Failure-Mode Importance Measures in System Reliability Analysis
Publication: Journal of Engineering Mechanics
Volume 140, Issue 11
Abstract
To quantitatively estimate the contributions of component failure modes to system output, failure-mode importance measures have been proposed in this paper. This issue is discussed in two schemes: in Scheme 1, failure-mode importance is measured by the change in the characteristics of the system output after removal of the interested failure mode; and in Scheme 2, failure-mode importance is measured by the expected change in the characteristics of the system output after fixing the failure mode of interest at nominal values. Properties and the computational strategies of the failure-mode importance measures also are presented. Discussions with numerical and engineering examples demonstrate that the importance measures are of great significance for the purpose of system improvement.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the Nature Science Foundation of China (Grants 51175425 and 51308459) and the Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China (Grant 20116102110003).
References
Bichon, B. J., McFarland, J. M., and Mahadevan, S. (2011). “Efficient surrogate models for reliability analysis of systems with multiple failure modes.” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 96(10), 1386–1395.
Borgonovo, E. (2006). “Measuring uncertainty importance: Investigation and comparison of alternative approaches.” Risk Anal., 26(5), 1349–1361.
Borgonovo, E. (2007). “A new uncertainty importance measure.” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 92(6), 771–784.
Borgonovo, E., Castaings, W., and Tarantola, S. (2011). “Moment independent importance measures: new results and analytical test cases.” Risk Anal., 31(3), 404–428.
Borgonovo, E., and Tarantola, S. (2008). “Moment independent and variance-based sensitivity analysis with correlations: An application to the stability of a chemical reactor.” Int. J. Chem. Kinet., 40(11), 687–698.
Botev, Z. I., Grotowski, J. F., and Kroese, D. P. (2010). “Kernel density estimation via diffusion.” Ann. Stat., 38(5), 2587–3216.
Mahadevan, S., and Raghothamachar, P. (2000). “Adaptive simulation for system reliability analysis of large structures.” Comput. Struct., 77(6), 725–734.
MATLAB 2012 [Computer software]. Natick, MA, MathWorks.
Rahman, S. (2009). “Stochastic sensitivity analysis by dimensional and score functions.” Probab. Eng. Mech., 24(3), 278–287.
Saltelli, A. (2002). “Sensitivity analysis for importance assessment.” Risk Anal., 22(3), 579–590.
Saltelli, A., et al. (2008). Global sensitivity analysis: The primer, Wiley, New York.
Saltelli, A., Annoni, P., Azzini, I., Campolongo, F., Ratto, M., and Tarantola, S. (2010). “Variance based sensitivity analysis of model output: Design and estimator for the total sensitivity index.” Comput. Phys. Commun., 181(2), 259–270.
Sobol, I. M., and Kucherenko, S. (2009). “Derivative based global sensitivity measures and their link with global sensitivity indices.” Math. Comput. Simul., 79(10), 3009–3017.
Tarantola, S., Gatelli, D., and Mara, T. A. (2006). “Random balance designs for the estimation of the first order global sensitivity indices.” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 91(6), 717–727.
Wei, P. F., Lu, Z. Z., and Yuan, X. K. (2013). “Monte Carlo simulation for moment-independent sensitivity analysis.” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 110, 60–67.
Zhao, Y.-G., and Ang, A. H.-S. (2003). “System reliability assessment by method of moments.” J. Struct. Eng., 1341–1349.
Zhao, Y.-G., and Lu, Z.-H. (2007). “Fourth-moment standardization for structural reliability assessment.” J. Struct. Eng., 916–924.
Zhao, Y.-G., Zhong, W.-Q., and Ang, A. H.-S. (2007). “Estimating joint failure probability of series structural systems.” J. Eng. Mech., 588–596.
Zhou, C. C., Lu, Z. Z., Li, L. Y., Feng, J., and Wang, B. T. (2013a). “A new algorithm for variance based importance analysis of models with correlated inputs.” Appl. Math. Model., 37(3), 864–875.
Zhou, C. C., Lu, Z. Z., and Yuan, X. K. (2013b). “Use of relevance vector machine in structural reliability analysis.” J. Aircr., 50(6), 1726–1733.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2014 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Jul 31, 2013
Accepted: Mar 26, 2014
Published online: Apr 22, 2014
Discussion open until: Sep 22, 2014
Published in print: Nov 1, 2014
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.