Exact Enforcement of the Causality Condition on the Aerodynamic Impulse Response Function Using a Truncated Fourier Series
Publication: Journal of Engineering Mechanics
Volume 140, Issue 5
Abstract
This paper presents the exact relation between the real and imaginary parts of aerodynamic transfer functions for deriving impulse response functions that satisfy the causality condition. A truncated Fourier series is used to express the aerodynamic transfer functions, and the causality condition is defined in terms of the coefficients of a Fourier cosine and sine series, which represent the real and imaginary parts of the aerodynamic transfer functions, respectively. The impulse response functions that satisfy the causality condition are obtained through the inverse Fourier transform of the aerodynamic transfer functions that conform to the exact relation. The coefficients of the Fourier series are determined by minimizing the error between the transfer functions formed by measured flutter derivatives and by the Fourier series. Because the impulse response functions become a series of Dirac delta functions in the proposed method, the aerodynamic forces are easily evaluated as the sum of current and past displacements with the same number of the terms in the Fourier series. The validity of the proposed method is demonstrated for two types of bluff sections: a rectangular section with a width-to-depth ratio of 5 and an H-type section. Time-domain aeroelastic analyses are performed for an elastically supported system with each section. The proposed method yields stable and accurate solutions for the examples efficiently.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
This research was supported by a grant (Grant No. 09CCTI-A052531-05-000000) from the Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs of the Korean government through the Core Research Institute at Seoul National University for Core Engineering Technology Development of Super Long Span Bridge R&D Center.
References
Caracoglia, L., and Jones, N. P. (2003). “Time domain vs. frequency domain characterization of aeroelastic forces for bridge deck sections.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn., 91(3), 371–402.
Chen, X. (2012). “Prediction of buffeting response of long span bridges to transient nonstationary winds.” Proc., Colloquium on Bluff-Body Aerodynamics and Applications (BBAA VII), China Communications Audio-Visual & Electronic Press, Shanghai, China.
Chen, X., and Kareem, A. (2003). “Aeroleastic analysis of bridges: Effects of turbulence and aerodynamic nonlinearities.” J. Eng. Mech., 885–895.
Chen, X., Matsumoto, M., and Kareem, A. (2000). “Time domain flutter and buffeting response analysis of bridges.” J. Eng. Mech., 7–16.
Diana, G., Argentini, T., and Muggiasca, S. (2010). “Aerodynamic instability of a bridge deck section model: Linear and nonlinear approach to force modeling.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn., 98(6–7), 363–374.
Jung, K., Kim, H. K., and Lee, H. S. (2012). “Evaluation of impulse response functions for convolution integrals of aerodynamic forces by optimization with a penalty function.” J. Eng. Mech., 519–529.
Kim, J. D., and King, J. P. C. (2007). “The development of wind tunnel test technique for an aeroelastic buffeting analysis of long-span bridges.” Draft Rep. BLWTL-SS19-2007, Korea Wind Engineering Research Center, Seoul, and Boundary Layer Wind Tunnel Laboratory, Univ. of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada.
Kreyszig, E. (1999). Advanced engineering mathematics, 8th Ed., Wiley, New York.
MathWorks. (2011). MATLAB reference guide (R2011b), Natick, MA.
Matsumoto, M., Okubo, K., Ito, Y., Matsumiya, H., and Kim, G. (2008). “The complex branch characteristics of coupled flutter.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn., 96(10–11), 1843–1855.
Salvatori, L., and Borri, C. (2007). “Frequency- and time-domain methods for the numerical modeling of full-bridge aeroelasticity.” Comput. Struct., 85(11—14), 675–687.
Scanlan, R. H. (2000). “Motion-related body-force functions in two-dimensional low-speed flow.” J. Fluids Struct., 14(1), 49–63.
Scanlan, R. H., and Tomko, J. J. (1971). “Airfoil and bridge deck flutter derivatives.” J. Engrg. Mech. Div., 97(6), 1717–1737.
Wu, T., and Kareem, A. (2011). “Modeling hysteretic nonlinear behavior of bridge aerodynamics via cellular automata nested neural network.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn., 99(4), 378–388.
Zhang, Z., Chen, Z., Cai, Y., and Ge, Y. (2011). “Indicial functions for bridge aeroelastic forces and time-domain flutter analysis.” J. Bridge Eng., 546–557.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2014 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Feb 19, 2013
Accepted: Sep 29, 2013
Published online: Oct 1, 2013
Published in print: May 1, 2014
Discussion open until: Jun 14, 2014
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.