Exploring Engineering Undergraduate Students’ Attitudes toward Mathematical Problem Posing
Publication: Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice
Volume 145, Issue 4
Abstract
Mathematics has a key role to play in engineering education. Without strong mathematical knowledge, engineering students often face difficulties in engineering courses. Previous studies have found that problem-posing tasks can be used to improve the teaching, learning, and assessment of mathematics at the primary and secondary levels. This study aims to explore undergraduate engineering students’ attitudes toward problem posing in mathematics to investigate the possibility of using problem-posing tasks in engineering education. This research was conducted owing to the lack of research at the tertiary level about mathematical problem posing, especially in engineering education. In this study, the attitudes of 135 undergraduate engineering students toward mathematical problem posing were explored using a questionnaire and semistructured interviews. The results of the questionnaire indicated that around 60% of engineering students believed that problem posing helped them develop their mathematical understanding and that problem-posing and problem-solving skills were related. More than 50% of the engineering students believed problem-posing tasks were enjoyable activities. The results of the interviews supported these findings. Problem-posing activities are likely to give engineering students opportunities to expand their mathematical understanding and increase their knowledge about the applications of mathematics. Teaching problem posing in the classroom could help students become more creative when learning mathematics and help them to become better problem solvers.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
Abu-Elwan, R. 1999. “The development of mathematical problem posing skills for prospective middle school teachers.” In Vol. 2 of Proc., Int. Conf. on Mathematical Education into the 21st Century, edited by A. Rogerson, 1–8. Cairo, Egypt.
Akay, H., and N. Boz. 2010. “The effect of problem posing oriented analyses-II course on the attitudes toward mathematics and mathematics self-efficacy of elementary prospective mathematics teachers.” Aust. J. Teach. Educ. 35 (1): 6. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2010v35n1.6.
Anton, H., I. Bivens, and S. Davis. 2012. Calculus: Early transcendentals. 10th ed. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley Global Education.
Arikan, E. E., and H. Ünal. 2015. “Investigation of problem-solving and problem-posing abilities of seventh-grade students.” Educ. Sci.: Theory Pract. 15 (5): 1403–1416. https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2015.5.2678.
Asshaari, I., N. M. Tawil, H. Othman, N. A. Ismail, Z. M. Nopiah, and A. Zaharim. 2012. “The importance of mathematical pre-university in first year engineering students.” Procedia-Soc. Behav. Sci. 60 (57): 372–377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.393.
Bolarinwa, O. A. 2015. “Principles and methods of validity and reliability testing of questionnaires used in social and health science researches.” Niger. Postgraduate Med. J. 22 (4): 195. https://doi.org/10.4103/1117-1936.173959.
Bonotto, C., and L. Dal Santo. 2015. “On the relationship between problem posing, problem solving, and creativity in the primary school.” In Mathematical problem posing, edited by F. M. Singer, N. F. Ellerton, and J. Cai, 103–123. New York: Springer.
Bouchey, H. A., and S. Harter. 2005. “Reflected appraisals, academic self-perceptions, and math/science performance during early adolescence.” J. Educ. Psychol. 97 (4): 673–686. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.97.4.673.
Breiner, J. M., S. S. Harkness, C. C. Johnson, and C. M. Koehler. 2012. “What is STEM? A discussion about conceptions of STEM in education and partnerships.” Sch. Sci. Math. 112 (1): 3–11. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2011.00109.x.
Brown, S. I., and M. I. Walter. 1993. Problem posing: Reflections and applications. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Cai, J. 1998. “An investigation of U.S. and Chinese students’ mathematical problem posing and problem solving.” Math. Educ. Res. J. 10 (1): 37–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03217121.
Cai, J., and S. Hwang. 2002. “Generalized and generative thinking in U.S. and Chinese students’ mathematical problem solving and problem posing.” J. Math. Behav. 21 (4): 401–421. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0732-3123(02)00142-6.
Cai, J., S. Hwang, C. Jiang, and S. Silber. 2015. “Problem-posing research in mathematics education: Some answered and unanswered questions.” In Mathematical problem posing, edited by F. M. Singer, N. F. Ellerton, and J. Cai, 3–34. New York: Springer.
Cankoy, O. 2014. “Interlocked problem posing and children’s problem posing performance in free structured situations.” Int. J. Sci. Math. Educ. 12 (1): 219–238. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-013-9433-9.
Cankoy, O., and S. Darbaz. 2010. “Problem kurma temelli problem çözme öğretiminin problemi anlama başarısına etkisi.” Hacettepe Univ. Educ. Faculty J. 38 (38): 11–24.
Cankoy, O., and H. Özder. 2017. “Generalizability theory research on developing a scoring rubric to assess primary school students’ problem posing skills.” EURASIA J. Math. Sci. Technol. Educ. 13 (6): 2423–2439. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.01233a.
Castaneda, D. I., and J. A. Mejia. 2018. “Culturally relevant pedagogy: An approach to foster critical consciousness in civil engineering.” J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract. 144 (2): 02518002. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EI.1943-5541.0000361.
Chen, L., W. Van Dooren, and L. Verschaffel. 2015. “Enhancing the development of Chinese fifth-graders’ problem-posing and problem-solving abilities, beliefs, and attitudes: A design experiment.” In Mathematical problem posing, edited by F. M. Singer, N. F. Ellerton, and J. Cai, 309–329. New York: Springer.
Christou, C., N. Mousoulides, M. Pittalis, D. Pitta-Pantazi, and B. Sriraman. 2005. “An empirical taxonomy of problem posing process.” ZDM 37 (3): 149–158.
Crespo, S. 2015. “A collection of problem-posing experiences for prospective mathematics teachers that make a difference. In Mathematical problem posing, edited by F. M. Singer, N. F. Ellerton, and J. Cai, 493–511. New York: Springer.
Creswell, J. 2014. Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Ellerton, N. F. 1986. “Children’s made-up mathematics problems—A new perspective on talented mathematicians.” Educ. Stud. Math. 17 (3): 261–271. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00305073.
Ellerton, N. F. 2013. “Engaging pre-service middle-school teacher-education students in mathematical problem posing: Development of an active learning framework.” Educ. Stud. Math. 83 (1): 87–101. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-012-9449-z.
Ellerton, N. F., F. M. Singer, and J. Cai. 2015. “Problem posing in mathematics: Reflecting on the past, energizing the present, and foreshadowing the future.” In Mathematical problem posing, edited by F. M. Singer, N. F. Ellerton, and J. Cai, 547–556. New York: Springer.
El Maraghy, W. H. 2011. “Future trends in engineering education and research.” In Advances in sustainable manufacturing, edited by G. Seliger, M. M. K. Khraisheh, and I. S. Jawahir, 11–16. Berlin: Springer.
Engelbrecht, J., C. Bergsten, and O. Kågesten. 2012. “Conceptual and procedural approaches to mathematics in the engineering curriculum: Student conceptions and performance.” J. Eng. Educ. 101 (1): 138–162. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2012.tb00045.x.
English, L. D. 1998. “Children’s problem posing within formal and informal contexts.” J. Res. Math. Educ. 29 (1): 83–106. https://doi.org/10.2307/749719.
English, L. D. 2009. “The changing realities of classroom mathematical problem solving.” In Words and worlds: Modeling verbal descriptions of situations, edited by L. Verschaffel, B. Greer, W. van Dooren, and S. Mukhopadhyay, 351–362. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
English, L. D. 2017. “Advancing elementary and middle school STEM education.” Supplement, Int. J. Sci. Math. Educ. 15 (S1): 5–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-017-9802-x.
Fuata’I, K. A. 2009. “Innovative problem solving and students’ mathematics attitudes.” In Proc., 32nd annual Conf. of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia. Canberra, Australia: Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia.
Grigg, N. S. 2018. “Civil engineering workforce and education: Twenty years of change.” J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract. 144 (4): 04018010. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EI.1943-5541.0000387.
Guvercin, S., A. K. Cilavdaroglu, and A. C. Savas. 2014. “The effect of problem posing instruction on 9th grade students’ mathematics academic achievement and retention.” Anthropologist 17 (1): 129–136. https://doi.org/10.1080/09720073.2014.11891422.
Guvercin, S., and V. Verbovskiy. 2014. “The effect of problem posing tasks used in mathematics instruction to mathematics academic achievement and attitudes toward mathematics.” Int. Online J. Primary Educ. 3 (2): 59–65.
Henderson, C., M. Connolly, E. L. Dolan, N. Finkelstein, S. Franklin, S. Malcom, and K. S. John. 2017. “Towards the STEM DBER alliance: Why we need a discipline-based STEM education research community.” J. Eng. Educ. 106 (3): 349–355. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20168.
Hibbeler, R. 2004. Engineering mechanics: Dynamics. 10th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
Hibbeler, R. 2006. Engineering mechanics: Statics. 11th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
Hošpesová, A., and M. Tichá. 2015. “Problem posing in primary school teacher training.” In Mathematical problem posing, edited by F. M. Singer, N. F. Ellerton, and J. Cai, 309–329. New York: Springer.
Islamic World Science Citation Center. 2018. “Ranking of universities & research institutes of Iran and Islamic countries.” Accessed April 16, 2019. http://ur.isc.gov.ir/.
Jain, S., S. Dubey, and S. Jain. 2016. “Designing and validation of questionnaire.” Int. Dent. Med. J. Adv. Res. 2 (1): 1–3.
Jones, S. R. 2013. “Understanding the integral: Students’ symbolic forms.” J. Math. Behav. 32 (2): 122–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2012.12.004.
Kar, T. 2015. “Analysis of problems posed by sixth-grade middle school students for the addition of fractions in terms of semantic structures.” Int. J. Math. Educ. Sci. Technol. 46 (6): 879–894. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2015.1021394.
Klingler, K. L. 2012. “Mathematic strategies for teaching problem solving: The influence of teaching mathematical problem solving strategies on students’ attitudes in middle school. Master’s thesis, School of Teaching, Learning, and Leadership, Univ. of Central Florida. http://stars.library.ucf.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3315&context=etd.
Kouropatov, A., and T. Dreyfus. 2013. “Constructing the integral concept on the basis of the idea of accumulation: suggestion for a high school curriculum.” Int. J. Math. Educ. Sci. Technol. 44 (5): 641–651. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2013.798875.
Kwek, M. L. 2015. “Using problem posing as a formative assessment tool.” In Mathematical problem posing, edited by F. M. Singer, N. F. Ellerton, and J. Cai, 273–292. New York: Springer.
Kyoung Ro, H., L. R. Lattuca, and B. Alcott. 2017. “Who goes to graduate school? engineers’ math proficiency, college experience, and self-assessment of skills.” J. Eng. Educ. 106 (1): 98–122. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20154.
Lavy, I. 2015. “Problem-posing activities in a dynamic geometry environment: When and how.” In Mathematical problem posing, edited by F. M. Singer, N. F. Ellerton, and J. Cai, 393–410. New York: Springer.
Lavy, I., and I. Bershadsky. 2003. “Problem posing via ‘what if not?’ strategy in solid geometry—A case study.” J. Math. Behav. 22 (4): 369–387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2003.09.007.
Lavy, I., and A. Shriki. 2010. “Engaging in problem posing activities in a dynamic geometry setting and the development of prospective teachers’ mathematical knowledge.” J. Math. Behav. 29 (1): 11–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2009.12.002.
Leung, S. S., and E. A. Silver. 1997. “The role of task format, mathematics knowledge, and creative thinking on the arithmetic problem posing of prospective elementary school teachers.” Math. Educ. Res. J. 9 (1): 5–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03217299.
Lim, S. Y., and E. Chapman. 2013. “An investigation of the Fennema-Sherman mathematics anxiety subscale.” Meas. Eval. Couns. Dev. 46 (1): 26–37. https://doi.org/10.1177/0748175612459198.
Lowrie, T. 2002. “Young children posing problems: The influence of teacher intervention on the type of problems children pose.” Math. Educ. Res. J. 14 (2): 87–98. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03217355.
McLeod, D. B. 1992. “Research on affect in mathematics education: A reconceptualization.” In Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning: A project of the national council of teachers of mathematics, edited by D. A. Grouws, 575–596. New York: Macmillan.
McNeill, N. J., E. P. Douglas, M. Koro-Ljungberg, D. J. Therriault, and I. Krause. 2016. “Undergraduate students’ beliefs about engineering problem solving.” J. Eng. Educ. 105 (4): 560–584. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20150.
Minato, S., and S. Yanase. 1984. “On the relationship between students attitudes towards school mathematics and their levels of intelligence.” Educ. Stud. Math. 15 (3): 313–320. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00312080.
Ministry of Education. 2006. Secondary mathematics curriculum. Singapore: Curriculum Planning and Development Division.
Mogari, D. 2003. “A relationship between attitude and achievement in Euclidean geometry of grade 10 pupils.” Afr. J. Res. Math. Sci. Technol. Educ. 7 (1): 63–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/10288457.2003.10740549.
NCTM (National Council of Teachers of Mathematics). 2000. Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Ngurah, A. A. M. I. G., and D. P. Lynch. 2013. “A confirmatory factor analysis of attitudes toward mathematics inventory (ATMI).” Math. Educ. 15 (1): 121–135.
Nicol, C., and L. Bragg. 2009. “Designing problems: What kinds of open-ended problems do preservice teachers pose?” In Vol. 4 of Proc., 33rd Conf. of the Int. Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, edited by M. Tzekaki, M. Kaldrimidou, and H. Sakonidis, 225–232. Thessaloniki, Greece: PME.
Nixon-Ponder, S. 1995. “Using problem posing dialogue in adult literacy education. Teacher to teacher.” Adult Learn. 7 (2): 10–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/104515959500700206.
Nunnally, J. C., and I. H. Bernstein. 1994. Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development). 2013. PISA 2012 results: Ready to learn: Students’ engagement, drive and self-beliefs (volume III): Preliminary version. Paris: OECD.
Parsian, N., and T. D. AM. 2009. “Developing and validating a questionnaire to measure spirituality: A psychometric process.” Global J. Health Sci. 1 (1): 2. https://doi.org/10.5539/gjhs.v1n1p2.
Patton, M. Q. 2005. Qualitative research. New York: Wiley.
Pollak, H. O. 1988. “Mathematics as a service subject—Why?” In Mathematics as a service subject: ICMI study series, edited by A. G. Howson, J. P. Kahane, P. Lauginie, and E. de Turkheim, 28–34. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Pyle, I. 2001. “Mathematics in school.” Eng. Sci. Educ. J. 12 (5): 202–203.
Radmehr, F., and M. Drake. 2017a. “Exploring student’s mathematical performance, metacognitive experiences and skills in relation to fundamental theorem of calculus.” Int. J. Math. Educ. Sci. Technol. 48 (7): 1043–1071. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2017.1305129.
Radmehr, F., and M. Drake. 2017b. “Revised Bloom’s taxonomy and integral calculus: Unpacking the knowledge dimension.” Int. J. Math. Educ. Sci. Technol. 48 (8): 1206–1224. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2017.1321796.
Radmehr, F., and M. Drake. 2018. “Students’ mathematical performance, metacognitive experiences and metacognitive skills in relation to integral-area relationships.” Teach. Math. Appl. 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1093/teamat/hry006.
Rosen, M. A. 2009. “Engineering education: Future trends and advances.” In Proc., 6th WSEAS Int. Conf. on Engineering Education. Stevens Point, WI: World Scientific and Engineering Academy and Society.
Rosli, R., M. M. Capraro, and R. M. Capraro. 2014. “The effects of problem posing on student mathematical learning: A meta-analysis.” Int. Educ. Stud. 7 (13): 227. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v7n13p227.
Samuelsson, J., and K. Granstrom. 2007. “Important prerequisites for students’ mathematical achievement.” J. Theory Pract. Educ. 3 (2): 150–170.
Sarouphim, K. M., and M. Chartouny. 2017. “Mathematics education in Lebanon: Gender differences in attitudes and achievement.” Educ. Stud. Math. 94 (1): 55–68. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-016-9712-9.
Schackow, J. B. 2005. “Examining the attitudes toward mathematics of preservice elementary school teachers enrolled in an introductory mathematics methods course and the experiences that have influenced the development of these attitudes.” Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. of Secondary Education, Univ. of South Florida. http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1852&context=etd.
Sealey, V. 2006. “Definite integrals, Riemann sums, and area under a curve: What is necessary and sufficient?” In Proc., 28th Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the Int. Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, edited by S. Alatorre, J. L. Cortina, M. Saiz, and A. Mendez, 46–53. Merida, Mexico.
Sealey, V. 2014. “A framework for characterizing student understanding of Riemann sums and definite integrals.” J. Math. Behav. 33 (1): 230–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2013.12.002.
Sealey, V., and M. Oehrtman. 2005. “Student understanding of accumulation and Riemann sums.” In Proc., 27th Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the Int. Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education. Roanoke, VA.
Serway, R., and J. Jewett. 2008. Physics for scientists and engineers. 7th ed. Belmont, CA: Thomson Learning.
Silber, S., and J. Cai. 2017. “Pre-service teachers’ free and structured mathematical problem posing.” Int. J. Math. Educ. Sci. Technol. 48 (2): 163–184. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2016.1232843.
Silver, E. A. 1994. “On mathematical problem posing.” Learn. Math. 14 (1): 19–28.
Silver, E. A., and J. Cai. 1996. “An analysis of arithmetic problem posing by middle school students.” J. Res. Math. Educ. 27 (5): 521–539. https://doi.org/10.2307/749846.
Singer, F. M., N. Ellerton, and J. Cai. 2013. “Problem-posing research in mathematics education: New questions and directions.” Educ. Stud. Math. 83 (1): 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-013-9478-2.
Singer, F. M., and H. Moscovici. 2008. “Teaching and learning cycles in a constructivist approach to instruction.” Teach. Teach. Educ. 24 (6): 1613–1634. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2007.12.002.
Singh, K., M. Granville, and S. Dika. 2002. “Mathematics and science achievement: Effects of motivation, interest, and academic engagement.” J. Educ. Res. 95 (6): 323–332. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220670209596607.
Stickles, P. R. 2011. “An analysis of secondary and middle school teachers’ mathematical problem posing.” Invest. Math. Learn. 3 (2): 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/24727466.2011.11790301.
Stoyanova, E., and N. F. Ellerton. 1996. “A framework for research into students’ problem posing in school mathematics.” In Technology in mathematics education, edited by P. Clarkson, 518–525. Melbourne, Australia: Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia.
Suhr, D. D. 2006. “Exploratory or confirmatory factor analysis?” In Proc., 31st Annual SAS? Users Group Int. Conf. Cary, NC: SAS Institute.
Tall, D. 1998. “Changing attitudes to university mathematics through problem solving.” Educ. Stud. Math. 37 (1): 67–82. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003456104875.
Tapia, M., and G. E. Marsh II. 2004. “An instrument to measure mathematics attitudes.” Acad. Exch. Q. 8 (2): 16–21.
Thompson, P., and J. Silverman. 2008. “The concept of accumulation in calculus.” In Making the connection: Research and teaching in undergraduate mathematics education, edited by M. Carlson and C. Rasmussen, 43–52. Washington, DC: Mathematical Association of America.
Tichá, M., and A. Hošpesová. 2009. “Problem posing and development of pedagogical content knowledge in pre-service teacher training.” In Vol. 6 of Proc.,Meeting of CERME. Utrecht, Netherlands: CERME (The European Society for Research in Mathematics Education).
Toluk-Uçar, Z. 2009. “Developing pre-service teachers understanding of fractions through problem posing.” Teach. Teach. Educ. 25 (1): 166–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2008.08.003.
Trochim, W. M. K. 2001. The research methods knowledge base. Cincinnati: Atomic Dog.
Trujillo, K. M., and O. D. Hadfield. 1999. “Tracing the roots of mathematics anxiety through in-depth interviews with preservice elementary teachers.” College Stud. J. 33 (2): 219–232.
Van Harpen, X. Y., and B. Sriraman. 2013. “Creativity and mathematical problem posing: An analysis of high school students’ mathematical problem posing in China and the USA.” Educ. Stud. Math. 82 (2): 201–221. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-012-9419-5.
Verschaffel, L., W. Van Dooren, L. Chen, and K. Stessens. 2009. “The relationship between posing and solving division-with-remainder problems among Flemish upper elementary school children.” In Words and worlds: Modelling verbal descriptions of situations, edited by L. Verschaffel, B. Greer, W. Van Dooren, and S. Mukhopadhyay, 143–160. Rotterdam, Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
Wirth, X., N. J. Jiang, T. da Silva, G. D. Vecchia, J. Evans, E. Romero, and S. K. Bhatia. 2017. “Undergraduate geotechnical engineering education of the 21st century.” J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract. 143 (3): 02516002. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EI.1943-5541.0000317.
Xie, J., and J. O. Masingila. 2017. “Examining interactions between problem posing and problem solving with prospective primary teachers: A case of using fractions.” Educ. Stud. Math. 96 (1): 101–118. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-017-9760-9.
Yin, R. K. 2015. Qualitative research from start to finish. New York: Guilford Publications.
Yong, A. G., and S. Pearce. 2013. “A beginner’s guide to factor analysis: Focusing on exploratory factor analysis.” Tutorials Quant. Methods Psychol. 9 (2): 79–94. https://doi.org/10.20982/tqmp.09.2.p079.
Zakaria, E., and N. Ngah. 2011. “A preliminary analysis of students’ problem-posing ability and its relationship to attitudes towards problem solving.” Res. J. Appl. Sci. Eng. Technol. 3 (9): 866–870.
Zan, R., and P. Di Martino. 2007. “Attitude toward mathematics: Overcoming the positive/negative dichotomy.” The Montana Mathematics Enthusiast 3: 157–168.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice
Volume 145 • Issue 4 • October 2019
Copyright
©2019 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Oct 13, 2018
Accepted: Feb 21, 2019
Published online: May 28, 2019
Published in print: Oct 1, 2019
Discussion open until: Oct 28, 2019
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.