Regrowth Potential of Bacteria after Ultraviolet Disinfection in the Absence of Light and Dark Repair
Publication: Journal of Environmental Engineering
Volume 141, Issue 3
Abstract
The objective of this study was to investigate the regrowth potential of E. coli and indigenous wastewater bacteria after ultraviolet (UV) disinfection in the absence of light and dark repair and under different nutrient conditions. Light repair was prevented by keeping the samples in the dark following UV exposure (15 and ). Dark repair was controlled for by varying the initial and surviving bacterial concentrations, and achieving complete inactivation and no growth in control samples. Net growth and die-off in samples were determined 6, 18, 24, 30, and 48 h after UV disinfection. The results of this study showed that the percent regrowth of E. coli and indigenous wastewater bacteria were higher after UV disinfection at than at , and the regrowth was also sustained for a longer time. Even in the absence of any nutrients, significant regrowth of E. coli was observed in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) indicating that the lysis of UV-damaged cells may provide a source of nutrients for the surviving bacteria. In spite of the availability of nutrients in wastewater, the presence of inhibiting and toxic substances appeared to slow down the regrowth of E. coli. Indigenous coliform bacteria in wastewater could achieve much higher regrowth compared to laboratory cultured E. coli even after a UV dose of .
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
American Public Health Association (APHA), American Water Works Association, and Water Pollution Control Federation. (2005). Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, Washington, DC.
Bohrerova, Z., and Linden, K. G. (2007). “Standardizing photoreactivation: Comparison of DNA photorepair rate in Escherichia coli using four different fluorescent lamps.” Water Res., 41(12), 2832–2838.
Bolton, J. R., and Linden, K. G. (2003). “Standardization of methods for fluence (UV dose) determination in bench-scale UV experiments.” J. Environ. Eng., 209–215.
Friedler, E., Yardeni, A., Gilboa, Y., and Alfiya, Y. (2011). “Disinfection of greywater effluent and regrowth potential of selected bacteria.” Water Sci. Technol., 63(5), 932–941.
German Gas, and Water Management Union (DVGW). (2006). UV disinfection devices for drinking water supply requirements and testing, DVGW W294-1, -2, and -3, Bonn, Germany.
Guo, M., Huang, J., Hu, H., and Liu, W. (2011). “Growth and repair potential of three species of bacteria in reclaimed wastewater after UV disinfection.” Biomed. Environ. Sci., 24(4), 400–407.
Hansen, L., Krog, G. F., and Søndergaard, M. (1986). “Decomposition of lake phytoplankton. 1. Dynamics of short-term decomposition.” Oikos, 46(1), 37–44.
Harris, G. D., Adams, V. D., Sorensen, D. L., and Curtis, M. S. (1987). “Ultraviolet inactivation of selected bacteria and viruses with photoreactivation of the bacteria.” Water Res., 21(6), 687–692.
Hu, J. Y., Chu, X. N., Quek, P. H., Feng, Y. Y., and Tan, X. L. (2005). “Repair and regrowth of Escherichia coli after low- and medium-pressure ultraviolet disinfection.” Water Sci. Technol. Water Supply, 5(5), 101–108.
IJpelaar, G. F., and Beerendonk, E. F. (2001). “Formation of by-products by UV disinfection—Comparison of various UV beamers on laboratory scale.”, (in Dutch).
Kalisvaart, B. F. (2004). “Re-use of wastewater: Preventing the recovery of pathogens by using medium-pressure UV lamp technology.” Water Sci. Technol., 50(6), 337–344.
Kashimada, K., Kamiko, N., Yamamoto, K., and Ohgaki, S. (1996). “Assessment of photoreactivation following ultraviolet light disinfection.” Water Sci. Technol., 33(10–11), 261–269.
Krog, G. F., Hansen, L., and Sondergaard, M. (1986). “Decomposition of lake phytoplankton. 2. Composition and lability of lysis products.” Oikos, 46(1), 45–50.
Lindenauer, K. G., and Darby, J. L. (1994). “Ultraviolet disinfection of wastewater: Effect of dose on subsequent photoreactivation.” Water Res., 28(4), 805–817.
Liu, W., Andrews, S. A., Bolton, J. R., Linden, K. G., Sharpless, C., and Stefan, M. (2002). “Comparison of disinfection byproduct (DBP) formation from different UV technologies at bench scale.” Water Sci. Technol. Water Supply, 2(5–6), 515–521.
Malley, J. P., et al. (2004). Inactivation of pathogens with innovative UV technologies, American Water Works Association Research Foundation.
Oguma, K., Katayama, H., Mitani, H., Morita, S., Hirata, T., and Oghaki, S. (2001). “Determination of pyrimidine dimmers in Escherichia coli and Cryptosporidium parvum during UV light inactivation, photoreactivation, and dark repair.” Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 67(10), 4630–4637.
Osterreichisches Normungsinstitut (ÖNORM). (2001). “Plants for the disinfection of water using ultraviolet radiation requirements and testing—Part 1: Low pressure mercury lamp plants.”, Vienna, Austria.
Shaw, J. P., Malley, J. P., Jr., and Willoughby, S. A. (2000). “Effects of UV irradiation on organic matter.” J. Am. Water Works Assoc., 92(4), 157–167.
Sinha, R. P., and Hader, D. P. (2002). “UV-induced DNA damage and repair: A review.” Photochem. Photobiol. Sci., 1(4), 225–236.
Sommer, R., Lhotsky, M., Haider, T., and Cabaj, A. (2000). “UV inactivation, liquid-holding recovery and photoreactivation of Escherichia coli O157 and other pathogenic Escherichia coli strains in water.” J. Food Prot., 63(8), 1015–1020.
Van der Maas, P., Van der Woerdt, D., Wübbels, G., and Van der Kooij, D. (2010). “Impact of low pressure UV on the regrowth potential of drinking water.” Proc., 2010 IWA World Water Congress, IWA Publishing, London.
Villarino, A., Rager, M., Grimont, P. A. D., and Bouvet, O. M. M. (2003). “Are UV-induced nonculturable Escherichia coli K-12 cells alive or dead?” Eur. J. Biochem., 270(12), 2689–2695.
Zimmer, J. L., and Slawson, R. M. (2002). “Potential repair of Escherichia coli DNA following exposure to UV radiation from both medium and low pressure UV sources in drinking water treatment.” Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 68(7), 3293–3299.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Environmental Engineering
Volume 141 • Issue 3 • March 2015
Copyright
© 2014 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Jan 25, 2014
Accepted: Aug 20, 2014
Published online: Sep 25, 2014
Discussion open until: Feb 25, 2015
Published in print: Mar 1, 2015
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.