Case Studies
Sep 13, 2017

The House Factory: A Simulation Game for Understanding Mass Customization in House Building

Publication: Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice
Volume 144, Issue 1

Abstract

Mass customization (MC) aims to provide customized products to fulfill clients’ requirements while maintaining efficiencies similar to mass production. Although the goals of mass customization, high product variety and production efficiency, are clear, its implementation might not be obvious. Indeed, a number of enablers (solution space, modular architecture, and delayed product differentiation) are required for these seemingly conflicting goals to be attained. This paper proposes a live simulation game called the House Factory to fulfill this gap. This game aims to enhance the intuitive understanding of mass customization and how this concept can be applied in house building. Distinct production modes are simulated to illustrate the trade-off between product variety and production efficiency, and this is addressed in mass customization. This paper presents an initial application of the game as a teaching tool in an undergraduate course and also discusses the potential learning yield from it.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the researchers the undergraduate students that took part in the applications reported here. They also thank Dr. Rafael Sacks and Samuel Korb for their comments on the game and suggestions for further developments. The authors acknowledge the financial support from the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq).

References

Barlow, J. (1999). “From craft production to mass customisation: Innovation requirements for the UK housebuilding industry.” House Stud., 14(1), 23–42.
Brown, S., and Bessant, J. (2003). “The manufacturing strategy-capabilities links in mass customisation and agile manufacturing—An exploratory study.” Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manage., 23(7), 707–730.
Cerato, A. B., Taghavi, A., Muraleetharan, K. K., and Miller, G. A. (2012). “Educational module to demonstrate the seismic behavior of piles in improved and unimproved soft soils.” J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract., 274–282.
Da Rocha, C., and Kemmer, S. (2013). “Method to implement delayed product differentiation in construction of high-rise apartment building projects.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 05013001.
Duray, R., Ward, P., Milligan, G. W., and Berry, W. L. (2000). “Approaches to mass customization: Configurations and empirical validations.” J. Oper. Manage., 18(6), 605–625.
Feitzinger, E., and Lee, H. L. (1997). “Mass customization at Hewlett-Packard: The power of postponement.” Harv. Bus. Rev., 75(1), 116–121.
González, V. A., Orozco, F., Senior, B., Ingle, J., Forcael, E., and Alarcón, L. F. (2015). “LEBSCO: Lean-based simulation game for construction management classrooms.” J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract., 04015002.
González, V. A., Senior, B., Orozco, F., Alarcón, L. F., Ingle, J., and Best, A. (2014). “Simulating lean production principles in construction: A Last Planner-driven game.” 22nd Annual Conf. of the Int. Group for Lean Construction, International Group for Lean Construction, B. T. Kalsaas, L. Koskela, and T. A. Saurin, eds., Oslo, Norway, 1221–1232.
Hart, C. W. L. (1995). “Mass customization: Conceptual underpinnings, opportunities and limits.” Int. J. Service Ind. Manage., 6(2), 36–45.
Hentschke, C. S., Formoso, C. T., Rocha, C. G., and Echeveste, M. E. S. (2014). “A method for proposing valued-adding attributes in customized housing.” Sustainability, 6(12), 9244–9267.
House Factory. (2012). “The house factory simulation game.” ⟨https://www.ufrgs.br/housefactorygame/⟩ (Aug. 27, 2017).
Koskela, L. (2000). “An exploration towards a production theory and its application to construction.”, Technical Research Centre of Finland, Espoo, Finland.
Kumar, A. (2004). “Mass customization: Metrics and modularity.” Int. J. Flexible Manuf. Syst., 16(4), 287–311.
LEAPCON [Computer software]. Technion—Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel.
Lewis, A. M., Valdes-Vasquez, R., Clevenger, C., and Shealy, T. (2015). “BIM energy modeling: Case study of a teaching module for sustainable design and construction courses.” J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract., C5014005.
Linner, T., and Bock, T. (2012). “Evolution of large-scale industrialization and service innovation in Japanese prefabrication industry.” Constr. Innov., 12(2), 156–178.
Mantecon, J., Gómez, M., and Rodellar, J. (2012). “Introducing dynamics and control to civil engineers through an experimental flume.” J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract., 267–273.
Muffato, M. (1999). “Introducing a platform strategy in product development.” Int. J. Prod. Econ., 60–61, 145–153.
Naylor, J. B., Naim, M. M., and Berry, D. (1999). “Leagility: Integrating the lean and agile manufacturing paradigms in the total supply chain.” Int. J. Prod. Econ., 62(1–2), 107–118.
Neupauer, R. M., and Dennis, N. D. (2009). “Classroom activities to illustrate concepts of Darcy’s law and hydraulic conductivity.” J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract., 17–23.
Noguchi, M., and Hernandez-Velasco, C. R. (2005). “A ‘mass custom design’ approach to upgrading conventional housing development in Mexico.” Habitat Int., 29(2), 325–336.
Piller, F., and Kumar, A. (2006). “For each their own: The strategic imperative of mass customization.” Ind. Eng., 38(9), 40–45.
Pine, B. J. (1993). “Mass customising products and services.” Strategy Leadersh., 21(4), 6–55.
Rocha, C. G. D., Formoso, C. T., and Santos, A. D. (2012). “An overview of the customisation strategies developed by four organisations of the house-building sector.” 20th Annual Conf. of the Int. Group for Lean Construction, I. D. Tommelein and C. L. Pasquire, eds., International Group for Lean Construction, San Diego, 18–20.
Roy, R., and Cochrane, S. P. (1999). “Development of a customer focused strategy in speculative house building.” Constr. Manage. Econ., 17(6), 777–787.
Rybkowski, Z., Zhou, X., Lavy, S., and Fernandez-Solis, J. (2012). “Investigation into the nature of productivity gains observed during the airplane game lean simulation.” Lean Constr. J., 78–90.
Sacks, R., Esquenazi, A., and Golin, M. (2007). “LEAPCON: Simulation of lean construction of high-rise apartment buildings.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 529–539.
Sacks, R., and Partouche, R. (2010). “Empire State Building project: Archetype of ‘mass construction’.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 702–710.
Salvador, F., De Holan, P. M., and Piller, F. (2009). “Cracking the code of cracking the code of mass customization.” MIT Sloan Manage. Rev., 50(3), 71–78.
Selladurai, R. S. S. (2004). “Mass customization in operations management: Oxymoron or reality?” Omega, 32(4), 295–300.
Tangen, S. (2005). “Demystifying productivity and performance.” Int. J. Productivity Perform. Manage., 54(1), 34–46.
Tommelein, I. D., Riley, D. R., and Howell, G. A. (1999). “Parade game: Impact of work flow variability on trade performance.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 304–310.
Tseng, J., and Jiao, M. M. (1996). “Design for mass customization.” Ann. ClRP, 45(1), 153–156.
Ulrich, K. (1995). “The role of product architecture in the manufacturing firm.” Res. Policy, 24(3), 419–440.
Verma, A. K. (2003). “Simulation tools and training programs in lean manufacturing: Current status.”, National Ship-building Research Program, Advanced Shipbuilding Enterprise, Summerville, SC.
Villego. (2016). “Villego: Last Planner simulation.” ⟨http://www.villego.com/⟩ (Jan. 19, 2016).
Visionary Products. (2016). “Lean zone production methodologies: The airplane game.” ⟨http://www.visionaryproducts.biz/Home/Products/LZPM/tabid/61/Default.aspx⟩ (Jan. 23, 2016).
Von Hippel, E. (2001). “PERSPECTIVE: User toolkits for innovation.” J. Prod. Innovation Manage., 18(4), 247–257.
Warcup, R., and Reeve, E. (2014). “Using the Villego simulation to teach the Last Planner system.” Lean Constr. J., 1–15.
Womack, J. P., Jones, D. T., and Roos, D. (1990). The machine that changed the world, Rawson Associates, New York.
Yang, B., and Burns, N. (2003). “Implications of postponement for the supply chain.” Int. J. Prod. Res., 41(9), 2075–2090.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice
Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice
Volume 144Issue 1January 2018

History

Received: Mar 30, 2015
Accepted: May 11, 2017
Published online: Sep 13, 2017
Published in print: Jan 1, 2018
Discussion open until: Feb 13, 2018

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Cecília Gravina da Rocha [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Federal Univ. of Rio Grande do Sul, 99 Osvaldo Aranha Ave., 3rd Floor, CEP 90035-190, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Luciana I. Gomes Miron [email protected]
Associate Professor, Dept. of Architecture, Federal Univ. of Rio Grande do Sul, 320 Sarmento Leite Ave., 4th Floor, CEP 90050-170, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share