Effects of Gasoline Octane Number on Fuel Consumption and Emissions in Two Vehicles Equipped with GDI and PFI Spark-Ignition Engine
Publication: Journal of Energy Engineering
Volume 146, Issue 6
Abstract
The fuel octane number affects the fuel consumption and emission characteristics of vehicles powered by spark-ignition engines. An investigation on the effects of commercial types of gasoline with different research octane numbers (RON) on a vehicle’s performance can provide valuable insights and guidelines for the further improvement of the engine and fuel design. In this work, three commercial-types of gasoline with RON values of 92, 95, and 98 were tested in two compact passenger vehicles. One vehicle is equipped with a gasoline direct injection (GDI) engine with a 1.4-L displacement and a turbocharging system, and the other one is equipped with a port fuel injection (PFI) naturally-aspired engine with a 1.6-L displacement. The new European drive cycle (NEDC) was used to test the effects of three gasoline fuels on both vehicles. The experimental results show that for the vehicle equipped with the GDI engine, with the increase of the RON number, the fuel consumption, carbon dioxide (), and carbon monoxide (CO) emissions increase first and then decrease. The total hydrocarbon (THC) and particulate matter (PM) emissions decrease first and then increase, while the NOx emissions increase gradually; the differences between the maximum and minimum values in the fuel consumptions and the emissions of NOx, CO, THC, , and PM are (1.7%), (4.5%), (3.3%), (2.3%), (2.0%), and (20.6%), respectively. For the vehicle with the PFI engine, with the increase of the RON number, the fuel consumption decreases, the and THC emissions decrease first and then increase, and the CO emission increases first and then decreases, while the NOx and PM emissions increase gradually; the differences between the maximum and minimum values of the fuel consumptions and the emissions of NOx, CO, THC, , and PM are , (1.1%), (1.6%), (3.1%), (0.9%), and (50.9%), respectively. It can be seen that different RONs lead to the variation in fuel consumption and emissions in an NEDC test. In terms of acceleration performance, the impact of different fuels is considered to be only marginal because the variation in the acceleration time due to fuel effects is less than 2%.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Data Availability Statement
All data, models, and code generated or used during the study appear in the published article.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) through Project Numbers 51922076 and 91941102.
References
Binjuwair, S., and A. Alkudsi. 2016. “The effects of varying spark timing on the performance and emission characteristics of a gasoline engine: A study on Saudi Arabian RON91 and RON95.” Fuel 180 (Sep): 558–564. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2016.04.071.
Binjuwair, S., T. I. Mohamad, A. Almaleki, A. Alkudsi, and I. Alshunaifi. 2015. “The effects of research octane number and fuel systems on the performance and emissions of a spark ignition engine: A study on Saudi Arabian RON91 and RON95 with port injection and direct injection systems.” Fuel 158 (Oct): 351–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2015.05.041.
Chen, Z., F. Yang, S. Xue, Z. K. Wu, and J. P. Liu. 2015. “Impact of higher n-butanol addition on combustion and performance of GDI engine in stoichiometric combustion.” Energy Convers. Manage. 106 (Dec): 385–392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2015.09.051.
Chen, Z., Y. Q. Zhang, X. T. Wei, Q. C. Zhang, Z. K. Wu, and J. P. Liu. 2017. “Thermodynamic process and performance of high -butanol/gasoline blends fired in a GDI production engine running wide-open throttle (WOT).” Energy Convers. Manage. 152 (Nov): 57–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2017.09.037.
Chow, E. W., J. B. Heywood, and R. L. Speth. 2014. Benefits of a higher octane standard gasoline for the US light-duty vehicle fleet. Warrendale, PA: SAE International.
Cui, Y. Q., H. F. Liu, C. Geng, Q. L. Tang, L. Feng, Y. Wang, W. T. Yi, Z. Q. Zheng, and M. F. Yao. 2020. “Optical diagnostics on the effects of fuel properties and coolant temperatures on combustion characteristic and flame development progress from HCCI to CDC via PPC.” Fuel 269 (Jun): 117441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2020.117441.
Diana, S., V. Giglio, B. Iorio, and G. Police. 1998. The influence of fuel composition on pollutant emission of premixed spark ignition engines in presence of EGR. Warrendale, PA: SAE International.
Duchaussoy, Y., P. Barbier, and P. Schmelzle. 2004. Impact of gasoline RON and MON on a turbocharged MPI SI engine performances. Warrendale, PA: SAE International.
Fukui, H., H. Komoriya, and T. Shimizu. 2001. Effects of octane number on stratified charge combustion in a direct injection gasoline engine. Warrendale, PA: SAE International.
Hashimoto, K., O. Inaba, and Y. Akasaka. 2000. Effects of fuel properties on the combustion and emission of direct-injection gasoline engine. Warrendale, PA: SAE International.
Jain, A. K., S. Pathak, Y. Singh, S. Singh, M. Saxena, M. Subramanian, and P. C. Kanal. 2007. Effect of gasoline composition (olefins, aromatics and benzene) on exhaust mass emissions from two-wheelers: An experimental study. Warrendale, PA: SAE International.
Jin, D. Y., K. Choi, M. Cha-Lee, Y. Lim, J. Lee, and S. Park. 2017. “The impact of various ethanol-gasoline blends on particulates and unregulated gaseous emissions characteristics from a spark ignition direct injection (SIDI) passenger vehicle.” Fuel 209 (Dec): 702–712. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2017.08.063.
Kim, Y., Y. Kim, J. Kang, S. Y. Jun, S. H. Rew, and D. Lee. 2013. Fuel effect on particle emissions of a direct injection engine. Warrendale, PA: SAE International.
Kosmadakis, G. M., D. C. Rakopoulos, and C. D. Rakopoulos. 2019. “Performance and emissions of a methane-fueled spark-ignition engine under consideration of its cyclic variability by using a computational fluid dynamics code.” Fuel 258 (Dec): 116154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2019.116154.
Leone, T. G., J. E. Anderson, R. S. Davis, A. Iqbal, R. A. Reese, M. H. Shelby, and W. M. Studzinski. 2015. “The effect of compression ratio, fuel octane rating, and ethanol content on spark-ignition engine efficiency.” Environ. Sci. Technol. 49 (18): 10778–10789. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b01420.
Leone, T. G., E. D. Olin, J. E. Anderson, H. H. Jung, and M. H. Shelby. 2014. Effects of fuel octane rating and ethanol content on knock, fuel economy, and for a turbocharged DI engine. Warrendale, PA: SAE International.
Liu, H. F., X. C. Wang, D. P. Zhang, F. Dong, X. L. Liu, Y. Yang, H. Z. Huang, Y. Wang, Q. L. Wang, and Z. Q. Zheng. 2019. “Investigation on blending effects of gasoline fuel with -butanol, DMF, and ethanol on the fuel consumption and harmful emissions in a GDI vehicle.” Energies 12 (10): 1845. https://doi.org/10.3390/en12101845.
Ministry of Ecology and Environment of the People’s Republic of China. 2019. “China mobile source environmental management annual report.” Accessed October 5, 2019. http://211.81.63.2/cloud/211.81.63.130/cache/10/03/www.mee.gov.cn/6e75eed24973ce46ad22674e8a8f5fad/P020190905586230826402.pdf.
Qian, Y., G. B. Liu, J. J. Guo, Y. H. Zhang, L. Zhu, and X. C. Lu. 2019. “Engine performance and octane on demand studies of a dual fuel spark ignition engine with ethanol/gasoline surrogates as fuel.” Energy Convers. Manage. 183 (Mar): 296–306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2019.01.011.
Qian, Y., J. P. Wang, Z. L. Li, C. X. Jiang, Z. Y. He, L. Yu, and X. C. Lu. 2020. “Improvement of combustion performance and emissions in a gasoline direct injection (GDI) engine by modulation of fuel volatility.” Fuel 268 (May): 117369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2020.117369.
Rakopoulos, C. D., A. M. Dimaratos, E. G. Giakoumis, and D. C. Rakopoulos. 2010a. “Investigating the emissions during acceleration of a turbocharged diesel engine operating with bio-diesel or -butanol diesel fuel blends.” Energy 35 (12): 5173–5184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2010.07.049.
Rakopoulos, C. D., D. C. Rakopoulos, G. C. Mavropoulos, and G. M. Kosmadakis. 2018. “Investigating the EGR rate and temperature impact on diesel engine combustion and emissions under various injection timings and loads by comprehensive two-zone modeling.” Energy 157 (Aug): 990–1014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2018.05.178.
Rakopoulos, D. C., C. D. Rakopoulos, E. G. Giakoumis, A. M. Dimaratos, and D. C. Kyritsis. 2010b. “Effects of butanol–diesel fuel blends on the performance and emissions of a high-speed DI diesel engine.” Energy Convers. Manage. 51 (10): 1989–1997. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2010.02.032.
Rakopoulos, D. C., C. D. Rakopoulos, E. G. Giakoumis, N. P. Komninos, G. M. Kosmadakis, and R. G. Papagiannakis. 2017. “Comparative evaluation of ethanol, -butanol, and diethyl ether effects as biofuel supplements on combustion characteristics, cyclic variations, and emissions balance in light-duty diesel engine.” J. Energy Eng. 143 (2): 04016044. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EY.1943-7897.0000399.
Rakopoulos, D. C., C. D. Rakopoulos, D. T. Hountalas, E. C. Kakaras, E. G. Giakoumis, A. M. Dimaratos, and R. G. Papagianakis. 2010c. “Investigation of the performance and emissions of bus engine operating on butanol/diesel fuel blends.” Fuel 89 (10): 2781–2790. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2010.03.047.
Rakopoulos, D. C., C. D. Rakopoulos, R. G. Papagiannakis, E. G. Giakoumis, S. Karellas, and G. M. Kosmadakis. 2016. “Combustion and emissions in an HSDI engine running on diesel or vegetable oil base fuel with -butanol or diethyl ether as a fuel extender.” J. Energy Eng. 142 (2): E4015006. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EY.1943-7897.0000308.
Sayin, C., I. Kilicaslan, M. Canakci, and N. Ozsezen. 2005. “An experimental study of the effect of octane number higher than engine requirement on the engine performance and emissions.” Appl. Therm. Eng. 25 (8–9): 1315–1324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2004.07.009.
Shen, Y. T., S. J. Shuai, and J. X. Wang. 2008. “A study on the effect of olefin on the emissions and combustion characteristics of engines.” [In Chinese.] Automot. Eng. 8: 644–647.
Sugaware, Y., Y. Akasaka, and M. Kagami. 1997. Effect of gasoline properties on acceleration performance of commercial vehicles. Warrendale, PA: SAE International.
Vallinayagam, R., S. Vedharaj, W. L. Roberts, R. W. Dibble, and S. M. Sarathy. 2017. “Performance and emissions of gasoline blended with terpineol as an octane booster.” Renewable Energy 101 (Feb): 1087–1093. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2016.09.055.
Wedekind, B., P. J. Bennett, C. L. Goodfellow, J. G. Jeffrey, G. F. Marchesi, and C. R. McDonald. 1995. The independent effect of mid-range, back-end volatility and aromatics on emissions from two European gasoline engines. Warrendale, PA: SAE International.
Wu, Y. Y., X. Y. Zhang, Z. Zhang, X. C. Wang, Z. L. Geng, C. Jin, H. F. Liu, and M. F. Yao. 2020. “Effects of diesel-ethanol-THF blend fuel on the performance and exhaust emissions on a heavy-duty diesel engine.” Fuel 271 (Jul): 117633. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2020.117633.
Zhao, L., G. M. Wang, and J. Zhu. 2005. “Effect of gasoline octane number on vehicle performance.” [In Chinese.] Automot. Technol. Mater. 2: 38–40.
Zheng, Z. Q., F. Dong, Y. F. Guo, X. L. Liu, Y. Yang, and H. F. Liu. 2017. “Effect of fuels with different distillation temperatures on performance and emissions of a diesel engine run at various injection pressures and timings.” J. Energy Eng. 143 (3): 04016061. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EY.1943-7897.0000413.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Energy Engineering
Volume 146 • Issue 6 • December 2020
Copyright
© 2020 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Apr 17, 2020
Accepted: Jul 21, 2020
Published online: Sep 20, 2020
Published in print: Dec 1, 2020
Discussion open until: Feb 20, 2021
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.