Technical Papers
Apr 12, 2012

Improved Adaptive Inverse Compensation Technique for Real-Time Hybrid Simulation

Publication: Journal of Engineering Mechanics
Volume 138, Issue 12

Abstract

Real-time hybrid simulation provides an economical and efficient experimental technique for performance evaluation of structures under earthquakes. A successful real-time hybrid simulation requires accurate actuator control in order to achieve reliable experimental results. The time delay as a result of servohydraulic dynamics, if not compensated for properly, would lead to inaccurate or even unstable simulation results. However, the nonlinearities in servohydraulic systems and experimental substructures make the actuator delay difficult to accurately estimate in practice. Therefore, actuator control presents a challenge for the application of the real-time hybrid simulation technique to earthquake engineering research. This paper presents an improved adaptive inverse compensation technique for real-time hybrid simulation. Two adaptive control laws based on a synchronization subspace plot are introduced to adjust the compensation parameters in order to minimize both phase and amplitude errors in the servohydraulic actuator response. The improved adaptive inverse compensation method is experimentally evaluated through real-time tests involving a large-scale magneto-rheological damper subjected to band-limited white noise–generated random displacements and variable current inputs. The experimental results are compared with the command displacements, with the error assessed using various evaluation criteria. The improved adaptive inverse compensation is compared with an existing adaptive inverse compensation method to demonstrate the improvement that the newly developed compensation method offers in minimizing actuator delay. The proposed improved adaptive inverse compensation method is demonstrated to further improve actuator control by reducing not only actuator tracking errors but also associated energy errors.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

This paper is based upon work supported by grants from the Pennsylvania Department of Community and Economic Development through the Pennsylvania Infrastructure Technology Alliance and by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. CMS-0402490 within the George E. Brown, Jr., Network for Earthquake Engineering Simulation Consortium Operations and Grant No. CMMI-0830173. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the sponsors. The MR fluid dampers were provided by Dr. Richard Christenson from the University of Connecticut. The authors appreciate his support.

References

Ahmadizadeh, M., Mosqueda, G., and Reinhorn, A. M. (2008). “Compensation of actuator delay and dynamics for real-time hybrid structural simulation.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 37(1), 21–42.
Bayer, V., Dorka, U. E., Fullekrug, U., and Gschwilm, J. (2005). “On real-time pseudo-dynamic sub-structure testing: Algorithm numerical and experimental results.” Aerosp. Sci. Technol., 9(3), 223–232.
Blakeborough, A., Williams, M. S., Darby, A. P., and Williams, D. M. (2001). “The development of real-time substructure testing.” Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London, Ser. A, 359(1786), 1869–1891.
Bonnet, P. A., et al. (2007). “Real-time hybrid experiments with Newmark integration, MCSmd outer-loop control and multi-tasking strategies.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 36(1), 119–141.
Chen, C. (2007). “Development and numerical simulation of hybrid effective force testing method.” Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Lehigh Univ., Bethlehem, PA.
Chen, C., and Ricles, J. M. (2008). “Stability analysis of SDOF real-time hybrid testing systems with explicit integration algorithms and actuator delay.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 37(4), 597–613.
Chen, C., and Ricles, J. M. (2009). “Analysis of actuator delay compensation methods for real-time testing.” Eng. Struct., 31(11), 2643–2655.
Chen, C., and Ricles, J. M. (2010). “Tracking error-based servo-hydraulic actuator adaptive compensation for real-time hybrid simulation.” J. Struct. Eng., 136(4), 432–440.
Chen, C., Ricles, J. M., Marullo, T., and Mercan, O. (2009a). “Real-time hybrid testing using the unconditionally stable explicit CR integration algorithm.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 38(1), 23–44.
Chen, C., Ricles, J. M., Sause, R., and Christenson, R. (2010a). “Experimental evaluation of an adaptive actuator control technique for real-time simulation of a large-scale magneto-rheological fluid damper.” Smart Mater. Struct., 19(2), 025017.
Chen, C., Ricles, J. M., Sause, R., and Karavasilis, T. L. (2010b). “Experimental evaluation of steel MRFs with large scale magneto-rheological dampers for seismic hazard mitigation using real-time hybrid simulation.” Proc., 9th U.S. National and 10th Canadian Conf. on Earthquake Engineering, Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, Oakland, CA.
Chen, C., Ricles, J. M., Sause, R., Karavasilis, T. L., and Chae, Y. (2009b), “Design and experimental evaluation of steel MRF with magneto-rheological dampers for seismic hazard mitigation.” Proc., Behavior of Steel Structures in Seismic Areas (STESSA), CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
Christenson, R., Lin, Y. Z., Emmons, A., and Bass, B. (2008). “Large-scale experimental verification of semi-active control through real-time hybrid simulation.” J. Struct. Eng., 134(4), 522–534.
Darby, A. P., Blakeborough, A., and Williams, M. S. (1999). “Real-time substructure tests using hydraulic actuators.” J. Eng. Mech., 125(10), 1133–1139.
Darby, A. P., Williams, M. S., and Blakeborough, A. (2002). “Stability and delay compensating for real-time substructure testing.” J. Eng. Mech., 128(12), 1276–1284.
Dermitzakis, S. N., and Mahin, S. A. (1985). “Development of substructuring techniques for on-line computer controlled seismic performance testing.” Rep. UBC/EERC-85/04, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Univ. of California–Berkeley, Berkeley, CA.
Dyke, S., Spencer, B., and Quast, P. (1995). “Role of control-structure interaction in protective system design.” J. Eng. Mech., 121(2), 322–338.
Horiuchi, T., Inoue, M., Konno, T., and Namita, Y. (1999). “Real-time hybrid experimental system with actuator delay compensation and its application to a piping system with energy absorber.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 28(10), 1121–1141.
Horiuchi, T., and Konno, T. (2001). “A new method for compensating actuator delay in real-time hybrid experiment.” Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London, Ser. A, 359(1786), 1893–1909.
Jung, R.Y., Shing, P.B., Stauffer, E. and Thoen, B. (2007). “Performance of a real-time pseudodynamic test system considering nonlinear structural response.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 36(12), 1785–1809.
Mercan, O. (2007). “Analytical and experimental studies on large scale, real-time pseudodynamic testing,” Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Lehigh Univ., Bethlehem, PA.
Mercan, O., and Ricles, J. M. (2007). “Stability and accuracy analysis of outer loop dynamics in real-time pseudodynamic testing of SDOF systems.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dynam., 36(11), 1523–1543.
Merritt, H. E. (1967). Hydraulic control systems, Wiley, New York.
Mosqueda, G., Stojadinovic, B., and Mahin, S. A. (2007). “Real-time error monitoring for hybrid simulation. Part II: Structural response modification due to errors.” J. Struct. Eng., 133(8), 1109–1117.
National Science Foundation (NSF). (2007). “Issues and research needs in simulation development.” Hybrid Simulation Development Rep., National Science Foundation, Chicago.
Nakashima, M., Kato, H., and Takaoka, E. (1992). “Development of real-time pseudodynamic testing.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 21(1), 79–92.
Network for Earthquake Engineering Simulation (NEES). (2010). “Lehigh RTMD users guide.” 〈http://www.nees.lehigh.edu/resources/users-guide〉 (Sep. 10, 2012).
Wallace, M. I., Sieber, J., Neild, S. A., Wagg, D. J., and Krauskopf, B. (2005). “Stability analysis of real-time dynamic substructuring using delay differential equation models.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 34(15), 1817–1832.
Wu, B., Wang, Q., Shing, P. B., and Ou, J. (2007). “Equivalent force control method for generalized real-time substructure testing with implicit integration.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 36(9), 1127–1149.
Zhao, J., French, C., Shield, C., and Posbergh, T. (2003). “Considerations for the development of real-time dynamic testing using servo-hydraulic actuation.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 32(11), 1773–1794.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Engineering Mechanics
Journal of Engineering Mechanics
Volume 138Issue 12December 2012
Pages: 1432 - 1446

History

Received: Jul 6, 2011
Accepted: Apr 9, 2012
Published online: Apr 12, 2012
Published in print: Dec 1, 2012

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Cheng Chen, A.M.ASCE [email protected]
Assistant Professor, School of Engineering, San Francisco State Univ., San Francisco, CA 94132 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
James M. Ricles, M.ASCE
Professor, ATLSS Research Center, Lehigh Univ., Bethlehem, PA 18015.
Tong Guo
Associate Professor, Key Laboratory of Concrete and Prestressed Concrete Structures of the Ministry of Education, Southeast Univ., Nanjing 210096, P.R. China.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share