Technical Papers
Jul 10, 2020

Hysteretic Beam Finite-Element Model Including Multiaxial Yield/Capacity Surface Evolution with Degradations

Publication: Journal of Engineering Mechanics
Volume 146, Issue 9

Abstract

A multiaxial degrading hysteretic model is developed, enabling consistent multiaxial yield/capacity surface evolution with degradations, and is appropriately incorporated in a finite-element framework using hysteretic Timoshenko beam elements. Degradation phenomena are introduced in this model in the form of either symmetric or asymmetric strength degradation, stiffness degradation, pinching functions, and various combinations thereof. More specifically, a new strength degradation function is developed and enhancements in other existing functions are suggested to simulate the physically observed degradation phenomena in structural elements. The degradation functions are then employed in a multiaxial classical damage-plasticity framework to satisfy the consistency criterion of the yield/capacity surface, thereby resulting in a set of new multiaxial hysteretic evolution equations. The proposed evolution equations are specifically formulated so as they could be seamlessly incorporated into a hysteretic finite-element formulation, using appropriate displacement and hysteretic interpolation functions, to satisfy the exact equilibrium conditions and model distributed plasticity characteristics, thereby avoiding any shear locking effects. As such, the proposed hysteretic finite-element model accounts for equilibrium, distributed plasticity, degradations, and multiaxial inelasticity with capacity interactions in a single consistent and unified framework. Constant system matrices are employed that do not require updating throughout the analysis, while the degradations and inelasticity are captured through the suggested multiaxial hysteretic evolution equations. An efficient numerical solution scheme is also devised, where the finite-element model can be expressed explicitly in terms of first order ordinary differential equations (ODEs), rather than a set of complex differential-algebraic equations for quasi-static cases. The resulting system of equations can be then straightforwardly solved using any standard ODE solver, without any required linearization. Numerical illustrations and experimental verifications are provided to demonstrate the performance and utility of the suggested methodology.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data used during the study are available in online repositories (Al-Shawwa and Lignos 2019a, b, DesignSafe-CI 2018), and details about the experiments are originally published in Yu et al. (2000), Gilton and Uang (2002), and Fell et al. (2009), respectively. All codes generated during the study are available from the authors by request.

Acknowledgments

This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. CMMI-1634575.

References

Al-Shawwa, N., and D. Lignos. 2019a “Web-based interactive tools for performance-based earthquake engineering.” Accessed June 23, 2020. http://resslabtools.epfl.ch/steel/report.php?s_id=Uang-SSRP-00-CW-1.
Al-Shawwa, N., and D. Lignos. 2019b “Web-based interactive tools for performance-based earthquake engineering.” Accessed June 23, 2020. http://resslabtools.epfl.ch/steel/report.php?s_id=Uang-SSR-00-LS-1.
Amir, M., K. G. Papakonstantinou, and G. P. Warn. 2020. “A consistent Timoshenko hysteretic beam finite element model.” Int. J. Non Linear Mech. 119: 103218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnonlinmec.2019.07.003.
Andriotis, C., I. Gkimousis, and V. K. Koumousis. 2015. “Modeling reinforced concrete structures using smooth plasticity and damage models.” J. Struct. Eng. 142 (2): 04015105. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001365.
Andriotis, C. P., K. G. Papakonstantinou, and V. K. Koumousis. 2018. “Nonlinear programming hybrid beam-column element formulation for large-displacement elastic and inelastic analysis.” J. Eng. Mech. 144 (10): 04018096. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0001483.
Baber, T. T., and M. N. Noori. 1985. “Random vibration of degrading, pinching systems.” J. Eng. Mech. 111 (8): 1010–1026. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1985)111:8(1010).
Baber, T. T., and Y.-K. Wen. 1981. “Random vibration hysteretic, degrading systems.” J. Eng. Mech. Div. 107 (6): 1069–1087.
Bathe, K. J. 1996. Finite element procedures. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Bouc, R. 1967. “Forced vibrations of mechanical systems with hysteresis.” In Proc., 4th Conf. on Nonlinear Oscillations. Prague, Czech Republic.
Casciati, F. 1989. “Stochastic dynamics of hysteretic media.” Struct. Saf. 6 (2–4): 259–269.
Charalampakis, A., and V. K. Koumousis. 2009. “A Bouc–Wen model compatible with plasticity postulates.” J. Sound Vib. 322 (4–5): 954–968. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2008.11.017.
Clark, P., K. Frank, H. Krawinkler, and R. Shaw. 1997. Protocol for fabrication, inspection, testing, and documentation of beam-column connection tests and other experimental specimens. Sacramento, CA: SAC Joint Venture.
Deierlein, G. G., A. M. Reinhorn, and M. R. Willford. 2010. Nonlinear structural analysis for seismic design. Gaithersburg, MD: NIST.
DesignSafe-CI. 2018 “NEES-2005-0096: Ultra-low cycle fatigue and fracture in steel structures.” Accessed June 23, 2020. https://www.designsafe-ci.org/data/browser/public/nees.public//NEES-2005-0096.groups/Experiment-1/.
Di Re, P., D. Addessi, and F. C. Filippou. 2018. “Mixed 3D beam element with damage plasticity for the analysis of RC members under warping torsion.” J. Struct. Eng. 144 (6): 04018064. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002039.
Do, T. N., and F. C. Filippou. 2018. “A damage model for structures with degrading response.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 47 (2): 311–332. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2952.
Erlicher, S., and N. Point. 2004. “Thermodynamic admissibility of Bouc–Wen type hysteresis models.” C.R. Mec. 332 (1): 51–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crme.2003.10.009.
Fell, B. V., A. M. Kanvinde, G. G. Deierlein, and A. T. Myers. 2009. “Experimental investigation of inelastic cyclic buckling and fracture of steel braces.” J. Struct. Eng. 135 (1): 19–32. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2009)135:1(19).
Feng, D.-C., X.-D. Ren, and J. Li. 2018. “Softened damage-plasticity model for analysis of cracked reinforced concrete structures.” J. Struct. Eng. 144 (6): 04018044. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002015.
Feng, D.-C., G. Wu, Z.-Y. Sun, and J.-G. Xu. 2017. “A flexure-shear Timoshenko fiber beam element based on softened damage-plasticity model.” Eng. Struct. 140 (Jun): 483–497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.02.066.
Foliente, G. C. 1995. “Hysteresis modeling of wood joints and structural systems.” J. Struct. Eng. 121 (6): 1013–1022. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1995)121:6(1013).
Gendy, A. S., and A. F. Saleeb. 1993. “Generalized yield surface representations in the elasto-plastic three-dimensional analysis of frames.” Comput. Struct. 49 (2): 351–362. https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7949(93)90114-S.
Gilton, C. S., and C.-M. Uang. 2002. “Cyclic response and design recommendations of weak-axis reduced beam section moment connections.” J. Struct. Eng. 128 (4): 452–463. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2002)128:4(452).
Grassl, P., and M. Jirásek. 2006. “Damage-plastic model for concrete failure.” Int. J. Solids Struct. 43 (22–23): 7166–7196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2006.06.032.
Gupta, A., and H. Krawinkler. 2002. Prediction of seismic demands for SMRF’s with ductile connections and elements.. Sacramento, CA: SAC Joint Venture.
Ibarra, L. F., R. A. Medina, and H. Krawinkler. 2005. “Hysteretic models that incorporate strength and stiffness deterioration.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 34 (12): 1489–1511. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.495.
Ismail, M., F. Ikhouane, and J. Rodellar. 2009. “The hysteresis Bouc-Wen model, a survey.” Arch. Comput. Methods Eng. 16 (2): 161–188. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11831-009-9031-8.
Kachanov, L. 1958. “Time of the rupture process under creep conditions.” Izvestiya Akademii Nauk SSSR Otdelenie Tekniches 8: 26–31.
Kachanov, M. 1980. “Continuum model of medium with cracks.” J. Eng. Mech. 106: 1039–1051.
Kottari, A., A. Charalampakis, and V. K. Koumousis. 2014. “A consistent degrading Bouc–Wen model.” Eng. Struct. 60: 235–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.12.025.
Krajcinovic, D. 1996. Vol. 41 of Damage mechanics. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier.
Krawinkler, H., A. Gupta, R. Medina, and N. Luco. 2000. Loading histories for seismic performance testing of SMRF components and assemblies. Sacramento, CA: SAC Joint Venture.
Lemaitre, J. 1985. “A continuous damage mechanics model for ductile fracture.” J. Eng. Mater. Technol. 107 (1): 83–89. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3225775.
Lemaitre, J. 1996. A course on damage mechanics. New York: Springer.
Lignos, D. G., and H. Krawinkler. 2010. “Deterioration modeling of steel components in support of collapse prediction of steel moment frames under earthquake loading.” J. Struct. Eng. 137 (11): 1291–1302. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000376.
Lubliner, J., J. Oliver, S. Oller, and E. Onate. 1989. “A plastic-damage model for concrete.” Int. J. Solids Struct. 25 (3): 299–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-7683(89)90050-4.
Miah, M. S., E. N. Chatzi, V. K. Dertimanis, and F. Weber. 2015. “Nonlinear modeling of a rotational MR damper via an enhanced Bouc–Wen model.” Smart Mater. Struct. 24 (10): 105020. https://doi.org/10.1088/0964-1726/24/10/105020.
Papakonstantinou, K. G., P. C. Dimizas, and V. K. Koumousis. 2008. “An inelastic beam element with hysteretic damping.” Shock Vib. 15 (3): 273–290. https://doi.org/10.1155/2008/707419.
Scott, M. H., G. L. Fenves, F. McKenna, and F. C. Filippou. 2008. “Software patterns for nonlinear beam-column models.” J. Struct. Eng. 134 (4): 562–571. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2008)134:4(562).
Sengupta, P., and B. Li. 2013. “Modified Bouc–Wen model for hysteresis behavior of RC beam–column joints with limited transverse reinforcement.” Eng. Struct. 46: 392–406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.08.003.
Simo, J., and T. Hughes. 1998. Computational inelasticity. New York: Springer.
Sivaselvan, M. V., and A. M. Reinhorn. 2000. “Hysteretic models for deteriorating inelastic structures.” J. Eng. Mech. 126 (6): 633–640. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2000)126:6(633).
Sivaselvan, M. V., and A. M. Reinhorn. 2004. Nonlinear structural analysis towards collapse simulation: A dynamical systems approach. Buffalo, NY: Univ. at Buffalo.
Sofianos, C. D., and V. K. Koumousis. 2018. “Hysteretic beam element with degrading smooth models.” Arch. Appl. Mech. 88 (1–2): 253–269. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00419-017-1263-8.
Spacone, E., F. C. Filippou, and F. F. Taucer. 1996. “Fibre beam–column model for non-linear analysis of RC frames: Part I. Formulation.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 25 (7): 711–725. https://doi.org/10.1002/%28SICI%291096-9845%28199607%2925%3A7%3C711%3A%3AAID-EQE576%3E3.0.CO%3B2-9.
Triantafyllou, S. P., and V. K. Koumousis. 2011a. “An inelastic Timoshenko beam element with axial–shear–flexural interaction.” Comput. Mech. 48 (6): 713–727. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-011-0616-3.
Triantafyllou, S. P., and V. K. Koumousis. 2011b. “Small and large displacement dynamic analysis of frame structures based on hysteretic beam elements.” J. Eng. Mech. 138 (1): 36–49. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0000306.
Van Do, V. N. 2016. “The behavior of ductile damage model on steel structure failure.” Procedia Eng. 142: 26–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.02.009.
Wang, C.-H., G. C. Foliente, M. V. Sivaselvan, and A. M. Reinhorn. 2001. “Hysteretic models for deteriorating inelastic structures.” J. Eng. Mech. 127 (11): 1200–1202. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2001)127:11(1200).
Wen, Y.-K. 1976. “Method for random vibration of hysteretic systems.” J. Eng. Mech. Div. 102 (2): 249–263.
Yu, B., C.-L. Ning, and B. Li. 2016. “Hysteretic model for shear-critical reinforced concrete columns.” J. Struct. Eng. 142 (9): 04016056. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001519.
Yu, Q., C. Gilton, and C.-M. Uang. 2000. Cyclic response of RBS moment connections: Loading sequence and lateral bracing effects. La Jolla, CA: Univ. of California at San Diego.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Engineering Mechanics
Journal of Engineering Mechanics
Volume 146Issue 9September 2020

History

Received: May 14, 2019
Accepted: Dec 3, 2019
Published online: Jul 10, 2020
Published in print: Sep 1, 2020
Discussion open until: Dec 10, 2020

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

M. Amir, S.M.ASCE [email protected]
Graduate Student Researcher, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Pennsylvania State Univ., University Park, PA 16802 (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]
K. G. Papakonstantinou, M.ASCE [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Pennsylvania State Univ., University Park, PA 16802. Email: [email protected]
G. P. Warn, A.M.ASCE [email protected]
Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Pennsylvania State Univ., University Park, PA 16802. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share