Technical Papers
Aug 18, 2021

Response Estimation of Multi-Degree-of-Freedom Nonlinear Stochastic Structural Systems through Metamodeling

Publication: Journal of Engineering Mechanics
Volume 147, Issue 11

Abstract

The ever-growing reliance on probabilistic performance-based frameworks in assessing and designing structural systems is creating a need for efficient tools for propagating uncertainty through general nonlinear and dynamic structural systems. This research is focused on the development of metamodeling strategies for rapid response evaluation of a class of nonlinear multi-degree-of-freedom (MDOF) structural systems driven by stochastic excitations. In particular, the nonlinear autoregressive with exogenous input (NARX) model has been demonstrated to be versatile and effective in this respect. However, significant difficulties in NARX model calibration and execution have been encountered when directly applying this approach to practical MDOF systems with large numbers of degrees of freedoms. To overcome this limitation, a new metamodeling approach is proposed in this work through combining projection-based model order reduction with multi-input multioutput NARX models. The effectiveness and accuracy of the proposed approach are illustrated on a 40-story nonlinear steel-frame subject to stochastic earthquake excitation.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data, models, and code generated or used during the study appear in the published article.

Acknowledgments

This research effort was supported in part by the National Science Foundation (NSF) under Grant No. CMMI-1750339. This support is gratefully acknowledged.

References

ASCE. 2017. Minimum design loads and associated criteria for buildings and other structures. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Bamer, F., A. K. Amiri, and C. Bucher. 2017. “A new model order reduction strategy adapted to nonlinear problems in earthquake engineering.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 46 (4): 537–559. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2802.
Bamer, F., and B. Markert. 2017. “An efficient response identification strategy for nonlinear structures subject to nonstationary generated seismic excitations.” Mech. Based Des. Struct. 45 (3): 313–330. https://doi.org/10.1080/15397734.2017.1317269.
Bhattacharyya, B., E. Jacquelin, and D. Brizard. 2020. “A Kriging-NARX model for uncertainty quantification of nonlinear stochastic dynamical systems in time domain.” J. Eng. Mech. 146 (7): 04020070. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0001792.
Billings, S. A. 2013. Nonlinear system identification: NARMAX methods in the time, frequency, and spatio-temporal domains. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
Billings, S. A., and S. Chen. 1998. “The determination of multivariable nonlinear models for dynamic systems.” In Neural network systems, techniques, and applications, edited by C. T. Leondes, 231–278. San Diego: Academic Press.
Billings, S. A., S. Chen, and M. J. Korenberg. 1989. “Identification of MIMO non-linear systems using a forward-regression orthogonal estimator.” Int. J. Control 49 (6): 2157–2189. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207178908559767.
Chuang, W. C., and S. M. J. Spence. 2017. “A performance-based design framework for the integrated collapse and non-collapse assessment of wind excited buildings.” Eng. Struct. 150 (10): 746–758. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.07.030.
Chuang, W. C., and S. M. J. Spence. 2019. “Rapid uncertainty quantification for non-linear and stochastic wind excited structures: A metamodeling approach.” Meccanica 54 (9): 1327–1338. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11012-019-00958-9.
Efron, B., T. Hastie, I. Johnstone, and R. Tibshirani. 2004. “Least angle regression.” Ann. Stat. 32 (2): 407–499. https://doi.org/10.1214/009053604000000067.
FEMA. 2012. Seismic performance assessment of buildings volume 1-methodology. Washington, DC: FEMA.
Gidaris, I., and A. A. Taflanidis. 2013. “Parsimonious modeling of hysteretic structural response in earthquake engineering: Calibration/validation and implementation in probabilistic risk assessment.” Eng. Struct. 49 (Apr): 1017–1033. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.12.030.
Gidaris, I., A. A. Taflanidis, and G. P. Mavroeidis. 2015. “Kriging metamodeling in seismic risk assessment based on stochastic ground motion models.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 44 (14): 2377–2399. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2586.
Grigoriu, M. 2009. “Reduced order models for random functions. Application to stochastic problems.” Appl. Math. Model. 33 (1): 161–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2007.10.023.
Grigoriu, M. 2012. “A method for solving stochastic equations by reduced order models and local approximations.” J. Comput. Phys. 231 (19): 6495–6513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2012.06.013.
Holmes, P., J. L. Lumley, and G. Berkooz. 1996. Turbulence, coherent structures. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Hutt, C. M., I. Almufti, M. Willford, and G. Deierlein. 2016. “Seismic loss and downtime assessment of existing tall steel-framed buildings and strategies for increased resilience.” J. Struct. Eng. 142 (8): C4015005. https://doi.org/10.1061/%28ASCE%29ST.1943-541X.0001314.
Jensen, H., A. Muñoz, C. Papadimitriou, and E. Millas. 2016. “Model reduction techniques for reliability-based design problems of complex structural systems.” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 149 (May): 204–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2016.01.003.
Kerschen, G., and J. C. Golinval. 2002. “Physical interpretation of the proper orthogonal modes using the singular value decomposition.” J. Sound Vib. 249 (5): 849–865. https://doi.org/10.1006/jsvi.2001.3930.
Kundu, A., and S. Adhikari. 2014. “Transient response of structural dynamic systems with parametric uncertainty.” J. Eng. Mech. 140 (2): 315–331. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0000643.
Leontaritis, I. J., and S. A. Billings. 1987. “Experimental design and identifiability for non-linear systems.” Int. J. Syst. Sci. 18 (1): 189–202. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207728708963958.
Lucor, D., and G. E. Karniadakis. 2004. “Adaptive generalized polynomial chaos for nonlinear random oscillators.” SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 26 (2): 720–735. https://doi.org/10.1137/S1064827503427984.
Lucor, D., C. H. Su, and G. E. Karniadakis. 2004. “Generalized polynomial chaos and random oscillators.” Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 60 (3): 571–596. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.976.
Mai, C. V. 2016. “Polynomial chaos expansions for uncertain dynamical systems-Applications in earthquake engineering.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Civil, Environmental and Geomatic Engineering, ETH Zürich.
Mai, C. V., M. D. Spiridonakos, E. N. Chatzi, and B. Sudret. 2016. “Surrogate modeling for stochastic dynamical systems by combining nonlinear autoregressive with exogenous input models and polynomial chaos expansions.” Int. J. Uncertainty Quantif. 6 (4): 313–339. https://doi.org/10.1615/Int.J.UncertaintyQuantification.2016016603.
Mai, C. V., and B. Sudret. 2017. “Surrogate models for oscillatory systems using sparse polynomial chaos expansions and stochastic time warping.” SIAM/ASA J. Uncertainty Quantif. 5 (1): 540–571. https://doi.org/10.1137/16M1083621.
Ouyang, Z., and S. M. J. Spence. 2020. “A performance-based wind engineering framework for the envelope system of engineered buildings subject to directional wind and rain hazards.” J. Struct. Eng. 146 (5): 04020049. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002568.
Ouyang, Z., and S. M. J. Spence. 2021. “Performance-based wind-induced structural and envelope damage assessment of engineered buildings through nonlinear dynamic analysis.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 208 (Jan): 104452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2020.104452.
Patsialis, D., and A. A. Taflanidis. 2020. “Reduced order modeling of hysteretic structural response and applications to seismic risk assessment.” Eng. Struct. 209 (Apr): 110135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.110135.
Piroddi, L., and W. Spinelli. 2003. “An identification algorithm for polynomial NARX models based on simulation error minimization.” Int. J. Control 76 (17): 1767–1781. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207170310001635419.
Rezaeian, S., and A. Der Kiureghian. 2010. “Simulation of synthetic ground motions for specified earthquake and site characteristics.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 39 (10): 1155–1180. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.997.
Spiridonakos, M. D., and E. N. Chatzi. 2015. “Metamodeling of dynamic nonlinear structural systems through polynomial chaos NARX models.” Comput. Struct. 157 (Sep): 99–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2015.05.002.
Tehrani, M. H., P. S. Harvey Jr., H. P. Gavin, and A. M. Mirza. 2018. “Inelastic condensed dynamic models for estimating seismic demands for buildings.” Eng. Struct. 177 (Dec): 616–629. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.07.083.
Volkwein, S. 2013. “Proper orthogonal decomposition: Theory and reduced-order modelling.” Lect. Notes, Univ. Konstanz 4 (4): 1–29.
Wei, H. L., and S. A. Billings. 2004. “A unified wavelet-based modelling framework for non-linear system identification: The WANARX model structure.” Int. J. Control 77 (4): 351–366. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020717042000197622.
Yang, T. Y., J. Moehle, B. Stojadinovic, and A. Der Kiureghian. 2009. “Seismic performance evaluation of facilities: Methodology and implementation.” J. Struct. Eng. 135 (10): 1146–1154. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2009)135:10(1146).

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Engineering Mechanics
Journal of Engineering Mechanics
Volume 147Issue 11November 2021

History

Received: Nov 17, 2020
Accepted: Mar 25, 2021
Published online: Aug 18, 2021
Published in print: Nov 1, 2021
Discussion open until: Jan 18, 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Graduate Student, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6859-4939. Email: [email protected]
Wei-Chu Chuang, Ph.D. [email protected]
Postdoctoral Scholar, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109. Email: [email protected]
Seymour M. J. Spence, Ph.D., A.M.ASCE [email protected]
Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Second-order Krylov subspaces for model order reduction of buildings subjected to seismic excitation, Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering, 10.1007/s40430-023-04043-x, 45, 2, (2023).
  • Metamodeling through Deep Learning of High-Dimensional Dynamic Nonlinear Systems Driven by General Stochastic Excitation, Journal of Structural Engineering, 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0003499, 148, 11, (2022).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share