How Students Spend Their Time
Publication: Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice
Volume 138, Issue 3
Abstract
An analysis was performed of how students spend their time while pursuing a bachelor of science in civil engineering at Villanova University. The purpose of this study was to determine how many hours per week students spent both in and out of class and how the students spent their time when not in class or studying. Another purpose of this study was to provide a methodology for tracking how much time students spend on their course work that could be applied at other universities to monitor academic stress and rigor. Several data sources were used to gather data on how the students were spending their time: Higher Education Research Institute (HERI) surveys, end-of-semester course surveys, the recommended curriculum for each semester, and time logs. Overall, the data indicate that the amount of time students devote to their course work has fluctuated throughout the years. In six out of the eight semesters that students are in the program, they were found to study more often in 2011 than they did in 2004. The students were found to spend approximately 3–4 hours a week on their course work outside of class, or approximately 1–1.25 hours outside of class for every hour spent in-class. The only semester that showed consistent decline was the spring of senior year. This decrease is reflected in all three of the instruments used in the study: the nationwide HERI survey, which is administered senior year; the end-of-semester surveys; and the time logs. The time-log and HERI survey data indicate that students are spending a significant amount of time on leisure activities, as opposed to extracurricular activities or paid work. Curricular changes, which were made over the time period considered in this study, were reflected in the data—indicating that these methods can be used to monitor and assess academic rigor and make data-driven curricular decisions.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank the department chairman, Ronald Chadderton, Nurit Friedman and Kathy Nazar from the Office of Planning and Institutional Research, and Edward Glynn for providing the historic university bulletins.
References
ABET, Inc. (2011). “Find an accredited program.” 〈http://www.abet.org/AccredProgramSearch/AccreditationSearch.aspx〉 (Jun. 8, 2011).
Babcock, P. S., and Marks, M. (2010). “The falling time cost of college: Evidence from half a century of time use data.” NBER Working Paper 15954, 〈http://www.nber.org/papers/w15954〉 (Jun. 8, 2011).
Centra, J. (2003). “Will teachers receive higher student evaluations by giving higher grades and less course work?” Res. High. Educ.RHEDAT, 44(5), 495–518.
Chen, X., and Weko, T. (2009). “Stats in brief: Students who study science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) in post-secondary education.” U.S. Dept. of Education 2009–161, 〈http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2009/2009161.pdf〉 (Jun. 8, 2011).
Cohen, L., Manion, L., and Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education, Routledge, New York.
Cook, T., and Reichardt, C. (1986). Qualitative and quantitative methods in evaluation research, Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, CA.
Fridley, K. (2011). “Today’s BSCE: A survey of credit hour requirements.” ASEE Annual Con. Proc., American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE), Washington, DC.
Garmendia, M., Guisasola, J., Barragues, J. I., and Zuza, K. (2008). “Estimate of students’ workload and the impact of the evaluation system on students’ dedication to studying a subject in first-year engineering courses.” Eur. J. Eng. Educ.EJEED8, 33(4), 463–470.
Gross, S., Dinehart, D., Yost, J. R., and Radlinska, A. (2011). “Overarching problems in sophomore mechanics courses.” ASEE Annual Conf. Proc., American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE), Washington, DC.
Guillaume, D., and Simon Khacikian, C. (2011). “The effect of time-on-task on student grades and grade expectations.” Assess. Eval. High. Educ.AEHEED, 36(3), 251–261.
Higher Education Research Institute (HERI). (2011). “The precision of the normative data and their comparisons.” 〈http://www.heri.ucla.edu/PDFs/CIRP_Reliability_Validity.PDF〉 (Jun. 8, 2011).
Horn, L. (1996). Nontraditional undergraduates, trends in enrollment from 1986 to 1992 and persistence and attainment among 1989–90 beginning postsecondary students (NCES 97–578), U.S. Dept. of Education, U.S. Government Printing Office, NCES, Washington, DC.
Kolari, S., Savander-Ranne, C., and Viskari, E. L. (2006). “Do our engineering students spend enough time studying?” Eur. J. Eng. Educ.EJEED8, 31(5), 499–508.
Min, Y., Zhang, G., Long, R. A., Anderson, T. J., and Ohland, M. W. (2011). “Nonparametric survival analysis of the loss rate of undergraduate engineering students.” J. Eng. Educ.JEEDEQ, 100(2), 349–373.
National Center for Higher Education Management Systems (NCHEMS). (2011). “NCHEMS information center for higher education policy making and analysis.” 〈http://www.higheredinfo.org/〉 (Jun. 8, 2011).
Pascarella, E., and Terenzini (2005). How college affects students, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA.
Ramsden, P., and Entwistle, N. J. (1981). “Effects of academic departments on students’ approaches to studying.” Br. J. Educ. Psychol., 51(3), 368–383.
Ressler, S. J., and Lenox, T. A. (1996). “The time survey: A course development tool that works!” ASEE Annual Con. Proc., American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE), Washington, DC.
Russell, J. S., and Stouffer, W. B. (2005). “Survey of the national civil engineering curriculum.” J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract.JPEPE3, 131(2), 118–128.
U.S. News & World Report. (2011). “Best colleges 2012.” 〈http://colleges.usnews.rankingsandreviews.com/best-colleges〉 (Jun. 8, 2011).
Wadzuk, B., Dinehart, D., Glynn, E., Gross, S., and Hampton, F. (2009). “A methodology for curriculum modification applied to civil engineering mechanics.” ASEE Annual Conf. Proc., American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE), Washington, DC.
Zhang, G., Anderson, T. J., Ohland, M. W., and Thorndyke, B. R. (2004). “Identifying factors influencing engineering student graduation: Alongitudinal and cross-institutional study.” J. Eng. Educ.JEEDEQ, 93, 313–320.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2012. American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Jun 9, 2011
Accepted: Dec 1, 2011
Published online: Dec 3, 2011
Published in print: Jul 1, 2012
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.