Abstract

An interpolation-based technique can effectively reduce the computational demand involved in a traditional simulation of the multivariate wind field utilizing the spectral representation method (SRM). However, errors are introduced by interpolation and are propagated to simulated wind samples. This influences the statistics of the simulated samples, which may exhibit a departure from the target. In order to properly reduce these errors, closed-form expressions of the statistical errors introduced by interpolation are derived, including the apparent wave effect of wind. The closed-form solutions are verified by a numerical example. It is shown that the interpolation brings no additional error to the mean value of the simulated wind velocity, but the statistical errors in the cross power spectral density (CPSD) function depend on the interpolation of the decomposed CPSD matrix. Through a parametric analysis, the influence of factors related to the interpolation steps, involving interpolation functions and interpolation intervals, on the statistical errors are further investigated numerically. The results show that the Hermite interpolation is preferable, because it causes smaller statistical errors in the multivariate wind field. Reducing the interpolation interval may decrease statistical errors quickly when the interpolation intervals are rather large, as used in engineering applications.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statements

All data, models, and code generated or used during the study appear in the published article.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to gratefully acknowledge the support of the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (Grant No. BK20190359), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51722804, and 51908125), the US National Science Foundation (CMMI 1562244 and 1612843), and the National Ten Thousand Talent Program for Young Top-notch Talents (W03070080).

References

Aas-Jakoben, K., and E. Strommen. 1998. “Time domain calculations of buffeting response of wind-sensitive structures.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 74–76 (Apr): 687–695. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6105(98)00062-2.
Aboshosha, H., A. Elshaer, G. K. Bitsuamlak, and A. El Damatty. 2015. “Consistent inflow turbulence generator for LES evaluation of wind-induced responses for tall buildings.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 142 (Jul): 198–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2015.04.004.
Bendat, J. S., and A. G. Piersol. 1986. Random data: Analysis and measurement procedures. New York: Wiley.
Cao, Y. H., H. F. Xiang, and Y. Zhou. 2000. “Simulation of stochastic wind velocity field on long-span bridges.” J. Eng. Mech. 126 (1): 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2000)126:1(1).
Carassale, L., and G. Solari. 2006. “Monte Carlo simulation of wind velocity fields on complex structures.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 94 (5): 323–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2006.01.004.
Chen, X. Z., and A. Kareem. 2005. “Proper orthogonal decomposition-based modeling, analysis, and simulation of dynamic wind load effects on structures.” J. Eng. Mech. 131 (4): 325–339. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2005)131:4(325).
Chen, X. Z., M. Matsumoto, and A. Kareem. 2000. “Time domain flutter and buffeting response analysis of bridges.” J. Eng. Mech. 126 (1): 7–16. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2000)126:1(7).
Davenport, A. G. 1968. “The dependence of wind load upon meteorological parameters.” In Proc., Int. Research Seminar on Wind Effects on Building and Structures. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Deodatis, G. 1996. “Simulation of ergodic multivariate stochastic processes.” J. Eng. Mech. 122 (8): 778–787. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1996)122:8(778).
Ding, F., and A. Kareem. 2019. “Generation of inflow velocity field for CFD analyses using GPUs.” In Proc., 15th Int. Conf. on Wind Engineering. Beijing: International Association of Wind Engineering.
Ding, F., A. Kareem, and J. W. Wan. 2019. “Aerodynamic tailoring of structures using computational fluid dynamics.” Struct. Eng. Int. 29 (1): 26–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/10168664.2018.1522936.
Ding, Q. S., L. D. Zhu, and H. F. Xiang. 2006. “Simulation of stationary Gaussian stochastic wind velocity field.” Wind Struct. 9 (3): 231–243. https://doi.org/10.12989/was.2006.9.3.231.
Ding, Q. S., L. D. Zhu, and H. F. Xiang. 2011. “An efficient Ergodic simulation of multivariate stochastic processes with spectral representation.” Probab. Eng. Mech. 26 (2): 350–356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.probengmech.2010.09.006.
Di Paola, M. 1998. “Digital simulation of wind field velocity.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 74–76 (Apr): 91–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6105(98)00008-7.
Di Paola, M., and I. Gullo. 2001. “Digital generation of multivariate wind field processes.” Probab. Eng. Mech. 16 (1): 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-8920(99)00032-6.
Gao, Y., Y. Wu, Y. Cai, H. Liu, D. Li, and N. Zhang. 2012. “Error assessment for spectral representation method in random field simulation.” J. Eng. Mech. 138 (6): 711–715. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0000379.
Gao, Y. F., Y. X. Wu, D. Y. Li, Y. Q. Cai, H. L. Liu, and N. Zhang. 2013. “Error assessment for the coherency matrix-based spectral representation method in multivariate random processes simulation.” J. Eng. Mech. 139 (9): 1294–1299. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0000563.
Grigoriu, M. 1986. “Errors in simulation of random processes.” J. Struct. Eng. 112 (12): 2697–2702. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1986)112:12(2697).
Gurley, K., A. Kareem, and M. A. Tognarelli. 1996. “Simulation of a class of non-normal random processes.” Int. J. Non Linear Mech. 31 (5): 601–617. https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-7462(96)00025-X.
He, X. H., H. X. Qin, T. Y. Tao, W. S. Liu, and H. Wang. 2017. “Measurement of non-stationary characteristics of a landfall Typhoon at Jiangyin Bridge site.” Sensors 17 (10): 2186. https://doi.org/10.3390/s17102186.
Heredia-Zavoni, E., and S. Santa-Cruz. 2000. “Conditional simulation of a class of nonstationary space-time random fields.” J. Eng. Mech. 126 (4): 398–404. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2000)126:4(398).
Hu, L., L. Li, and M. Gu. 2010. “Error assessment for spectral representation method in wind velocity field simulation.” J. Eng. Mech. 136 (9): 1090–1104. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0000058.
Hu, L., Y. L. Xu, and W. F. Huang. 2013. “Typhoon-induced non-stationary buffeting response of long-span bridges in complex terrain.” Eng. Struct. 57 (Dec): 406–415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.09.044.
Hu, L., Z. F. Xu, Y. L. Xu, L. Li, and A. Kareem. 2017. “Error analysis of spatially varying seismic ground motion simulation by spectral representation method.” J. Eng. Mech. 143 (9): 04017083. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0001282.
Huang, G. Q. 2015. “Application of proper orthogonal decomposition in fast Fourier transform-assisted multivariate nonstationary process simulation.” J. Eng. Mech. 141 (7): 04015015. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0000923.
Huang, S. H., Q. S. Li, and J. R. Wu. 2010. “A general inflow turbulence generator for large eddy simulation.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 98 (10): 600–617. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2010.06.002.
Kaimal, J. C. 1972. “Spectral characteristics of surface-layer turbulence.” Q. J. R. Meteorolog. Soc. 98 (417): 563–589. https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49709841707.
Kareem, A. 2008. “Numerical simulation of wind effects: A probabilistic perspective.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 96 (10–11): 1472–1497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2008.02.048.
Li, J. H., C. X. Li, and S. S. Chen. 2011. “Spline-interpolation-based FFT approach to fast simulation of multivariate stochastic processes.” Math. Prob. Eng. 2011: 842183. https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/842183.
Li, Y., and A. Kareem. 1993. “Simulation of multivariate random processes: Hybrid DFT and digital filtering approach.” J. Eng. Mech. 119 (5): 1078–1098. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1993)119:5(1078).
Li, Y., and A. Kareem. 1995. “Stochastic decomposition and its applications to probabilistic dynamics.” J. Eng. Mech. 121 (1): 162–174. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1995)121:1(162).
Novak, D., S. Stoyanoff, and H. Herda. 1995. “Error assessment for wind histories generated by autoregressive method.” Struct. Saf. 17 (2): 79–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-4730(95)00003-M.
Priestley, M. B. 1981. Spectral analysis and time series. London: Academic Press.
Professional Standard PRC (People’s Republic of China). 2004. Wind-resistant design specification for highway bridges. Beijing: China Communications Press.
Rice, S. O. 1944. “Mathematical analysis of random noise.” Bell Syst. Tech. J. 23 (3): 282–332. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1538-7305.1944.tb00874.x.
Rossi, R., M. Lazzari, and R. Vitaliani. 2004. “Wind field simulation for structural engineering purposes.” Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 61 (5): 738–763. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.1083.
Samaras, E., M. Shinozuka, and A. Tsurui. 1985. “ARMA representation of random processes.” J. Eng. Mech. 111 (3): 449–461. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1985)111:3(449).
Shinozuka, M., and C. M. Jan. 1972. “Digital simulation of random processes and its applications.” J. Sound Vib. 25 (1): 111–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-460X(72)90600-1.
Smirnov, A., S. Shi, and I. Celik. 2001. “Random flow generation technique for large eddy simulations and particle-dynamics modeling.” J. Fluids Eng. 123 (2): 359–371. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1369598.
Solari, G., and L. Carassale. 2000. “Modal transformation tools in structural dynamics and wind engineering.” Wind Struct. 3 (4): 221–241. https://doi.org/10.12989/was.2000.3.4.221.
Tao, T., H. Wang, C. Yao, X. He, and A. Kareem. 2018b. “Efficacy of interpolation-enhanced schemes in random wind field simulation over long-span bridges.” J. Bridge Eng. 23 (3): 04017147. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001203.
Tao, T. Y., and H. Wang. 2019. “Modelling of longitudinal evolutionary power spectral density of typhoon winds considering high-frequency subrange.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 193 (Oct): 103957. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2019.103957.
Tao, T. Y., H. Wang, and A. Kareem. 2018a. “Reduced-Hermite bifold-interpolation assisted schemes for the simulation of random wind field.” Probab. Eng. Mech. 53 (Jun): 126–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.probengmech.2018.08.002.
Wang, H., R. M. Hu, J. Xie, and T. Tong. 2013. “Comparative study on buffeting performance of Sutong Bridge based on design and measured spectrum.” J. Bridge Eng. 18 (7): 587–600. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000394.
Wu, Y. X., Y. F. Gao, and D. Y. Li. 2015. “Error assessment of multivariate random processes simulated by a conditional-simulation method.” J. Eng. Mech. 141 (5): 04014155. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0000877.
Wu, Y. X., Y. F. Gao, D. Y. Li, C. J. Xu, and A. H. Mahfouz. 2013. “Approximation approach to the SRM based on root decomposition in the simulation of spatially varying ground motions.” Earthquake Eng. Eng. Vib. 12 (3): 363–372. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-013-0178-9.
Xu, Y. L., L. Hu, and A. Kareem. 2014. “Conditional simulation of nonstationary fluctuating wind speeds for long-span bridges.” J. Eng. Mech. 140 (1): 61–73. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0000589.
Yang, J. N. 1972. “Simulation of random envelope process.” J. Sound Vib. 21 (1): 73–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-460X(72)90207-6.
Yang, J. N. 1973. “On the normality and accuracy of simulated random processes.” J. Sound Vib. 26 (3): 417–428. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-460X(73)80196-8.
Yang, W. W., T. Y. P. Chang, and C. C. Chang. 1997. “An efficient wind field simulation technique for bridges.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerod. 67–68 (1): 697–708. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6105(97)00111-6.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Engineering Mechanics
Journal of Engineering Mechanics
Volume 146Issue 6June 2020

History

Received: Jan 11, 2019
Accepted: Jan 7, 2020
Published online: Apr 6, 2020
Published in print: Jun 1, 2020
Discussion open until: Sep 6, 2020

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Assistant Professor, Key Laboratory of C&PC Structures of Ministry of Education, Southeast Univ., Nanjing 210096, China. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0922-8736. Email: [email protected]
Professor, Key Laboratory of C&PC Structures of Ministry of Education, Southeast Univ., Nanjing 210096, China (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1187-0824. Email: [email protected]
Associate Professor, School of Civil Engineering and Mechanics, Huazhong Univ. of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8232-2756. Email: [email protected]
Ahsan Kareem, Dist.M.ASCE [email protected]
Robert M. Moran Professor of Engineering, NatHaz Modeling Laboratory, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering and Earth Sciences, Univ. of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN 46556. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share