Mechanistic-Empirical Modeling of Geosynthetic-Reinforced Unpaved Roads
Publication: International Journal of Geomechanics
Volume 12, Issue 4
Abstract
Mechanistic-empirical modeling and design solutions have been routinely used for conventional flexible pavements and have recently entered mainstream design practice through the issue of AASHTO design software. Recent work has been performed to incorporate mechanisms of base reinforcement with geosynthetics into mechanistic-empirical modeling and design. The purpose of this paper is to examine the use of this work for mechanistic-empirical modeling of reinforced unpaved roads by using the same model components used for paved roads and incorporating new components that account for the significant influence of pore-water pressure generation in the subgrade. Results from instrumented unpaved road test sections are used to calibrate and compare with the model predictions. The model provides reasonable predictions of rutting behavior for test sections where rut development is stable, where stable is defined as a rate of rutting that decreases with increasing traffic. The importance of excess pore-water pressure development in the subgrade is illustrated by the test sections and accounted for by the inclusion of steps in the model.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
AASHTO. (2008). Mechanistic-empirical pavement design guide, interim edition: A manual of practice, AASHTO, Washington, DC.
ASTM. (2009). “Standard test method for measuring geosynthetic-soil resilient interface shear modulus.” ASTM D7499, West Conshohocken, PA.
Barksdale, R. D., and Alba, J. L. (1993). “Laboratory determination of resilient modulus for flexible pavement design.” Interim Rep. No. 2, National Cooperative Highway Research Program, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, DC.
Chazallon, C., Hornych, P., and Mouhoubi, S. (2006). “Elastoplastic model for the long-term behavior modeling of unbound granular materials in flexible pavements.” Int. J. Geomech., 6(4), 279–289.IJGNAI
Christopher, B. R., and Lacina, B. (2008). “Roadway subgrade stabilization study.” Proc., GeoAmericas 2008, International Geosynthetic Society, Cancun, Mexico, 1013–1021.
Christopher, B. R., Perkins, S. W., Lacina, B. A., and Marr, W. A. (2009). “Pore water pressure influence on geosynthetic stabilized subgrade performance.” Proc., Conf. Geosynthetics 2009 (CD-ROM), Industrial Fabrics Association, Inc., Roseville, MN.
Cuelho, E. V., and Perkins, S. W. (2005). “Resilient interface shear modulus from short-strip, cyclic pullout tests.” Proc., Conf. GeoFrontiers, Geotech. Special Publication 140, Slopes and Retaining Structures under Seismic and Static Conditions (CD-ROM), ASCE, Austin, TX.
Cuelho, E. V., Perkins, S. W., and Ganeshan, S. K. (2005). “Determining geosynthetic material properties pertinent to reinforced pavement design.” Proc., Conf. GeoFrontiers, Geotech, Special Publication 130, Advances in Pavement Engineering (CD-ROM), ASCE, Austin, TX.
Eiksund, G. R., Hoff, I., and Perkins, S. W. (2004). “Cyclic triaxial tests on reinforced base course material.” Proc., Conf. EuroGeo 2004, International Geosynthetics Society, Munich, Germany, 619–624.
GeoTesting Express. (2009). NAUE stabilization study: A laboratory evaluation of the performance of NAUE base reinforcement geogrids in Montana roadway stabilization applications, GeoTesting Express, Alpharetta, GA.
Giroud, J. P., and Han, J. (2004). “Design method for geogrid-reinforced unpaved roads, parts 1 and 2.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 130(8), 775–797.JGGEFK
Giroud, J. P., and Noiray, L. (1981). “Geotextile-reinforced unpaved road design.” J. Geotech. Eng., 107(9), 1233–1254.JGENDZ
Hangen, H., Detert, O., and Alexiew, D. (2008). “Biaxial testing of geogrids: Recent developments.” Proc., 4th European Geosynthetics Conf. EuroGeo4, International Geosynthetics Society, Edinburgh, Scotland, 258.
Kinney, T. C. (2000). Standard test method for determining the aperture stability modulus of geogrid, Shannon & Wilson, Seattle.
McGown, A., and Kupec, J. (2004). “A new approach to the assessment of the behavior of geogrids subject to biaxial loading.” Proc., 3rd European Geosynthetics Conf. EuroGeo3, International Geosynthetics Society, Munich, Germany, 2, 643–648.
Milligan, G. W. E., Jewell, R. A., Houlsby, G. T., and Burd, H. J. (1989a). “A new approach to the design of unpaved roads: Part I.” Ground Eng., 22(3), 25–29.GRENDB
Milligan, G. W. E., Jewell, R. A., Houlsby, G. T., and Burd, H. J. (1989b). “A new approach to the design of unpaved roads: Part II.” Ground Eng., 22(11), 37–42.GRENDB
Mooney, M. A., and Rinehart, R. V. (2009). “In situ soil response to vibratory loading and its relationship to roller-measured soil stiffness.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 135(8), 1022–1031.JGGEFK
Nazzal, M. D., Abu-Farsakh, M. Y., and Mohammad, L. N. (2010). “Implementation of a critical state two-surface model to evaluate the response of geosynthetic reinforced pavements.” Int. J. Geomech., 10(5), 202–212.IJGNAI
National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP). (2000). “Harmonized test methods for laboratory determination of resilient modulus for flexible pavement design. Volume 1: Unbound granular material.” NCHRP Project 1-28a, NCHRP, Washington, DC.
National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP). (2004). “NCHRP Project 1-37A design guide, mechanistic-empirical design of new and rehabilitated pavement structures.” 〈http://www.trb.org/mepdg/〉 (Jan. 1, 2010).
Perkins, S. W. (1999). “Mechanical response of geosynthetic-reinforced flexible pavements.” Geosynth. Int.GINTFD, 6(5), 347–382.
Perkins, S. W. et al. (2004). “Development of design methods for geosynthetic reinforced flexible pavements.” FHWA Rep. Ref. No. DTFH61-01-X-00068, U. S. Dept. of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC.
Perkins, S. W., Christopher, B. R., Cuelho, E. L., Eiksund, G. R., Schwartz, C. S., and Svanø, G. (2009). “A mechanistic-empirical model for base reinforced flexible pavements.” Int. J. Pavement Eng., 10(2), 101–114.IJPEF7
Perkins, S. W., and Eiksund, G. R. (2005). “Geosynthetic material properties for use in 2-D finite element pavement response models.” Proc., 7th Int. Conf. Bearing Capacity of Roads, Railways and Airfields, Norwegian Univ. of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Perkins, S. W., and Svanø, G. (2006). “Assessment of interface shear growth from measured geosynthetic strains in a reinforced pavement subject to repeated loads.” 8th Int. Conf. Geosynthetics, Kuwano, J. and Koseki, J., eds., International Geosynthetics Society, Vol. 3, 813–816.
Selig, E. T. (1987). “Tensile zone effects on performance of layered systems.” Geotechnique, 37(3), 247–254.GTNQA8
Steward, J., Williamson, R., and Mohney, J. (1977). “Guidelines for use of fabrics in construction and maintenance of low-volume roads.” USDA, Forest Service, Portland, OR and reprinted as Report No. FHWA-TS-78-205, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC.
Uzan, J. (1985). “Characterization of granular materials.” Transportation research record no. 1022, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, DC., 52–59.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
International Journal of Geomechanics
Volume 12 • Issue 4 • August 2012
Pages: 370 - 380
Copyright
© 2012. American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Jan 11, 2010
Accepted: Oct 14, 2011
Published online: Oct 18, 2011
Published in print: Aug 1, 2012
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.