Embedded Knowledge in Transportation Engineering: Comparisons between Engineers and Instructors
Publication: Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice
Volume 139, Issue 1
Abstract
Substantial research in a diversity of fields suggests that being successful in a skilled profession requires ways of thinking that are unique to the context of that profession and present in practitioners of that field. The purpose of this study is to characterize embedded knowledge of sight distance and stopping sight distance in instructors and engineers and similarly examine course materials. Individual interviews were conducted with 29 transportation engineers and 19 transportation instructors. Course notes from a selection of instructors and three commonly used textbooks were also analyzed. Although instructors and practitioners expressed similar content knowledge, there were significant differences in the context in which it was embedded. Engineering practitioners used and referred to software, manuals, and specific experiences, while instructors primarily spoke in a more abstract context or referred to textbooks. Also, engineers discussed methods of mitigating for the inability to meet minimum design criteria; this was not found in course notes or textbooks. This research strongly suggests that context-dependent embedded knowledge exists in transportation engineering and efforts are necessary to integrate this knowledge in the curriculum.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
The authors of this paper would like to thank the National Institute for Advanced Transportation Technology (NIATT) Grant DTRT07G0056, and the University of Idaho for their funding and support on this project.
References
AASHTO. (2004). A policy on geometric design of highways and streets, Washington, DC.
Andrews, B., Brown, S., and Montfort, D. (2010). “Student understanding of sight distance in geometric design: A beginning line of inquiry to characterize student understanding of transportation engineering.”, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
Bligh, J. (1995). “Problem based education in medicine: An introduction.” The Fellowship of Postgraduate Medicine, 71(836), 323–326.
Brown, J. S. (1989). “Situated cognition and the culture of learning.” Educ. Res., 18(1), 32–42.
Chaiklin, S., and Lave, J. (1996). Understanding practice: Perspectives on activity and context, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
Chi, M. T. H. (2009). “Active-constructive-interactive: A conceptual framework for differentiating learning activities.” Top. Cognitive Sci., 1(1), 73–105.
Ginsburg, H. (1997). Entering the child’s mind: The clinical interview in psychological research and practice, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
Greenspan, S. I. (2003). The clinical interview of the child, 3rd Ed., American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc., Washington, DC.
Guest, G., Bunce, A., and Johnson, L. (2006). “How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability.” Field Methods, 18(1), 59–82.
Hake, R. (1998). “Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses.” Am. J. Phys., 66(1), 64–74.
Hundhausen, C. (2008). “OSBLE.” 〈http://osble.eecs.wsu.edu〉 (Jul. 29, 2011).
Jones, S., and Tanner, H. (2002). “Teachers’ interpretations of effective whole-class interactive teaching in secondary mathmatics classrooms.” Edu. Stud., 28(3), 265–274.
Kyte, M., Dixon, M., Abdel-Rahim, A., and Brown, S. (2010). “Process for improving design of transportation curriculum materials with examples.”, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
Lave, J., and Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
Lincoln, Y. S., and Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry, SAGE Publications, Newberry Park, CA.
Maykut, P., and Morehouse, R. (1994). Beginning qualitative research: A philosophical and practical guide, Falmer Press, Washington, DC.
Miles, M. B., and Huberman, M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis, SAGE Publications Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA.
Montfort, D., Brown, S., and Pollock, D. (2009). “An investigation of students’ conceptual understanding in related sophomore to graduate-level engineering and mechanics courses.” J. Eng. Edu., 98(2), 111–129.
National Academy of Engineering. (2004). The engineer of 2020: Visions of engineering in the new century, The National Academies Press, Washington, DC.
Nvivo Version 9.1.106.0 [Computer software]. QSR International, Cambridge, MA, 〈http://www.qsrinternational.com/products_nvivo.aspx〉 (Jul. 28, 2011).
Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods, SAGE Publications Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA.
Pirtle, Z. (2010). “How the models of engineering tell the truth.” Philosophy and engineering: An emerging agenda (Philosophy of Engineering and Technology), van de Poel, I., and Goldberg, D., eds., Vol_2, Springer Science and Business Media, New York, 95–108.
Prince, M. J., Felder, R. M., and Brent, R. (2007). “Does faculty research improve undergraduate teaching? An analysis of existing and potential synergies.” J. Eng. Edu., 96(4), 283–294.
Robbins, P., and Aydede, M. (2009). The Cambridge handbook of situated cognition, Cambridge University Press, New York.
Savin-Baden, M. (2000). Problem based learning in higher education: Untold stories, SRHE and Open University Press, Buckingham, UK.
Sommers-Flanagan, J., and Sommers-Flanagan, R. (2009). Clinical interviewing, 4th Ed., Wiley, Hoboken, NJ.
Sternberg, R. J., and Horvath, J. A., eds. (1999). Tacit knowledge in professional practice: Researcher and practioner perspectives, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Mahwah, NJ.
Trowbridge, D. E., and McDermott, L. C. (1980). “Investigation of student understanding of the concept of velocity in one dimension.” Am. J. Phys., 48(12), 1020–1028.
Vincenti, W. (1990). What engineers know and how they know it: Analytical studies from aeronautical history, The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD.
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity, Cambridge University Press, New York.
Wenger, E. (2000). Communities of practice and social learning systems, Sage Publications, Ltd., Thousand Oaks, CA.
Wenger, E. (2002). Cultivating communities of practice: A guide to managing knowledge, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.
Wolcott, M. P., Brown, S., King, M., Ascher-Barnstone, D., Beyreuther, T., and Olsen, K. (2011). “A model for faculty, student, and practitioner development in sustainability engineering through an integrated design experience.” J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract., 137(2), 94–101.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice
Volume 139 • Issue 1 • January 2013
Pages: 51 - 58
Copyright
© 2013 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Nov 10, 2011
Accepted: Mar 5, 2012
Published online: Mar 7, 2012
Discussion open until: Aug 7, 2012
Published in print: Jan 1, 2013
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.