Technical Papers
Aug 18, 2014

Civil Engineering Faculty Incorporation of Sustainability in Courses and Relation to Sustainability Beliefs

Publication: Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice
Volume 141, Issue 2

Abstract

Professional practice within civil and environmental engineering demands that practitioners within the field have knowledge of sustainability. Engineering education has attempted to reflect this standard, as noted in statements of expected student outcomes from ABET. Yet, the degree of integration of sustainability in engineering education is varied and inconsistent across and within institutions of higher learning. In order to address this issue, this study investigates one of the potential barriers to integrating sustainability into undergraduate engineering classrooms: educators’ beliefs regarding sustainability. The two-fold relationship between civil engineering faculty beliefs about sustainability and actual practice of integrating and incorporating sustainability within their classrooms is investigated in this study. Using thematic analysis of semistructured interview data; we present three personas that emerged from the data set. These personas represent characteristics shared among participants’ statements of beliefs and practices in a detailed, descriptive manner. This enables shortening the distance between the study participants, our interpretations of the participants’ statements, and potential readers’ immediate use of these interpretations. The three personas that emerged from the data set revealed a complex relationship between what faculty members believed the field expects of students’ knowledge, the relative importance of sustainability within the curriculum, and their own personal beliefs regarding sustainability in everyday life. By providing insights into these complex relationships, this study fulfills a critical step in developing more effective ways to successfully integrate sustainability within undergraduate engineering classrooms.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

ABET. (2011). “Criteria for accrediting engineering programs.” Baltimore, MD, 〈http://www.abet.org/DisplayTemplates/DocsHandbook.aspx?id=3143〉.
Aurandt, J. L., and Butler, E. C. (2011). “Sustainability education: Approaches for incorporating sustainability into the undergraduate curriculum.” J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract., 102–106.
Basturkmen, H. (2012). “Review of research into the correspondence between language teachers’ stated beliefs and practices.” System, 40(2), 282–295.
Beheiry, S. M., Abu-Lebdeh, G., Murtula, M., and Al-Tamimi, A. K. (2012). “Integrating sustainability education in a classical civil engineering program: The case of transportation and construction courses.” Adv. Mater. Res., 347–352, 2921–2932.
Bielefeldt, A. R. (2011). “Incorporating a sustainability module into first-year courses for civil and environmental engineering students.” J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract., 78–85.
Borrego, M., Froyd, J. E., and Hall, T. S. (2010). “Diffusion of engineering education innovations: A survey of awareness and adoption rates in US engineering departments.” J. Eng. Educ., 99(3), 185–207.
Bramald, T., and Wilkinson, S. (2009). “Introducing and stimulating sustainable engineering in first year civil engineering students.” Proc., ASEE Annual Conf. and Exposition, American Society for Engineering Education, Washington, DC.
Bruque, S., Moyano, J., and Eisenberg, J. (2008). “Individual adaptation to IT-induced change: The role of social networks.” J. Manage. Inf. Syst., 25(3), 177–206.
Chang, Y., Lim, Y., and Stolterman, E. (2008). “Personas: From theory to practices.” Proc., 5th Nordic Conf. on Human-Computer Interaction: Building Bridges, ACM, New York, NY, 439–442.
Chau, K. W. (2007). “Incorporation of sustainability concepts into a civil engineering curriculum.” J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract., 188–191.
Colby, A., and Sullivan, W. (2008). “Ethics teaching in undergraduate engineering education.” J. Eng. Educ., 97(3), 327–338.
Cooper, A. (2004). The inmates are running the asylum, Vol. 1, Sams, IN.
Creswell, J. W. (2013). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches, 4th Ed., Sage Publications, Los Angeles.
Diker, A., Walters, L. M., Cunningham-Sabo, L., and Baker, S. S. (2011). “Factors influencing adoption and implementation of cooking with kids: An experiential school-based nutrition education curriculum.” J. Extension, 49(1), 1–13.
Ertmer, P. A. (2005). “Teacher pedagogical beliefs: The final frontier in our quest for technology integration?” Educ. Technol. Res. Dev., 53(4), 25–39.
Fenner, R. A., Ainger, C. M., Cruickshank, H. J., and Guthrie, P. M. (2005). “Embedding sustainable development at Cambridge University engineering department.” Int. J. Sustainab. Higher Educ., 6(3), 229–241.
Godfrey, E., and Lesley, P. (2010). “Mapping the cultural landscape in engineering education.” J. Eng. Educ., 99(1), 5–22.
Hall, G. E., and Hord, S. M. (2005). “Implementing change: Patterns, principles.” Implementing change: Patterns, principles, and potholes, Allyn & Bacon, Boston, 2–17.
Haselbach, L. (2010). The engineering guide to LEED—New construction: Sustainable construction for engineers (GreenSource), McGraw-Hill, New York.
Haws, D. R. (2001). “Ethics instruction in engineering education: A (mini) meta analysis.” J. Eng. Educ., 90(2), 223–229.
Henderson, C., Beach, A., and Finkelstein, N. (2011). “Facilitating change in undergraduate STEM instructional practices: An analytic review of the literature.” J. Res. Sci. Teach., 48(8), 952–984.
Henderson, C., Finkelstein, N., and Beach, A. (2010). “Beyond dissemination in college science teaching: An introduction to four core change strategies.” J. College Sci. Teach., 39(5), 18–25.
Huntzinger, D. N., Hutchins, M. J., Gierke, J. S., and Sutherland, J. W. (2007). “Enabling sustainable thinking in undergraduate engineering education.” Int. J. Eng. Educ., 23(2), 218–230.
Jowitt, P. W. (2004). “Sustainability and the formation of the civil engineer.” Proc. ICE Eng. Sustainability, 157(2), 79–88.
Kane, R., Sandretto, S., and Heath, C. (2002). “Telling half the story: A critical review of research on the teaching beliefs, and practices of university academics.” Rev. Educ. Res., 72(2), 177–228.
Kelly, W. E. (2008). “General education for civil engineers: Sustainable development.” J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract., 75–83.
Kevern, J. T. (2011). “Green building and sustainable infrastructure: Sustainability education for civil engineers.” J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract., 107–112.
Krathwohl, D. R. (2009). Methods of educational and social science research: The logic of methods, 3rd Ed., Waveland Press, Long Grove, IL.
Lozano, R. (2010). “Diffusion of sustainable development in universities’ curricula: An empirical example from Cardiff University.” J. Cleaner Prod., 18(7), 637–644.
Lucena, J., and Schneider, J. (2008). “Engineers, development, and engineering education: From national to sustainable community development.” Eur. J. Eng. Educ., 33(3), 247–257.
Miller, G. T., Jr., and Spoolman, S. E. (2012). Living in the environment, Brooks/Cole, Cengage Learning, Belmont, CA.
Montfort, D., Brown, S., and Pegg, J. (2012). “The adoption of a capstone assessment instrument.” J. Eng. Educ., 101(4), 657–678.
Moore, J. (2005). “Barriers and pathways to creating sustainability education programs: Policy, rhetoric, and reality.” Environ. Educ. Res., 11(5), 537–555.
Murphy, C. F., et al. (2009). “Sustainability in engineering education and research at U.S. universities.” Environ. Sci. Technol., 43(15), 5558–5564.
Nagel, R. L., Pappas, E. C., and Pierrakos, O. (2012). “On a vision to educating students in sustainability and design—The James Madison University School of Engineering approach.” Sustainability, 4(1), 72–91.
Nielsen, L. (2013). Personas—User focused design, Vol. 15, Springer, London.
Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative evaluation and research methods, 3rd Ed., Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.
Prawat, R. S. (1992). “Teachers’ beliefs about teaching and learning: A constructivist perspective.” Am. J. Educ., 100(3), 354–395.
Pruitt, J., and Adlin, T. (2010). The persona lifecycle: Keeping people in mind throughout product design, Morgan Kaufmann, Burlington, MA.
Richardson, V., Anders, P., Tidwell, D., and Lloyd, C. (1991). “The relationship between teachers’ beliefs and practices in reading comprehension instruction.” Am. Educ. Res. J., 28(3), 559–586.
Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations, 5th Ed., The Free Press, New York.
Sahin, I., and Thompson, A. (2006). “Using Rogers’ theory to interpret instructional computer use by COE faculty.” J. Res. Technol. Educ., 39(1), 81–104.
Seffah, A., Gulliksen, J., and Desmarais, M. C., eds. (2005). Human-centered software engineering: Integrating usability in the software development lifecycle, Vol. 8, Springer, Dordrecht, Netherlands.
Shuman, L. J., Besterfield-Sacre, M., and McGourty, J. (2005). “The ABET ‘Professional skills’—Can they be taught? Can they be assessed?” J. Eng. Educ., 94(1), 41–55.
Smerdon, E. T., and Russell, J. S. (2007). “Two comprehensive U.S. studies of engineering education reform.” Proc., Int. Conf. on Engineering Education, Coimbra, Portugal.
Sparks, G. M. (1988). “Teachers’ attitudes toward change and subsequent improvements in classroom teaching.” J. Educ. Psychol., 80(1), 111–117.
Stipek, D. J., Givvin, K. B., Salmon, J. M., and MacGyvers, V. L. (2001). “Teachers’ beliefs and practices related to mathematics instruction.” Teach. Teach. Educ., 17(2), 213–226.
Thompson, A. G. (1984). “The relationship of teachers’ conceptions of mathematics and mathematics teaching to instructional practice.” Educ. Stud. Math., 15(2), 105–127.
Vanderburg, W. H. (1999). “On the measurement and integration of sustainability in engineering education.” J. Eng. Educ., 88(2), 231–235.
Vest, C. M. (2008). “Context and challenge for twenty-first century engineering education.” J. Eng. Educ., 97(3), 235–236.
Watson, M. K., Lozano, R., Noyes, C., and Rodgers, M. (2013). “Assessing curricula contribution to sustainability more holistically: Experiences from the integration of curricula assessment and students’ perceptions at the Georgia Institute of Technology.” J. Cleaner Prod., 61, 106–116.
Wolcott, M., et al. (2011). “Model for faculty, student, and practitioner development in sustainability engineering through an integrated design experience.” J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract., 94–101.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice
Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice
Volume 141Issue 2April 2015

History

Received: Dec 31, 2013
Accepted: Jun 17, 2014
Published online: Aug 18, 2014
Discussion open until: Jan 18, 2015
Published in print: Apr 1, 2015

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Shane Brown, M.ASCE [email protected]
Associate Professor, School of Civil and Construction Engineering, Oregon State Univ., Corvallis, OR 97331 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Floraliza Bornasal [email protected]
Graduate Student, School of Civil and Construction Engineering, Oregon State Univ., Corvallis, OR 97331. E-mail: [email protected]
Sarah Brooks [email protected]
Research Assistant, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Washington State Univ., Pullman, WA 99164. E-mail: [email protected]
Julie P. Martin [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Engineering and Science Education, Clemson Univ., Clemson, SC 29634. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share