Case Studies
Jul 9, 2018

Pedagogy and Evaluation of an Envision Case Study Module Bridging Sustainable Engineering and Behavioral Science

Publication: Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice
Volume 144, Issue 4

Abstract

Designing for sustainability demands systems thinking and problem-based learning focused on the types of ill-structured problems found in the real world. The approach detailed in this paper uses the Envision Gold–certified Historic Fourth Ward Park on the Atlanta BeltLine as the basis for a case study. The purpose is to convey how aspects of behavioral decision science, as well as stakeholder involvement and leadership, inform real-world design decisions. The module was taught in two classes at Virginia Tech (n=23 and 43). Methods to evaluate learning include presurveys and postsurveys, free-response questions, frequency tables and word clouds, and evaluation of homework assignments using a defined rubric. The dominating themes from both classes before the module about barriers to sustainable infrastructure related to cost and time. After the module, many students understood the role that humans’ mental barriers such as choice overload, bounded rationality, and satisficing play in decision making for sustainability. The case study, teaching material, and homework assignment are available in both one-day and two-day modules for other faculty to use. This paper is meant to guide others developing and assessing case study modules, and to encourage more open-access educational materials about sustainable infrastructure.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

For the Historic Fourth Ward Park case, the authors thank Robby Bryant and Jen Ninete, team members who described the project via phone interviews and offered the Envision documentation and resources used to create the case study. This material is based in part on work supported by the National Science Foundation, through Grant No. 1531041. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.

References

ABET. 2016. “Criteria for accrediting engineering programs.” Accessed October 19, 2017. http://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for-accrediting-engineering-programs-2016-2017/#outcomes.
Allen, D., B. Allenby, M. Bridges, J. Crittenden, C. Davidson, C. Hendrickson, S. Matthews, C. Murphy, and D. Pijawka. 2008. Benchmarking sustainable engineering education: Final report. Austin, TX: Univ. of Texas at Austin.
Allenby, B. 2011. “Rethinking engineering education.” In Proc., IEEE Int. Symp. on Sustainable Systems and Technology (ISSST). 1–5. Chicago.
ASCE. 2008. Civil engineering body of knowledge for the 21st century: Preparing the civil engineer for the future. 2nd ed. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Ashford, N. A. 2004. “Major challenges to engineering education for sustainable development: What has to change to make it creative, effective, and acceptable to the established disciplines?” Int. J. Sustainability Higher Educ. 5 (3): 239–250. https://doi.org/10.1108/14676370410546394.
Ball, L. J., L. Maskill, and T. C. Ormerod. 1998. “Satisficing in engineering design: Causes, consequences, and implications for design support.” Autom. Constr. 7 (2–3): 213–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0926-5805(97)00055-1.
Beamish, T. D., and N. W. Biggart. 2012. “The role of social heuristics in project-centred production networks: Insights from the commercial construction industry.” Eng. Project Organ. J. 2 (1–2): 57–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/21573727.2011.637192.
Bhandari, A., S. Ong, and B. Steward. 2011. “Student learning in a multidisciplinary sustainable engineering course.” J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract. 137 (2): 86–93. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EI.1943-5541.0000055.
Bielefeldt, A. 2013. “Pedagogies to achieve sustainability learning outcomes in civil and environmental engineering students.” Sustainability 5 (10): 4479–4501. https://doi.org/10.3390/su5104479.
Borrego, M., C. Newswander, L. D. McNair, and M. Paretti. 2009. “Using concept maps to assess interdisciplinary integration of green engineering knowledge.” Adv. Eng. Educ. 2 (1): 1–26.
Bragança, L., S. M. Vieira, and J. B. Andrade. 2014. “Early stage design decisions: The way to achieve sustainable buildings at lower costs.” Sci. World J. 2014: 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/365364.
Burian, S. J. 2014. “Using a sustainable infrastructure rating system in the civil engineering capstone design course.” In Proc., 121st ASEE Annual Conf. and Exposition. Washington, DC: American Society for Engineering Education.
Burian, S. J., and S. K. Reynolds. 2014. Using the envisionTM sustainable infrastructure rating system in a civil engineering capstone design course. 24.1348.1–24.1348.20. Washington, DC: American Society for Engineering Education.
Cascetta, E., A. Cartenì, F. Pagliara, and M. Montanino. 2015. “A new look at planning and designing transportation systems: A decision-making model based on cognitive rationality, stakeholder engagement and quantitative methods.” Transp. Policy 38 (Feb): 27–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2014.11.005.
Chau, K. W. 2007. “Incorporation of sustainability concepts into a civil engineering curriculum.” J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract. 133 (3): 188–191. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1052-3928(2007)133:3(188).
Chernev, A., U. Böckenholt, and J. Goodman. 2015. “Choice overload: A conceptual review and meta-analysis.” J. Consum. Psychol. 25 (2): 333–358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2014.08.002.
Clevenger, C. M., M. E. Ozbek, and S. Simpson. 2013. “Review of sustainability rating systems used for infrastructure projects.” In Proc., Associated Schools of Construction 49th Annual Int. Conf. Fort Collins, CO: Associated Schools of Construction.
Davidson, C. I., B. R. Allenby, L. M. Haselbach, M. Heller, and W. E. Kelly. 2016. “Educational materials on sustainable engineering: Do we need a repository?” Elementa 4: 89. https://doi.org/10.12952/journal.elementa.000089.
EDAW, Arcadis, and APD. 2009. “Atlanta beltline master plan: Subarea 5: Freedom Parkway, Historic Fourth Ward Park master plan report.” Accessed October 15, 2017. https://beltlineorg-wpengine.netdna-ssl.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/Atlanta-BeltLine_Subarea-5_Master-Plan.pdf.
El-adaway, I., O. Pierrakos, and D. Truax. 2015. “Sustainable construction education using problem-based learning and service learning pedagogies.” J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract. 141 (1): 05014002. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EI.1943-5541.0000208.
Flyvbjerg, B. 2007. “Policy and planning for large-infrastructure projects: Problems, causes, cures.” Environ. Plann. B: Plann. Des. 34 (4): 578–597. https://doi.org/10.1068/b32111.
Harris, N., T. Shealy, and L. Klotz. 2016. “How exposure to ‘role model’ projects can lead to decisions for more sustainable infrastructure.” Sustainability 8 (2): 130. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8020130.
Hatchuel, A. 2002. “Towards design theory and expandable rationality: The unfinished program of Herbert Simon.” J. Manage. Governance 5 (3–4): 260–273.
Huntzinger, D. N., M. J. Hutchins, J. S. Gierke, and J. W. Sutherland. 2007. “Enabling sustainable thinking in undergraduate engineering education.” Int. J. Eng. Educ. 23 (2): 218–230.
Institute for Sustainable Infrastructure. 2015. “Envision rating system for sustainable infrastructure.” Accessed October 10, 2017. http://research.gsd.harvard.edu/zofnass/files/2015/06/Envision-Manual_2015_red.pdf.
Iyengar, S., and M. Lepper. 2000. “When choice is demotivating: Can one desire too much of a good thing?” J. Personality Soc. Psychol. 79 (6): 995–1006. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.79.6.995.
Johnson, E. J., et al. 2012. “Beyond nudges: Tools of a choice architecture.” Marketing Lett. 23 (2): 487–504. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-012-9186-1.
Kagawa, F. 2007. “Dissonance in students’ perceptions of sustainable development and sustainability: Implications for curriculum change.” Int. J. Sustainability Higher Educ. 8 (3): 317–338. https://doi.org/10.1108/14676370710817174.
Kahneman, D., and A. Tversky. 1979. “Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk.” Econometrica 47 (2): 263–292. https://doi.org/10.2307/1914185.
Kevern, J. T. 2011. “Green building and sustainable infrastructure: Sustainability education for civil engineers.” J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract. 137 (2): 107–112. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EI.1943-5541.0000048.
Langdon, D. 2004. Costing green: A comprehensive cost database and budgeting methodology by Lisa Fay Matthiesen and Peter Morris. Washington, DC: US Green Building Council.
Lu, M. 2015. “Integrating sustainability into the introduction of environmental engineering.” J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract. 141 (2): C5014004. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EI.1943-5541.0000227.
Miller, N., J. Spivey, and A. Florance. 2008. “Does green pay off?” J. Real Estate Portfolio Manage. 14 (4): 385–400. https://doi.org/10.5555/repm.14.4.m5g300025p233u24.
Mossman, A. 2013. “Appendix C: Choosing by advantages.” In The design manager’s handbook, edited by J. Eynon. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
National Academy of Engineering. 2005. Educating the engineer of 2020: Adapting engineering education to the new century. New York: National Academies Press.
Newson, T. A., and N. J. Delatte. 2011. “Case methods in civil engineering teaching.” Can. J. Civ. Eng. 38 (9): 1016–1030.
Norman, D. 2010. “Why design education must change.” Accessed July 17, 2017. https://www.jnd.org/dn.mss/why_design_education.html.
Ottens, M., M. Franssen, P. Kroes, and I. van de Poel. 2006. “Modelling infrastructures as socio-technical systems.” Int. J. Crit. Infrastruct. 2 (2–3): 133–145. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJCIS.2006.009433.
Pellicer, E., L. A. Sierra, and V. Yepes. 2016. “Appraisal of infrastructure sustainability by graduate students using an active-learning method.” J. Clean. Prod. 113 (Feb): 884–896. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.11.010.
Pierrakos, O., R. Nagel, E. Pappas, J. Nagel, T. Moran, E. Barrella, and M. Panizo. 2013. “A mixed-methods study of cognitive and affective learning during a sophomore design problem-based service learning experience.” Int. J. Serv. Learn. Eng. 1–28. https://doi.org/10.24908/ijsle.v0i0.5145.
Scheibehenne, B., R. Greifeneder, and P. M. Todd. 2010. “Can there ever be too many options? A meta-analytic review of choice overload.” J. Consum. Res. 37 (3): 409–425. https://doi.org/10.1086/651235.
Schwartz, B. 2004. The paradox of choice: Why more is less. New York: Ecco.
Segalàs, J., D. Ferrer-Balas, and K. F. Mulder. 2008. “Conceptual maps: Measuring learning processes of engineering students concerning sustainable development.” Eur. J. Eng. Educ. 33 (3): 297–306. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043790802088616.
Segalàs, J., K. F. Mulder, and D. Ferrer-Balas. 2012. “What do EESD ‘experts’ think sustainability is? Which pedagogy is suitable to learn it?: Results from interviews and Cmaps analysis gathered at EESD 2008.” Int. J. Sustainability Higher Educ. 13 (3): 293–304. https://doi.org/10.1108/14676371211242599.
Shealy, T., and L. Klotz. 2014. “Encouraging elegant solutions by applying choice architecture to infrastructure project delivery.” In Proc., Construction Research Congress. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Shealy, T., and L. Klotz. 2017. “Choice architecture as a strategy to encourage elegant infrastructure outcomes.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 23 (1): 04016023. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000311.
Shealy, T., L. Klotz, E. U. Weber, E. J. Johnson, R. G. Bell, and N. Harris. 2016. “Alleviating biases in infrastructure decisions for sustainability: A summary of five experiments and a call to action for the engineering project management research community.” In Proc., Engineering Project Organization Conf. Boulder, CO: Engineering Project Organization Society.
Simon, H. 1956. “Rational choice and the structure of the environment.” Psychol. Rev. 63 (2): 129–138. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0042769.
Simon, H. A. 1972. “Models of bounded rationality.” In Decision and organization, edited by C. B. McGuire and R. Radner. Amsterdam, Netherlands: North-Holland Publishing.
Sisiopiku, V., R. W. Peters, and O. E. Ramadan. 2015. “Introducing sustainability into the civil engineering curriculum.” In Proc., 122nd ASEE Annual Conf. and Exposition. Washington, DC: American Society for Engineering Education.
Steinemann, A. 2003. “Implementing sustainable development through problem-based learning: Pedagogy and practice.” J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract. 129 (4): 216–224. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1052-3928(2003)129:4(216).
Surbeck, C. 2018. “Using a service-learning course to reinforce the three pillars of sustainability.” J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract. 144 (1): 05017006. https://doi.org/10.1061/%28ASCE%29EI.1943-5541.0000346.
Thaler, R., and C. Sunstein. 2008. Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Tuncer, G. 2008. “University students’ perception on sustainable development: A case study from Turkey.” Int. Res. Geogr. Environ. Educ. 17 (3): 212–226. https://doi.org/10.1080/10382040802168297.
Van Buiten, M., and A. Hartmann. 2013. “Public-private partnerships: Cognitive biases in the field.” In Proc., Engineering Project Organization Conf. Boulder, CO: Engineering Project Organization Society.
Wang, Y. 2009. “Sustainability in construction education.” J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract. 135 (1): 21–30. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1052-3928(2009)135:1(21).
Watson, M. K. 2013. “Assessment and improvement of sustainability education in civil and environmental engineering.” Ph.D. dissertation, Georgia Institute of Technology.
Watson, M. K., and E. Barrella. 2016. “Using concept maps to explore the impacts of a learning-cycle-based sustainability module implemented in two institutional contexts.” J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract. 143 (2): D4016001. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EI.1943-5541.0000304.
Watson, M. K., R. Lozano, C. Noyes, and M. Rodgers. 2013a. “Assessing curricula contribution to sustainability more holistically: Experiences from the integration of curricula assessment and students’ perceptions at the Georgia Institute of Technology.” J. Clean. Prod. 61 (Dec): 106–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.09.010.
Watson, M. K., C. Noyes, and M. O. Rodgers. 2013b. “Student perceptions of sustainability education in civil and environmental engineering at the Georgia Institute of Technology.” J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract. 139 (3): 235–243. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EI.1943-5541.0000156.
Watson, M. K., J. Pelkey, C. R. Noyes, and M. O. Rodgers. 2016. “Assessing conceptual knowledge using three concept map scoring methods.” J. Eng. Educ. 105 (1): 118–146. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20111.
Weber, E. U. 2017. “Breaking cognitive barriers to a sustainable future.” Nat. Hum. Behav. 1 (1): 0013. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-016-0013.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice
Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice
Volume 144Issue 4October 2018

History

Received: Sep 5, 2017
Accepted: Mar 29, 2018
Published online: Jul 9, 2018
Published in print: Oct 1, 2018
Discussion open until: Dec 9, 2018

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Nathan McWhirter, S.M.ASCE [email protected]
Graduate Research Assistant, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24061. Email: [email protected]
Tripp Shealy, Ph.D., A.M.ASCE [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24061 (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share