State-of-the-Art Reviews
Mar 21, 2018

Student Misconceptions of General Plane Motion in Rigid-Body Kinematics

Publication: Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice
Volume 144, Issue 3

Abstract

This paper presents a review on student misconceptions of general plane motion (GPM), one of the most difficult yet important concepts in engineering dynamics and a foundational course that civil and mechanical engineering students are required to take in their undergraduate study. The paper discusses student misconceptions of GPM reported in the literature. Five reasons that cause student misconceptions of GPM are proposed and analyzed: lack of fundamental understanding of basic concepts, basic mathematics skills, knowledge transfer skills, spatial skills, and hand-sketching skills. Some remedial strategies for correcting student misconceptions of GPM are also discussed.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

This paper is partially based upon work supported by the U.S. National Science Foundation under Grant No. 1244700.

References

Bayraktar, S. (2009). “Misconceptions of Turkish pre-service teachers about force and motion.” Int. J. Sci. Math. Educ., 7(2), 273–291.
Bedford, A. M., and Fowler, W. (2007). Engineering mechanics: Dynamics, 5th Ed., Prentice Hall, Lebanon, IN.
Beer, F., Johnston, E. R., Cornwell, P., and Self, B. (2015). Vector mechanics for engineers: Dynamics, 11th Ed., McGraw-Hill, Columbus, OH.
Bilda, Z., Gero, J. S., and Purcell, T. (2006). “To sketch or not to sketch? That is the question.” Des. Stud., 27(5), 587–613.
Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., and Cocking, R. R. (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school: Expanded edition, National Academy Press, Washington, DC.
Cornwell, P. J., and Layton, R. A. (2005). “Should kinetics follow kinematics? Only in the dictionary!” Proc., American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conf., American Society for Engineering Education, Washington, DC.
Demirci, N. (2005). “A study about students’ misconceptions in force and motion concepts by incorporating a web-assisted physics program.” Turk. Online J. Educ. Technol., 4(3), 40–48.
Duman, I., Demirci, N., and Sekercioglu, A. (2015). “University students’ difficulties and misconceptions on rolling, rotational motion and torque concepts.” Int. J. New Trends Educ. Implications, 6(1), 46–54.
Evatt, M. A. C. (2002). “Sketching a dying art?” Proc., Engineering and Product Design Education Conf., Design Society, Bristol, U.K.
Fang, N. (2012). “Students’ perceptions of dynamics concept pairs and correlation with their problem-solving performance.” J. Sci. Educ. Technol., 21(5), 571–580.
Fang, N. (2014). “Difficult concepts in engineering dynamics: Students’ perceptions and educational implications.” Int. J. Eng. Educ., 30(5), 1110–1119.
Graham, T., Berry, J., and Rowlands, S. (2013). “Are ‘misconceptions’ or alternative frameworks of force and motion spontaneous or formed prior to instruction?” Int. J. Math. Educ. Sci. Technol., 44(1), 84–103.
Graham, T., and Peek, A. (1997). “Developing an approach to the introduction of rigid body dynamics.” Int. J. Math. Educ. Sci. Technol., 28(3), 373–380.
Gray, G. L., Costanzo, F., Evans, D., Cornwell, P., Self, B., and Lane, J. L. (2005). “The dynamics concept inventory assessment test: A progress report and some results.” Proc., American Society of Engineering Educational Annual Conf., American Society for Engineering Education, Washington, DC.
Gray, G. L., Evans, D., Cornwell, P., Costanzo, F., and Self, B. (2003). “Toward a nationwide dynamics concept inventory assessment test.” Proc., American Society of Engineering Educational Annual Conf., American Society for Engineering Education, Washington, DC.
Gu, Y. T., and Tan, A. (2010). “A powerful tool for effective teaching of dynamics.” Proc., Int. Conf. Engineering Educational ICEE-2010, IEEE, New York.
Ha, O., and Fang, N. (2016). “Spatial ability in learning engineering mechanics: Critical review.” J. Prof., Issues Eng. Educ. Pract., 04015014.
Hegarty, M. (1992). “Mental animation: Inferring motion from static displays of mechanical systems.” J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Memory Cognit., 18(5), 1084–1102.
Hibbeler, R. C. (2014). Engineering mechanics-dynamics, 14th Ed., Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
Ibrahim, S. R. (2004). “An integrated approach for the engineering dynamics course.” Proc., American Society of Engineering Education Annual Conf., American Society of Engineering Education, Washington, DC.
Isaak, M. I., and Just, M. A. (1995). “Constraints on the processing of rolling motion: The curtate cycloid illusion.” J. Exp. Psychol. Human Percept. Perform., 21(6), 1391–1408.
Kara, I. (2007). “Revelation of general knowledge and misconceptions about Newton’s laws of motion by drawing method.” World Appl. Sci. J., 2(S), 770–778.
Kavakli, M., and Gero, J. S. (2001). “Sketching as mental imagery processing.” Des. Stud., 22(4), 347–364.
Kunberger, T., Csavina, K., and O’Neil, R. (2010). “K’NEXING models to examples in engineering mechanics.” Proc., American Society of Engineering Education Annual Conf., American Society for Engineering Education, Washington, DC.
Lopez, M. L. (2003). “Angular and linear acceleration in a rigid rolling body: Students’ misconceptions.” Eur. J. Phys., 24(6), 553–562.
Marklin, R. W., Jr., Goldberg, J. R., and Nagurka, M. (2013). “Freehand sketching for engineers: A pilot study.” Proc., American Society of Engineering Education Annual Conf., American Society for Engineering Education, Washington, DC.
Martin-Erro, A., Somonte, M. D., and Escudero, E. M. M. (2016). “The role of sketching in engineering design and its presence on engineering education.” Proc., iCERI Conf., International Academy of Technology, Education and Development, Valencia, Spain.
Marunić, G., and Glažar, V. (2014). “Improvement and assessment of spatial ability in engineering education.” Eng. Rev., 34(2), 139–150.
Mashood, K. K., and Singh, V. A. (2015). “Rotational kinematics of a rigid body about a fixed axis: Development and analysis of an inventory.” Eur. J. Phys., 36(4), 045020.
Monaghan, M., and Clement, J. (1999). “Use of a computer simulation to develop mental simulations for understanding relative motion concepts.” Int. J. Sci. Educ., 21(9), 921–944.
Murphey, T. D. (2008). “Teaching rigid body mechanics using student-created virtual environments.” IEEE Trans. Educ., 51(1), 45–52.
Perkins, D. N., and Salomon, G. (1992). Transfer of learning: Contribution to the international encyclopedia of education, 2nd Ed., Pergamon, Oxford, U.K.
Rimoldini, L. G., and Singh, C. (2005). “Student understanding of rotational and rolling motion concepts.” Phys. Educ. Res., 1(1), 1–9.
Robb, D. A., Childs, P. R. N., and Harminder, F. (2009). “Sketching to solid modelling skills for mechanical engineers.” Proc., Int. Conf. on Engineering Product Design and Education, Univ. of Brighton, Brighton, U.K.
Schmidt, L. C., Hernandez, N. V., and Ruocco, A. L. (2012). “Research on encouraging sketching in engineering design.” Artif. Intell. Eng. Des. Anal. Manufact., 26(3), 303–315.
Schutze, M., Sachse, P., and Romer, A. (2003). “Support value of sketching in the design process.” Res. Eng. Des., 14(2), 89–97.
Sitaram, P. (2016). “Methods to improve student learning in statics and dynamics courses.” Proc., American Society of Engineering Education North Central Section Conf., American Society for Engineering Education, Washington, DC.
Sorby, S. A. (2009). “Educational research in developing 3-D spatial skills for engineering students.” Int. J. Sci. Educ., 31(3), 459–480.
Toh, T. L. (2006). “A survey on the teaching of relative velocities and pupils’ learning difficulties.” Asia Pac. Forum Sci. Learn. Teach., 7(2), 1–12.
Uttal, D. H., et al. (2013). “The malleability of spatial skills: A meta-analysis of training studies.” Psychol. Bull., 139(2), 352–402.
Yang, M. C., and Cham, J. G. (2007). “An analysis of sketching skill and its role in early stage engineering design.” Trans. ASME, 129(5), 476–482.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice
Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice
Volume 144Issue 3July 2018

History

Published online: Mar 21, 2018
Published in print: Jul 1, 2018
Discussion open until: Aug 21, 2018

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Ning Fang, Ph.D. [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Engineering Education, College of Engineering, Utah State Univ., 4160 Old Main Hill, Logan, UT 84322 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Jacek Uziak, Ph.D. [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Technology, Univ. of Botswana, Private Bag UB0061, Gaborone, Botswana. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share