Technical Papers
Nov 13, 2019

Simulation and Peak Value Estimation of Non-Gaussian Wind Pressures Based on Johnson Transformation Model

Publication: Journal of Engineering Mechanics
Volume 146, Issue 1

Abstract

The simulation and peak value estimation of non-Gaussian wind pressures are important to the structural and cladding design of the building. Due to its straightforwardness and accuracy, the moment-based Hermite polynomial model (HPM) has been widely used. However, its effective region for monotonicity is limited, resulting in its unsuitability for non-Gaussian processes whose skewness and kurtosis are out of the effective region. On the other hand, the Johnson transformation model (JTM) has attracted attention due to its larger effective region compared with that of the HPM. Nevertheless, the systematic study of its application to the simulation and peak value estimation of non-Gaussian wind pressures is less addressed. Specifically, its comparison with the HPM is not well discussed. In this study, a set of closed-form formulas to determine the relationship between correlation coefficients of the non-Gaussian process and those of the underlying Gaussian process was derived, and they facilitate a JTM-based simulation method for the non-Gaussian process. Analytical expressions for the non-Gaussian peak factor were developed. Furthermore, the JTM was systematically compared with the HPM in terms of the translation function, which helps to understand the ensuing performance evaluation on these two models in the simulation and peak value estimation based on the very long wind pressure data. Results showed that the JTM-based peak value estimation method performs well for wind pressures with weak to mild non-Gaussianity, even those beyond the effective region of the HPM, although it may provide slightly worse estimation for strong softening processes compared with the HPM.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data, models, or code generated or used during the study are available from the corresponding author by request.

Acknowledgments

The support of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51778546), 111 Project (Grant No. B18062), and the Science and Technology Development Program of Shandong Province (2018GGX104006) is gratefully acknowledged.

References

Chen, X., and G. Huang. 2009. “Evaluation of peak resultant response for wind-excited tall buildings.” Eng. Struct. 31 (4): 858–868. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2008.11.021.
Davenport, A. G. 1964. “Note on the distribution of the largest value of a random function with application to gust loading.” Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. 28 (2): 187–196. https://doi.org/10.1680/iicep.1964.10112.
Deodatis, G. 1996. “Simulation of ergodic multivariate stochastic processes.” J. Eng. Mech. 122 (8): 778–787. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1996)122:8(778).
Ding, J., and X. Chen. 2014. “Assessment of methods for extreme value analysis of non-Gaussian wind effects with short-term time history samples.” Eng. Struct. 80 (Dec): 75–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.08.041.
Ding, J., and X. Chen. 2015. “Moment-based translation model for hardening non-Gaussian response processes.” J. Eng. Mech. 142 (2): 06015006. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0000986.
Ditlevsen, O., G. Mohr, and P. Hoffmeyer. 1996. “Integration of non-Gaussian fields.” Probab. Eng. Mech. 11 (1): 15–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/0266-8920(95)00023-2.
Fan, W., P. Yang, A. H. Ang, and Z. Li. 2016. “Analysis of complex system reliability with correlated random vectors.” Probab. Eng. Mech. 45 (Jul): 61–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.probengmech.2016.03.004.
Gioffre, M., V. Gusella, and M. Grigoriu. 2000. “Simulation of non-Gaussian field applied to wind pressure fluctuations.” Probab. Eng. Mech. 15 (4): 339–345. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-8920(99)00035-1.
Gong, K., and X. Chen. 2014. “Influence of non-Gaussian wind characteristics on wind turbine extreme response.” Eng. Struct. 59 (Feb): 727–744. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.11.029.
Grigoriu, M. 1984. “Crossings of non-Gaussian translation processes.” J. Eng. Mech. 110 (4): 610–620. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1984)110:4(610).
Grigoriu, M. 1998. “Simulation of stationary non-Gaussian translation processes.” J. Eng. Mech. 124 (2): 121–126. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1998)124:2(121).
Gurley, K. R., and A. Kareem. 1998. “A conditional simulation of non-normal velocity/pressure fields.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 77 (Sep): 39–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6105(98)00130-5.
Gurley, K. R., A. Kareem, and M. A. Tognarelli. 1996. “Simulation of a class of non-normal random processes.” Int. J. Non Linear Mech. 31 (5): 601–617. https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-7462(96)00025-X.
Hill, I. D., R. Hill, and R. L. Holder. 1976. “Algorithm AS 99: Fitting Johnson curves by moments.” J. R. Stat. Soc. C Appl. Stat. 25 (2): 180–189.
Holmes, J. D. 1981. “Non-Gaussian characteristics of wind pressure fluctuations.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 7 (1): 103–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6105(81)90070-2.
Huang, G., and X. Chen. 2007. “Wind load effects and equivalent static wind loads of tall buildings based on synchronous pressure measurements.” Eng. Struct. 29 (10): 2641–2653. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2007.01.011.
Huang, G., X. Ji, H. Zheng, Y. Luo, X. Peng, and Q. Yang. 2017a. “Uncertainty of peak value of non-Gaussian wind load effect: Analytical approach.” J. Eng. Mech. 144 (2): 04017172. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0001402.
Huang, G., Y. Luo, K. R. Gurley, and J. Ding. 2016. “Revisiting moment-based characterization for wind pressures.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 151 (Apr): 158–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2016.02.006.
Huang, G., Y. Luo, Q. Yang, and Y. Tian. 2017b. “A semi-analytical formula for estimating peak wind load effects based on Hermite polynomial model.” Eng. Struct. 152 (Dec): 856–864. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.09.062.
Huang, M., W. Lou, C. M. Chan, N. Lin, and X. Pan. 2013. “Peak distributions and peak factors of wind-induced pressure processes on tall buildings.” J. Eng. Mech. 139 (12): 1744–1756. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0000616.
Johnson, N. L. 1949. “Systems of frequency curves generated by methods of translation.” Biometrika 36 (1/2): 149–176. https://doi.org/10.2307/2332539.
Kareem, A., and J. Zhao. 1994. “Analysis of non-Gaussian surge response of tension leg platforms under wind loads.” J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng. 116 (3): 137–144. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2920142.
Kibble, W. F. 1945. “An extension of a theorem of Mehler’s on Hermite polynomials.” In Vol. 41 of Mathematical Proc., Cambridge Philosophical Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kwon, D. K., and A. Kareem. 2011. “Peak factors for non-Gaussian load effects revisited.” J. Struct. Eng. 137 (12): 1611–1619. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000412.
Li, J., and C. Li. 2011. “Simulation of non-Gaussian stochastic process with target power spectral density and lower-order moments.” J. Eng. Mech. 138 (5): 391–404. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0000349.
Ma, X., and F. Xu. 2017. “Peak factor estimation of non-Gaussian wind pressure on high-rise buildings.” Struct. Des. Tall. Spec. 26 (17): e1386. https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.1386.
Ma, X., F. Xu, A. Kareem, and T. Chen. 2016. “Estimation of surface pressure extremes: Hybrid data and simulation-based approach.” J. Eng. Mech. 142 (10): 04016068. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0001127.
Sadek, F., and E. Simiu. 2002. “Peak non-Gaussian wind effects for database-assisted low-rise building design.” J. Eng. Mech. 128 (5): 530–539. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2002)128:5(530).
Shields, M. D., G. Deodatis, and P. Bocchini. 2011. “A simple and efficient methodology to approximate a general non-Gaussian stationary stochastic process by a translation process.” Probab. Eng. Mech. 26 (4): 511–519. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.probengmech.2011.04.003.
Shinozuka, M., and G. Deodatis. 1991. “Simulation of stochastic processes by spectral representation.” Appl. Mech. Rev. 44 (4): 191–204. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3119501.
Shinozuka, M., and C. M. Jan. 1972. “Digital simulation of random processes and its applications.” J. Sound Vib. 25 (1): 111–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-460X(72)90600-1.
Slifker, J. F., and S. S. Shapiro. 1980. “The Johnson system: Selection and parameter estimation.” Technometrics 22 (2): 239–246. https://doi.org/10.1080/00401706.1980.10486139.
Tognarelli, M. A., J. Zhao, and A. Kareem. 1997. “Equivalent statistical cubicization for system and forcing nonlinearities.” J. Eng. Mech. 123 (8): 890–893. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1997)123:8(890).
Winterstein, S. R. 1988. “Nonlinear vibration models for extremes and fatigue.” J. Eng. Mech. 114 (10): 1772–1790. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1988)114:10(1772).
Winterstein, S. R., and T. Kashef. 2000. “Moment-based load and response models with wind engineering applications.” J. Sol. Energy Eng. 122 (3): 122–128. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1288028.
Winterstein, S. R., and C. A. MacKenzie. 2013. “Extremes of nonlinear vibration: Comparing models based on moments, L-moments, and maximum entropy.” J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng. 135 (2): 021602. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4007050.
Yamazaki, F., and M. Shinozuka. 1988. “Digital generation of non-Gaussian stochastic fields.” J. Eng. Mech. 114 (7): 1183–1197. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1988)114:7(1183).
Yang, L., K. R. Gurley, and D. O. Prevatt. 2013. “Probabilistic modeling of wind pressure on low-rise buildings.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 114 (Mar): 18–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2012.12.014.
Yang, Q., and Y. Tian. 2015. “A model of probability density function of non-Gaussian wind pressure with multiple samples.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 140 (May): 67–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2014.11.005.
Zhang, X. Y., Y. G. Zhao, and Z. H. Lu. 2019. “Unified Hermite polynomial model and its application in estimating non-Gaussian processes.” J. Eng. Mech. 145 (3): 04019001. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0001577.
Zhao, Y., and Z. Lu. 2007. “Fourth-moment standardization for structural reliability assessment.” J. Struct. Eng. 133 (7): 916–924. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2007)133:7(916).
Zhao, Y., X. Zhang, and Z. Lu. 2018. “Complete monotonic expression of the fourth-moment normal transformation for structural reliability.” Comput. Struct. 196 (Feb): 186–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2017.11.006.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Engineering Mechanics
Journal of Engineering Mechanics
Volume 146Issue 1January 2020

History

Received: Sep 14, 2018
Accepted: May 28, 2019
Published online: Nov 13, 2019
Published in print: Jan 1, 2020
Discussion open until: Apr 13, 2020

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Ph.D. Candidate, School of Civil Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong Univ., Chengdu, Sichuan 610031, China. Email: [email protected]
Guoqing Huang, A.M.ASCE [email protected]
Professor, School of Civil Engineering, Chongqing Univ., Chongqing 40044, China; Professor, School of Civil Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong Univ., Chengdu, Sichuan 610031, China (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]
Postdoctor, School of Civil Engineering, Chongqing Univ., Chongqing 40044, China. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share