Technical Papers
May 18, 2022

Shock Environment Assessment of Underground Arch–Wall Structures Subjected to Ground Shock

Publication: Journal of Engineering Mechanics
Volume 148, Issue 8

Abstract

Underground structures provide more effective protection against air blast and surface explosions compared with their aboveground counterparts, but their safety is threatened by subsurface detonations due to the strong coupling between the explosion energy and the surrounding soil. For a certain standoff distance between the explosion center and buried structure, the inside equipment may be damaged by the strong vibration within the structure, while the structure itself experiences minor or even no damage. This strong vibration, not damaging the main structure, but damaging the contained equipment, is termed in-structure shock. In the present study, a theoretical model is established to evaluate the in-structure shock environment of a buried arch–wall structure subjected to overhead subsurface detonation. Dynamic soil-structure interaction, as well as different response modes including local deflection and global rigid body motion, are incorporated to determine the response of the concerned structural member. A small-scale field test was conducted to validate the proposed model. Subsequently, shock response spectra are employed to characterize the in-structure shock level within the structure. Furthermore, a parametric study is conducted to examine the influence of governing parameters on the structural response and consequent in-structure shock level, including soil parameters, ground shock characteristics, scaled distance, and location. The present study not only provides a method for quick assessment of the in-structure shock level of underground arch–wall structures subjected to overhead ground shock in preliminary design but also extends the theoretical prediction of buried structure response from the directly loaded members to opposite ones.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

The funding supports from the National Natural Science Foundation of China with Grant Nos. 51808017, 51778028, and 51627812 and National Key Research and Development Project 2019YFD1101005 are gratefully acknowledged. The open project of the State Key Laboratory of Explosion Science and Technology (Beijing Institute of Technology) with Grant No. KFJJ20-02M is gratefully acknowledged.

References

Alwis, W. A. M., and K. Y. Lam. 1994. “Response spectrum of underground protective structures.” Finite Elem. Anal. Des. 18 (1–3): 203–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-874X(94)90102-3.
Anand, S. 2007. “Measurement and modeling of ground response due to dynamic loading.” Ph.D. thesis, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Nanyang Technological Univ.
Chen, H. L., Z. C. Xia, J. N. Zhou, H. L. Fan, and F. N. Jin. 2013. “Dynamic responses of underground arch structures subjected to conventional blast loads: Curvature effects.” Arch. Civ. Mech. Eng. 13 (3): 322–333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acme.2013.04.004.
Chen, H. L., J. N. Zhou, H. L. Fan, F. N. Jin, Y. Xu, Y. Y. Qiu, P. Wang, and W. Xie. 2014. “Dynamic responses of buried arch structure subjected to subsurface localized impulsive loading: Experimental study.” Int. J. Impact Eng. 65 (Mar): 89–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2013.11.004.
Chen, Y., and T. Krauthammer. 1989. “A combined ADINA-finite difference approach with substructure for solving seismically induced nonlinear soil-structure interaction problems.” Comput. Struct. 32 (3–4): 779–785. https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7949(89)90363-5.
Cheng, R. S., W. S. Chen, H. Hao, and J. D. Li. 2021. “A state-of-the-art review of road tunnel subjected to blast loads.” Tunnelling Underground Space Technol. 112 (Jun): 103911. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2021.103911.
Clough, R. W., and J. Penzien. 1993. Dynamics of structures. New York: McGraw-Hill.
De, A., A. N. Morgante, and T. F. Zimmie. 2016. “Numerical and physical modeling of geofoam barriers as protection against effects of surface blast on underground tunnels.” Geotext. Geomembr. 44 (1): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2015.06.008.
Dragos, J., and C. Q. Wu. 2014. “Application of normalized pressure impulse diagrams for vented and unvented confined blasts.” J. Eng. Mech. 140 (3): 593–603. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0000680.
Hao, H., G. W. Ma, and Y. Lu. 2002. “Damage assessment of masonry infilled RC frames subjected to blasting induced ground excitations.” Eng. Struct. 24 (6): 799–809. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(02)00010-X.
Henrych, J. 1981. The dynamics of arches and frames. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier.
Ichino, H., M. Beppu, E. B. Williamson, and N. Haraguchi. 2021. “Performance and evaluation of an EPS plate to mitigate blast on underground protective structures.” Int. J. Impact Eng. 148 (Feb): 103758. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2020.103758.
Jin, L., W. X. Yu, X. L. Du, S. Zhang, and D. Li. 2019. “Meso-scale modelling of the size effect on dynamic compressive failure of concrete under different strain rates.” Int. J. Impact Eng. 125 (Mar): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2018.10.011.
Lu, Y., Z. Q. Wang, and K. Chong. 2005. “A comparative study of buried structure in soil subjected to blast load using 2D and 3D numerical simulation.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 25 (4): 275–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2005.02.007.
Ma, G. W., H. Y. Zhou, and K. Chong. 2011. “In-structure shock assessment of underground structures with consideration of rigid body motion.” J. Eng. Mech. 137 (12): 797–806. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0000300.
Mandal, J., A. K. Agarwal, and M. D. Goel. 2020. “Numerical modeling of shallow buried tunnel subject to surface blast loading.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 34 (6): 04020106. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0001518.
Mussa, M. H., A. A. Mutalib, R. Hamid, S. R. Naidu, N. A. M. Radzi, and M. Abedini. 2017. “Assessment of damage to an underground box tunnel by a surface explosion.” Tunnelling Underground Space Technol. 66 (Jun): 64–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2017.04.001.
Qian, H. M., J. Li, Z. H. Zong, C. Q. Wu, and Y. H. Pan. 2021a. “Behavior of precast segmental utility tunnel under ground surface explosion: A numerical study.” Tunnelling Underground Space Technol. 115 (Sep): 104071. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2021.104071.
Qian, H. M., Z. H. Zong, C. Q. Wu, J. Li, and L. Gan. 2021b. “Numerical study on the behavior of utility tunnel subjected to ground surface explosion.” Thin-Walled Struct. 161 (Apr): 107422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2020.107422.
Qian, Q. H., and M. Y. Wang. 1994. “Comparison studies on the loading theory and test results for shadow-buried structures under nuclear explosion.” [In Chinese.] Explos. Shock Waves 14 (1): 9–18.
Rao, S. S. 2007. Vibration of continuous systems. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Stamos, A. A., and D. E. Beskos. 1995. “Dynamic analysis of large 3-D underground structure by the BEM.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 24 (6): 917–934. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290240609.
Stevens, D. J., and T. Krauthammer. 1988. “A finite difference/finite element approach to dynamic soil-structure interaction modeling.” Comput. Struct. 29 (2): 199–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7949(88)90253-2.
Stevens, D. J., and T. Krauthammer. 1991. “Analysis of blast-loaded, buried arch response. Part I: Numerical approach.” J. Struct. Eng. 117 (1): 197–212. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1991)117:1(197).
US Army. 1986. Fundamentals of protective design for conventional weapons. TM-5-855-1. Washington, DC: US Army.
Wang, Z. Q., Y. Lu, H. Hao, and K. Chong. 2005. “A full coupled numerical analysis approach for buried structures subjected to subsurface blast.” Comput. Struct. 83 (4–5): 339–356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2004.08.014.
Waymire, D. R. 1989. Current shock-isolation system theory and practice for Sandia instrumentation systems at the Nevada test site. New Mexico: Sandia National Laboratories.
Weidlinger, P., and E. Hinman. 1988. “Analysis of underground protective structures.” J. Struct. Eng. 114 (7): 1658–1673. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1988)114:7(1658).
Wu, C. Q., and H. Hao. 2005. “Numerical study of characteristics of underground blast surface ground motion and their effect on above-ground structures. Part 1. Ground motion characteristics.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 25 (1): 27–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2004.08.001.
Yang, G. D., G. H. Wang, W. B. Lu, X. H. Zhao, P. Yan, and M. Chen. 2018. “Numerical modeling of surface explosion effects on shallow-buried box culvert behavior during the water diversion.” Thin-Walled Struct. 133 (Dec): 153–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2018.09.039.
Yang, Z. W. 1997. “Finite element simulation of response of buried shelters to blast loadings.” Finite Elem. Anal. Des. 24 (3): 113–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-874X(96)00033-9.
Zhou, H. Y., M. Beppu, G. W. Ma, and Z. Y. Zhao. 2013a. “In-structure shock of underground structures: A revisit with experimental investigation.” Eng. Struct. 56 (Nov): 1620–1630. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.07.037.
Zhou, H. Y., P. L. Cong, X. J. Wang, Y. H. Wang, H. L. Dai, S. J. Yu, and J. G. Du. 2021. “Global response of underground structures subjected to ground shock with consideration of rise time.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 143 (Apr): 106624. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2021.106624.
Zhou, H. Y., Z. Y. Zhao, and G. W. Ma. 2013b. “Mitigating ground shocks with cellular solids.” J. Eng. Mech. 139 (10): 1362–1371. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0000585.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Engineering Mechanics
Journal of Engineering Mechanics
Volume 148Issue 8August 2022

History

Received: Aug 16, 2021
Accepted: Mar 12, 2022
Published online: May 18, 2022
Published in print: Aug 1, 2022
Discussion open until: Oct 18, 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Hongyuan Zhou
Professor, Key Laboratory of Urban Security and Disaster Engineering of Ministry of Education, Beijing Univ. of Technology, Beijing 100124, China; Professor, State Key Laboratory of Explosion Science and Technology, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China.
Wenzhao Du
Graduate Student, Key Laboratory of Urban Security and Disaster Engineering of Ministry of Education, Beijing Univ. of Technology, Beijing 100124, China.
Xiaojuan Wang [email protected]
Associate Professor, Key Laboratory of Urban Security and Disaster Engineering of Ministry of Education, Beijing Univ. of Technology, Beijing 100124, China (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]
Guowei Ma
Professor, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Prefabricated Building and Intelligent Construction, Hebei Univ. of Technology, Tianjin 300401, China.
Shangjiang Yu
Research Fellow, Institute of Engineering Protection, IDE, AMS, PLA, Luoyang 471023, China.
Jianguo Du
Research Fellow, Institute of Engineering Protection, IDE, AMS, PLA, Luoyang 471023, China.
Yonghui Wang
Associate Professor, Key Laboratory of Structures Dynamic Behaviour and Control of the Ministry of Education, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150001, China.
Laddu Bhagya Jayasinghe
Research Fellow, Faculty of Science, Technology and Medicine, Univ. of Luxembourg, Esch-sur-Alzette L-4364, Luxembourg.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share