Rock-Concrete Interfacial Crack Propagation under Mixed Mode I-II Fracture
Publication: Journal of Engineering Mechanics
Volume 144, Issue 6
Abstract
Experimental tests were conducted on composite rock-concrete specimens with four roughness profiles to investigate the propagation of interfacial cracks under three-point bending and four-point shear conditions. By measuring the initial fracture loads, various combinations of interfacial stress intensity factors (SIFs) of Modes I and II corresponding to the initial fracture conditions were determined. Based on these results, an expression for classifying the initiation of interfacial cracks in mixed Mode I-II fracture was derived by normalization, which could eliminate the effect of interfacial roughness. Furthermore, a criterion for specifying propagation of the interfacial crack that takes into account nonlinear interfacial characteristics was proposed, which indicated that the crack would start to propagate along the interface when the SIFs caused by the external loads and the cohesive stresses satisfied this criterion. Numerical simulations of the interfacial fracture process were also conducted, introducing the crack propagation criterion to predict load–versus crack mouth opening displacement (P-CMOD) curves. They revealed fairly good agreement with the experimental results. Finally, by combining the criterion for maximum circumferential stress with the proposed criterion for crack propagation, the interfacial crack propagation mode was assessed. The results indicated that, once the initial fracture toughnesses for the rock, the concrete, and the rock-concrete interface from the experimental work were obtained, the propagation of interfacial cracks and the corresponding fracture modes, including nonlinear characteristics of the materials and interface, could be predicted using the method derived in this study.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. NSFC 51478083, NSFC 51421064, and NSFC 51109026), of the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of China (Grant DUT17LK06), and of the Natural Science Foundation of Liaoning Province of China (Grant 20170540183).
References
ANSYS [Computer software]. ANSYS, Inc., Canonsburg, PA.
Bažant, Z. P., and Kazemi, M. T. (1990). “Size effect in fracture of ceramics and its use to determine fracture energy and effective process zone length.” J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 73(7), 1841–1853.
Bažant, Z. P., and Pfeiffer, P. A. (1987). “Determination of fracture energy from size effect and brittleness number.” ACI Mater. J., 84(6), 463–480.
Bažant, Z. P., and Planas, J. (1997). Fracture and size effect in concrete and other quasibrittle materials, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
Bažant, Z. P., Tabbara, M. R., Kazemi, M. T., and Pijaudier-Cabot, G. (1990). “Random particle model for fracture of aggregate or fiber composites.” J. Eng. Mech., 1686–1705.
Bažant, Z. P., and Yu, Q. (2009). “Universal size effect law and effect of crack depth on quasi-brittle structure strength.” J. Eng. Mech., 78–84.
Carloni, C., Santandrea, M., and Wendner, R. (2017). “An investigation on the ‘width and size effect’ in the evaluation of the fracture energy of concrete.” Procedia Struct. Integrity, 3(1), 450–458.
Červenka, J., Kishen, J. C., and Saouma, V. E. (1998). “Mixed mode fracture of cementitious bimaterial interfaces. II: Numerical simulation.” Eng. Fract. Mech., 60(1), 95–107.
Cusatis, G., Bažant, Z. P., and Cedolin, L. (2003a). “Confinement-shear lattice model for concrete damage in tension and compression. I: Theory.” J. Eng. Mech., 1439–1448.
Cusatis, G., Bažant, Z. P., and Cedolin, L. (2003b). “Confinement-shear lattice model for concrete damage in tension and compression. II: Computation and validation.” J. Eng. Mech., 1449–1458.
Cusatis, G., Bažant, Z. P., and Cedolin, L. (2006). “Confinement-shear lattice CSL model for fracture propagation in concrete.” Comput. Method Appl. Mech. Eng., 195(52), 7154–7171.
Cusatis, G., Mencarelli, A., Pelessone, D., and Baylot, J. (2011a). “Lattice discrete particle model (LDPM) for failure behavior of concrete. II: Calibration and validation.” Cem. Concr. Compos., 33(9), 891–905.
Cusatis, G., Pelessone, D., and Mencarelli, A. (2011b). “Lattice discrete particle model (LDPM) for failure behavior of concrete. I: Theory.” Cem. Concr. Compos., 33(9), 881–890.
Dong, W., Wu, Z., and Zhou, X. (2013). “Calculating crack extension resistance of concrete based on a new crack propagation criterion.” Constr. Build. Mater., 38(1), 879–889.
Dong, W., Wu, Z., and Zhou, X. (2016). “Fracture mechanisms of rock-concrete interface: Experimental and numerical.” J. Eng. Mech., 04016040.
Dong, W., Wu, Z., Zhou, X., Wang, N., and Kastiukas, G. (2017a). “An experimental study on crack propagation at rock-concrete interface using digital image correlation technique.” Eng. Fract. Mech., 171(3), 50–63.
Dong, W., Yang, D., Zhou, X., Kastiukas, G., and Zhang, B. (2017b). “Experimental and numerical investigations on fracture process zone of rock–concrete interface.” Fatigue Fract. Eng. Mater. Struct., 40(5), 820–835.
Hillerborg, A., Modéer, M., and Petersson, P.-E. (1976). “Analysis of crack formation and crack growth in concrete by means of fracture mechanics and finite elements.” Cem. Concr. Res., 6(6), 773–781.
Hu, X. (2011). “Size effect on tensile softening relation.” Mater. Struct., 44(1), 129–138.
Kishen, J. C., and Singh, K. D. (2001). “Stress intensity factors based fracture criteria for kinking and branching of interface crack: Application to dams.” Eng. Fract. Mech., 68(2), 201–219.
Moës, N., and Belytschko, T. (2002). “Extended finite element method for cohesive crack growth.” Eng. Fract. Mech., 69(7), 813–833.
Nagashima, T., Omoto, Y., and Tani, S. (2003). “Stress intensity factor analysis of interface cracks using X-FEM.” Int. J. Numer. Method Eng., 56(8), 1151–1173.
Qian, W., and Sun, C. (1998). “Methods for calculating stress intensity factors for interfacial cracks between two orthotropic solids.” Int. J. Solids Struct., 35(25), 3317–3330.
Ryoji, Y., and Jin-Quan, X. (1992). “Stress based criterion for an interface crack kinking out of the interface in dissimilar materials.” Eng. Fract. Mech., 41(5), 635–644.
Slowik, V., Kishen, J. C., and Saouma, V. E. (1998). “Mixed mode fracture of cementitious bimaterial interfaces. I: Experimental results.” Eng. Fract. Mech., 60(1), 83–94.
Sujatha, V., and Kishen, J. C. (2003). “Energy release rate due to friction at bimaterial interface in dams.” J. Eng. Mech., 793–800.
Wu, Z., Rong, H., Zheng, J., and Dong, W. (2013). “Numerical method for mixed-mode I-II crack propagation in concrete.” J. Eng. Mech., 1530–1538.
Xu, S., and Reinhardt, H. W. (1999a). “Determination of double-determination of double-K criterion for crack propagation in quasi-brittle fracture. I: Experimental investigation of crack propagation.” Int. J. Fract., 98(2), 111–149.
Xu, S., and Reinhardt, H. W. (1999b). “Determination of double-K criterion for crack propagation in quasi-brittle fracture. II: Analytical evaluating and practical measuring methods for three-point bending notched beams.” Int. J. Fract., 98(2), 151–177.
Yang, S., Song, L., Li, Z., and Huang, S. (2008). “Experimental investigation on fracture toughness of interface crack for rock/concrete.” Int. J. Mod. Phys. B, 22(31n32), 6141–6148.
Zhong, H., Ooi, E. T., Song, C., Ding, T., Lin, G., and Li, H. (2014). “Experimental and numerical study of the dependency of interface fracture in concrete–rock specimens on mode mixity.” Eng. Fract. Mech., 124(9), 287–309.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
©2018 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Jul 2, 2017
Accepted: Dec 13, 2017
Published online: Apr 13, 2018
Published in print: Jun 1, 2018
Discussion open until: Sep 13, 2018
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.