Technical Papers
Feb 13, 2014

Analytical Modeling of Field Axial Pullout Tests Performed on Buried Extensible Pipes

Publication: International Journal of Geomechanics
Volume 15, Issue 2

Abstract

The performance evaluation of buried extensible plastic pipelines, such as polyethylene pipes in the gas distribution industry, in areas prone to ground movement is a key consideration for many utility owners. Considering the relatively smaller deformation stiffness and nonlinear stress-strain response of these pipes compared with those of steel pipes, a good understanding of the basic soil–pipe interaction mechanisms forms a critical part in these evaluations. The increase in soil normal stress on the pipe attributable to soil dilation and gradual degradation of interface friction with axial pipe displacement was investigated. An analytical method was developed to estimate the pipe response when subject to axial frictional loads arising from soil movements, which accounts for these factors and the nonlinear stress-strain response of the pipe material. For a known relative axial soil displacement, the approach provides a convenient way to determine the axial force, strain, and length along which the friction is mobilized. The proposed analytical solution was used to model the response of five large-scale field pipe pullout tests. It is shown that the analytical solution is capable of effectively forming a framework to relate pipe displacement, pullout resistance, strain, and mobilized length. The findings also highlight the significance and need to account for soil dilation effects in describing the soil–pipe interaction in extensible plastic pipes.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The funding provided by FortisBC, Surrey, British Columbia, Canada, in support of this research work is deeply appreciated.

References

Airey, D. W., and Kelly, R. B. (2008). “Interface behaviours from large diameter ring shear tests.” Proc., Research Symp. on Characterization and Behavior of Interfaces, J. D. Frost, ed., IOS Press, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 1–6.
Altun, A., and Goktepe, S. (2006). “Dependence of dynamic shear modulus of uniform sands on stress level and density.” Civ. Eng. Environ. Syst., 23(2), 101–116.
American Lifelines Alliance. (2001). “Guidelines for the design of buried steel pipe.” 〈http://www.americanlifelinesalliance.com/pdf/Update061305.pdf〉 (Jul. 2007).
Anderson, C. (2004). “Soil-pipeline interaction of polyethylene natural gas pipelines in sand.” M.Sc. thesis, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
ASCE. (1984). “Guidelines for the seismic design of oil and gas pipeline systems.” Prepared by the Committee on Gas and Liquid Fuel Lifelines of the ASCE Technical Council on Lifeline Earthquake Engineering, New York.
Bolton, M. D. (1986). “The strength and dilatancy of sands.” Geotechnique, 36(1), 65–78.
Boulon, M., and Foray, P. (1986). “Physical and numerical simulation of lateral shaft friction along offshore piles in sand.” Proc., 3rd Int. Conf. on Numerical Methods in Offshore Piling, Technip, Paris, 127–147.
Boulon, M., and Nova, R. (1990). “Modeling of soil-structure interface behavior. A comparison between elastoplastic and rate type laws.” Comput. Geotech., 9(1–2), 21–46.
Chakraborty, T., and Salgado, R. (2010). “Dilatancy and shear strength of sand at low confining pressures.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 527–532.
Foray, P., Balachowski, L., and Colliat, J. L. (1998). “Bearing capacity of model piles driven into overconsolidated sands.” Can. Geotech. J., 35(2), 374–385.
Hardin, B. O., and Drnevich, V. P. (1972). “Shear modulus and damping in soils.” J. Soil Mech. and Found. Div., 98(7), 667–692.
Honegger, D., and Nyman, D. (2004). “Guidelines for the seismic design and assessment of natural gas and liquid hydrocarbon pipelines.” Catalog No. L51927, Pipeline Research Council International, Falls Church, VA.
Iwasaki, T., Tatsuoka, F., Tokida, K., and Yasuda, S. (1978). “A practical method for assessing soil liquefaction potential based on case studies at various sites in Japan.” Proc., 2nd Int. Conf. on Microzonation for Safer Construction—Research and Application, National Science Foundation, Arlington, VA, 885–896.
Jaky, J. (1944). “The coefficient of earth pressure at rest.” J. Soc. Hung. Archit. Eng., 78(22), 355–358.
Johnston, I. W., Lam, T. S. K., and Williams, A. F. (1987). “Constant normal stiffness direct shear testing for socketed pile design in weak rock.” Geotechnique, 37(1), 83–89.
Karimian, A. H. (2006). “Response of buried steel pipelines subjected to longitudinal and transverse ground movement.” Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Luo, S. Q., Tan, S. A., and Yong, K. Y. (2000). “Pull-out resistance mechanism of a soil nail reinforcement in dilative soils.” Soils Found., 40(1), 47–56.
Negussey, D., Wijewickreme, D., and Vaid, Y. P. (1989). “Geomembrane interface friction.” Can. Geotech. J., 26(1), 165–169.
Randolph, M. F., Dolwin, J., and Beck, R. D. (1994). “Design of driven piles in sand.” Geotechnique, 44(3), 427–448.
Rinne, N. F. (1985). “Evaluation of interface friction between cohesionless soil and common construction materials.” M.Sc. thesis, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Roscoe, K. H. (1970). “The influence of strains in soil mechanics. Tenth Rankine lecture.” Geotechnique, 20(2), 129–170.
Scarpelli, G., and Muir Wood, D. (1982). “Experimental observations of shear band patterns in direct shear tests.” Proc., IUTAM Symp. on Deformation and Failure of Granular Materials, P. A. Vermeer and H. J. Luger, eds., Balkema, Rotterdam, Netherlands, 473–484.
Schlosser, F., and Elias, V. (1978). “Friction in reinforced earth.” Proc., Symp. on Earth Reinforcement, ASCE, New York, 735–763.
Seed, H. B., Wong, R. T., Idriss, I. M., and Tokimatsu, K. (1986). “Moduli and damping factors for dynamic analyses of cohesionless soils.” J. Geotech. Engrg., 1016–1032.
Stewart, H. E., Bilgin, O., O’Rourke, T. D., and Keeney, T. M. (1999). “Technical reference for improved design and construction to account for thermal loads in plastic gas pipelines.” Technical Rep., Cornell Univ., Ithaca, NY.
Stone, K. J. L., and Muir Wood, D. (1992). “Effects of dilatancy and particle size observed in model tests on sands.” Soils Found., 32(4), 43–57.
Suleiman, M. T. and Coree, B. J. (2004). “Constitutive model for high density polyethylene material: Systematic approach.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng., 511–515.
Tatsuoka, F., and Shibuya, S. (1991). “Deformation characteristics of soils and rocks from field and laboratory tests.” Proc., 9th Asian Regional Conf. on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Vol. 2, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Netherlands, 101–170.
Uesugi, M., Kishida, H., and Tsubakihara, Y. (1988). “Behavior of sand particles in sand-steel friction.” Soils Found., 28(1), 107–118.
Uthayakumar, M. (1996). “Liquefaction of sands under multiaxial loading.” Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Weerasekara, L., and Wijewickreme, D. (2008). “Mobilization of soil loads on polyethylene natural gas pipelines subject to relative axial ground displacements.” Can. Geotech. J., 45(9), 1237–1249.
Weerasekara, L., Wijewickreme, D., and Mitchell, A. (2006). “Response of tee-junctions in buried polyethylene natural gas distribution piping subject to ground movement.” Proc., 59th Canadian Geotechnical Conf., Canadian Geotechnical Society, Richmond, BC, Canada, 321–329.
Wijewickreme, D., Karimian, H., and Honegger, D. G. (2009). “Response of buried steel pipelines subject to relative axial soil movement.” Can. Geotech. J., 46(7), 735–752.
Yu, P., and Richart, F. E. (1984). “Stress ratio effects on shear modulus of dry sands.” J. Geotech. Engrg., 331–345.
Zeghal, M., and Edil, T. B. (2002). “Soil structure interaction analysis: Modeling the interface.” Can. Geotech. J., 39(3), 620–628.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to International Journal of Geomechanics
International Journal of Geomechanics
Volume 15Issue 2April 2015

History

Received: Sep 5, 2012
Accepted: Dec 23, 2013
Published online: Feb 13, 2014
Published in print: Apr 1, 2015

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Dharma Wijewickreme, P.Eng., M.ASCE [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada V6T 1Z4 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Lalinda Weerasekara [email protected]
Geotechnical Engineer, Tetra Tech EBA, 1066 W. Hastings St., Vancouver, BC, Canada V6E 3X2. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share