Technical Papers
Jul 26, 2012

Model-Based Multiactuator Control for Real-Time Hybrid Simulation

Publication: Journal of Engineering Mechanics
Volume 139, Issue 2

Abstract

Hybrid simulation combines numerical simulation and experimental testing in a loop of action and reaction to capture the dynamic behavior of a structure. With an extended time scale, convergence of the desired displacements or forces can be assured in each actuator connected to the experimental component before advancing to the next time step. However, when the rate-dependent behavior of an experimental component is of interest, the hybrid simulation must be conducted in real time [i.e., real-time hybrid simulation (RTHS)]. In RTHS, the dynamic behavior of the loading system (i.e., actuators, controllers, and computers) is directly introduced into the RTHS loop. These dynamics consist of both time delays and frequency dependent time lags. At the same time, the phenomenon of control-structure interaction leads to a coupling of the dynamic behavior of the actuators and the structure. Traditional actuator control approaches for RTHS compensate for an apparent time delay or time lag rather than address the actuator dynamics directly. Moreover, most actuator control approaches focus on single-actuator systems. The RTHS control approach proposed herein directly addresses actuator dynamics through model-based feedforward-feedback control. Capturing the dynamic coupling between the actuators ensures accurate control for multiactuator systems. The proposed approach is illustrated through numerical simulation for a 3-story building with multiple actuators to provide control during RTHS.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the support of National Science Foundation Award No. CMMI-1011534.

References

Bonnet, P. A., Lim, C. N., and Williams, M. S. (2007). “Real-time hybrid experiments with Newmark integration, MSCmd outer-loop control and multi-tasking strategies.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dynam., 36(1), 119–141.
Carrion, J. E., and Spencer, B. F., Jr. (2007). “Model-based strategies for real-time hybrid testing.” Newmark structural engineering laboratory report series, Univ. of Illinois, Urbana, IL.
Carrion, J. E., Spencer, B. F., Jr., and Phillips, B. M. (2009). “Real-time hybrid simulation for structural control performance assessment.” Earthquake Eng. Eng. Vibration, 8(4), 481–492.
Chang, C. M. (2011). “Multi-axial active isolation for seismic protection of buildings.” Ph.D. thesis, Univ. of Illinois, Urbana, IL.
Chen, C., and Ricles, J. M. (2009). “Analysis of actuator delay compensation method for real-time testing.” Eng. Struct., 31(11), 2643–2655.
De Silva, C. W. (2007). Vibration fundamentals and practice, 2nd Ed., Taylor & Francis, Boca Raton, FL.
Dyke, S. J., Spencer, B. F., Jr., Sain, M. K., and Carlson, J. D. (1996). “Modeling and control of magnetorheological dampers for seismic response reduction.” Smart Mater. Struct., 5(5), 565–575.
Dyke, S. J., Spencer, B. F., Jr., Quast, P., and Sain, M. K. (1995). “Role of control-structure interaction in protective system design.” J. Eng. Mech., 121(2), 322–338.
Horiuchi, T., Nakagawa, M., Sugano, M., and Konno, T. (1996). “Development of a real-time hybrid experimental system with actuator delay compensation.” Proc., 11th World Conf. Earthquake Engineering, International Association for Earthquake Engineering, Tokyo.
Jung, R. Y., Shing, P. B., Stauffer, E., and Thoen, B. (2007). “Performance of a real-time pseudodynamic test system considering nonlinear structural response.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dynam., 36(12), 1785–1809.
Kim, S. B., Spencer, B. F., Jr., and Yun, C. B. (2005). “Frequency domain identification of multi-input, multi-output systems considering physical relationships between measured variables.” J. Eng. Mech., 131(5), 461–473.
Lewis, F. L., and Syrmos, V. L. (1995). Optimal control, 2nd Ed., Wiley, New York, 377–393.
Phillips, B. M., and Spencer Jr., B. F. (2011). “Model-based feedforward-feedback tracking control for real-time hybrid simulation.” Newmark structural engineering laboratory report series, Univ. of Illinois, Urbana, IL.
Shing, P. B. (2008). “Real-time hybrid testing techniques.” Modern testing techniques for structural systems, O. S. Bursi and D. J. Wagg, eds., Springer, Vienna, Austria, 259–292.
Spencer, B. F., Jr., Dyke, S. J., Sain, M. K., and Carlson, J. D. (1997). “Phenomenological model for magnetorheological dampers.” J. Eng. Mech., 123(3), 230–238.
Stengel, R. F. (1986). Stochastic optimal control: Theory and application, Wiley, New York.
Wallace, M., Wagg, D. J., and Neild, S. A. (2005). “An adaptive polynomial based forward prediction algorithm for multi-actuator real-time dynamic substructuring.” Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A, 461(2064), 3807–3826.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Engineering Mechanics
Journal of Engineering Mechanics
Volume 139Issue 2February 2013
Pages: 219 - 228

History

Received: Jan 24, 2012
Accepted: Jun 7, 2012
Published online: Jul 26, 2012
Published in print: Feb 1, 2013

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Brian M. Phillips, A.M.ASCE
Ph.D. Candidate, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801.
Billie F. Spencer Jr., F.ASCE [email protected]
P.E.
Nathan M. and Anne M. Newmark Endowed Chair of Civil Engineering, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share