Case Studies
Jan 11, 2016

Assessment of Students’ Preconceptions in an Introductory Transportation Engineering Course: Case Study at Virginia Tech

Publication: Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice
Volume 142, Issue 3

Abstract

Introductory transportation engineering (TE) courses are crucial for developing students’ interest in TE and for creating a professional knowledge foundation. However, effective learning requires certain conditions. Students’ preconceptions are instrumental to the learning process, and ignoring preconceptions can result in the creation of knowledge gaps and negative effects on learning. The previous research did not focus on students’ preconceptions in the introductory TE courses. Consequently, the purpose of this case study was the assessment of students’ preconceptions in the introductory TE course at Virginia Tech. The research methodology was based on a precourse survey and concept maps, including the development of a transferable coding method. Qualitative data were used to assess how students integrate, organize, and relate concepts using their previous knowledge. Results indicate that variation of students’ preconceptions exists based on their major and year, along with specific positive, negative, or incomplete concepts. Additionally, the analysis indicates an increase in concept consistency and convergence in concepts based on students’ previous knowledge. Conclusively, awareness of students’ preconceptions is necessary for developing new approaches that could improve the learning environment.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors are extremely grateful to the four reviewers for their review and insight, which has significantly improved the paper.

References

ABET (Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology). (2012). “Criteria for accrediting engineering programs—Effective for reviews during the 2013-2014 accreditation cycle.” Baltimore.
Agrawal, A. W., and Dill, J. (2008). “To be a transportation engineer or not?: How civil engineering students choose a specialization.” Transp. Res. Rec., 2046(1), 76–84.
Angelo, T., and Cross, P. (1993). “Teaching goals inventory.” 〈http://fm.iowa.uiowa.edu/fmi/xsl/tgi/data_entry.xsl?-db=tgi_data&-lay=Layout01&-view〉 (Jan. 15, 2013).
APTA (American Public Transportation Association). (2012). “Creating sustainable human capital investment.” 〈〉.
ASCE. (2008). “Civil engineering body of knowledge for the 21st century: Preparing the civil engineer for the future.” Reston, VA.
Bartels, B. H. (1995). “Promoting mathematics connections with concept mapping.” Math. Teach. Middle School, 1(7), 542–549.
Bertini, R. L., Monsere, C. M., Byrd, A., Rose, M., and El-Seoud, T. A. (2005). “Using custom transportation data collection software with handheld computers for education, research, and practice.” Transp. Res. Rec., 1924(1), 37–45.
Besterfield-Sacre, M., Gerchak, J., Lyons, M. R., Shuman, L. J., and Wolfe, H. (2004). “Scoring concept maps: An integrated rubric for assessing engineering education.” J. Eng. Educ., 93(2), 105–115.
Brown, J. S. (1989). “Situated cognition and the culture of learning.” Educ. Res., 18(1), 32–42.
Brown, S., Nicholas, C., and Kyte, M. (2013). “Evaluating the effectiveness of dynamic traffic animations: Case study in transportation engineering education.” J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract., 196–205.
Carnegie Mellon University. (2015). “Grading and performance rubrics.” 〈https://www.cmu.edu/teaching/designteach/teach/rubrics.html〉 (May 14, 2015).
Chen, W., and Levinson, D. M. (2006). “Effectiveness of learning transportation network growth through simulation.” J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract., 29–41.
Cooley, H., Brown, S., and Abdel-Rahim, A. (2012). “Incorporating traffic observation into transportation engineering education: Potential effect on conceptual change.” Proc., 91st Annual Meeting of Transportation Research Board, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
Corotis, R. B., and Scanlan, R. H. (1989). “Future of civil engineering profession and role of education.” J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract., 117–124.
Crain, W. C. (2005). Theories of development: Concepts and applications, Routledge, New York.
Davis, S., Brown, S., Dixon, M., Borden, R., and Montfort, D. (2013). “Embedded knowledge in transportation engineering: Comparisons between engineers and instructors.” J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract., 51–58.
Eck, R. W. (1990). “Developing a civil engineer for the 21st century.” J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract., 156–163.
Handy, S. L., Weston, L., Song, J., Lane, K. M. D., and Terry, J. (2002). “The education of transportation planning professionals.”, Univ. of California, Davis, CA.
Huang, A., and Levinson, D. (2012). “To game or not to game: Teaching transportation planning with board games.” Proc., 91st Annual Meeting of Transportation Research Board, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
Hurwitz, D. S., et al. (2014). “Influence of collaborative curriculum design on educational beliefs, communities of practitioners, and classroom practice in transportation engineering education.” J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract., 04013020.
ITE (Institute of Transportation Engineers). (2009). Traffic engineering handbook, Washington, DC.
Ivey, S. S., Golias, M. M., Palazolo, P., Edwards, S., and Thomas, P. (2012). “Attracting students to transportation engineering.” Transp. Res. Rec., 2320(1), 90–96.
Jarvis, P. (2006). Towards a comprehensive theory of human learning, Routledge, London.
Jewers, S., et al. (2010). “Education for sustainable development and civil engineering for children: Interactive model case study.” J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract., 165–174.
Khisty, C. (1996). “Education and training of transportation engineers and planners vis-à-vis public involvement.” Transp. Res. Rec., 1552(1), 171–176.
Kyte, M., Abdel-Rahim, A., and Lines, M. (2003). “Traffic signal operations education through hands-on experience: Lessons learned from a workshop prototype.” Transp. Res. Rec., 1848(1), 50–56.
Laferrière, D. (1977). “What is semiotics?” Semiotic Scene, 1(1), 2–4.
Lave, J., and Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Liao, C.-F., and Levinson, D. M. (2013). “ROAD: Interactive geometric design tool for transportation education and training.” J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract., 116–122.
Liao, C.-F., Liu, H. X., and Levinson, D. M. (2009). “Simulating transportation for realistic engineering education and training.” Transp. Res. Rec., 2109(1), 12–21.
Liao, C.-F., Morris, T., and Donath, M. (2006). “Development of internet-based traffic simulation framework for transportation education and training.” Transp. Res. Rec., 1956(1), 184–192.
Lorion, A., Harvey, M., and Chow, J. (2014). “Redesign of curricula in transit systems planning to meet data-driven challenges.” J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract., 05014007.
Male, S. A., and Baillie, C. A. (2011). Engineering threshold concepts, Proc., SEFI Annual Conf., Lisbon, Portugal.
Meyer, J., and Land, R. (2003). “Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge (1): Linkages to ways of thinking and practising within the disciplines.” Improving student learning theory and practice, Oxford Brookes Univ., Oxford, U.K., 412–424.
Mintz, K., Talesnick, M., Amadei, B., and Tal, T. (2014). “Integrating sustainable development into a service-learning engineering course.” J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract., 05013001.
Mladenovic, M., Mangaroska, K., and Abbas, M. (2014). “Assessment of students’ preconceptions in the introductory transportation engineering course.” Proc., 93 Annual Meeting of Transportation Research Board, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
Murphy, M. L. (2003). Semantic relations and the lexicon: Antonymy, synonymy and other paradigms, Cambridge University Press, New York.
National Academy Press. (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school, Washington, DC.
Norman, M. (2010). “Training leaders to build tomorrow’s transportation workforce.” Proc., 16th IRF World Meeting, Lisbon, Portugal.
Novak, J. (1990). “Concept maps and vee diagrams: Two metacognitive tools to facilitate meaningful learning.” Instruct. Sci., 19(1), 29–52.
Novak, J., and Gowin, D. (1984). Learning how to learn, Cambridge University Press, New York.
Novak, J. D., and Cañas, A. J. (2008). The theory underlying concept maps and how to construct and use them, Florida Institute for Human and Machine Cognition, Pensacola, FL.
NVivo [Computer software]. QSR International, Doncaster, VIC, Australia.
Pellegrino, J. W., Chudowsky, N., and Glaser, R. (2001). Knowing what students know: The science and design of educational assessment, National Academies Press, Washington, DC.
Perkins, D. (1999). “The many faces of constructivism.” Educ. Leadersh., 57(3), 6–11.
Pitera, K., and Goodchild, A. (2014). “Changing university student perceptions of freight transportation.” J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract., 04013009.
Popescu, M. (2010). “Defining semantic relations in the domain of traffic engineering: Urban transport.” Proc., 3rd WSEAS Int. Conf. on Urban Planning and Transportation, Corfu, Greece.
Prado da Silva, C., Fontenele, H., and Rodrigues da Silva, A. (2014). “Transportation engineering education for undergraduate students: Competencies, skills, teaching-learning, and evaluation.” J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract., 05014006.
Robbins, P., and Aydede, M. (2009). The Cambridge handbook of situated cognition, Cambridge University Press, New York.
Rodrigues Da Silva, A. N., Kuri, N. P., and Casale, A. (2012). “PBL and B-learning for civil engineering students in a transportation course.” J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract., 305–313.
Rose, G. (2011). “Assessable online discussions to support postgraduate student learning in transport planning.” Transp. Res. Rec., 2211, 36–43.
Russell, J. S., and Stouffer, W. B. (2005). “Survey of the national civil engineering curriculum.” J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract., 118–128.
Sinha, K. C., et al. (2002). “Development of transportation engineering research, education, and practice in a changing civil engineering world.” J. Transp. Eng., 301–313.
Transportation Research Board. (2003). “The workforce challenge—Recruiting, training, and retaining qualified workers for transportation and transit agencies.”, Washington, DC.
Turochy, R. E. (2006). “Determining the content of the first course in transportation engineering.” J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract., 200–203.
Turochy, R. E., et al. (2013). “Assessment of introductory transportation engineering course and general transportation engineering curriculum.” Transp. Res. Rec., 2328, 9–15.
Turochy, R. E. (2013). “Structuring the content of the first course in transportation engineering: Perspectives of engineers and educators.” J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract., 206–210.
USDOT (U.S. Department of Transportation). (2015). “National transportation workforce development.” 〈http://www.rita.dot.gov/ntwd〉 (May 15, 2015).
Vekiri, I. (2002). “What is the value of graphical displays in learning?” Educ. Psychol. Rev., 14(3), 261–312.
Wolch, T. E. (2011). “The state of traffic engineering.” J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract., 208–210.
Yean Yng Ling, F., Khai Ng, P., and Leung, M.-Y. (2011). “Predicting the academic performance of construction engineering students by teaching and learning approaches: Case study.” J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract., 277–284.
Zheng, W., Shih, H.-R., Lozano, K., and Mo, Y.-L. (2011). “Impact of nanotechnology on future civil engineering practice and its reflection in current civil engineering education.” J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract., 162–173.
Zhu, S., Xie, F., and Levinson, D. (2011). “Enhancing transportation education through online simulation using an agent-based demand and assignment model.” J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract., 38–45.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice
Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice
Volume 142Issue 3July 2016

History

Received: Jan 13, 2015
Accepted: Oct 9, 2015
Published online: Jan 11, 2016
Discussion open until: Jun 11, 2016
Published in print: Jul 1, 2016

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Milos N. Mladenovic, Ph.D. [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Aalto Univ., Rakentajanaukio 4A, 02150 Espoo, Finland (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Katerina Mangaroska
Independent Consultant, Otakallio 4, 02150 Espoo, Finland.
Montasir M. Abbas, Ph.D.
P.E.
Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State Univ., 301-A, Patton Hall, Blacksburg, VA 24061.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share