Teaching Structural Analysis through Design, Building, and Testing
Publication: Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice
Volume 138, Issue 3
Abstract
This paper presents the results of an innovative teaching experience in the area of structural analysis in the mechanical engineering program of the Universidad de Sevilla, Spain. The teaching methodology used is aimed at motivating students to learn by promoting the design, calculation, building, and testing of structures. This method not only trains students to make calculations, but also develops skills that allow them to understand how structures function. The project includes subjects taught in the third and fifth year of the course. In their third year, students begin their structural training studying structural analysis, where they learn the basics by designing, building, and testing balsa wood structures. Students have access to computer software when optimizing the design of their models before building and testing them in the laboratory. After this first approach to structural analysis, students receive training on more advanced concepts. A few examples of such concepts are the dynamic behavior of structures and instabilities in specific types of structures such as plates and laminar structures, and in structural materials such as steel and concrete. Before completing their studies, students are exposed to a project-based teaching methodology in the area of experimental structural analysis, where students deal with similar projects to those they will face as professionals after graduating. This paper explains the advantages of this methodology for teaching in engineering.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
Aparicio, A. C., and Ruiz-Teran, A. M. (2007). “Tradition and innovation in teaching structural design in civil engineering.” J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract., 133(4), 340–349.
Dunlap, J. C., and Grabinger, S. (2003). “Preparing students for lifelong learning: A review of instructional features and teaching methodologies.” Perform. Improv. Q., 16(2), 6–25.
Elazouni, A. M., and Raslan, M. S. (2003). “Footbridge: Project to implement management functions at AASTMT.” J. Prof. Issues in Eng. Educ. Pract., 129(1), 44–51.
European Commission. (2004). “European Credit Transfer and Accumulation System (ECTS): Key features.” 〈http://ec.europa.eu/education/lifelong-learning-policy/doc/ects/key_en.pdf〉 (Dec. 1, 2010).
Frank, M., Lavy, I., and Elata, D. (2003). “Implementing the project-based learning approach in an academic engineering course.” Int. J. Technol. Des. Educ.IJDEEE, 13(3), 273–288.
Galvín, P., and Domínguez, J. (2007). “Dynamic analysis of a cable-stayed deck steel arch bridge.” J. Constr. Steel Res.JCSRDL, 63(8), 1024–1035.
Glynn, E. F., and Fergusson, W. B. (1994). “Innovative introduction to civil engineering curriculum.” J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract., 120(2), 149–157.
Hadim, H. A., and Esche, S. K. (2002). “Enhancing the engineering curiculum through project-based learning.” Proc. 32nd Front. Educ. Conf., (2), F3F-1–F3F-6.
Krajcik, J. S., Czerniak, C. M., and Berger, C. (1999). Teaching children science: A project-based approach, McGraw-Hill, Boston.
Perrenet, J. C., Bouhuijs, P. A. J., and Smits, J. G. M. M. (2000). “The suitability of problem-based learning for engineering education: Theory and practice.” Teach. High. Educ., 5(3), 345–358.
Quinn, K. A., and Albano, L. D. (2008). “Problem-Based learning in structural engineering education.” J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract., 134(4), 329–334.
Romero, M. L., and Museros, P. (2002). “Structural analysis education through model experiments and computer simulation.” J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract., 128(4), 170–175.
Rosenfeld, M., and Rosenfeld, S. (1999). “Understanding the surprise in PBL: An exploration into the learning styles of teachers and their students.” Proc. 8th Conf. of EARLI (European Association for Research in Learning and Instruction), Univ. of Gothenberg, Gothenberg, Sweden.
Tamir, P. (1990). “Considering the role of invitations to inquiry in science teaching and in teacher education.” J. Sci. Teach. Educ., 1(3), 41–45.
Universidad de Sevilla. (2011). “School of engineering, undergraduate syllabus.” 〈http://aplicaciones.esi.us.es/english/grado/ingenieria_industrial〉.
Unterweger, H. (2005). “Simple structural models for the education of structural engineers at Graz University.” J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract., 131(4), 227–230.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice
Volume 138 • Issue 3 • July 2012
Pages: 246 - 253
Copyright
© 2012. American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Mar 11, 2011
Accepted: Aug 26, 2011
Published online: Jun 15, 2012
Published in print: Jul 1, 2012
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.