth walls with marginal-quality soils.” Transportation Research Record, 2363, 66–74.
Hatami K., Khoury C. N., and Miller, G. A. (2008). “Suction-controlled testing of soil-geotextile interfaces,” GeoAmericas 2008, The First Pan American Geosynthetics Conf. and Exhibition, March 2008, Industrial Fabrics Association International, Roseville, MN, Paper No. 1236, 262–271.
Hatami, K., Miller, G. A., and Esmaili, D. (2011). “Use of MSE technology to stabilize highway embankments and slopes in Oklahoma.” Final Rep. FHWA-11-04, ODOT SPR Item 2214, Oklahoma Dept. of Transportation, Oklahoma City, OK.
Hatami, K., Miller, G. A., and Garcia, L. (2010). “Use of MSE technology to stabilize highway embankments and slopes in Oklahoma.” Final Rep. OTC REOS7-1-19, Oklahoma Dept. of Transportation, Oklahoma City, OK.
Hossain, J., Hossain, M. S., and Hoyos, L. R. (2013). “Effect of rainfall on stability of unsaturated earth slopes constructed on expansive clay.” Geo-Congress 2013, ASCE, San Diego, 417–425.
Hsu, S. C., Maldonado, J., Loehr, E., Bowders, J., Lindsey, E., and Omatson, W. (2013). “Model testing of precipitation-induced landslides.” Geo-Congress 2013, ASCE, San Diego, 426–433.
Huang, C. C., Tatsuoka, F., and Sato, Y. (1994). “Failure mechanism of reinforced sand slopes loaded with a footing.” Soils Found., 34(2), 27–40.
Kawamura, S., Miura, S., Yokohama, S., Kudo, A., and Kaiya, N. (2013). “Field monitoring of embankment constructed by volcanic soil and its evaluation.” Geo-Congress 2013, ASCE, San Diego, 373–382.
Khoury, C. N., Miller, G. A., and Hatami, K. (2010). “Shear strength of unsaturated soil-geotextile interfaces.” GeoFlorida 2010: Advances in analysis, modeling and design, Geotechnical special publication 199, D. Fratta, A. J. Puppala, and B. Munhunthan, eds., ASCE, Reston, VA, 307–316.
Khoury, C. N., Miller, G. A., and Hatami, K. (2011). “Unsaturated soil-geotextile interface behavior.” Geotext. Geomembr., 29(1), 17–28.
Kim, Y. T., and Lee, J. S. (2013). “Slope stability characteristic of unsaturated weathered granite soil in Korea considering antecedent rainfall.” Geo-Congress 2013, ASCE, San Diego, 394–401.
Lee, K. M., and Manjunath, V. R. (1999). “Experimental and numerical studies of geosynthetic-reinforced sand slopes loaded with a footing.” Can. Geotech. J., 37(4), 828–842.
Marr, W. A. (2012). “Selecting backfill materials for MSE retaining walls.” NCHRP 24-22 Project (7/23/2003--12/31/2012). 〈http://apps.trb.org/cmsfeed/trbnetprojectdisplay.asp?projectid=721〉.
Phoon, K.-K., and Kulhawy, F. H. (2008). “Serviceability limit state reliability-based design.” Reliability-based design in geotechnical engineering: Computations and applications, K.-K. Phoon, ed., Taylor & Francis, New York, 344–384.
Tohari, A., Nishigaki, M., and Komatsu, M. (2007). “Laboratory rainfall-induced slope failure with moisture content measurement.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 575–587.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
International Journal of Geomechanics
Volume 16 • Issue 6 • December 2016
Copyright
© 2016 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Oct 7, 2014
Accepted: Oct 14, 2015
Published online: Jan 22, 2016
Discussion open until: Jun 22, 2016
Published in print: Dec 1, 2016
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.