Technical Papers
Nov 7, 2022

Theoretical Translation of Clean Water to Wastewater Oxygen Transfer Rates

Publication: Journal of Environmental Engineering
Volume 149, Issue 1

Abstract

In wastewater treatment design, it is common practice to test aeration equipment in clean water first, and then extrapolate the result to wastewater via a correction factor. In addition to the many variables, such as the organic loading and physicochemical properties of the water, that affect its magnitude, there is evidence that biochemical reactions play an important role in oxygen transfer in wastewater. The proposed model for in-process oxygen transfer is based on the novel concept of a resistance to gas transfer due to the microbial activity in the field. The hypothesis proposed in this study is that the alpha factor α, or the relative mass transfer coefficient, which is the ratio of the mass transfer coefficient in wastewater KLaf to the mass transfer coefficient in water KLa, is independent of microbial activities in an aeration basin, and the corresponding performance ratio in terms of efficiencies is the same function as α=OTEf/OTE, where subscript f denotes field water characteristics. The common approach is to report the OTEf from off-gas measurements in the field and translate this value to KLaf, giving α as the ratio OTEpw/OTE that gives only a false or apparent alpha, where the subscript pw denotes process water undergoing biological stabilization due to microbial metabolism. The field-determined OTEpw is affected by the respiration rate R, which is dictated by the microbial activity, which is mathematically associative to the transfer process by addition and not associative by multiplication with a scalar quantity. A gas-phase mass balance for oxygen around a completely mixed aeration tank confirmed the association nature of the alpha factor. Examination of test data extracted from the literature indicates that the field-determined OTEpw is indeed affected by the respiration rate R. Using the data collected from previous investigators, the alpha factor has a consistent magnitude of about 0.8 for domestic sewage.

Practical Applications

The activated sludge (AS) process is an important wastewater treatment technology that requires aeration, which is an energy-intensive process. Estimating the oxygen transfer rates under various process conditions is crucial for design and operation of aeration systems. Because clean-water testing is an established method to determine the aeration performance of diffusers, it is common practice to extrapolate the result to wastewater via a correction factor, α. In addition to the many variables that affect its magnitude, there is evidence that biochemical reactions play an important role in oxygen transfer in wastewater. A proposed model based on the novel concept of a resistance to gas transfer due to the microbial activities in the aeration basin showed that the correction factor is quite independent of these activities. Treating α as pertaining only to the wastewater characteristics will provide some control over its parameter estimation, which is needed for any sensible design of a biological treatment plant. Currently, mechanistic models continue to evolve in scope and sophistication to cover all aspects of design and operational optimization, with the support of various sensors for water resource recovery facilities (WRRFs). The findings of this study may be utilized in the development of optimization strategies for energy consumption in such facilities.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data, models, and code generated or used during the study appear in the published article.

References

Abadie, T., et al. 2022. “Oxygen transfer of microbubble clouds in aqueous solutions—Application to wastewater.” Chem. Eng. Sci. 257 (Aug): 117693. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2022.117693.
Albertson, O. E., and D. DiGregorio. 1975. “Biologically mediated inconsistencies in aeration equipment performance.” J. Water Pollut. Control Fed. 47 (May): 976.
Amaral, A., et al. 2019. “Modelling gas–liquid mass transfer in wastewater treatment: When current knowledge needs to encounter engineering practice and vice versa.” Water Sci. Technol. 80 (4): 607–619. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2019.253.
Amaral, A., G. Bellandi, U. Rehman, R. Neves, Y. Amerlinck, and I. Nopens. 2018. “Towards improved accuracy in modeling aeration efficiency through understanding bubble size distribution dynamics.” Water Res. 131 (Mar): 346–355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2017.10.062.
APHA (American Public Health Association. 2017. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. 23rd ed. Washington, DC: APHA.
Arnaldos, M., U. Rehman, W. Naessens, Y. Amerlinck, and I. Nopens. 2018. “Understanding the effects of bulk mixing on the determination of the affinity index: Consequences for process operation and design.” Water Sci. Technol. 77 (3): 576–588. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2017.550.
ASCE. 1997. Standard guidelines for in-process oxygen transfer testing. ASCE-18-96. Reston, VA: ASCE.
ASCE. 2007. Measurement of oxygen transfer in clean water. ASCE/EWRI 2-06. Reston, VA: ASCE.
ASCE. 2018. Standard guidelines for in-process oxygen transfer testing. ASCE/EWRI 18-18. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Baeten, J. E., M. C. M. van Loosdrecht, and E. I. P. Volcke. 2020. “When and why do gradients of the gas phase composition and pressure affect liquid-gas transfer?” Water Res. 178 (Jul): 115844. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2020.115844.
Baillod, C. R. 1979. “Review of oxygen transfer model refinements and data interpretation.” In Proc., Workshop toward an Oxygen Transfer Standard, edited by W. C. Boyle, 17–26. Washington, DC: USEPA.
Baillod, C. R., L. C. Brown, B. Barrett, D. L. Bennett, R. Kapur, M. B. Lakin, J. Lee, A. D. Nardozzi, D. T. Redmon, C. Scaccia, M. K. Stenstrom. 1979. “Group B. Modelling and data interpretation, the model.” In Proc., Workshop toward an Oxygen Transfer Standard, edited by W. C. Boyle, 17–26. Washington, DC: USEPA.
Baquero-Rodríguez, G. A., J. A. Lara-Borrero, D. Nolasco, and D. Rosso. 2018. “A critical review of the factors affecting modeling oxygen transfer by fine-pore diffusers in activated sludge.” Water Environ. Res. 90 (5): 431–441. https://doi.org/10.2175/106143017X15131012152988.
Bellandi, G. 2018. “N2O emissions and aeration efficiency in wastewater treatment: Improved monitoring, mechanistic modelling and data mining.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Applied Biological Sciences, Ghent Univ.
Bencsik, D., I. Takács, and D. Rosso. 2022. “Dynamic alpha factors: Prediction in time and evolution along reactors.” Water Res. 216 (Jun): 118339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2022.118339.
Bewtra, J., and P. Tewari. 1982. “Alpha and beta factors for domestic wastewater.” J. Water Pollut. Control Fed. 54 (9): 1281–1287.
Birima, A. H., M. J. Megat Mohd Noor, T. A. Mohammed, A. Idris, S. A. Muyibi, H. Nagaoka, J. Ahmed, and L. A. Abdul Ghani. 2009. “The effects of SRT, OLR and feed temperature on the performance of membrane bioreactor treating high strength municipal wastewater.” Desalin. Water Treat. 7 (1–3): 275–284. https://doi.org/10.5004/dwt.2009.720.
Boon A. G. 1979. “Oxygen transfer in the activated sludge process.” In Proc., Workshop toward an Oxygen Transfer Standard, U.S. EPA/600-9-78-021, edited by W. C. Boyle, 17–26. Washington, DC: USEPA.
Campbell, K. A. 2020. Physical and biological factors affecting oxygen transfer in the activated sludge wastewater treatment process. Rolla, MO: Missouri Univ. of Science and Technology.
CEN (European Committee for Standardization). 2003. Wastewater treatment plants—Part 15: Measurement of the oxygen transfer in clean water in aeration tanks of activated sludge plants. EN 12255-15. Brussels, Belgium: CEN.
Chiesa, S. C., M. G. Rieth, and T. E. K. L. Ching. 1990. “Evaluation of activated sludge oxygen uptake rate test procedures.” J. Environ. Eng. 116 (3): 472–486. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(1990)116:3(472).
Doyle, M. 1981. Small scale determination of alpha in a fine bubble diffuser system. Madison, WI: Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Wisconsin.
Doyle, M. L., W. C. Boyle, T. Rooney, and G. Huibregtse. 1983. “Pilot plant determination of oxygen transfer in fine bubble aeration.” J. Water Pollut. Control Fed. 55 (12): 1435–1440.
Eckenfelder, W. W. 1959. “Factors affecting the aeration efficiency of sewage and industrial wastes.” Sewage Ind. Wastes 31 (1): 60–70. https://doi.org/10.2307/25033795.
Eckenfelder, W. W. 1970. Water pollution control: Experimental procedures for process design. Austin, TX: Pemberton Press.
Fogler, H. S. 2007. Essentials of chemical reaction engineering. 4th ed. Prentice Hall: Univ. of Michigan.
Garcia-Ochoa, F., and E. Gomez. 2009. “Bioreactor scale-up and oxygen transfer rate in microbial processes: An overview.” Biotechnol. Adv. 27 (2): 153–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2008.10.006.
Hu, J. 2006. “Evaluation of parameters influencing oxygen transfer efficiency in a membrane bioreactor.” Ph.D. dissertation, Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Hawaii.
Hwang, H. J., and M. K. Stenstrom. 1985. “Evaluation of fine-bubble alpha factors in near full-scale equipment.” J. Water Pollut. Control Fed. 57 (12): 1142–1151.
Jiang, P., and M. K. Stenstrom. 2012. “Oxygen transfer parameter estimation: Impact of methodology.” J. Environ. Eng. 138 (2): 137–142. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943-7870.0000456.
Jimenez, M., N. Dietrich, J. R. Grace, and G. Hébrard. 2014. “Oxygen mass transfer and hydrodynamic behaviour in wastewater: Determination of local impact of surfactants by visualization techniques.” Water Res. 58 (Jul): 111–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2014.03.065.
Kim, S., et al. 2021. “SARS-CoV-2 RNA is enriched by orders of magnitude in solid relative to liquid wastewater at publicly owned treatment works.” medRxiv 2022 (8): 757–770 https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.11.10.21266138.
Kimweri, H. T. H. 2001. Enhancement of gas-liquid mass transfer in hydrometallurgical leaching systems. Vancouver, BC, Canada: The Univ. of British Columbia.
Krause, S., P. Cornel, and M. Wagner. 2003. “Comparison of different oxygen transfer testing procedures in full-scale membrane bioreactors.” Water Sci. Technol. 47 (12): 169–176. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2003.0643.
Larsson, T., C. D. Quintero, S. Gillot, A. Cockx, and Y. Fayolle. 2022. “Development and validation of a comprehensive 1-D model to simulate gas hold-up and gas–liquid transfer in deep air–water bubble columns.” Chem. Eng. Sci. 248 (Part B): 117210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2021.117210.
Lebrun, G., S. Benaissa, C. Le Men, V. Pimienta, G. Hébrard, and N. Dietrich. 2022. “Effect of surfactant lengths on gas-liquid oxygen mass transfer from a single rising bubble.” Chem. Eng. Sci. 247 (Jan): 117102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2021.117102.
Lebrun, G., F. Xu, C. Le Men, G. Hébrard, and N. Dietrich. 2021. “Gas–liquid mass transfer around a rising bubble: Combined effect of rheology and surfactant.” Fluids 6 (2): 84. https://doi.org/10.3390/fluids6020084.
Lee, J. 2018. “Development of a model to determine the baseline mass transfer coefficient in bioreactors (aeration tanks).” Water Environ. Res. 90 (12): 2126–2140. https://doi.org/10.2175/106143017X15131012187999.
Lee, J. 2020a. “Baseline mass-transfer coefficient and interpretation of nonsteady state submerged bubble-oxygen transfer data.” J. Environ. Eng. 146 (1): 04019102. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943-7870.0001624.
Lee, J. 2020b. “Oxygen transfer rate and oxygen uptake rate in subsurface bubble aeration systems.” J. Environ. Eng. 146 (1): 02519003. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943-7870.0001635.
Lewis, W. K., and W. G. Whitman. 1924. “Principles of gas absorption.” Ind. Eng. Chem. 16 (12): 1215–1220. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie50180a002.
López, J., P. Rodríguez, I. O. Alberola, M. M. M. Ballesteros, P. Sánchez Pérez, S. Fernández, and Y. Chisti. 2006. “Simultaneous determination of oxygen consumption rate and volumetric oxygen transfer coefficient in pneumatically agitated bioreactors.” Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 45 (3): 1167–1171. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie050782a.
Mahendraker, V. 2003. “Development of a unified theory of oxygen transfer in activated sludge processes—The concept of net respiration rate flux.” Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of British Columbia.
Mahendraker, V., D. S. Mavinic, and K. J. Hall. 2005a. “Comparative evaluation of mass transfer of oxygen in three activated sludge processes operating under uniform conditions.” J. Environ. Eng. Sci. 4 (2): 89–100. https://doi.org/10.1139/s04-042.
Mahendraker, V., D. S. Mavinic, and B. Rabinowitz. 2005b. “Comparison of oxygen transfer test parameters from four testing methods in three activated sludge processes.” Water Qual. Res. J. Can. 40 (2): 164–176. https://doi.org/10.2166/wqrj.2005.019.
Mahendraker, V., D. S. Mavinic, and B. Rabinowitz. 2005c. “A simple method to estimate the contribution of biological floc and reactor-solution to mass transfer of oxygen in activated sludge processes.” Biotechnol. Bioeng. 91 (4): 393–405. https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.20515.
Mazzei AirJection Systems. n.d. Process water oxygen transfer rate test results. Bakersfield, CA: Mazzei AirJection Systems.
McCarthy, J. 1982. Technology assessment of fine bubble aerators. Washington, DC: USEPA.
McGinnis, D. F., and J. C. Little. 2002. “Predicting diffused-bubble oxygen transfer rate using the discrete-bubble model.” Water Res. 36 (18): 4627–4635. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(02)00175-6.
McKinney, R. E., and J. R. Stukenberg. 1979. “On-site evaluation:Steady state vs. non-steady state testing.” In Proc., Workshop toward an Oxygen Transfer Standard, U.S. EPA/600-9-78-021, edited by W. C. Boyle, 17–26. Washington, DC: USEPA.
Mines, R. O., Jr., M. C. Callier, B. J. Drabek, and A. J. Butler. 2017. “Comparison of oxygen transfer parameters and oxygen demands in bioreactors operated at low and high dissolved oxygen levels.” J. Environ. Sci. Health, Part A 52 (4): 341–349. https://doi.org/10.1080/10934529.2016.1258871.
Rehman, U. 2016. “Next generation bioreactor models for wastewater treatment systems by means of detailed combined modelling of mixing and biokinetics.” Ph.D. dissertation, Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Dept. of mathematical modelling, statistics and bioinformatics, Ghent Univ.
Salzman R. N., and M. B. Lakin. 1979. “Influence of mixing in aeration.” In Proc., Workshop toward an Oxygen Transfer Standard, U.S. EPA/600-9-78-021, edited by W. C. Boyle, 17–26. Washington, DC: USEPA.
Santos, V. E., C. Galdeano, E. Gomez, A. Alcon, and F. Garcia-Ochoa. 2006. “Oxygen uptake rate measurements both by the dynamic method and during the process growth of Rhodococcus erythropolis IGTS8: Modelling and difference in results.” Biochem. Eng. J. 32 (3): 198–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bej.2006.09.025.
Sharma, A., and D. White Jr. 1989. “Effects of gas depletion on gas–liquid reaction systems.” Chem. Eng. Sci. 44 (3): 471–481. https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-2509(89)85025-0.
Soons, Z. I. T. A., J. van den IJssel, L. A. van der Pol, G. van Straten, and A. J. B. van Boxtel. 2009. “Scaling-up vaccine production: Implementation aspects of a biomass growth observer and controller.” Bioprocess. Biosyst. Eng. 32 (3): 289–299. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00449-008-0248-y.
Stack, V. T., Jr. 1979. Analytical measurement and saturation values for dissolved oxygen in water. Plymouth Meeting, PA: Betz - Converse - Murdoch.
Stenstrom, M. K., and R. G. Gilbert. 1981. “Effects of alpha, beta and theta factor upon the design, specification and operation of aeration systems.” Water Res. 15 (6): 643–654. https://doi.org/10.1016/0043-1354(81)90156-1.
Sweeney, M., and J. Kabouris. 2020. “Modeling, instrumentation, automation, and optimization of water resource recovery facilities (Review of 2018 Literature) DIRECT.” Water Environ. Res. 92 (10): 1618–1624. https://doi.org/10.1002/wer.1408.
Tribe, L. A., C. L. Briens, and A. Margaritis. 1995. “Determination of the volumetric mass transfer coefficient (kLa) using the dynamic “gas out–gas in” method: Analysis of errors caused by dissolved oxygen probes.” Biotechnol. Bioeng. 46 (4): 388–392. https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.260460412.
Vaxelaire, J., N. Roche, and C. Prost. 1995. “Oxygen transfer in activated sludge surface-aerated process.” Environ. Technol. 16 (3): 279–285. https://doi.org/10.1080/09593331608616270.
Whitman, W. G. 1962. “The two film theory of gas absorption.” Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 5 (5): 429–433. https://doi.org/10.1016/0017-9310(62)90032-7.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Environmental Engineering
Journal of Environmental Engineering
Volume 149Issue 1January 2023

History

Received: Jul 11, 2022
Accepted: Aug 25, 2022
Published online: Nov 7, 2022
Published in print: Jan 1, 2023
Discussion open until: Apr 7, 2023

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

ASCE Technical Topics:

Authors

Affiliations

Independent Researcher, Biotechnology Technician Program, Conestoga College, 299 Doon Valley Dr., Kitchener, ON, Canada N2G 4M4. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4993-654X. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Temperature Correction for Clean-Water Tests with Reference to ASCE/EWRI Standard 2-22, Journal of Environmental Engineering, 10.1061/JOEEDU.EEENG-7346, 149, 11, (2023).
  • Best Practices for Computational Fluid Dynamic Applications in Water Infrastructure, Journal of Environmental Engineering, 10.1061/JOEEDU.EEENG-7289, 149, 10, (2023).
  • Domain Geometry and Process Models, Computational Fluid Dynamics Modeling in Water Infrastructure, 10.1061/9780784485125.ch2, (5-12), (2023).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share