Technical Papers
May 11, 2021

Linearized Generation-Expansion Planning Considering Transmission Planning, Switching, and Dynamic-Line Rating

Publication: Journal of Energy Engineering
Volume 147, Issue 4

Abstract

Centralized generation-expansion planning is one of the well-known problems in the literature, and usually a static power transmission network is considered for this problem. As power systems are moving toward renewable sources of energy, static transmission networks no longer provide efficient transmission solutions. Dynamic-line rating and transmission switching are two alternatives to static transmission network, especially in power systems integrated with renewable energy sources. These alternatives have not been explored for generation-expansion planning. This paper integrated dynamic-line rating and transmission switching into the generation-expansion planning problem. Transmission planning was incorporated into the generation-expansion model to obtain more-competitive solutions. This addition resulted in a mixed-integer nonlinear problem. The nonlinear problem was linearized into a mixed-integer linear problem which was solved by a commercial solver. The proposed model was demonstrated with two test power systems, and the efficiency of dynamic-line rating and transmission switching in renewable sources planning was evaluated through numerical experiments.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data and models developed or used during this study appear in the published paper. The CPLEX OPL codes generated during this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

Aghaei, J., M. A. Akbari, A. Roosta, and A. Baharvandi. 2013. “Multiobjective generation expansion planning considering power system adequacy.” Electr. Power Syst. Res. 102 (Sep): 8–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsr.2013.04.001.
Alonso, F., and C. A. E. Greenwell. 2013. “Underground vs. overhead: Power line installation-cost comparison and mitigation.” Accessed January 2, 2013. https://www.power-grid.com/td/underground-vs-overhead-power-line-installation-cost-comparison/#gref.
Arabpour, A., M. R. Besmi, and P. Maghouli. 2018. “Transmission expansion planning with linearized AC load flow by special ordered set method.” J. Energy Eng. 144 (2): 04018008. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EY.1943-7897.0000523.
Bakirtzis, G. A., P. N. Biskas, and V. Chatziathanasiou. 2012. “Generation Expansion Planning by MILP considering mid-term scheduling decisions.” Electr. Power Syst. Res. 86 (May): 98–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsr.2011.12.008.
Binato, S., M. V. F. Pereira, and S. Granville. 2001. “A new Benders decomposition approach to solve power transmission network design problems.” IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 16 (2): 235–240. https://doi.org/10.1109/59.918292.
Budi, R. F. S., and S. P. Hadi. 2019. “The impact of a deterministic reliability index on deregulated multi-objective generation expansion planning.” In Proc., 2019 11th Int. Conf. on Information Technology and Electrical Engineering (ICITEE), 1–6. New York: IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICITEED.2019.8929971.
California Energy Commission. 1999. Dynamic circuit thermal line rating. Sacramento, CA: California Energy Commission.
Chen, Q., C. Kang, Q. Xia, and J. Zhong. 2010. “Power generation expansion planning model towards low-carbon economy and its application in China.” IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 25 (2): 1117–1125. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRS.2009.2036925.
Chen, S., P. Liu, and Z. Li. 2019. “Multi-regional power generation expansion planning with air pollutants emission constraints.” Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev. 112 (Sep): 382–394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2019.05.062.
CIGRE Working Group 22.12. 1992. “The thermal behaviour of overhead line conductors.” Electra 114 (3): 107–125.
Ciniglio, O. A., and A. K. Deb. 2004. “Optimizing transmission path utilization in Idaho Power.” IEEE Trans. Power Delivery 19 (2): 830–834. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRD.2003.823186.
EWEA (European Wind Energy Association). 2013. “Transmission system operation with a large penetration of wind and other renewable electricity sources in electricity networks using innovative tools and integrated energy solutions (TWENTIES).” Accessed June 1, 2013. http://www.ewea.org/fileadmin/files/library/publications/reports/Twenties_report_short.pdf.
Firmo, H. T., and L. F. L. Legey. 2002. “Generation expansion planning: An iterative genetic algorithm approach.” IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 17 (3): 901–906. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRS.2002.801036.
Fisher, E. B., R. P. O’Neill, and M. C. Ferris. 2008. “Optimal transmission switching.” IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 23 (3): 1346–1355. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRS.2008.922256.
Garver, L. L. 1970. “Transmission network estimation using linear programming.” IEEE Trans. Power Appartus Syst. PAS-89 (7): 1688–1697. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAS.1970.292825.
IEC (International Electrochemical Commission). 1985. Overhead electrical conductors—Calculation methods for stranded bare conductors. IEC Standard TR 1597. London: IEC.
IEEE. 2007. IEEE standard for calculating the current-temperature of bare overhead conductors. IEEE 738-2006. New York: IEEE.
Jabarnejad, M., and J. Valenzuela. 2016. “Optimal investment plan for dynamic thermal rating using benders decomposition.” Eur. J. Oper. Res. 248 (3): 917–929. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2015.08.010.
Jabarnejad, M., J. Wang, and J. Valenzuela. 2015. “A decomposition approach for solving seasonal transmission switching.” IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 30 (3): 1203–1211. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRS.2014.2343944.
Kannan, S., S. Baskar, J. D. McCalley, and P. Murugan. 2009. “Application of NSGA-II algorithm to generation expansion planning.” IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 24 (1): 454–461. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRS.2008.2004737.
Kannan, S., S. M. R. Slochanal, and N. P. Padhy. 2005. “Application and comparison of metaheuristic techniques to generation expansion planning problem.” IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 20 (1): 466–475. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRS.2004.840451.
Khodaei, A., M. Shahidehpour, and S. Kamalinia. 2010. “Transmission switching in expansion planning.” IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 25 (3): 1722–1733. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRS.2009.2039946.
Malkin, S., and E. Hsieh. 2013. “Beyond real time: The computational challenges of forecasting dynamic line ratings.” In Proc., FERC Software Tech Conf. Bingley, UK: The Valley Group.
Manickavasagam, M., M. F. Anjos, and W. D. Rosehart. 2015. “Sensitivity-based chance-constrained Generation Expansion Planning.” Electr. Power Syst. Res. 127 (Oct): 32–40 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsr.2015.05.011.
Meza, J. L. C., M. B. Yildirim, and A. S. M. Masud. 2007. “A model for the multiper iod multiobjective power generation expansion problem.” IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 22 (2): 871–878. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRS.2007.895178.
Meza, J. L. M., M. B. Yildirim, and A. S. M. Masud. 2009. “A multiobjective evolutionary programming algorithm and its applications to power generation expansion planning.” IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A Syst. Humans 39 (5): 1086–1096. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMCA.2009.2025868.
Mori, S., Y. Makishita, and K. Kamegai. 2017. “Two-stage approach for the assessment of photovoltaic and cogeneration systems: Integration of regional distributed energy systems and power-expansion planning.” J. Energy Eng. 143 (3): F4016005. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EY.1943-7897.0000370.
Murugan, P., S. Kannan, and S. Baskar. 2009. “Application of NSGA-II algorithm to single-objective transmission constrained generation expansion planning.” IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 24 (4): 1790–1797. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRS.2009.2030428.
Oh, H., and W. Short. 2009. “Optimal expansion planning for the deployment of wind energy.” J. Energy Eng. 135 (3): 83–88. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9402(2009)135:3(83).
Park, J-B., Y.-M. Park, J.-R. Won, and K. Y. Lee. 2000. “An improved genetic algorithm for generation expansion planning.” IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 15 (3): 916–922. https://doi.org/10.1109/59.871713.
Pereira, S., P. Ferreira, and A. I. F. Vaz. 2017. “Generation expansion planning with high share of renewables of variable output.” Appl. Energy 190 (Mar): 1275–1288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.01.025.
Pytlak, P., P. Musilek, and J. Doucet. 2011. “Using dynamic thermal rating systems to reduce power generation emissions.” In Proc., 2011 IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting, 1–7. New York: IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/PES.2011.6039401.
Rashidaee, S. A., T. Amraee, and M. Fotuhi-Firuzabad. 2018. “A linear model for dynamic Generation Expansion Planning considering Loss of Load Probability.” IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 33 (6): 6924–6934. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRS.2018.2850822.
Sepasian, M. S., H. Seifi, A. Akbari Foroud, and A. R. Hatami. 2009. “A multiyear security constrained hybrid generation-transmission expansion planning algorithm including fuel supply costs.” IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 24 (3): 1609–1618. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRS.2009.2021218.
Teh, J., and I. Cotton. 2016. “Reliability impact of dynamic thermal rating system in wind power integrated network.” IEEE Trans. Reliab. 65 (2): 1081–1089. https://doi.org/10.1109/TR.2015.2495173.
Tejada-Arango, D. A., G. Morales-España, S. Wogrin, and E. Centeno. 2020. “Power-based generation expansion planning for flexibility requirements.” IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 35 (3): 2012–2023. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRS.2019.2940286.
Uski-Joutsenvuo, S., and R. Pasonen. 2013. Maximising power line transmission capability by employing dynamic line ratings—Technical survey and applicability in Finland. Espoo, Finland: VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland.
Villumsen, J. C., and A. B. Philpott. 2012. “Investment in electricity networks with transmission switching.” Eur. J. Oper. Res. 222 (2): 377–385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2012.05.002.
Zhan, Y., Q. P. Zheng, J. Wang, and P. Pinson. 2017. “Generation expansion planning with large amounts of wind power via decision-dependent stochastic programming.” IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 32 (4): 3015–3026. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRS.2016.2626958.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Energy Engineering
Journal of Energy Engineering
Volume 147Issue 4August 2021

History

Received: Nov 8, 2020
Accepted: Mar 3, 2021
Published online: May 11, 2021
Published in print: Aug 1, 2021
Discussion open until: Oct 11, 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Assistant Professor, Dept. of Industrial Engineering, Dogus Univ., Istanbul 34775, Turkey. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1633-5094. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share