Technical Papers
Apr 27, 2020

A Three-Dimensional Multishear Bounding Surface Model of Granular Soil–Structure Interfaces under Monotonic and Cyclic Loading

Publication: Journal of Engineering Mechanics
Volume 146, Issue 7

Abstract

This study develops a three-dimensional multishear bounding surface model for simulating the constitutive response of interfaces between the granular soil and structure. Based on the plasticity slip theory, the model is established by splitting the overall response of interfaces into a macronormal response and a series of orientated microshear responses in microshear structures. This discrete approach provides a simple and effective means to predict the macroshear response of interfaces by superposition of individual responses from all microshear structures. The microshear structure consists of a microshear response and a micronormal response due to dilatancy, which are described by a microstress–strain relation and a microstress–dilatancy relation, respectively. By introducing a state parameter related to the critical state of granular soils, the model is suitable for predicting the constitutive response of interfaces for various soil densities and normal stresses. The effectiveness of the model is confirmed by simulating the granular soil–structure interface tests with different boundary and load conditions.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some data, models, and code generated during the study are available from the corresponding author by request.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the reviewers for their creative suggestions and professional comments. This work was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51878605).

References

Been, K., and M. G. Jefferies. 1985. “A state parameter for sands.” Géotechnique 35 (2): 99–112. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1985.35.2.99.
Caggiano, A., D. A. Schicchi, E. Etse, and M. Ripania. 2018. “Meso-scale response of concrete under high temperature based on coupled thermo-mechanical and pore-pressure interface modeling.” Eng. Fail. Ana1. 85 (Mar): 167–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2017.11.016.
Chen, X., J. Zhang, Y. Xiao, and J. Li. 2015. “Effect of roughness on shear behavior of red clay–concrete interface in large-scale direct shear tests.” Can. Geotech. J. 52 (8): 1122–1135. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2014-0399.
Clough, G. W., and J. M. Duncan. 1971. “Finite element analyses of retaining wall behavior.” J. Soil Mech. Found. Div. 97 (12): 1657–1673.
Corigliano, A., and M. Ricci. 2001. “Rate-dependent interface models: Formulation and numerical applications.” Int. J. Solids Struct. 38 (4): 547–576. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7683(00)00088-3.
Dafalias, Y. F., and M. T. Manzari. 2004. “Simple plasticity sand model accounting for fabric change effects.” J. Eng. Mech. 130 (6): 622–634. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2004)130:6(622).
D’Aguiar, S. C., A. Modaressi-Farahmand-Razavi, J. A. D. Santos, and F. Lopez-Caballero. 2011. “Elastoplastic constitutive modelling of soil–structure interfaces under monotonic and cyclic loading.” Comput. Geotech. 38 (4): 430–447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2011.02.006.
DeJong, J. T., and Z. J. Westgate. 2009. “Role of initial state, material properties, and confinement condition on local and global soil–structure interface behavior.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 135 (11): 1646–1660. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2009)135:11(1646).
Desai, C. S., E. C. Drumm, and M. M. Zaman. 1985. “Cyclic testing and modeling of interfaces.” J. Geotech. Eng. 111 (6): 793–815. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1985)111:6(793).
Desai, C. S., S. K. Pradhan, and D. Cohen. 2005. “Cyclic testing and constitutive modeling of saturated sand–concrete interfaces using the disturbed state concept.” Int. J. Geomech. 5 (4): 286–294. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1532-3641(2005)5:4(286).
Donna, A. D., A. Ferrari, and L. Laloui. 2016. “Experimental investigations of the soil–concrete interface: Physical mechanisms, cyclic mobilization, and behaviour at different temperatures.” Can. Geotech. J. 53 (4): 659–672. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2015-0294.
Duriez, J., and É. Vincens. 2015. “Constitutive modelling of cohesionless soils and interfaces with various internal states: An elasto-plastic approach.” Comput. Geotech. 63 (Jan): 33–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2014.08.001.
Eid, H. T., R. S. Amarasinghe, K. H. Rabie, and D. Wijewickreme. 2015. “Residual shear strength of fine-grained soils and soil–solid interfaces at low effective normal stresses.” Can. Geotech. J. 52 (2): 198–210. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2014-0019.
Evgin, E., and K. Fakharian. 1996. “Effect of stress paths on the behavior of sand–steel interfaces.” Can. Geotech. J. 33 (6): 853–865. https://doi.org/10.1139/t96-116-336.
Evgin, E., and K. Fakharian. 1998. “Cyclic rotational simple-shear behavior of sand–steel interfaces.” Soils Found. 38 (2): 191–199. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf.38.2_191.
Fakharian, K. 1996. “Three-dimensional monotonic and cyclic behavior of sand–steel interfaces: Testing and modelling.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Ottawa.
Fakharian, K., and E. Evgin. 2000. “Elasto-plastic modelling of stress-path-dependent behaviour of interfaces.” Int. J. Numer. Anal. Methods Geomech. 24 (2): 183–199. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9853(200002)24:2%3C183::AID-NAG63%3E3.0.CO;2-3.
Fang, H., Y. Shen, and Y. Zhao. 2019. “Multishear bounding surface modelling of anisotropic sands accounting for fabric and its evolution.” Comput. Geotech. 110 (Jun): 57–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2019.02.015.
Fang, H. L., H. Zheng, and J. Zheng. 2017. “Micromechanics-based multi-mechanism bounding surface model for sands.” Int. J. Plast. 90 (Mar): 242–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijplas.2017.01.011.
Farhadi, B., and A. Lashkari. 2017. “Influence of soil inherent anisotropy on behavior of crushed sand–steel interfaces.” Soils Found. 57 (1): 111–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sandf.2017.01.008.
Faulkner, D. R., C. Sanchez-Roa, C. Boulton, and S. A. M. Hartog. 2017. “Pore fluid pressure development in compacting fault gouge in theory, experiments, and nature.” J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 123 (1): 226–241. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JB015130.
Feng, D. K., J. M. Zhang, and L. J. Deng. 2018a. “Three-dimensional monotonic and cyclic behavior of a gravel–steel interface from large-scale simple-shear tests.” Can. Geotech. J. 55 (11): 1657–1667. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2018-0065.
Feng, D. K., J. M. Zhang, and W. J. Hou. 2018b. “Three-dimensional direct-shear behaviors of a gravel–structure interface.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 144 (12): 04018095. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001968.
Frost, J. D., J. T. DeJong, and M. Recalde. 2002. “Shear failure behavior of granular-continuum interfaces.” Eng. Fract. Mech. 69 (17): 2029–2048. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0013-7944(02)00075-9.
Gennaro, V. D., and R. Frank. 2002. “Elasto-plastic analysis of the interface behaviour between granular media and structure.” Comput. Geotech. 29 (7): 547–572. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-352X(02)00010-1.
Ghionna, V. N., and G. Mortara. 2002. “An elastoplastic model for sand–structure interface behaviour.” Géotechnique 52 (1): 41–50. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.2002.52.1.41.
Ho, T. Y. K., R. J. Jardine, and N. Anh-Minh. 2011. “Large-displacement interface shear between steel and granular media.” Géotechnique 61 (3): 221–234. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.8.P.086.
Hossain, M. A., and J. Yin. 2014. “Behavior of a pressure-grouted soil–cement interface in direct shear tests.” Int. J. Geomech. 14 (1): 101–109. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000301.
Hosseinali, M., and V. Toufigh. 2018. “A plasticity-based constitutive model for the behavior of soil–structure interfaces under cyclic loading.” Transp. Geotech. 14 (Mar): 41–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trgeo.2017.10.001.
Hou, W. J. 2008. “Research on monotonic and cyclic behavior and constitutive model of three-dimensional soil–structure interface.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Tsinghua Univ.
Hu, L., and J. Pu. 2004. “Testing and modeling of soil–structure interface.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 130 (8): 851–860. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2004)130:8(851).
Koval, G., F. Chevoir, J. N. Roux, J. Sulem, and A. Corfdir. 2011. “Interface roughness effect on slow cyclic annular shear of granular materials.” Granular Matter 13 (5): 525–540. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10035-011-0267-2.
Lashkari, A. 2017. “A simple critical state interface model and its application in prediction of shaft resistance of non-displacement piles in sand.” Comput. Geotech. 88 (Aug): 95–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2017.03.008.
Lashkari, A., and E. Torkanlou. 2016. “On the constitutive modeling of partially saturated interfaces.” Comput. Geotech. 74 (Apr): 222–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2016.01.007.
Lehane, B. M., C. Gaudin, and J. A. Schneider. 2005. “Scale effects on tension capacity for rough piles buried in dense sand.” Géotechnique 55 (10): 709–719. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.2005.55.10.709.
Li, T., and A. M. Rubin. 2017. “A microscopic model of rate and state friction evolution.” J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 122 (8): 6431–6453. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JB013970.
Li, X. S. 2002. “A sand model with state-dependent dilatancy.” Géotechnique 52 (3): 173–186. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.2002.52.3.173.
Liu, H., and H. I. Ling. 2008. “Constitutive description of interface behavior including cyclic loading and particle breakage within the framework of critical state soil mechanics.” Int. J. Numer. Anal. Methods Geomech. 32 (12): 1495–1514. https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.682.
Liu, J., D. Zou, and X. Kong. 2014. “A three-dimensional state-dependent model of soil–structure interface for monotonic and cyclic loadings.” Comput. Geotech. 61 (Sep): 166–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2014.05.012.
Manzari, M. T., and Y. F. Dafalias. 1997. “A critical state two-surface plasticity model for sands.” Géotechnique 47 (2): 255–272. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1997.47.2.255.
Martinez, A., and J. D. Frost. 2018. “Undrained behavior of sand–structure interfaces subjected to cyclic torsional shearing.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 144 (9): 04018063. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001942.
Mortara, G., D. Ferrara, and G. Fotia. 2010. “Simple model for the cyclic behave of smooth sand–steel interfaces.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 136 (7): 1004–1009. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000315.
Mortara, G., A. Mangiola, and V. N. Ghionna. 2007. “Cyclic shear stress degradation and post-cyclic behaviour from sand–steel interface direct shear tests.” Can. Geotech. J. 44 (7): 739–752. https://doi.org/10.1139/t07-019.
Navayogarajah, N., C. S. Desai, and P. D. Kiousis. 1992. “Hierarchical single-surface model for static and cyclic behavior of interfaces.” J. Eng. Mech. 118 (5): 990–1011. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1992)118:5(990).
Oumarou, T. A., and E. Evgin. 2005. “Cyclic behaviour of a sand–steel plate interface.” Can. Geotech. J. 42 (6): 1695–1704. https://doi.org/10.1139/t05-083.
Porcino, D., V. Fioravante, V. N. Ghionna, and S. Pedroni. 2003. “Interface behavior of sands from constant normal stiffness direct shear tests.” Geotech. Test. J. 26 (3): 289–301. https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ11308J.
Pra-ai, S., and M. Boulon. 2017. “Soil–structure cyclic direct shear tests: A new interpretation of the direct shear experiment and its application to a series of cyclic tests.” Acta Geotech. 12 (1): 107–127. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-016-0456-6.
Richart, F., J. Hall, and R. Woods. 1970. Vibrations of soils and foundations: International series in theoretical and applied mechanics. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Saberi, M., C. D. Annan, and J. M. Konrad. 2017. “Constitutive modeling of gravelly soil–structure interface considering particle breakage.” J. Eng. Mech. 143 (8): 04017044. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0001246.
Saberi, M., C. D. Annan, J. M. Konrad, and A. Lashkari. 2016. “A critical state two-surface plasticity model for gravelly soil–structure interfaces under monotonic and cyclic loading.” Comput. Geotech. 80 (Dec): 71–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2016.06.011.
Shahidi, M., B. Pichler, and Ch Hellmich. 2016. “Interfacial micromechanics assessment of classical rheological models. I: Single interface size and viscosity.” J. Eng. Mech. 142 (3): 040150929. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0001012.
Shahrour, I., and F. Rezaie. 1997. “An elastoplastic constitutive relation for the soil–structure interface under cyclic loading.” Comput. Geotech. 21 (1): 21–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-352X(97)00001-3.
Stutz, H., D. Mašín, and A. S. Sattari. 2017. “A general approach to model interfaces using existing soil constitutive models application to hypoplasticity.” Comput. Geotech. 87 (7): 115–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2017.02.010.
Stutz, H., D. Mašín, and F. Wuttke. 2016. “Enhancement of a hypoplastic model for granular soil–structure interface behaviour.” Acta Geotech. 11 (6): 1249–1261. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-016-0440-1.
Sun, D., W. Huang, and Y. Yao. 2008. “An experimental study of failure and softening in sand under three-dimensional stress condition.” Granular Matter 10 (3): 187–195. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10035-008-0083-5.
Taha, A., and M. Fall. 2013. “Shear behavior of sensitive marine clay–concrete interfaces.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 139 (4): 644–650. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000795.
Taylor, G. I. 1938. “The plastic strain of metals.” J. Inst. Met. 62 (5): 307–324.
Wang, Z. L., Y. F. Dafalias, and C. K. Shen. 1990. “Bounding surface hypoplasticity model for sand.” J. Eng. Mech. 116 (5): 983–1001. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1990)116:5(983).
Weißenfels, C., and P. Wriggers. 2015. “Methods to project plasticity models onto the contact surface applied to soil structure interactions.” Comput. Geotech. 65 (Apr): 187–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2014.11.015.
Yavari, N., A. M. Tang, J. M. Pereira, and G. Hassen. 2016. “Effect of temperature on the shear strength of soils and soil/structure interface.” Can. Geotech. J. 53 (7): 1186–1194. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2015-0355.
Zhang, G., L. Wang, and J. M. Zhang. 2011. “Dilatancy of the interface between a structure and gravelly soil.” Géotechnique 61 (1): 75–84. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.9.P.051.
Zhang, G., and J. M. Zhang. 2006. “Monotonic and cyclic tests of interface between structure and gravelly soil.” Soils Found. 46 (4): 505–518. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf.46.505.
Zhang, G., and J. M. Zhang. 2008. “Unified modeling of monotonic and cyclic behavior of interface between structure and gravelly soil.” Soils Found. 48 (2): 231–245. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf.48.231.
Zhao, J., and N. Guo. 2013. “Unique critical state characteristics in granular media considering fabric anisotropy.” Géotechnique 63 (8): 695–704. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.12.P.040.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Engineering Mechanics
Journal of Engineering Mechanics
Volume 146Issue 7July 2020

History

Received: Apr 8, 2019
Accepted: Jan 23, 2020
Published online: Apr 27, 2020
Published in print: Jul 1, 2020
Discussion open until: Sep 27, 2020

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Huolang Fang, Ph.D. [email protected]
Professor, College of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Zhejiang Univ., 866 Yuhangtang Rd., Hangzhou 310058, China (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]
Wenjie Wang [email protected]
Graduate Student, College of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Zhejiang Univ., 866 Yuhangtang Rd., Hangzhou 310058, China. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share