Public Safety Appraisal for Siting Marine Liquefied Natural Gas Terminals in California
Publication: Journal of Energy Engineering
Volume 141, Issue 3
Abstract
Multifarious proposals for siting, design, construction, and operation of onshore and offshore liquefied natural gas (LNG) import terminals in California have recently undergone a rigorous federal and state regulatory appraisal. The regulations call for compliance with various environmental, public safety, and security mandates encoded in legal statutes. Public safety from the hazards of a large-scale LNG spill over water, during LNG tanker transit or marine terminal operation, emerged as the dominant concern for the affected local communities. To address their apprehension, extensive modeling of potentially perilous beyond design basis spill scenarios, ensuing from natural, accidental, and malevolent intentional events was conducted. It entailed finite element modeling for vessel collision with diverse LNG tanker types and applying computational fluid dynamics to predict the extent of LNG spread over water, atmospheric dispersion of vapor cloud, and the consequences of ignition. The objective was to appraise the adverse impacts of cryogenic fluid, fire propagation, and thermal radiation on humans and property not associated with these LNG terminals. Based on insights from risk analyses for three LNG projects in California, challenges in developing complex mathematical models, assessing public safety, and specification of safety criteria are delineated to benefit others planning similar ventures in California or elsewhere.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
API RP 2A: Recommended practice for planning, designing and constructing fixed offshore platforms (2009).
Code of Federal Regulations (CFR). (2013a). “Deepwater ports: Design construction and equipment.”.
Code of Federal Regulations (CFR). (2013b). “Deepwater ports: General.”.
Code of Federal Regulations (CFR). (2013c). “Deepwater ports: Operations.”.
Code of Federal Regulations (CFR). (2013d). “Liquefied natural gas facilities: Federal safety standards.”.
Code of Federal Regulations (CFR). (2013e). “Process safety management of highly hazardous chemicals.”.
Code of Federal Regulations (CFR). (2013f). “Safety standards for self-propelled vessels carrying bulk liquefied gases.”.
Code of Federal Regulations (CFR). (2013g). “Waterfront facilities handling liquefied natural gas and liquefied hazardous gas.”.
Code of Federal Regulations (CFR). (2014). “Chemical accidents prevention provisions.”.
CSLC/USCG/MARAD. (2007). “Final environmental impact statement/environmental impact report.” Cabrillo Port Liquefied Natural Gas Deepwater Port, Federal Docket # USCG-2004-16877, State Clearinghouse #2004021107, and CSLC EIR #727.
Fay, J. A. (2003). “Models of spills and fires from LNG and oil tankers.” J. Hazard. Mater., 96(2–3), 171–188.
FERC/EIS-0168D. (2005). “Draft environmental impact statement/environmental impact report.” Long Beach LNG Import Project, Vol. I and II, Docket No. CP04-58-000, FERC, Washington, DC.
Fire Dynamics Simulator [Computer software]. Washington, DC, National Institute of Standards and Technology, United States Dept. of Commerce.
Hightower, M., et al. (2004). “Guidance on risk analysis and safety implications of a large liquefied natural gas (LNG) spill over water.”, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM.
Hightower, M., Covan, J., Gritzo, L., and Luketa-Hanlin, A. (2006). “Review of the independent risk assessment of the proposed Cabrillo liquefied natural gas deepwater port project.”, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM.
Hightower, M., and Luketa-Hanlin, A. (2006). “Risk assessment/hazards for deep water port LNG terminals.” California State Lands Commission, Prevention 1st 2006 Symp., CSLC.
Hissong, D. W. (2007). “Keys to modeling LNG spills on water.” J. Hazard. Mater., 140(3), 465–477.
Koopmans, et al. (1982). “Burro series data report.” LLNL/NWC 1980 LNG Spill Tests, UCID-19075, Vol. 1, Univ. of California.
Licari, F. A., and Weimer, C. D. (2011). “Risk-based siting considerations for LNG terminals—Comparative perspectives of United States and Europe.” J. Loss Prev. Process Ind., 24(6), 736–775.
Luketa-Hanlin, A., Hightower, M. M., and Attaway, S. (2008). “Breach and safety analysis of spills over water from large liquefied natural gas carriers.”, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM.
Nafday, A. M. (2012). “Regulatory compliance for marine LNG import terminals in California.” J. Leg. Aff. Dispute Resolut. Eng. Constr., 55–66.
National Fire Protection Association. (2006). “Standard for the production, storage and handling of liquefied natural gas (LNG).” NFPA 59A.
Parihar, A., Vergara, C., and Clutter, J. K. (2011). “Methodology for consequence analysis of LNG releases at deepwater port facilities.” Saf. Sci., 49(5), 686–694.
Pitblado, R. M., Baik, J., Hughes, G. J., Ferro, C., and Shaw, S. J. (2005). “Consequences of liquefied natural gas marine incidents.” Process Saf. Prog., 24(2), 108–114.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2014 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: May 29, 2013
Accepted: Jan 28, 2014
Published online: May 12, 2014
Discussion open until: Oct 12, 2014
Published in print: Sep 1, 2015
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.