Interactive Learning through Gaming Simulation in an Integrated Land Use–Transportation Planning Course
Publication: Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice
Volume 140, Issue 1
Abstract
The paper describes the use of gaming simulation in the teaching of integrated land use–transportation planning as a part of an undergraduate civil engineering course. A key innovation of the UPTown game developed at the University of Pretoria, South Africa, is the way in which the actions of both public-sector planners and private-sector real estate developers are simulated by students. This allows students to explore the problems of conflicting objectives and to discover the value of cooperative planning in the land use and transportation development process. The paper describes the background to and rationale for an integrated planning course, and it explains the game and simulation aspects in detail. Assessment of student performance showed that the game significantly enhanced the achievement of learning outcomes. Students who faced more complex and open-ended tasks performed better, reaching higher levels of competence earlier on in the game. The paper should be of value to educators who wish to develop new approaches, such as gaming simulation, to respond to contemporary engineering students’ preferences for more active and social learning styles.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
Bonwell, C. C., and Eison, J. A. (1991). “Active learning: creating excitement in the classroom.” ERIC Digests, 1–4. 〈http://www.ericfacility.net/ericdigests/ed340272.html〉 (Jul. 15, 2011).
Brown, J. S., and Adler, R. P. (2008). “Minds on fire: Open education, the long tail, and learning 2.0.” Educause Rev., 43(1), 16–32.
Carpenter, J. M. (2006). “Effective teaching methods for large classes.” J. Family Cons. Sci. Educ., 24(2), 13–23.
Chen, W., and Levinson, D. (2006). “Effectiveness of learning transportation network growth through simulation.” J. Profl Issues Eng. Educ. Pract., 132(1), 29–41.
Cheng, W., and Warren, M. (2000). “Making a difference: Using peers to assess individual students’ contributions to a group project.” Teaching Higher Educ., 5(2), 243–255.
Cuthbert, A. R. (1985). “Architecture, society and space–the high density question re-examined.” Prog. Plann., 24(2), 71–160.
Duke, R. D. (2000). “A personal perspective on the evolution of gaming.” Simulat Gaming, 31(1), 79–85.
Feldt, A. G. (1972). CLUG: Community land use game. Player’s manual with selected readings,. The Free Press, New York.
Greyling, F. C., and Wentzel, A. (2007). “Humanising education through technology: Creating social presence in large classes.” S. Afr. J. Higher Educ., 21(4), 654–679.
Handy, S., Weston, L., Song, J., Maria, K., and Lane, D. (2002). “Education of transportation planning professionals.”, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 151–160.
Harrison, P. (2002). Towards integrated inter-governmental planning in South Africa: The IDP as a building block, Univ. of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg.
Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., and Smith, K. A. (1991). “Cooperative learning: Increasing college faculty instructional productivity.” ASHEERIC Rep. on higher education. George Washington Univ., Washington, DC.
Khisty, C. J. (1987). “Importance of planning education for civil engineers.” J. Urban Plann. Dev., 54–60.
Killen, R. (2000). Teaching strategies for outcomes based education, Juta and Co., Cape Town.
Krizek, K., and Levinson, D. (2005). “Teaching integrated land use–transportation planning: Topics, readings, and strategies.” J. Plann. Educ. Res., 24(3), 304–316.
Levinson, D. M., and Krizek, K. J. (2008). Planning for place and plexus: Metropolitan land use and transport. Routledge, New York.
Liao, C., Liu, H. X., and Levinson, D. (2009). “Simulating transportation for realistic engineering education and training: Engaging undergraduate students in transportation studies.”, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 12–21.
Light, R. (n.d.), “The college experience: A blueprint for success.” 〈http://athome.harvard.edu/programs/light/index.html〉 (Jul. 10, 2011).
Lyles, R. W. (1987). “Planning education: Let’s forget it for civil engineers.” J. Urban Plann. Dev., 61–66.
Muller, J. (1994). “Community development and decision-making.” Urban Forum, 5(1), 3–22.
Nirmalakhandan, N., Ricketts, C., McShannon, J., and Barrett, S. (2007). “Teaching tools to promote active learning: Case study.” J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract., 133(1), 31–37.
Republic of South Africa. (1999). The green paper on development and planning, Government of South Africa, Pretoria.
Starr, P. (1994). “Seductions of sim: Policy as a simulation game.” The Amer. Prospect, 17, 19–29.
Taylor, N. (1998). Urban planning theory since 1945,. Sage Publications, London.
Venter, C. J., Lamprecht, T. J., and Badenhorst, W. (2006). “Simulating land use development through a stochastic allocation procedure in Johannesburg, South Africa.”, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
Venter, C. J., and Mokonyama, M. (2009). “UPTRANS: An incremental transport model with feedback for quick-response strategy evaluation.” Proc. 28th Southern African Transp. Conf., Document Technologies, Pretoria, 〈http://hdl.handle.net/2263/10968〉 (Jan. 1, 2010).
Zhu, S., Xie, F., and Levinson, D. (2011). “Enhancing transportation education through online simulation using an agent-based demand and assignment model.” J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract., 137(1), 38–45.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2013 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Jun 15, 2012
Accepted: Jun 27, 2013
Published online: Jul 1, 2013
Published in print: Jan 1, 2014
Discussion open until: Mar 11, 2014
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.