Proposal for Standardization of Pull Tests on Rock Joints
Publication: International Journal of Geomechanics
Volume 11, Issue 1
Abstract
This note intends to approach the mechanical characterization of rock joints, emphasizing the application of pull tests, which are an economic and simple type of shear experiments. Explanation is given on the drawbacks resulting from the classical testing procedures which do not control the sample’s middle plane position, leading to normal scale effects (represented by negative exponential regressions), where small sample results are misleading in terms of safety. In effect, pull tests allow a very easy measurement of several joint properties, such as the so-called joint roughness coefficient, the slope of joint roughness, the roughness anisotropy, and joint strengths under low normal stresses. Some rules for their standardization are suggested by pointing out the systematic leveling of the middle joint sample plane, thus rehabilitating the interest on small samples, because of the inverse scale effects on strength that are obtained, represented by positive exponential regressions.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
Bandis, S. (1980). “Experimental studies of scale effects on shear strength and deformation of rock joints.” Ph.D. thesis, Univ. of Leeds, Leeds, U.K., 385.
Bandis, S. C. (1990). “Scale effects in the strength and deformability of rocks and rock joints.” Scale Effects in Rock Masses (Proc.), Balkema, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, 59–76.
Barton, N., and Bandis, S. (1980). “Some effects of scale on the shear strength of joints.” Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. Geomech. Abstr., 17, 69–73.
Barton, N., and Choubey, V. (1977). “The shear strength of rock joints in theory and practice.” Rock Mech., 10, 1–54.
Brown, E. T. (1981). Rock characterization, testing and monitoring—ISRM suggested methods, Pergamon, Oxford, U.K., 211.
Charrua-Graça, J. G. (1985). Heterogeneity and scale effect. Reflections on safety of works in rock masses, LNEC, Lisbon, Portugal, 137 (in Portuguese).
Giani, G. P., Ferrero, A. M., Passarelo, G., and Reinaudo, L. (1992). “Scale effect evaluation on natural discontinuity shear strength.” Fractured and Jointed Rock Masses (Proc.), 456–462.
Harrison, J. P., and Goodfellow, R. J. F. (1993). “Effect of scale on roughness anisotropy and magnitude.” Scale Effects in Rock Masses (Proc.), Balkema, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, 111–117.
Kutter, H. K., and Otto, F. (1990). “Influence of parallel and cross joints on shear behaviour of rock.” Rock Joints (Proc.), Balkema, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, 243–250.
Leal-Gomes, M. J. A., and Dinis-da-Gama, C. (2007). “New insights on the geomechanical concept of joint roughness.” Proc., 11th ISRM Congress, ISRM, Lisboa, Portugal, 347–350.
Leal-Gomes, M. J. A., and Dinis-da-Gama, C. (2009). “An experimental study on scale effects in rock mass joint strength.” Soils Rocks, Sao Paulo, 32(3), 109–122.
Muralha, J. J. R. D. (1995). “Probabilistic approach on the mechanical behaviour of rock mass joints.” Ph.D. thesis, IST, Technical Univ. of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal, I–XL and 1–502.
Patton, F. D. (1966). “Multiple modes of shear failure in rock and related materials.” Ph.D. thesis, Univ. of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, Ill., 281.
Sagaseta, C. (1986). “On the modes of instability of a rigid block on an inclined plane.” Rock Mech. Rock Eng., 19, 261–266.
Swan, G. T., and Zongqi, S. (1985). “Prediction of shear behaviour of joints using profiles.” Rock Mech. Rock Eng., 18, 183–212.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2011 ASCE.
History
Received: Jun 28, 2009
Accepted: May 11, 2010
Published online: Jun 24, 2010
Published in print: Feb 2011
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.