Case Studies
Sep 22, 2016

Environmental, Economic, and Social Parameters in International Green Building Rating Tools

Publication: Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice
Volume 143, Issue 2

Abstract

The concept of sustainability is regarded to be threefold: environmental, economic, and social. This is usually identified as the triple bottom line of sustainability and is often represented by three intertwined circles. Therefore, for a construction to be sustainable, it should be environmentally, economically, and socially sustainable. However, the extent to which green building rating tools evaluate the three pillars of sustainability is questionable. This research aims to analyze the effectiveness of eight international green building rating tools in evaluating environmental, economic, and social sustainability in buildings. The credit points of each rating tool was initially categorized based on the related category of sustainability and a comparison analysis was carried out based on a normalized score. Finally, the comparison result is presented with a radar diagram. Further, three case study buildings were also analyzed based on the credit points achieved. Accordingly, environmental sustainability is widely considered in green building rating tools while economic sustainability is rarely evaluated. Further, social sustainability is evaluated in all the green building rating tools, which would approximately amount to 20% of the credit points allocated by each rating tool.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to acknowledge the financial support from the Australian Research Council (ARC), Australian Government (No. DP150101015).

References

Abidin, N. Z. (2010). “Investigating the awareness and application of sustainable construction concept by Malaysian developers.” Habitat Int., 34(4), 421–426.
Ahankoob, A., Morshedi, R., and Rad, K. G. (2013). “A comprehensive comparison between LEED and BCA green mark as green building assessment tool.” Int. J. Eng. Sci., 2(7), 31–38.
Asdrubali, F., Baldinelli, G., Bianchi, F., and Sambuco, S. (2015). “A comparison between environmental sustainability rating systems LEED and ITACA for residential buildings.” Build. Environ., 86, 98–108.
Balkema, A. J., Preisig, H. A., Otterpohl, R., and Lambert, F. J. (2002). “Indicators for the sustainability assessment of wastewater treatment systems.” Urban Water, 4(2), 153–161.
Baloi, D. (2003). “Sustainable construction: Challenges and opportunities.” 19th Annual ARCOM Conf., D. J. Greenwood, ed., Vol. 1, Association of Researchers in Construction Management, 289–297.
Brundtland, G. H. (1987). “Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our common future.” Oxford University Press, Oxford, U.K.
Carew, A., and Mitchell, C. (2008). “Teaching sustainability as a contested concept: Capitalizing on variation in engineering educators’ conceptions of environmental, social and economic sustainability.” J. Cleaner Prod., 16(1), 105–115.
Cassidy, R., Wright, G., and Flynn, L. (2003). White paper on sustainability: A report of the green building movement. Building design and construction, Reed Business Information, Clearwater, FL.
Chan, E. H. W., Qian, Q. K., and Lam, P. T. I. (2009). “The market for green building in developed Asian cities—The perspectives of building designers.” Energy Policy, 37(8), 3061–3070.
Curran, M. A. (2009). “Wrapping our brains around sustainability.” Sustainability, 1(1), 5–13.
Ding, G. K. C. (2008). “Sustainable construction—The role of environmental assessment tools.” J. Environ. Manage., 86(3), 451–464.
Dobrovolskienė, N., and Tamošiūnienė, R. (2015). “An index to measure sustainability of a business project in the construction industry: Lithuanian case.” Sustainability, 8(1), 1–14.
Dovers, S. R., and Handmer, J. W. (1992). “Uncertainty, sustainability and change.” Global Environ. Change, 2(4), 262–276.
Eichholtz, P., Kok, N., and Quigley, J. M. (2010). “Doing well by doing good? Green office buildings.” Am. Econ. Rev., 100(5), 2492–2509.
Elkington, J. (1994). “Towards the sustainable corporation: Win-win-win business strategies for sustainable development.” California Manage. Rev., 36(2), 90–100.
Fenner, R. A., and Ryce, T. (2008). “A comparative analysis of two building rating systems. Part 1: Evaluation.” Eng. Sustainability, 161(1), 55–63.
Forsberg, A., and Von Malmborg, F. (2004). “Tools for environmental assessment of the built environment.” Build. Environ., 39(2), 223–228.
Fowler, K. M., and Rauch, E. M. (2006). “Sustainable building rating systems summary.” Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL), Richland, WA.
Foxon, T. J., et al. (2002). “Sustainability criteria for decision support in the UK water industry.” J. Environ. Plann. Manage., 45(2), 285–301.
Giddings, B., Hopwood, B., and O’Brien, G. (2002). “Environment, economy and society: Fitting them together into sustainable development.” Sustainable Dev., 10(4), 187–196.
Gladwin, T. N., Kennelly, J. J., and Krause, T.-S. (1995). “Shifting paradigms for sustainable development: Implications for management theory and research.” Acad. Manage. Rev., 20(4), 874–907.
Global Reporting Initiative. (2011). “Sustainability reporting guidelines.” Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Goodland, R. (1995). “The concept of environmental sustainability.” Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 26(1), 1–24.
Gowri, K. (2004). “Green building rating systems: An overview.” ASHRAE J., 46, 56–60.
Green Building Council Australia. (2015). “Green star project directory.” 〈http://www.gbca.org.au/project-directory.asp〉 (Jul. 25, 2015).
Grierson, D. (2009). “Towards a sustainable built environment.” CIC Start Online Innovation Rev., 1(1), 70–77.
Hara, M., Nagao, T., Hannoe, S., and Nakamura, J. (2016). “New key performance indicators for a smart sustainable city.” Sustainability, 8(3), 206.
Institute for Building Environment and Energy Conservation. (2014). “CASBEE for building new construction.” Tokyo.
Kats, G., Alevantis, L., Berman, A., Mills, E., and Perlman, J. (2003). “The costs and financial benefits of green buildings.” California’s Sustainable Building Task Force, Sacramento, CA.
Kuhlman, T., and Farrington, J. (2010). “What is sustainability?” Sustainability, 2(11), 3436–3448.
Markelj, J., Kitek Kuzman, M., Grošelj, P., and Zbašnik-Senegačnik, M. (2014). “A simplified method for evaluating building sustainability in the early design phase for architects.” Sustainability, 6(12), 8775–8795.
Munasinghe, M. (2004). “Sustainomics: A Trans-disciplinary framework for making development more sustainable.” International Society for Ecological Economics, Colombo, Sri Lanka.
Nevado-Peña, D., López-Ruiz, V.-R., and Alfaro-Navarro, J.-L. (2015). “The effects of environmental and social dimensions of sustainability in response to the economic crisis of European cities.” Sustainability, 7(7), 8255–8269.
Ortiz, O., Castells, F., and Sonnemann, G. (2009). “Sustainability in the construction industry: A review of recent developments based on LCA.” Constr. Build. Mater., 23(1), 28–39.
Palmer, J., Cooper, I., and Van Der Vorst, R. (1997). “Mapping out fuzzy buzzwords-who sits where on sustainability and sustainable development.” Sustainable Dev., 5(2), 87–93.
Papajohn, D., Brinker, C., and Asmar, M. E. (2016). “Uncovering key criteria to assess sustainability rating systems for the built environment.” Construction Research Congress 2016: Old and New Construction Technologies Converge in Historic San Juan, ASCE, Reston, VA, 1303–1312.
Parkin, S. (2000). “Sustainable development: The concept and the practical challenge.” Proc., Institution of Civil Engineers—Civil Engineering, Thomas Telford, London.
Pawłowski, A. (2008). “How many dimensions does sustainable development have?” Sustainable Dev., 16(2), 81–90.
Pearce, A. R. (2008). “Sustainable capital projects: Leapfrogging the first cost barrier.” Civ. Eng. Environ. Syst., 25(4), 291–300.
Ross, A. (2009). “Modern interpretations of sustainable development.” J. Law Soc., 36(1), 32–54.
Said, H., and Berger, L. (2013). “Future trends of sustainability design and analysis in construction industry and academia.” Pract. Period. Struct. Des. Constr., 77–88.
Sartori, S., Latrônico, F., and Campos, L. (2014). “Sustainability and sustainable development: A taxonomy in the field of literature.” Ambiente Soc., 17(1), 01–22.
Siew, R. Y. J., Balatbat, M. C. A., and Carmichael, D. G. (2013). “A review of building/infrastructure sustainability reporting tools (SRTs).” Smart Sustainable Built Environ., 2(2), 106–139.
Solow, R. M. (1992). An almost practical step toward sustainability, Resources for the Future, Washington, DC.
Suzer, O. (2015). “A comparative review of environmental concern prioritization: LEED vs other major certification systems.” J. Environ. Manage., 154, 266–283.
Svensson, G., and Wagner, B. (2015). “Implementing and managing economic, social and environmental efforts of business sustainability: Propositions for measurement and structural models.” Manage. Environ. Qual., 26(2), 195–213.
Todd, J. A., Crawley, D., Geissler, S., and Lindsey, G. (2001). “Comparative assessment of environmental performance tools and the role of the green building challenge.” Build. Res. Inf., 29(5), 324–335.
United Nations Commission on Sustainable Development. (2001). “Indicators of sustainable development; Guidelines and methodologies.” New York.
U.S. Green Building Council. (2015). “LEED.” 〈http://www.usgbc.org/projects〉 (Aug. 1, 2015).
U.S. Green Building Council. (2016). “LEED projects.” 〈http://www.usgbc.org/projects/new-construction〉 (Jul. 9, 2016).
Vanegas, J. A., Dubose, J. R., and Pearce, A. R. (1996). “Sustainable technologies for the building construction industry.” Proc., Symp.on Design for the Global Environment, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta.
Vos, R. O. (2007). “Defining sustainability: A conceptual orientation.” J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol., 82(4), 334–339.
Welsford, J., See, Y. H., and Erkki, N. J. (2014). “Sustainability India in global context.” J. Indian Pulp Paper Tech. Assoc., 26(1), 47–52.
World Green Building Council. (2015). “About World GBC.” 〈http://www.worldgbc.org/worldgbc/become-member/members/〉 (Jul. 23, 2015).
Young, J. W. (1997). “A framework for the ultimate environmental index-putting atmospheric change into context with sustainability.” Environ. Monit. Assess., 46(1), 135–149.
Zhang, J. W. (2014). “Cost, efficiency and hygiene three reflections on green building.” Appl. Mech. Mater., 587–589, 203–207.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice
Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice
Volume 143Issue 2April 2017

History

Received: Apr 17, 2016
Accepted: Aug 16, 2016
Published online: Sep 22, 2016
Discussion open until: Feb 22, 2017
Published in print: Apr 1, 2017

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

I. M. Chethana S. Illankoon
Ph.D. Student, School of Computing Engineering and Mathematics, Western Sydney Univ., Locked Bag 1797, Penrith, NSW 2751, Australia.
Vivian W. Y. Tam, Ph.D. [email protected]
Associate Professor, School of Computing Engineering and Mathematics, Western Sydney Univ., Locked Bag 1797, Penrith, NSW 2751, Australia; Adjunct Professor, College of Civil Engineering, Shenzhen Univ., Shenzhen 518060, China (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Khoa N. Le, Ph.D.
Senior Lecturer, School of Computing Engineering and Mathematics, Western Sydney Univ., Locked Bag 1797, Penrith, NSW 2751, Australia.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share