Technical Papers
Feb 22, 2022

Simulation of Coal Gasification in Texaco Gasifier: Kinetics-Based Aspen Plus Model

Publication: Journal of Energy Engineering
Volume 148, Issue 3

Abstract

A kinetic model of coal gasification in a Texaco gasifier was developed using the software Aspen Plus, and the model was validated using experimental data from previously reported research. The effects of the gasification temperature, use of steam (H2O) or carbon dioxide (CO2) as the gasification agent (GA), and the gasification agent/carbon molar ratio (GA/C) on the composition, net CO2 emissions, and H2/CO molar ratio of the resulting syngas were evaluated. The results showed that for both H2O and CO2, CO was preferentially generated at high temperatures, whereas H2 and CO2 were dominant at low temperatures, although the carbon conversion was higher and the net CO2 emissions lower at high temperatures. On the other hand, the concentration of H2 was higher when H2O was employed as the GA, reaching 49% when the H2O/C ratio was 2.0, but the concentration of CO was higher with CO2 as the GA, reaching 72% at a CO2/C ratio of 2.0. The net CO2 emissions and the H2/CO ratio were lower with CO2 and higher with H2O as the GA. The concentration of CO in the syngas was the highest (72%) when the temperature was 1,600 K and the CO2/C ratio was 0.4, making it suitable as a raw material for the production of formic acid. The results of this study offer guidelines for the optimization of the operating parameters for entrained flow gasification and the application of H2O and CO2 gasification technology.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data, models, and code generated or used during the study appear in the published article.

Acknowledgments

This work was not financially supported.

References

Adeyemi, I., and I. Janajreh. 2015. “Modeling of the entrained flow gasification: Kinetics-based ASPEN Plus model.” Renewable Energy 82 (Oct): 77–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2014.10.073.
Agarwal, P., and H. C. Frey. 1997. “Modeling and evaluation of externally fired combined cycle using aspen.” J. Energy Eng. 123 (3): 69–87. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9402(1997)123:3(69).
Avasthi Jitendra, M., and H. Singleton Alan. 1984. “Underground coal gasification: A near-term alternate fuel.” J. Energy Eng. 110 (2): 89–99. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9402(1984)110:2(89).
Baxter, L. L. 1993. “Ash deposition during biomass and coal combustion: A mechanistic approach.” Biomass Bioenergy 4 (2): 85–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/0961-9534(93)90031-X.
British Petroleum Company. 2020. BP statistical review of world energy 2020. London: British Petroleum Company.
Dattatray, A. D., and V. Shilapuram. 2018. “Detailed parametric investigation of dry gasification oxy-combustion power cycle using ASPEN plus simulations.” Fuel 236 (Jan): 501–515. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2018.09.023.
Furusawa, Y., H. Taguchi, S. Ismail, S. Thangavel, K. Matsuoka, and C. Fushimi. 2019. “Estimation of cold gas efficiency and reactor size of low-temperature gasifier for advanced-integrated coal gasification combined cycle systems.” Fuel Process. Technol. 193 (Oct): 304–316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2019.05.023.
Ghassemi, H., S. Mostafavi, and R. Shahsavan Markadeh. 2015. “Modeling of high-ash coal gasification in an entrained-flow gasifier and an IGCC plant.” J. Energy Eng. 142 (4): 04015052. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EY.1943-7897.0000330.
Ghassemi, H., S. Mostafavi, and R. Shahsavan-Markadeh. 2016. “Modeling of high-ash coal gasification in an entrained-flow gasifier and an IGCC plant.” J. Energy Eng. 142 (4): 04015052. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EY.1943-7897.0000330.
Govind, R., and J. Shah. 1984. “Modeling and simulation of an entrained flow gasifier.” AIChE J. 30 (1): 79–92. https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.690300113.
Ismail, T., M. Shi, J. Xu, X. Chen, F. Wang, and M. Abd El-Salam. 2020. “Assessment of coal gasification in a pressurized fixed bed gasifier using an Aspen Plus and Euler–Euler model.” Int. J. Coal Sci. Technol. 7 (3): 516–535. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40789-020-00361-w.
Jin, K., D. Ji, Q. Xie, Y. Nie, F. Yu, and J. Ji. 2019. “Hydrogen production from steam gasification of tableted biomass in molten eutectic carbonates.” Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 44 (41): 22919–22925. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.07.033.
Kaneko, S. 2016. “Integrated coal gasification combined cycle: A reality, not a dream.” J. Energy Eng. 142 (2): E4015018. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EY.1943-7897.0000312.
Kim, S. K., J. Y. Park, D. K. Lee, S. C. Hwang, S. H. Lee, and Y. W. Rhee. 2016. “Kinetic study on low-rank coal char: Characterization and catalytic CO2 gasification.” J. Energy Eng. 142 (3): 04015032. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EY.1943-7897.0000294.
Kong, X., W. Zhong, W. Du, and F. Qian. 2013. “Three stage equilibrium model for coal gasification in entrained flow gasifiers based on Aspen Plus.” Chin. J. Chem. Eng. 21 (1): 79–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1004-9541(13)60444-9.
Levenspiel, O. 1972. Chemical reaction engineering. New York: Wiley.
Li, X., J. R. Grace, A. P. Watkinson, C. J. Lim, and A. Ergudenler. 2001. “Equilibrium modeling of gasification: A free energy minimization approach and its application to a circulating fluidized bed coal gasifier.” Fuel 80 (2): 195–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-2361(00)00074-0.
Liu, G. S., H. R. Rezaei, J. A. Lucas, D. J. Harris, and T. F. Wall. 2000. “Modelling of a pressurised entrained flow coal gasifier: The effect of reaction kinetics and char structure.” Fuel 79 (14): 1767–1779. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-2361(00)00037-5.
Olivieri, A., and S. Ravelli. 2020. “Cogasification of coal and biomass in an integrated gasification combined cycle power plant: Effects on thermodynamic performance and gas composition.” J. Energy Eng. 146 (6): 04020071. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EY.1943-7897.0000716.
Preti, D., S. Squarcialupi, and G. Fachinetti. 2012. “Conversion of syngas into formic acid.” ChemCatChem 4 (4): 469–471. https://doi.org/10.1002/cctc.201200046.
Rupesh, S., C. Muraleedharan, and P. Arun. 2020. “Energy and exergy analysis of syngas production from different biomasses through air-steam gasification.” Front. Energy 14 (3): 607–619. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11708-016-0439-1.
Sadhwani, N., P. Li, M. Eden, and S. Adhikari. 2017. “Process modeling of fluidized bed biomass-CO2 gasification using ASPEN Plus.” In Computer aided chemical engineering, 2509–2514. Barcelona, Spain: Elsevier.
Sanchez, C., E. Arenas, F. Chejne, C. A. Londono, S. Cisneros, and J. C. Quintana. 2016. “A new model for coal gasification on pressurized bubbling fluidized bed gasifiers.” Energy Convers. Manage. 126 (Oct): 717–723. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2016.08.066.
Shen, Z., and Z. Huang. 2018. “High-efficiency and pollution-controlling in-situ gasification chemical looping combustion system by using CO2 instead of steam as gasification agent.” Chin. J. Chem. Eng. 26 (11): 2368–2376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjche.2018.03.016.
Shi, Z., S. Shen, T. Li, Y. Sun, W. Shan, Y. Bai, Q. Zhang, and F. Li. 2017. “The evaluation of a process for clean syngas based on lump coal pressurized gasification.” Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 42 (12): 7883–7894. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.02.078.
Shu, X., J. Li, J. Hao, Z. Liu, Q. Wang, and X. Lu. 2020. “Effect of atmosphere and temperature on syngas production during gasification of Zhundong lignite and water-washed Zhundong lignite in a fixed-bed reactor.” Chem. Papers 74 (2): 555–569. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11696-019-00898-4.
Sudiro, M., M. Pellizzaro, F. Bezzo, and A. Bertucco. 2010. “Simulated moving bed technology applied to coal gasification.” Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 88 (4): 465–475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2009.09.001.
Wang, X., A. Panahi, H. Qi, M. Zhai, P. Dong, and A. Levendis Yiannis. 2020. “Product compositions from sequential biomass pyrolysis and gasification of its char residue.” J. Energy Eng. 146 (5): 04020049. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EY.1943-7897.0000695.
Wen, C., H. Chen, and M. Onozaki. 1982. User’s manual for computer simulation and design of the moving-bed coal gasifier. Morgantown, WV: West Virginia Univ.
Wen, C. Y., and T. Z. Chaung. 1979. “Entrainment coal gasification modeling.” Ind. Eng. Chem. Process Des. Dev. 18 (4): 684–695. https://doi.org/10.1021/i260072a020.
Wu, R., J. Beutler, and L. L. Baxter. 2020a. “Non-catalytic ash effect on char reactivity.” Appl. Energy 260 (Feb): 114358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.114358.
Wu, R., J. Beutler, C. Price, and L. L. Baxter. 2020b. “Biomass char particle surface area and porosity dynamics during gasification.” Fuel 264 (Mar): 116833. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2019.116833.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Energy Engineering
Journal of Energy Engineering
Volume 148Issue 3June 2022

History

Received: Oct 6, 2021
Accepted: Dec 14, 2021
Published online: Feb 22, 2022
Published in print: Jun 1, 2022
Discussion open until: Jul 22, 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Zhongya Kong [email protected]
Middle School Senior Teacher, Xishui No.1 Middle School, Hubei 438200, China. Email: [email protected]
Zhihang Zheng [email protected]
Ph.D. Candidate, College of Energy Science and Engineering, Central South Univ., 932 Lushan South Rd., Changsha 410083, China (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]
Dongying Tang [email protected]
Middle School Senior Teacher, Xishui No.1 Middle School, Hubei 438200, China. Email: [email protected]
Jiayuan Zhang [email protected]
Professor, College of Energy Science and Engineering, Central South Univ., 932 Lushan South Rd., Changsha 410083, China. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share