Technical Papers
Jan 27, 2016

Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Wastewater Treatment Plants on a Plantwide Scale: Sensitivity and Uncertainty Analysis

Publication: Journal of Environmental Engineering
Volume 142, Issue 6

Abstract

This paper presents the sensitivity and uncertainty analysis of a mathematical model for greenhouse gas emission (GHG) and energy consumption assessment in wastewater treatment plants. A sensitivity analysis was carried out (using two different methods) to determine which model factors have the greatest effect on the predicted values of the GHG production. Further, an uncertainty analysis was carried out to quantify the uncertainty of the key model outputs, such as carbon dioxide production from activated sludge treatment. The results show that influent fractionation factors, which characterize influent composition, have an important role on direct and indirect GHGs production and emission. Moreover, model factors related to the aerobic biomass growth show a relevant influence on GHGs in terms of emission from off-site power generation (mCO2eq,PG). Further, model factors related to the autotrophic biomass growth were found to strongly interact with other factors especially in modeling mCO2eq,PG. Finally, nitrous oxide (N2O) emission associated with the effluent has the highest uncertainty, suggesting the need for a mechanistic model for N2O production in biological treatment.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

This work forms a part of a research project supported by grant of the Italian Ministry of Education, University and Research (MIUR) through the Research Project of National Interest PRIN2012 (D.M. 28 dicembre 2012 n. 957/Ric—Prot. 2012PTZAMC) entitled “Energy consumption and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in the wastewater treatment plants: A decision support system for planning and management” in which the corresponding author is the principal investigator (http://ghgfromwwtp.unipa.it).

References

Ahn, J. H., Kim, S., Park, H., Rahm, B., Pagilla, K., and Chandran, K. (2010). “N2O emissions from activated sludge processes, 2008–2009: Results of a national monitoring survey in the United States.” Environ. Sci. Technol., 44(12), 4505–4511.
Brun, R., Kühni, M., Siegrist, H., Gujer, W., and Reichert, P. (2002). “Practical identifiability of ASM2d parameters: Systematic selection and tuning of parameter subsets.” Water Res., 36(16), 4113–4127.
Cakir, F. Y., and Stenstrom, M. K. (2005). “Greenhouse gas production: A comparison between aerobic and anaerobic wastewater treatment technology.” Water Res., 39(17), 4197–4203.
Caniani, D., Esposito, G., Gori, R., and Mannina, G. (2015). “Towards a new decision support system for design, management and operation of wastewater treatment plants for the reduction of greenhouse gases emission.” Water, 7(10), 5599–5616.
Corominas, L., Flores-Alsina, X., Snip, L., and Vanrolleghem, P. A. (2012). “Comparison of different modeling approaches to better evaluate greenhouse gas emissions from whole wastewater treatment plants.” Biotechnol. Bioeng., 109(11), 2854–2863.
Cosenza, A., Mannina, G., Neumann, M. B., Viviani, G., and Vanrolleghem, P. A. (2013a). “Biological nitrogen and phosphorus removal in membrane bioreactors: Model development and parameter estimation.” Bioproc. Biosyst. Eng., 36(4), 499–514.
Cosenza, A., Mannina, G., Vanrolleghem, P. A., and Neumann, M. B. (2013b). “Global sensitivity analysis in wastewater applications: A comprehensive comparison of different methods.” Environ. Modell. Software, 49, 40–52.
Czepiel, P., Crill, P., and Harriss, R. (1995). “Nitrous-oxide emissions from municipal waste-water treatment.” Environ. Sci. Technol., 29(9), 2352–2356.
Czepiel, P., Crill, P. C., and Harriss, R. C. (1993). “Methane emissions from municipal wastewater treatment processes.” Environ. Sci. Technol., 27(12), 2472–2477.
Daelman, M. R. J., van Voorthuizen, E. M., van Dongen, U. G. J. M., Volcke, E. I. P., and van Loosdrecht, M. C. M. (2012). “Methane emission during municipal wastewater treatment.” Water Res., 46(11), 3657–3670.
Flores-Alsina, X., et al. (2014). “Balancing effluent quality, economic cost and greenhouse gas emissions during the evaluation of (plant-wide) control/operational strategies in WWTPs.” Sci. Total Environ., 466–467, 616–624.
Flores-Alsina, X., Corominas, L., Snip, L., and Vanrolleghem, P. A. (2011). “Including greenhouse gas emissions during benchmarking of wastewater treatment plant control strategies.” Water Res., 45(16), 4700–4710.
Foley, J., de Haas, D., Yuan, Z., and Lant, P. (2010). “Nitrous oxide generation in full-scale biological nutrient removal wastewater treatment plants.” Water Res., 44(3), 831–844.
Freni, G., and Mannina, G. (2010). “Bayesian approach for uncertainty quantification in water quality modelling: The influence of prior distribution.” J. Hydrol., 392(1–2), 31–39.
Gori, R., Giaccherini, F., Jiang, L.-M., Sobhani, R., and Rosso, D. (2013). “Role of primary sedimentation on plant-wide energy recovery and carbon footprint.” Water Sci. Technol., 68(4), 870–878.
Gori, R., Jiang, L.-M., Sobhani, R., and Rosso, D. (2011). “Effects of soluble and particulate substrate on the carbon and energy footprint of wastewater treatment processes.” Water Res., 45(18), 5858–5872.
GRP (General Reporting Protocol). (2008). “Accurate, transparent, and consistent measurement of greenhouse gases across North America version 1.1.” Mountain View, CA.
GWRC (Global Water Research Coalition). (2011). “N2O and CH4 emission from wastewater collection and treatment systems—State of the science report.” London.
Hauduc, H., et al. (2011). “Activated sludge modelling: Development and potential use of a practical applications database.” Water Sci. Technol., 63(10), 2164–2182.
Hiatt, W. C., and Grady, C. P. L., Jr. (2008). “An updated process model for carbon oxidation, nitrification, and denitrification.” Water Environ. Res., 80(11), 2145–2156.
IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change). (2006). “Guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories.” 〈http://www.ipcc-nggip.iges.or.jp/public/2006gl/〉.
Kampschreur, M. J., Temmink, H., Kleerebezem, R., Jettena, M. S. M., and van Loosdrecht, M. C. M. (2009). “Nitrous oxide emission during wastewater treatment.” Water Res., 43(17), 4093–4103.
Law, Y., Jacobsen, G., Smith, A., Yuan, Z., Lant, P. (2013). “Fossil organic carbon in wastewater and its fate in treatment plants.” Water Res., 47(14), 5270–5281.
Law, Y., Ye, L., Pan, Y., and Yuan, Z. (2012). “Nitrous oxide emissions from wastewater treatment processes.” Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B., 367(1593), 1265–1277.
LGO (Local Government Operations). (2008). “Local government operations protocol for the quantification and reporting of greenhouse gas emissions inventories, version 1.0.” 〈http://www.theclimateregistry.org/resources/protocols/local-government-operations-protocol/〉 (Sep. 2008).
Mannina, G., and Cosenza, A. (2015). “Quantifying sensitivity and uncertainty analysis of a new mathematical model for the evaluation of greenhouse gas emissions from membrane bioreactors.” J. Membr. Sci., 475(1), 80–90.
Mannina, G., Cosenza, A., Randrianantoandro, M., Anctil, F., Neumann, M. B., and Vanrolleghem, P. A. (2014). “Global sensitivity analysis in environmental water quality modelling: Where do we stand?” Proc., 7th Int. Congress on Environmental Modelling and Software: Bold Visions for Environmental Modeling, iEMSs, San Diego, 619.
Mannina, G., Cosenza, A., Vanrolleghem, P. A., and Viviani, G. (2011). “A practical protocol for calibration of nutrient removal wastewater treatment models.” J. Hydroinf., 13(4), 575–595.
Monteith, H. D., Sahely, H. R., MacLean, H. L., and Bagley, D. M. (2005). “A rational procedure for estimation of greenhouse-gas emissions from municipal wastewater treatment plants.” Water Environ. Res., 77(4), 390–403.
Neumann, M. B. (2012). “Comparison of sensitivity analysis techniques for modelling micropollutant oxidation in water treatment.” Sci. Total Environ., 433(1), 530–537.
Ni, B. J., Ruscalleda, M., Pellicer-Nàcher, C., and Smets, B. F. (2011). “Modeling nitrous oxide production during biological nitrogen removal via nitrification and denitrification: Extensions to the general ASM models.” Environ. Sci. Technol., 45(18), 7768–7776.
Ni, B. J., Ye, L., Law, Y., Byers, C., and Yuan, Z. (2013a). “Mathematical modeling of nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions from full-scale wastewater treatment plants.” Environ. Sci. Technol., 47(14), 7795–7803.
Ni, B. J., Yuan, Z., Chandran, K., Vanrolleghem, P. A., and Murthy, S. (2013b). “Evaluating four mathematical models for nitrous oxide production by autotrophic ammonia-oxidizing bacteria.” Biotechnol. Bioeng., 110(1), 153–163.
Pagilla, K., Shaw, A., Kunetz, T., and Schiltz, M. (2009). “A systematic approach to establishing carbon footprints for wastewater treatment plants.” Proc. Water Environ. Fed., 2009(10), 5399–5409.
Pujol, G. (2007). “Sensitivity: Sensitivity analysis, R package version 1.3–0.” R Development Core Team, France.
Rosso, D., and Stenstrom, M. K. (2008). “The carbon-sequestration potential of municipal wastewater treatment.” Chemosphere, 70(8), 1468–1475.
Saltelli, A., et al. (2008). Global sensitivity analysis, the primer, Wiley, Chichester, U.K.
Sin, G., Gernaey, K. V., Neumann, M. B., van Loosdrecht, M., and Gujer, W. (2011). “Global sensitivity analysis in wastewater treatment plant model applications: Prioritizing sources of uncertainty.” Water Res., 45(2), 639–651.
Sweetapple, C., Fu, G., and Butler, D. (2013). “Identifying key sources of uncertainty in the modelling of greenhouse gas emissions from wastewater treatment.” Water Res., 47(13), 4652–4665.
Townsend-Small, A., Pataki, D. E., Tseng, L. Y., Tsai, C.-Y., and Rosso, D. (2011). “Nitrous oxide emissions from wastewater treatment and water reclamation plants in southern California.” J. Environ. Qual., 40(5), 1542–1550.
Vanrolleghem, P. A., Mannina, G., Cosenza, A., and Neumann, M. B. (2015). “Global sensitivity analysis for urban water quality modelling: Terminology, convergence and comparison of different methods.” J. Hydrol., 522, 339–352.
WEF (Water Environment Federation). (2009). Energy conservation in water and wastewater facilities–MOP 32, Alexandria, VA.
Weijers, S. R., and Vanrolleghem, P. A. (1997). “A procedure for selecting best identifiable parameters in calibrating activated sludge model no. 1 to full-scale plant data.” Water Sci. Technol., 36(5), 69–79.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Environmental Engineering
Journal of Environmental Engineering
Volume 142Issue 6June 2016

History

Received: Jan 14, 2015
Accepted: Oct 28, 2015
Published online: Jan 27, 2016
Published in print: Jun 1, 2016
Discussion open until: Jun 27, 2016

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Giorgio Mannina [email protected]
Associate Professor, Dipartimento di Ingegneria Civile, Ambientale, Aerospaziale, dei Materiali, Università degli Studi di Palermo, Viale delle Scienze, 90128 Palermo, Italy (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Alida Cosenza [email protected]
Postdoctoral Fellow, Dipartimento di Ingegneria Civile, Ambientale, Aerospaziale, dei Materiali, Università degli Studi di Palermo, Viale delle Scienze, 90128 Palermo, Italy. E-mail: [email protected]
Riccardo Gori [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering (DICEA), Univ. of Florence, Via Santa Marta 3, 50139 Florence, Italy. E-mail: [email protected]
Manel Garrido-Baserbac [email protected]
Postdoctoral Fellow, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of California, Irvine, CA 92697-2175. E-mail: [email protected]
Reza Sobhani [email protected]
Postdoctoral Fellow, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of California, Irvine, CA 92697-2175. E-mail: [email protected]
Diego Rosso [email protected]
Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of California, Irvine, CA 92697-2175. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share