Technical Papers
Mar 13, 2019

Professional Licensure among Civil Engineering Faculty and Related Educational Requirements

Publication: Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice
Volume 145, Issue 3

Abstract

Engineering education is an important part of the professional socialization process, communicating to students the importance (or lack thereof) of professional registration and licensure. This research benchmarked 74 US civil engineering (CE) departments in the extent to which the faculty members were licensed as professional engineers, and whether program objectives mention professional licensure or registration. The percentage of licensed professional engineers among the CE faculty ranged from 12% to 100% with a median of 54%. PE licensure of CE faculty was lower at Doctoral institutions (44%) compared to Bachelor’s and Master’s institutions (67% and 66%); at institutions with fewer faculty a higher percentage were licensed. Geotechnically specialized faculty had the greatest licensure rate among subdisciplines. Professional engineering licensure was less common in mechanical, electrical, and chemical engineering. The CE program objectives of 62% of the programs included professional licensure or registration, and 19% of the CE programs required that undergraduate students take the Fundamentals of Engineering Exam. The results raise concerns about the extent that engineering students are being socialized to value professional licensure and registration.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

Abel, T. S. 2018. “Ethically ambiguous: Addressing the implications of university engineering faculty who teach without obtaining professional licensure, and an argument for professional licensure in engineering Academia.” J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract. 144 (2): 02517007. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EI.1943-5541.0000350.
ABET. 2017. Criteria for accrediting engineering programs. Effective for reviews during the 2018–2019 accreditation cycle. Baltimore: ABET.
Addington, J. S. 2007. “Six years and thousands of assignments later: What have they learned, and what have we learned?” In Proc., American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conf. and Exposition, 22. Washington, DC: ASEE.
Aldrich, B. 2018. “Cited in: CE Roundtable: What issue will dominate the civil engineering industry in 2018? Ben Walpole, January 10, 2018.” Accessed January 12, 2018. http://news.asce.org/ce-roundtable-what-issue-will-dominate-the-civil-engineering-industry-in-2018/?utm_campaign=Comm-20180112-ASCEnews%20Weekly&utm_medium=email&utm_source=Eloqua.
Andrawis, M. 2011. “Using active learning in teaching electromagnetics.” In Proc., American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conf. and Exposition, 7. Washington, DC: ASEE.
ASCE. 2008. Civil engineering body of knowledge for the 21st century. Preparing the civil engineering for the future. 2nd ed. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Barry, B., Y. Mehta, and S. St. Clair. 2009. “Professional engineering licensure and professional experience among civil engineering faculty: A multi-institutional comparison.” In Proc., American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conf. and Exposition, 18. Washington, DC: ASEE.
Brunhaver, S. R., S. K. Gilmartin, H. L. Chen, H. M. Matusovich, and S. Sheppard. 2015. “Comparing disparate outcome measures for better understanding of engineering graduates.” In Proc., American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conf. and Exposition, 21. Washington, DC: ASEE.
Carnegie Classification of Institutions of Higher Education. 2018. “Institution lookup.” Accessed January 12, 2018. http://carnegieclassifications.iu.edu/lookup/lookup.php.
Cech, E. 2013. “Culture of disengagement in engineering education?” Sci. Technol. Hum. Values 39 (1): 42–72. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243913504305.
Deci, E. L., and R. M. Ryan. 2002. “Overview of self-determination theory: An organismic dialectical perspective.” In Handbook of self determination research, edited by E. L. Deci and R. M. Ryan, 3–33. Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press.
Evans, M., and A. R. Boucher. 2015. “Optimizing the power of choice: supporting student autonomy to foster motivation and engagement in learning.” Mind Brain Educ. 9 (2): 87–91. https://doi.org/10.1111/mbe.12073.
Gnanapragasam, N., K. Kuder, and J. Dragovich. 2008. “Comparison between grade earned in a course and performance in a simulated FE exam for mechanics related courses.” In Proc., American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conf. and Exposition, 15. Washington, DC: ASEE.
Hall, K. 2014. Results from FE exam survey. Reston, VA: ASCE Dept. Heads Council.
Helgeson, R., and E. Wheeler. 2006. “Passing the fundamentals of engineering examination as a graduation requirement in a general engineering program: Lessons learned.” In Proc., American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conf. and Exposition, 15. Washington, DC: ASEE.
Korpela, C. M. 2008. “Assessing the EE program outcome assessment process. Case study: EE401– Senior design capstone project course.” Accessed August 31, 2018. https://www.usma.edu/cfe/Literature/Korpela_08.pdf.
Lattuca, L. R., and T. A. Litzinger. 2014. “Studying teaching and learning in undergraduate engineering programs: Conceptual frameworks to guide research on practice.” In Cambridge handbook of engineering education research, edited by A. Johri and B. M. Olds. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Liaw, G.-S., P. Saha, and J. Foreman. 2008. “Preparing minority engineering students to pass the fundamentals of engineering examination.” In Proc., American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conf. and Exposition, 8. Washington, DC: ASEE.
Lichtenstein, G., H. G. Loshbaugh, B. Claar, H. L. Chen, K. Jackson, and S. D. Sheppard. 2009. “An engineering major does not (necessarily) an engineer make: Career decision making among undergraduate engineering majors.” J. Eng. Edu. 98 (3): 227–234. https://doi.org/doi/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2009.tb01021.x.
Madhavan, K., and S. Malasri. 2003. “Professional registration of engineering faculty.” J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract. 129 (3): 122–124. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1052-3928(2003)129:3(122).
Musselman, C. N. 2013. “Issues in engineering licensure–2013.” In Proc., NHJES 7th Annual Joint Engineering Societies Conf., 31. Bedford, NH: New Hampshire Joint Engineering Societies.
NCEES (National Council of Examiners for Engineering and Surveying). 2004. The history of the National Council of Examiners for Engineering and surveying: 1920–2004. Appendix 9. Clemson, SC: NCEES.
NCEES (National Council of Examiners for Engineering and Surveying). 2014. “Squared reports.” Accessed August 15, 2018. https://ncees.org/about/publications/past-annual-reports-squared/.
NCEES (National Council of Examiners for Engineering and Surveying). 2015. “Squared reports.” Accessed August 15, 2018. https://ncees.org/about/publications/past-annual-reports-squared/.
NCEES (National Council of Examiners for Engineering and Surveying). 2016. “Squared reports.” Accessed August 15, 2018. https://ncees.org/about/publications/past-annual-reports-squared/.
NSPE (National Society of Professional Engineers). 2014. “Survey: PE license crucial in academia, but not always encouraged.” Accessed October 27, 2018. https://www.nspe.org/resources/pe-magazine/december-2014/survey-pe-license-crucial-academia-not-always-encouraged.
NSPE (National Society of Professional Engineers). 2018. “NSPE position statement no. 09-173—Industrial exemptions.” August 25, 2018. https://www.nspe.org/resources/issues-and-advocacy/position-statements/industrial-exemptions.
Palmquist, S. M. 2017. “Professional practice: Teaching the value of licensure.” In ASEE Zone II Conference Proc., 6. Washington, DC: ASEE.
Plantenberg, K. 2007. “Fundamentals of engineering exam graduation requirement (Procs and Cons).” In Proc., Spring 2007 American Society for Engineering Education North Central Section Conf., 8. Washington, DC: ASEE.
Ressler, S. J. 2011. “Sociology of professions: Application to the civil engineering ‘Raise the Bar’ initiative.” J. Prof. Issues Eng. Edu. Pract. 137 (3): 151–161. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EI.1943-5541.0000043.
Ressler, S. J., and T. A. Lennox. 2015. “Raising the bar for engineering: Why ABET is necessary but not sufficient.” In Proc., American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conf. and Exposition, 9. Washington, DC: ASEE.
Spinden, P. M. 2015. “The enigma of engineering’s industrial exemption to licensure: The exception that swallowed a profession.” UMKC Law Rev. 83 (3): 637–686.
Sullivan, S., R. Williams, W. Howard, J. Yao, and P. Kauffmann. 2007. “Identifying the content of a general engineering program using benchmarking and the Fundamentals of Engineering examination.” In Proc., American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conf. and Exposition, 16. Washington, DC: ASEE.
Swenty, M., and B. J. Swenty. 2017. “Professional licensure: The core of the civil engineering body of knowledge.” In Proc., American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conf. and Exposition, 14. Washington, DC: ASEE.
Turner, C. D., D. Schroder, A. Tarquin, and W. L. Craver. 2003. “Using the fundamentals exam as a legislative performance indicator.” In Proc., American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conf. and Exposition, 7. Nashville, TN. Washington, DC: ASEE.
University of Idaho. n.d. “Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, B.S. Civil Engineering, fast facts.” Accessed August 27, 2018. https://www.uidaho.edu/engr/departments/cee/bs-civil-engr.
University of Tennessee Martin. n.d. “Department of Engineering.” Accessed August 27, 2018. https://www.utm.edu/departments/engineering/.
US Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, and IPEDS (Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System). n.d. Completions survey. Washington, DC: US Dept. of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, and Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System.
US News and World Report. 2017. Best undergraduate engineering programs. New York: US News and World Report, L.P.
Wang, D. 2018. “Databytes: Most engineering undergrads attend doctoral institutions.” Accessed August 30, 2018. https://connections.cmail19.com/t/ViewEmail/y/945A9A7C94CAB5F9/70C5F137867E63C1C06B463AA70A4F2C.
Weidman, J. C. 2006. “Socialization of students in higher education: Organizational perspectives.” Chap. 14 in The SAGE handbook for research in education, 253–262. Los Angeles: Sage.
Yoder, B. L. 2016. “Engineering by the numbers.” In Profiles of engineering and engineering technology colleges, 11–49. Washington, DC: American Society for Engineering Education.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice
Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice
Volume 145Issue 3July 2019

History

Received: Aug 31, 2018
Accepted: Nov 7, 2018
Published online: Mar 13, 2019
Published in print: Jul 1, 2019
Discussion open until: Aug 13, 2019

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Angela R. Bielefeldt, Ph.D., M.ASCE [email protected]
P.E.
Professor, Dept. of Civil, Environmental, and Architectural Engineering, Univ. of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO 80309-0428. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share