Technical Papers
Jul 27, 2021

Constructing Quasi-Site-Specific Multivariate Probability Distribution Using Hierarchical Bayesian Model

This article has been corrected.
VIEW CORRECTION
Publication: Journal of Engineering Mechanics
Volume 147, Issue 10

Abstract

In geotechnical engineering, it is challenging to construct a site-specific multivariate probability distribution model for soil/rock properties because the site-specific data are usually sparse and incomplete. In contrast, there are abundant generic soil/rock data in the literature for the construction of a generic multivariate probability distribution model, but this model is typically biased and/or imprecise for a specific site. A hybridization method has been proposed to combine these two sources of soil/rock data (site-specific data and a generic database) to produce a quasi-site-specific model, but this method is essentially heuristic. In the current paper, a more rational method that exploits the geologic origin of soil/rock data is proposed. There is a tendency for data to be more similar within a single site and less similar between sites. This is called site uniqueness in geotechnical engineering practice, but no data-driven methods exist to quantify this data feature currently. The hierarchical Bayesian model (HBM) is a natural model to exploit this group information. The grouping criterion can be site localization, soil/rock types, or others. This paper only studies the group criterion based on site localization. This means that a generic database is now viewed as a collection of data groups labeled by qualitative site labels. This site label does not contain any quantitative information such as GPS location, it merely demarcates each group as distinct. The novel contribution is the development of an efficient HBM with closed-form conditional probabilities based on suitably chosen conjugate priors that can handle multivariate, uncertain and unique, sparse, incomplete, and potentially corrupted (MUSIC) data containing site labels. Numerical comparisons between the hybridization method (which cannot incorporate group information) and HBM show that even the simple qualitative knowledge that data belong to a geographically constrained site can improve the estimation of soil/rock properties. The GPS location of each site is not needed.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All database data, case history data, and computer codes that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the members of the TC304 Committee on Engineering Practice of Risk Assessment & Management of the International Society of Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering for developing the database 304dB (http://140.112.12.21/issmge/Database_2010.htm) used in this study and making it available for scientific inquiry. The first author would like to thank the Ministry of Science and Technology of Taiwan for their support (Project No. 107-2221-E-002-053-MY3). The third author extends his appreciation to the Institute for Risk and Reliability, Leibniz University, and the funding from the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation for providing the support to work on this paper.

References

Behmanesh, I., B. Moaveni, G. Lombaert, and C. Papadimitriou. 2015. “Hierarchical Bayesian model updating for structural identification.” Mech. Syst. Sig. Process. 64–65 (Dec): 360–376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2015.03.026.
Bozorgzadeh, N., and R. J. Bathurst. 2019. “Hierarchical Bayesian approaches to statistical modelling of geotechnical data.” Georisk 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/17499518.2020.1864411.
Bozorgzadeh, N., J. P. Harrison, and M. D. Escobar. 2019. “Hierarchical Bayesian modelling of geotechnical data: Application to rock strength.” Géotechnique 69 (12): 1056–1070. https://doi.org/10.1680/jgeot.17.P.282.
Ching, J. 2020. “Value of geotechnical big data and its application in site-specific soil property estimation.” J. GeoEng. 15 (4): 173–182. https://dx.doi.org/10.6310%2fjog.202012_15(4).1.
Ching, J. 2018. “What does the soil parameter estimated from a transformation model really mean?” J. GeoEng. 13 (3): 105–113. https://dx.doi.org/10.6310%2fjog.201809_13(3).2.
Ching, J., and K. K. Phoon. 2014a. “Correlations among some clay parameters—The multivariate distribution.” Can. Geotech. J. 51 (6): 686–704. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2013-0353.
Ching, J., and K. K. Phoon. 2014b. “Transformations and correlations among some parameters of clays—The global database.” Can. Geotech. J. 51 (6): 663–685. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2013-0262.
Ching, J., and K. K. Phoon. 2019. “Constructing site-specific probabilistic transformation model by Bayesian machine learning.” J. Eng. Mech. 145 (1): 04018126. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0001537.
Ching, J., and K. K. Phoon. 2020. “Constructing a site-specific multivariate probability distribution using sparse, incomplete, and spatially variable (MUSIC-X) data.” J. Eng. Mech. 146 (7): 04020061. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0001779.
Ching, J., K. K. Phoon, Y. H. Ho, and M. C. Weng. 2020a. “Quasi-site-specific prediction for deformation modulus of rock mass.” Can. Geotech. J. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2020-0168.
Ching, J., K. K. Phoon, Z. Khan, D. M. Zhang, and H. W. Huang. 2020b. “Role of municipal database in constructing site-specific multivariate probability distribution.” Comput. Geotech. 124 (Aug): 103623. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2020.103623.
Ching, J., K. K. Phoon, Z. Yang, and A. W. Stuedlein. 2021. “Constructing a quasi-site-specific multivariate probability distribution model for soil properties using sparse, incomplete, and three-dimensional (MUSIC-3X) data.” Georisk. https://doi.org/10.1080/17499518.2021.1896005.
Chung, Y., A. Gelman, S. Rabe-Hesketh, J. Liu, and V. Dorie. 2015. “Weakly informative prior for point estimation of covariance matrices in hierarchical models.” J. Educ. Behav. Stat. 40 (2): 136–157. https://doi.org/10.3102/1076998615570945.
Gelman, A., and J. Hill. 2006. Data analysis using regression and multilevel/hierarchical models. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Geman, S., and D. Geman. 1984. “Stochastic relaxation, Gibbs distribution and the Bayesian restoration of images.” IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. PAMI-6 (6): 721–741. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.1984.4767596.
Gilks, W. R., D. J. Spiegelhalter, and S. Richardson. 1996. Markov chain Monte Carlo in practice. London: Chapman and Hill.
Huang, A., and M. P. Wand. 2013. “Simple marginally noninformative prior distributions for covariance matrices.” Bayesian Anal. 8 (2): 439–452. https://doi.org/10.1214/13-BA815.
James, A. 1964. “Distributions of matrix variates and latent roots derived from normal samples.” Ann. Math. Stat. 35 (2): 475–501. https://doi.org/10.1214/aoms/1177703550.
Johnson, N. L. 1949. “Systems of frequency curves generated by methods of translation.” Biometrika 36 (1–2): 149–176. https://doi.org/10.2307/2332539.
Kulhawy, F. H., and P. W. Mayne. 1990. Manual on estimating soil properties for foundation design. Palo Alto, CA: Electric Power Research Institute.
Lu, S., J. Zhang, S. Zhou, and A. Xu. 2018. “Reliability prediction of the axial ultimate bearing capacity of piles: A hierarchical Bayesian method.” Adv. Mech. Eng. 10 (11): 168781401881105. https://doi.org/10.1177/1687814018811054.
Mardia, K. V., J. T. Kent, and J. M. Bibby. 1979. Multivariate analysis. London: Academic Press.
Mayne, P. W., B. R. Christopher, and J. DeJong. 2001. Manual on subsurface investigations. Washington, DC: Federal Highway Administration.
Nagel, J. B., and B. Sudret. 2016. “A unified framework for multilevel uncertainty quantification in Bayesian inverse problems.” Probab. Eng. Mech. 43 (Jan): 68–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.probengmech.2015.09.007.
Ou, C. Y., and J. T. Liao. 1987. Geotechnical engineering research report. Rep. No. GT96008. Taipei, Taiwan: National Taiwan Univ. of Science and Technology.
Phoon, K. K. 2020. “The Goldilocks dilemma—Too little or too much data.” GeoStrata 24 (1): 14–16.
Phoon, K. K., and J. Ching. 2021. “Project deepGeo—Data-driven 3D subsurface mapping.” J. GeoEng. 16 (2): 61–73.
Phoon, K. K., J. Ching, and T. Shuku. 2021. “Challenges in data-driven site characterization.” In Georisk. Milton Park, MI: Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.1080/17499518.2021.1896005.
Phoon, K. K., J. Ching, and Y. Wang. 2019. “Managing risk in geotechnical engineering—From data to digitalization.” In Proc., 7th Int. Symp. on Geotechnical Safety and Risk (ISGSR 2019). London: International Society for Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering.
Wu, S., P. Angelikopoulos, J. L. Beck, and P. Koumoutsakos. 2019. “Hierarchical stochastic model in Bayesian inference for engineering applications: Theoretical implications and efficient approximation.” ASCE-ASME J. Risk Uncertainty Eng. Syst. Part B Mech. Eng. 5 (1): 011006. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4040571.
Yu, J.-Z., and H. Baroud. 2019. “Quantifying community resilience using hierarchical Bayesian kernel methods: A case study on recovery from power outages.” Risk Anal. 39 (9): 1930–1948. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.13343.
Zhang, J., C. H. Juang, J. R. Martin, and H. W. Huang. 2016. “Inter-region variability of Robertson and Wride method for liquefaction hazard analysis.” Eng. Geol. 203 (Mar): 191–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2015.12.024.
Zhang, J., J. P. Li, L. M. Zhang, and H. W. Huang. 2014. “Calibrating cross-site variability for reliability-based design of pile foundations.” Comput. Geotech. 62 (Oct): 154–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2014.07.013.
Zhang, L. 2016. Engineering properties of rocks. 2nd ed. Cambridge, MA: Elsevier.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Engineering Mechanics
Journal of Engineering Mechanics
Volume 147Issue 10October 2021

History

Received: Dec 3, 2019
Accepted: Mar 29, 2021
Published online: Jul 27, 2021
Published in print: Oct 1, 2021
Discussion open until: Dec 27, 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, National Taiwan Univ., Taipei 10617, Taiwan (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6028-1674. Email: [email protected]
Stephen Wu, M.ASCE [email protected]
Associate Professor, Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Research Organization of Information and Systems, Tachikawa, Tokyo 190-8562, Japan; Graduate Univ. for Advanced Studies, Tachikawa, Tokyo 190-8562, Japan. Email: [email protected]
Professor, Singapore University of Technology and Design, 8 Somapah Rd., Singapore 487372. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2577-8639. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Dictionary Learning of Spatial Variability at a Specific Site Using Data from Other Sites, Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 10.1061/JGGEFK.GTENG-12408, 150, 9, (2024).
  • A Bayesian Vine Algorithm for Geotechnical Site Characterization Using High Dimensional, Multivariate, Limited, and Missing Data, Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 10.1061/JENMDT.EMENG-7460, 150, 7, (2024).
  • Data-driven approximation of geotechnical dynamics to an equivalent single-degree-of-freedom vibration system based on dynamic mode decomposition, Georisk: Assessment and Management of Risk for Engineered Systems and Geohazards, 10.1080/17499518.2023.2184479, (1-21), (2023).
  • Integration of Double-Weighted Bayesian and Simplified Methods for Predicting Seismic Liquefaction Based on Multiple Databases, International Journal of Geomechanics, 10.1061/IJGNAI.GMENG-8548, 23, 12, (2023).
  • What Geotechnical Engineers Want to Know about Reliability, ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering, 10.1061/AJRUA6.RUENG-1002, 9, 2, (2023).
  • Inferring Spatial Variation of Soil Classification by Both CPT and Borehole Data, Geo-Risk 2023, 10.1061/9780784484975.016, (142-151), (2023).
  • Data-centric quasi-site-specific prediction for compressibility of clays, Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 10.1139/cgj-2021-0658, 59, 12, (2033-2049), (2022).
  • Time capsule for geotechnical risk and reliability, Georisk: Assessment and Management of Risk for Engineered Systems and Geohazards, 10.1080/17499518.2022.2136717, (1-28), (2022).
  • A Hierarchical Bayesian Similarity Measure for Geotechnical Site Retrieval, Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0002145, 148, 10, (2022).
  • Unpacking data-centric geotechnics, Underground Space, 10.1016/j.undsp.2022.04.001, 7, 6, (967-989), (2022).
  • See more

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share