Abstract
In the past several decades, women have entered the engineering profession in larger numbers across the United States. Concurrently, a larger percentage of women have entered engineering academia, although they are still greatly outnumbered by male faculty. Although the numbers and progress of women in engineering academia are the subject of ongoing study, there was a lack of detailed analysis specifically of woman civil engineering faculty. One of the objectives of this study was to examine the perceptions of job satisfaction by woman civil engineering faculty relating to issues specific to academia to assess whether perceptions vary across the different academic ranks. Data were collected by designing a survey and distributing it to all woman civil engineering faculty from universities with ABET accredited civil engineering programs within the United States. The data collected included demographic variables, and perceptions of job satisfaction, available mentoring, academic climate, and sense of inclusion in an environment still largely led by male faculty. It was found that approximately 14.6% of the faculty in civil engineering departments surveyed were woman. This paper presents analysis of women faculty perceptions of the academic environment, support, and overall job satisfaction. Understanding these facets of job satisfaction is necessary to ensure that women in engineering academia have the proper tools, working conditions, and effective mentoring to successfully achieve promotion and tenure. Having more women successfully pursue careers in engineering academia provides additional role models for women engineering students and a clear example that engineering can be a rewarding career for them.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
Agresti, A. (2002). Categorical data analysis, 2nd Ed., Wiley, Hoboken, NJ.
Allen, I. E., and Seaman, C. A. (2007). “Likert scales and data analyses.” Qual. Prog., 40(7), 64–65.
ASEE (American Society for Engineering Education). (2011). “Profiles of engineering & engineering technology colleges 2010.” Washington, DC.
ASEE (American Society for Engineering Education). (2013). “Profiles of engineering & engineering technology colleges 2012.” Washington, DC.
Corbett, C., and Hill, C. (2012). Graduating to a pay gap the earnings of women and men one year after college graduation, American Association of Univ. Women, Washington, DC.
Dey, J. G., and Hill, C. (2007). Beyond the pay gap, American Association of Univ. Women Educational Foundation, Washington, DC.
Fouad, N. A., and Singh, R. (2011). “Stemming the tide: Why women leave engineering.” Women’s persistence in engineering careers: Contextual barriers/supports, National Science Foundation, Univ. of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, WI, 1–64.
Greenberg, J. (1987). “A taxonomy of organizational justice theories.” Acad. Manage. Rev., 16(2), 399–432.
Gruneberg, M. M. (1979). Understanding job satisfaction, Wiley, New York.
Heilman, M. E., and Okimoto, T. G. (2007). “Why are women penalized for success at male tasks? The implied communality deficit.” J. Appl. Psychol., 92(1), 81–92.
Heilman, M. E., Wallen, A. S., Fuchs, D., and Tamkins, M. M. (2004). “Penalties for success: Reaction to women who succeed in male gender-typed tasks.” J. Appl. Psychol., 89(3), 416–427.
Hill, C., Corbett, C., and St. Rose, A. (2010). Why so few? Women in technology, engineering, and mathematics, American Association of Univ. Women, Washington, DC.
Isaksen, S. G., and Ekvall, G. (2007). Assessing the context for change: A technical manual for the situational outlook questionnaire, The Creative Problem Solving Group, Orchard Park, NY.
Judge, T. A., Thoresen, C. J., Bono, J. E., and Patton, G. K. (2001). “The job satisfaction-job performance relationship: A qualitative and quantitative review.” Psychol. Bull., 127(3), 376–407.
Leonard, K., and Nicholls, G. (2013). “History and status of female faculty in civil engineering.” J. Proj. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract., 218–225.
Likert, R. (1932). A technique for the measurement of attitudes, Science Press, New York.
Lopez, E. M. (1982). “A test of the self-consistency theory of the job performance—Job satisfaction relationship.” Acad. Manage. J., 25(2), 335–348.
Mamiseishvili, K., and Rosser, V. J. (2011). “Examining the relationship between faculty productivity and job satisfaction.” J. Professoriate, 5(2), 100–132.
Mason, M. (2013). “The baby penalty.” The chronicle of higher education, 〈http://chronicle.com/article/The-Baby-Penalty/140813/〉 (Jun. 20, 2014).
MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology). (1999). “A study on the status of women faculty in science at MIT.” MIT Faculty Newsletter, 11(4), 21–27.
Mobley, W. H. (1977). “Intermediate linkages in the relationship between job satisfaction and employee turnover.” J. Appl. Psychol., 62(2), 237–240.
NRC (National Research Council). (2001). “Female engineering faculty at U.S. institutions: A data profile, Committee on women in science and engineering.” National Academy Press, Washington, DC.
NSF (National Science Foundation). (2003). “Gender differences in the careers of academic scientists and engineers: A literature review.”, Div. of Science Resources Statistics, Arlington, VA.
NWLC (National Women’s Law Center). (2014). 〈http://www.nwlc.org/resource/lilly-ledbetter-fair-pay-act-0〉 (Jun. 1, 2014).
Opare, P. B. (2013). Factors that female higher education faculty in select science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) fields perceive as being influential to their success and persistence in their chosen professions, Ph.D. thesis, Old Dominion Univ., Norfolk, VA.
Pearson, K. (1910). “On a new method of determining correlation, when one variable is given by alternative and the other by multiple categories.” Biometrika, 7(3), 248–257.
Rain, J. S., Lane, I. M., and Steiner, D. D. (1991). “A current look at the job satisfaction/life satisfaction relationship: Review and future considerations.” Human Relat., 44(3), 287–307.
Rode, J. C. (2004). “Job satisfaction and life satisfaction revisited: A longitudinal test of an integrated model.” Human Relat., 57(9), 1205–1230.
Smith, P. C., Kendall, L. M., and Hulin, C. L. (1969). The measurement of satisfaction in work and retirement, Rand McNally, Chicago.
SurveyMonkey. (2014). Portland, OR, 〈http://www.surveymonkey.com〉.
Tabibnia, G., Satpute, A. B., and Lieberman, M. D. (2008). “The sunny side of fairness: Preference for fairness activates reward circuitry (and disregarding unfairness activates self-control circuitry).” Psychol. Sci., 19(4), 339–347.
Thurstone, L. L. (1929). “Theory of attitude measurement.” Psychol. Rev., 36(3), 222–241.
Trower, C. A. (2012). Success on the tenure track: Five keys to faculty job satisfaction, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD.
Trower, C. A., and Chait, R. P. (2002). “Faculty diversity: Too little for too long.” Harv. Mag., 33–37.
University of Akron. (2014). “IDEAL project on hiring.” 〈http://www.uakron.edu/itl/IDEAL/ideal-at-ua.dot?com.dotmarketing.htmlpage.language=1&host_id=1〉 (Jun. 1, 2014).
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice
Volume 141 • Issue 3 • July 2015
Copyright
© 2014 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Feb 24, 2014
Accepted: Oct 16, 2014
Published online: Nov 24, 2014
Discussion open until: Apr 24, 2015
Published in print: Jul 1, 2015
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.