Technical Papers
Jun 20, 2019

Real-Time Aerodynamics Hybrid Simulation: A Novel Wind-Tunnel Model for Flexible Bridges

Publication: Journal of Engineering Mechanics
Volume 145, Issue 9

Abstract

Despite rapid development in computational fluid dynamics, semiempirical analyses based on parameters identified from spring-mounted sectional models are still widely used to examine wind-induced effects on bridges. In addition, wind tunnel results from full-bridge aeroelastic models, viewed as the most comprehensive representations, are typically a final check for wind design of long-span cable-supported bridges. There are several well-known limitations associated with conventional wind tunnel testing of both sectional and full-bridge models. For example, structural nonlinearities and large deformations are difficult to simulate in sectional models, and only a limited number of modes can be accurately simulated in full-bridge aeroelastic models. To advance aeroelastic modeling of flexible bridges in the wind tunnel, a slightly different version of the real-time hybrid simulation (RTHS) techniques, frequently used in various branches of engineering, is developed here. Specifically, the skeleton of the sectional or full-bridge model, characterizing the dynamic properties (e.g., mass, damping, and stiffness of the structure), is numerically simulated using computational structural dynamics, while its skin, characterizing the aerodynamic and aeroelastic properties, is physically modeled in the wind tunnel. Aerodynamic inputs (gusts) are applied directly on the skin in the wind tunnel, while aeroelastic inputs (motions) are represented by the simulation outputs of the bridge skeleton. On the other hand, the dynamic inputs to the bridge skeleton are acquired from the measured forces (and moments) on the bridge skin. The interactions between the skeleton and skin of the bridge are accomplished through a system consisting of sensors, a network of electromagnetic actuators, and controllers. The time history of the wind-induced bridge responses can be obtained at the end of the proposed real-time aerodynamics hybrid simulation (RTAHS). The feasibility of the RTAHS methodology is demonstrated by a numerical example involving both linear and nonlinear wind-induced forces on the bridge deck.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The support for this project provided by the Institute of Bridge Engineering at the University at Buffalo is gratefully acknowledged.

References

Allotta, B., R. Conti, E. Meli, L. Pugi, and A. Ridolfi. 2013. “Development of a HIL railway roller rig model for the traction and braking testing activities under degraded adhesion conditions.” Int. J. Non Linear Mech. 57 (Dec): 50–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnonlinmec.2013.06.003.
Bachynski, E. E., M. Thys, T. Sauder, V. Chabaud, and L. O. Sæther. 2016. “Real-time hybrid model testing of a braceless semi-submersible wind turbine: Part II—Experimental results.” In Proc., ASME 2016 35th Int. Conf. on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering, V006T09A040–V006T09A040. New York: ASME.
Bayati, I., M. Belloli, D. Ferrari, F. Fossati, and H. Giberti. 2014. “Design of a 6-DoF robotic platform for wind tunnel tests of floating wind turbines.” Energy Procedia 53: 313–323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2014.07.240.
Berthelsen, P. A., E. E. Bachynski, M. Karimirad, and M. Thys. 2016. “Real-time hybrid model tests of a braceless semi-submersible wind turbine: Part III—Calibration of a numerical model.” In Proc., ASME 2016 35th Int. Conf. on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering, V006T09A047–V006T09A047. New York: ASME.
Brockett, R. W. 1965. “Poles, zeros, and feedback: State space interpretation.” IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 10 (2): 129–135. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAC.1965.1098118.
Carl, J., and M. V. Sivaselvan. 2011. “Improved dynamic testing by impedance control.” Earthquake Eng. Eng. Vib. 10 (3): 423–435. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-011-0078-9.
Davenport, A. G. 1962. “Buffeting of a suspension bridge by storm winds.” J. Struct. Div. 88 (3): 233–270.
Dyke, S. J., B. F. Spencer Jr., P. Quast, and M. K. Sain. 1995. “Role of control-structure interaction in protective system design.” J. Eng. Mech. 121 (2): 322–338. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1995)121:2(322).
Ge, Y., and X. Weng. 2014. “Similitude theory and criteria of long-span bridge aeroelasticity in wind tunnel testing.” In Proc., Advances in Civil, Environmental, and Materials Research (ACEM14). Daejeon, Korea: Techno-Press.
Kanda, M., A. Kawaguchi, T. Koizumi, and E. Maruta. 2003. “A new approach for simulating aerodynamic vibrations of structures in a wind tunnel—Development of an experimental system by means of hybrid vibration technique.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 91 (11): 1419–1440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2003.07.002.
Kato, Y., and M. Kanda. 2014. “Development of a modified hybrid aerodynamic vibration technique for simulating aerodynamic vibration of structures in a wind tunnel.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 135 (Dec): 10–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2014.09.005.
Kim, B.-C., and S.-S. Yhim. 2014. “Buffeting analysis of a cable-stayed bridge using three-dimensional computational fluid dynamics.” J. Bridge Eng. 19 (11): 04014044. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000618.
Lang, G. F., and D. Snyder. 2001. “Understanding the physics of electrodynamic shaker performance.” Sound Vib. 35 (10): 24–33.
Mahin, S. A., P.-S. B. Shing, C. R. Thewalt, and R. D. Hanson. 1989. “Pseudodynamic test method—Current status and future directions.” J. Struct. Eng. 115 (8): 2113–2128. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1989)115:8(2113).
McCrum, D. P., and M. S. Williams. 2016. “An overview of seismic hybrid testing of engineering structures.” Eng. Struct. 118: 240–261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.03.039.
Montoya, M. C., J. P. C. King, L. Kong, F. Nieto, and S. Hernández. 2017. “A method for improving the dynamic response of full bridge reduced-scale models in aeroelastic wind tunnel tests by using optimization algorithms.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 167 (Aug): 198–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2017.04.003.
Moticont. 2018. “Technical support: Linear motor force calculation.” Accessed April 20, 2018. http://www.moticont.com/tech-support.htm.
Plummer, A. R. 2006. “Model-in-the-loop testing.” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part I: J. Syst. Control Eng. 220 (3): 183–199. https://doi.org/10.1243/09596518JSCE207.
Sauder, T., V. Chabaud, M. Thys, E. E. Bachynski, and L. O. Sæther. 2016. “Real-time hybrid model testing of a braceless semi-submersible wind turbine. I: The hybrid approach.” In Proc., ASME 2016 35th Int. Conf. on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering, V006T09A039–V006T09A039. New York: ASME.
Scanlan, R. H., and A. Sabzevari. 1969. “Experimental aerodynamic coefficients in the analytical study of suspension bridge flutter.” J. Mech. Eng. Sci. 11 (3): 234–242. https://doi.org/10.1243/JMES_JOUR_1969_011_031_02.
Scanlan, R. H., and J. J. Tomko. 1971. “Airfoil and bridge deck flutter derivatives.” J. Eng. Mech. Div. 97 (6): 1717–1737.
Shao, X., A. M. Reinhorn, and M. V. Sivaselvan. 2010. “Real-time hybrid simulation using shake tables and dynamic actuators.” J. Struct. Eng. 137 (7): 748–760. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000314.
Stefanaki, A. 2017. “A simple strategy for dynamic substructuring and its application to soil-foundation-structure interaction.” Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. of Civil, Structural and Environmental Engineering, State Univ. of New York at Buffalo.
Stefanaki, A., and M. V. Sivaselvan. 2018. “A simple strategy for dynamic substructuring. I: Concept and development.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 47 (9): 1801–1822. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.3039.
Stefanaki, A., M. V. Sivaselvan, S. Weinreber, and M. Pitman. 2018. “A simple strategy for dynamic substructuring. II: Experimental evaluation.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 47 (9): 1823–1843. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.3041.
Wu, T., and A. Kareem. 2013. “Bridge aerodynamics and aeroelasticity: A comparison of modeling schemes.” J. Fluids Struct. 43 (Nov): 347–370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2013.09.015.
Wu, T., and A. Kareem. 2015. “A nonlinear analysis framework for bluff-body aerodynamics: A Volterra representation of the solution of Navier-Stokes equations.” J. Fluids Struct. 54 (Apr): 479–502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2014.12.005.
Wu, T., A. Kareem, and Y. Ge. 2013. “Linear and nonlinear aeroelastic analysis frameworks for cable-supported bridges.” Nonlinear Dyn. 74 (3): 487–516. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-013-0984-7.
Yalla, S. K., and A. Kareem. 2007. “Dynamic load simulator: Actuation strategies and applications.” J. Eng. Mech. 133 (8): 855–863. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2007)133:8(855).
Yalla, S. K., A. Kareem, S. Kabat, and F. L. Haan Jr. 2001. “Dynamic load simulator: Development of a prototype.” J. Eng. Mech. 127 (12): 1310–1315. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2001)127:12(1310).
Zasso, A., T. Argentini, I. Bayati, M. Belloli, and D. Rocchi. 2017. “Super-long bridges with floating towers: The role of multi-box decks and hardware-in-the-loop technology for wind tunnel tests.” In Vol. 276 of Proc., IOP Conf. Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 012008. Bristol, UK: IOP Publishing.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Engineering Mechanics
Journal of Engineering Mechanics
Volume 145Issue 9September 2019

History

Received: Apr 20, 2018
Accepted: Feb 11, 2019
Published online: Jun 20, 2019
Published in print: Sep 1, 2019
Discussion open until: Nov 20, 2019

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil, Structural and Environmental Engineering, Univ. at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY 14260 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9163-4716. Email: [email protected]
Shaopeng Li
Graduate Student, Dept. of Civil, Structural and Environmental Engineering, Univ. at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY 14260.
Mettupalayam Sivaselvan, A.M.ASCE
Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil, Structural and Environmental Engineering, Univ. at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY 14260.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share