Technical Papers
Oct 8, 2022

Efficient Multilayered Shell Model and Its Application in Large Reinforced Concrete Structures

Publication: Journal of Engineering Mechanics
Volume 148, Issue 12

Abstract

When using the traditional multilayered shell element to perform material nonlinearity analysis of large structures, the computation time is often overwhelming because of the repeated updating and factorization of the large-size global stiffness matrix. This paper aims to provide an efficient and general solution to such problems. To this end, a novel flat multilayered shell model is proposed by adding additional inelastic degrees of freedom (IDOFs) to describe the inelastic behavior of elements and adopting the approximate Woodbury formula that is an efficient solution method based on matrix perturbation theory as a solver. In this way, the entire nonlinear solution process only needs to factorize a sparse matrix called approximate Schur complement, whose dimension is consistent with the IDOF number, instead of the global stiffness matrix. To avoid the performance degradation of the proposed approach due to the activation of too many IDOFs when performing material nonlinearity analysis on large reinforced concrete (RC) structures, an improved concrete constitutive model and a two-level sparseness strategy are further developed. These measures are helpful to numerically reduce the IDOF number of the RC multilayered shell model, thus saving the computational overhead of factorizing and constructing the approximate Schur complement matrix. The accuracy and efficiency of the proposed scheme are verified by numerical examples.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge the financial support from the National Key R&D Program of China (Grant No. 2018YFC1504303), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 52038002 and 52008075), China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (Grant No. 2020M670751), and Liaoning Revitalization Talents Program (Grant No. XLYC1902043). The opinions, findings, and conclusions expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of those acknowledged here.

References

Altin, S., O. Anil, and M. E. Kara. 2008. “Strengthening of RC nonductile frames with RC infills: An experimental study.” Cem. Concr. Compos. 30 (7): 612–621. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2007.07.003.
Bathe, K. J., and E. N. Dvorkin. 1985. “A four-node plate bending element based on Mindlin/Reissner plate theory and a mixed interpolation.” Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 21 (2): 367–383. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.1620210213.
Celes, W., G. H. Paulino, and R. Espinha. 2005. “A compact adjacency-based topological data structure for finite element mesh representation.” Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 64 (11): 1529–1556. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.1440.
Cuthill, E., and J. Mckee. 1969. “Reducing the bandwidth of sparse symmetric matrices.” In Proc., 24th National Conf. ACM, 157–172. New York: Association for Computing Machinery.
Dodd, L. L., and N. Cooke. 1994. The dynamic behaviour of reinforced-concrete bridge piers subjected to New Zealand seismicity. Christchurch, New Zealand: Dept. of Civil Engineering.
Fialko, S. 2021. “Parallel finite element solver for multi-core computers with shared memory.” Comput. Math. Appl. 94 (12): 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.camwa.2021.04.013.
Garcia, M. S. C., G. H. Siqueira, L. C. M. V. Junior, and I. Vizotto. 2019. “Evaluation of structural capacity of triangular and hexagonal reinforced concrete free-form shell.” Eng. Struct. 188 (Mar): 519–537. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.03.044.
Golub, G. H. 2014. Matrix computations. 4th ed. Beijing: Posts & Telecom Press.
Hager, W. W. 1989. “Updating the inverse of a matrix.” SIAM Rev. 31 (2): 221–239. https://doi.org/10.1137/1031049.
Hsu, T. T. C., and R. R. H. Zhu. 2002. “Softened membrane model for reinforced concrete elements in shear.” ACI Struct. J. 99 (4): 460–469.
Kirsch, U. 2008. Reanalysis of structures: A unified approach for linear, nonlinear, static and dynamic systems. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
Kulkarni, D. V., D. A. Tortorelli, and M. Wallin. 2007. “A Newton–Schur alternative to the consistent tangent approach in computational plasticity.” Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 196 (7): 1169–1177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2006.06.013.
Ladeveze, P., A. Nouy, and O. Loiseau. 2002. “A multiscale computational approach for contact problems.” Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 191 (43): 4869–4891. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-7825(02)00406-1.
Li, G., and D. H. Yu. 2018. “Efficient inelasticity-separated finite-element method for material nonlinearity analysis.” J. Eng. Mech. 144 (4): 04018008. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0001426.
Li, G., D. H. Yu, and H. N. Li. 2018. “Seismic response analysis of reinforced concrete frames using inelasticity-separated fiber beam-column model.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 47 (5): 1291–1308. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.3018.
Long, Y. Q., and Y. Xu. 1994. “Generalized conforming quadrilateral membrane element with vertex rigid rotational freedom.” Comput. Struct. 52 (4): 749–755. https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7949(94)90356-5.
Lu, X. Z., M. K. Li, H. Guan, X. Lu, and L. P. Ye. 2015a. “A comparative case study on seismic design of tall RC frame-core-tube structures in China and USA.” Struct. Des. Tall Special Build. 24 (9): 687–702. https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.1206.
Lu, X. Z., Y. Tian, S. Cen, H. Guan, L. L. Xie, and L. S. Wang. 2018. “A high-performance quadrilateral flat shell element for seismic collapse simulation of tall buildings and its implementation in OpenSees.” J. Earthquake Eng. 22 (9): 1662–1682. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2017.1297269.
Lu, X. Z., L. L. Xie, H. Guan, Y. L. Huang, and X. Lu. 2015b. “A shear wall element for nonlinear seismic analysis of super-tall buildings using OpenSees.” Finite Elem. Anal. Des. 98 (Jan): 14–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.finel.2015.01.006.
Luu, C. H., Y. L. Mo, and T. T. C. Hsu. 2017. “Development of CSMM-based shell element for reinforced concrete structures.” Eng. Struct. 132 (Nov): 778–790. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.11.064.
Luu, H. C., Y. L. Mo, T. T. C. Hsu, and C. L. Wu. 2019. “FE simulation of cylindrical RC containment structures under reserved cyclic loading.” Eng. Struct. 179 (10): 255–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.10.050.
Mander, J. B., and M. J. N. Priestley. 1988. “Theoretical stress-strain model for confined concrete.” J. Struct. Eng. 114 (8): 1804–1826. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1988)114:8(1804).
Mansour, M., and T. T. C. Hsu. 2005a. “Behavior of reinforced concrete elements under cyclic shear. I: Experiments.” J. Struct. Eng. 131 (1): 44–53. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2005)131:1(44).
Mansour, M., and T. T. C. Hsu. 2005b. “Behavior of reinforced concrete elements under cyclic shear. II: Theoretical model.” J. Struct. Eng. 131 (1): 54–65. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2005)131:1(54).
Mansour, M., J. Y. Lee, and T. T. C. Hsu. 2001. “Cyclic stress-strain curves of concrete and steel bars in membrane elements.” J. Struct. Eng. 127 (12): 1402–1411. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2001)127:12(1402).
Miao, Z. W., L. P. Ye, H. Guan, and X. Z. Lu. 2011. “Evaluation of modal and traditional pushover analyses in frame-shear-wall structures.” Adv. Struct. Eng. 14 (5): 815–836. https://doi.org/10.1260/1369-4332.14.5.815.
Mindlin, R. D. 1951. “Influence of rotary inertia and shear on flexural motions of isotropic elastic plates.” J. Appl. Mech. 18 (1): 31–38. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4010217.
Mohd Yassin, M. H. 1994. “Nonlinear analysis of prestressed concrete structures under monotonic and cyclic loads.” Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of California.
Palermo, D., and F. J. Vecchio. 2003. “Compression field modeling of reinforced concrete subjected to reversed loading: Formulation.” ACI Struct. J. 100 (5): 616–625.
Rojas, F., J. C. Anderson, and L. M. Massone. 2019. “A nonlinear quadrilateral thin flat layered shell element for the modeling of reinforced concrete wall structures.” Bull. Earthquake Eng. 17 (Jan): 6491–6513. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-019-00566-8.
Spacone, E., F. C. Filippou, and F. F. Taucer. 2015. “Fibre beam-column model for non-linear analysis of R/C frames: Part 1. Formulation.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 25 (7): 711–725. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199607)25:7%3C711::AID-EQE576%3E3.0.CO;2-9.
Thomsen, J. H., and J. W. Wallace. 2004. “Displacement-based design of slender reinforced concrete structural walls-experimental verification.” J. Struct. Eng. 130 (4): 618–630. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2004)130:4(618).
Toupin, R. A. 1965. “Saint-Venant’s principle.” Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 18 (2): 83–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00282253.
Vecchio, F. J. 1999. “Towards cyclic load modeling of reinforced concrete.” ACI Struct. J. 96 (2): 193–202.
Vecchio, F. J. 2001. “Disturbed stress field model for reinforced concrete: Formulation.” J. Struct. Eng. 126 (9): 1070–1077. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2000)126:9(1070).
Vecchio, F. J., and M. P. Collins. 1986. “The modified compression-field theory for reinforced concrete elements subjected to shear.” ACI J. 83 (2): 219–231.
Xiao, L., X. Z. Lu, H. Guan, and L. P. Ye. 2013. “Collapse simulation of reinforced concrete high-rise building induced by extreme earthquakes.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 42 (5): 705–723. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2240.
Xu, J. J., Y. L. Huang, and Z. Qu. 2020. “An efficient and unconditionally stable numerical algorithm for nonlinear structural dynamics.” Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 121 (20): 4614–4629. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.6456.
Yang, Y., S. Wang, and J. Z. Lin. 2017. “Direct-iterative hybrid solution in nonlinear dynamic structural analysis.” Comput.-Aided Civ. Infrastruct. Eng. 32 (Dec): 397–411. https://doi.org/10.1111/mice.12259.
Yu, D. H., G. Li, and H. N. Li. 2018. “Improved Woodbury solution method for nonlinear analysis with high-rank modifications based on a sparse approximation approach.” J. Eng. Mech. 144 (11): 04018103. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0001530.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Engineering Mechanics
Journal of Engineering Mechanics
Volume 148Issue 12December 2022

History

Received: Nov 29, 2021
Accepted: Jul 2, 2022
Published online: Oct 8, 2022
Published in print: Dec 1, 2022
Discussion open until: Mar 8, 2023

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

ASCE Technical Topics:

Authors

Affiliations

Ph.D. Candidate, State Key Laboratory of Coastal and Offshore Engineering, Dalian Univ. of Technology, Dalian, Liaoning Province 116024, China. Email: [email protected]
Ding-Hao Yu [email protected]
Postdoctoral Researcher, State Key Laboratory of Coastal and Offshore Engineering, Dalian Univ. of Technology, Dalian, Liaoning Province 116024, China. Email: [email protected]
Gang Li, Aff.M.ASCE [email protected]
Professor, State Key Laboratory of Coastal and Offshore Engineering, Dalian Univ. of Technology, Dalian, Liaoning Province 116024, China (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share