Fracture Mechanisms of Polymer Cement Mortar: Concrete Interfaces
Publication: Journal of Engineering Mechanics
Volume 139, Issue 2
Abstract
Laboratory tests, including splitting tension, three-point bending, and direct shear tests, were conducted on polymer cement mortar (PCM)-concrete composite specimens with various degrees of interface roughness (). The PCM-concrete bond strength, fracture energy, and fracture surface were investigated qualitatively. The failure mode and the condition of the fracture surface significantly affected the interface bond strength and fracture energy. The bond strength and fracture energy were found to increase with increasing interface roughness until the fracture location shifted from the PCM-concrete interface to within either the PCM or the concrete. The interface roughness has a greater influence on the interface fracture energy and the flexural strength than on the tensile and shear strengths. Considering the single mode (Mode I or Mode II) bond and fracture properties, as well as retrofitting costs, a roughness index of approximately 1 mm () is proposed as the optimum value of interface roughness, and the corresponding recommended treatment is water-jetting (WJ) to a depth of 2–2.5 mm. Finally, an interfacial tension softening model that takes into account the effects of fracture energy, tensile strength, and failure mode is presented.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
This study is a part of the International Collaborative Research Project Life Cycle Prediction and Management of Concrete Structures, adopted by the Asia-Africa S and T Strategic Cooperation Promotion Program of Special Coordination Funds for Science and Technology of Japan’s Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology. The authors received financial aid from Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (A) No. 22246058.
References
Dai, J. G., Ueda, T., Hasan, M., and Sato, Y. (2003). “Mode I fracture behavior of FRP-concrete interfaces.” Proc. Jpn. Concrete Inst., 25(1), 1577–1582 (in Japanese).
Denki Kagaku Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha (DENKA). (2004). Technical Rep. on Polymer Cement Mortar, Tokyo.
Furuuchi, H., Sakai, R., and Ueda, T. (2006). “Effects of interface roughness and size of coarse aggregate on bond characteristics of PCM.” Proc. Jpn. Concrete Inst., 28(2), 1567–1572 (in Japanese).
Geissert, D. G., Li, S., Franz, G. C., and Stephens, J. E. (1999) “Splitting prism test method to evaluate concrete-to-concrete bond strength.” ACI Mater. J., 96(3), 359–366.
Gohnert, M. (2003). “Horizontal shear transfer across a roughened surface.” Cement Concr. Compos., 25(3), 379–385.
Hillerborg, M., Modeer, M., and Peterson, P. (1976). “Analysis of crack formation and crack growth in concrete by meansof fracture mechanics and finite elements.” Cement Concr. Res., 6(6), 773–782.
Hindo, K. R. (1990). “In-place bond testing and surface preparation of concrete.” ACI Mater. J., 12(4), 46–48.
International Concrete Repair Institute (ICRI). (1997). No. 03732P, selecting and specifying concrete surface preparation for coatings, sealers, and polymer overlay, Rosemont, IL.
Japan Concrete Institute (JCI). (2004). Standard Specification.
Japan Concrete Institute (JIS). (2001). Geometrical product specifications (GPS): Surface texture: Profile method—Terms, definitions and surface texture parameters, Tokyo.
Julio, E. N. B. S., Brancho, F. A. B., and Silva, V.D. (2004). “Concrete-to-concrete bond strength. Influence of the roughness of the substrate surface.” Construct. Build. Mater., 18(9), 675–681.
Kunieda, M., Kurihara, N., Uchida, Y., and Rokugo, K. (2000). “Application of tension softening diagrams to evaluation of bond properties at concrete interfaces.” Eng. Fract. Mech., 65(2–3), 299–315.
Li, S., et al. (1997). Durability and bond of high-performance concrete and repaired portland cement concrete, Joint Highway Research Advisory Council, Univ. of Connecticut, Storrs-Mansfield, CT, 232.
Li, V. C., and Ward, R. J. (1989). “A novel testing technique for post-peak tensile behavior of cementitious materials.” Fracture toughness and fracture energy, Balkema, Rotterdam, Netherlands, 183–195.
Loov, R. E., and Patnaik, A. K. (1994). “Horitontal shear strength of composite concrete beams with a rough interface.” Prestressed Concrete Inst. J., 39(1), 48–69.
Mahaboonpachai, T., and Matsumoto, T. (2005). “Investigation of interfacial resistance between concrete and polymer-cement mortar and development of constitutive material model for the interface.” J. Appl. Mech., 8, 977–985.
Mahaboonpachai, T., Matsumoto, T., and Inabac, Y. (2010). “Investigation of interfacial fracture toughness between concrete and adhesive mortar in an external wall tile structure.” Int. J. Adhes. Adhes., 30(1), 1–9.
Momayez, A., Ehsani, M. R., Ramezanianpour, A. A., and Rajaie, H. (2005). “Comparison of methods for evaluating bond strength between concrete substrate and repair materials.” Cement Concr. Res., 35(4), 748–757.
Monteiro, P. J. M., Maso, J. C., and Ollivier, J. P. (1985). “The aggregate-mortar interface.” Cement Concr. Res., 15(6), 953–958.
Moriwaki, T., Tsuji, Y., Hashimoto, C., and Nakajima, T. (1996). “Characteristics for strength of construction joint using polymer-modified mortar as joint materials.” Proc., Japan Society of Civil Engineering, 31, 15–26 (in Japanese).
Niwa, J., Sumranwanich, T., and Tantermisirikul, S. (1998). “New method to determine the tension softening curve of concrete.” Fracture Mechanics of Concrete Structures: Proc., FRAMCOS-3, Vol. 1, Aedificatio, Freiburg, Germany, 347–356.
RILEM Draft Recommendation (50-FMC). (1985). “Determination of the fracture energy of mortar and concrete by means of three point bend tests on notched beams.” Mater. Struct., 18(106), 287–297.
Riley, V. R., and Razl, I. (1974). “Polymer additives for cement composites: A review.” J. Composites, 5(1), 27–33.
Rokugo, K., Iwasa, M., Seko, S., and Koyanagi, W. (1989). “Tension softening diagrams of steel fiber reinforced concrete.” Fracture of concrete and rock, Elsevier, New York, 513–522.
Sato, K., and Hashida, T. (2006). “Fracture toughness evaluation based on tension-softening model and its application to hydraulic fracturing.” Pure Appl. Geophys., 163(5–6), 1073–1089.
Silfwerbrand, J. (1990). “Improving concrete bond in repaired bridge decks.” Concr. Int., 12(9), 121–126.
Uchida, Y., Rokugo, K., and Koyanagi, W. (1991). “Determination of tension softening diagrams of concrete by means of bending test.” J. Mater. Concrete Struct. Pavements 14(426), 203–212.
Wittmann, F. H. (2005). “Modulus of rupture, tensile strength, and fracture energy: An application of non-linear fracture mechanics.” Restoration Buildings Monuments, 11(3), 141–150.
Zhang, D. W., Furuuchi, H., Hori, A., Fujima, S., and Ueda, T. (2009a). “Determination of tensile crack bridging of PCM-concrete interface subjected to fatigue loading by means of bending test.” J. Struct. Eng., 55A, 861–870.
Zhang, D. W., Furuuchi, H., Hori, A., and Ueda, T. (2008). “Mode I fracture behaviors of PCM-concrete interfaces.” Proc. Jpn. Concrete Inst., 30(2), 601–606.
Zhang, D. W., Furuuchi, H., Hori, A., and Ueda, T. (2009b). “Bond strength of PCM-concrete interface: Influence of interface roughness and substrate concrete.” Proc. Jpn. Concrete Inst., 31(1), 1969–1974.
Zhang, D. W., Furuuchi, H., Hori, A., and Ueda, T. (2009c). “Fatigue degradation properties of PCM-concrete interface.” J. Adv. Concrete Technol., 7(3), 425–438.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2013 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: May 23, 2011
Accepted: Jun 1, 2012
Published online: Jul 31, 2012
Published in print: Feb 1, 2013
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.