Technical Papers
Dec 30, 2013

Transport of Hydraulic Fracturing Water and Wastes in the Susquehanna River Basin, Pennsylvania

Publication: Journal of Environmental Engineering
Volume 140, Issue 5

Abstract

The development of the Marcellus Shale gas play in Pennsylvania and the northeastern United States has resulted in significant amounts of water and wastes transported by truck over roadways. This study used geographic information systems (GIS) to quantify truck travel distances via both the preferred routes (minimum distance while also favoring higher-order roads) as well as, where available, the likely actual distances for freshwater and waste transport between pertinent locations (e.g., gas wells, treatment facilities, freshwater sources). Results show that truck travel distances in the Susquehanna River Basin are greater than those used in prior life-cycle assessments of tight shale gas. When compared to likely actual transport distances, if policies were instituted to constrain truck travel to the closest destination and higher-order roads, transport mileage reductions of 40–80% could be realized. Using reasonable assumptions of current practices, greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions associated with water and waste hauling were calculated to be 70–157 MT CO2eq per gas well. Furthermore, empty so-called backhaul trips, such as to freshwater withdrawal sites or returning from deep well injection sites, were found to increase emissions by an additional 30%, underscoring the importance of including return trips in the analysis. The results should inform future life-cycle assessments of tight shale gases in managed watersheds and help local and regional governments plan for impacts of transportation on local infrastructure.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

This work was funded in part by the Katherine Mabis McKenna Environmental Internship and the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, both at Bucknell University. R. Hupp is currently a graduate student in the Charles E. Via, Jr. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering at Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; 200 Patton Hall, Blacksburg, VA, 24061.

References

Adesoye, K. (2009). “Shale characterization for evaluating shale-drilling fluid interaction.” M.S. thesis, Univ. of Oklahoma, Norman, OK.
ArcGIS Desktop 10.0 [Computer software]. Environmental Systems Research Institute, Redlands, CA.
Bulldog Chemicals. (2011). “Tuff-lube material safety data sheet.” 〈http://bulldogchemicals.com/pdfs/MSDS_Tuff_Lube.pdf〉 (Feb. 12, 2012).
Burnham, A., Han, J., Clark, C. E., Wang, M., Dunn, J. B., and Palou-Rivera, I. (2012). “Life-cycle greenhouse gas emissions of shale gas, natural gas, coal, and petroleum.” Environ. Sci. Technol., 46(2), 619–627.
Citgo Petroleum Corporation. (2010). “Mystik lubricants rock drill oil, ISO100, material safety data sheet.” 〈http://docs.mystiklubes.com/msds_pi/663813002.pdf〉 (Oct. 04, 2012).
Conquest Drilling Fluids. (2011). “ViChem L-10/super l lubricant material safety data sheet.” 〈http://www.conquestdrilling.com/prod-vicheml10.html〉 (Oct. 04, 2012).
Control Chemical Corp. (2011). “RDO302 ES Material safety data sheet.” 〈http://www.americawestdrillingsupply.com/RDO302ESandESMW.asp〉 (Jul. 2011).
D-A Lubricant Co. (2012). “D-A lubricant material safety data sheet.” 〈http://www.dalube.com/msds/Rock%20Drill%20all%20grades.pdf〉 (Oct. 04, 2012).
Dijkstra, E. W. (1959). “A note on two problems in connexion with graphs.” Numerische Mathematik, 1(1), 269–271.
Durbin, T. D., Norbeck, J. M., Wilson, R. D., and Galdamez, H. A. (2000). “Effect of payload on exhaust emissions from light heavy-duty diesel and gasoline trucks.” Environ. Sci Technol., 34(22), 4708–4713.
Environmental Systems Research Institute (ESRI). (2005). White paper: Hierarchical routes in ArcGIS network analyst. 〈http://downloads.esri.com/support/whitepapers/other_/ArcGIS_NA_Hierarchical_Routes _Aug05.pdf〉 (Oct. 15, 2012).
Federal Rail Administration (FRA). (2009)., U.S. Dept. of Transportation by ICF International, Washington, DC.
Francke, H., and Thorade, M. (2010). “Density and viscosity of brine: An overview from a process engineers perspective.” Chemie der Erde, 70(3), 23–32.
Gannett Fleming Freight Solutions. (2011). Marcellus Shale Freight transportation study. 〈http://www.northerntier.org/upload/NTRPDC%20Marcellus%20Shale%20Freight%20TraTra.%20Study.pdf〉 (May 3, 2012).
Gresh, K. (2011). “DEP calls on natural gas drillers to stop giving treatment facilities wastewater.” 〈http://www.portal.state.pa.us/portal/server.pt/community/newsroom/14287?id=17071&typeid=1〉 (Jul. 27, 2012).
Howarth, R. W., Santoro, R., and Ingraffea, A. (2011). “Methane and the greenhouse–gas footprint of natural gas from shale formations: A letter.” Climatic Change, 106(4), 679–690.
IPCC. (2007). “Climate change 2007: Synthesis report.” Contribution of working groups I, II and III to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change, R. K. Pachauri, and A. Reisinger, eds., IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland, 104.
Jiang, M., Griffen, W. M., Hendrickson, C., Jaramillo, P., VanBriesen, J., and Venkatesh, A. (2011). “Life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of Marcellus Shale gas.” Environ. Res. Lett., 6(3), 1–9.
Kargbo, D. M., Wilhelm, R. G., and Campbell, D. J. (2010). “Natural gas plays in the Marcellus Shale: Challenges and potential opportunities.” Environ. Sci. Technol., 44(15), 5679–5684.
Lee, D. S., Herman, J., Elsworth, D., Kim, H. T., and Lee, H. S. (2011). “A critical evaluation of unconventional gas recovery from the Marcellus Shale, Northeastern United States.” Korean Society of Civil Engineers (KSCE) J. Civ. Eng., 15(4), 679–687.
Lim, H. (2002)., U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.
Muster, T. (2000). Fuel savings potential and costs considerations for US Class 8 heavy duty trucks through resistance reductions and improved propulsion technologies until 2020, Number MIT_EL 00-001, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Energy Laboratory Publication, Cambridge, MA.
Network Analyst [from DVD series ‘ESRI Data & Maps 10’]. Environmental Systems Research Institute, Redlands, CA.
Pennsylvania Dept. of Environmental Protection (PA DEP). (2011). Marcellus only (6 months): Waste [CSV File], 〈https://www.paoilandgasreporting.state.pa.us/publicreports/Modules/DataExports/DataExports.aspx〉 (Jun. 18, 2012).
Powers, J. P., Corwin, A. B., Schmall, P. C., and Kaeck, W. E. (2007). Construction dewatering and groundwater control, 3rd Ed., Wiley, Hoboken, NJ.
OMV Petrol Ofisi A.S. “Rock drill lubricant 100 material safety data sheet.” 〈http://www.poas.com.tr/PO_pdf/madeni_yaglar/msds/endustriyel_yaglar/rock_drill_lubricant_100_ing.pdf〉 (Oct. 04, 2011).
National Research Council (NRC). (2010). Technologies and approaches to reducing the fuel consumption of medium- and heavy-duty vehicles, National Academies Press, National Academy of Sciences, Washington, DC.
Schneider, A. (2012). “GPS visualizer’s quick geocoder.” 〈http://www.gpsvisualizer.com/geocode〉 (Jun. 18, 2012).
SigmaPlot [Computer software]. Systat, Chicago.
Smith Cooper, J., Woods, L., and Lee, S. J. (2008). “Distance and backhaul in commodity transport modeling.” Int. J. Life Cycle Assess., 13(5), 389–400.
Stephenson, T., Valle, J. E., and Riera-Palou, X. (2011). “Modeling the relative GHG emissions of conventional and shale gas production.” Environ. Sci. Technol., 45(24), 10757–10764.
StreetMap North America [Computer software]. Environmental Systems Research Institute, Redlands, CA.
Susquehanna River Basin Commission (SRBC). (2010). “Susquehanna River Basin information sheet: Natural gas development in the Susquehanna River Basin.” 〈http://www.srbc.net/programs/docs/ProjectReviewMarcellusShale(NEW)(1_2010).pdf〉 (May 3, 2012).
Susquehanna River Basin Commission (SRBC). (2011). “Approved source list for natural gas development.” 〈http://www.srbc.net/wrp/ApprovedSourceList.aspx〉 (Jun. 1, 2011).
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). (2012). “Underground injection control program.” 〈http://water.epa.gov/type/groundwater/uic/wells.cfm〉 (Aug. 26, 2012).
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). (2011). “Emissions factors for greenhouse gas inventories.” EPA center for corporate climate leadership, 〈http://www.epa.gov/climateleadership/guidance/ghg-emissions.html〉 (Sep. 24, 2012).
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). (2008). “Direct emissions from mobile combustion sources: Greenhouse gas inventory protocol core module guidance.”, Office of Air and Radiation, USEPA, Washington, DC.
Weber, C. L., and Calvin, C. (2012). “Life cycle carbon footprint of shale gas: Review of evidence and implications.” Environ. Sci. Technol., 46(11), 5688–5695.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Environmental Engineering
Journal of Environmental Engineering
Volume 140Issue 5May 2014

History

Received: Nov 30, 2012
Accepted: Nov 15, 2013
Published online: Dec 30, 2013
Published in print: May 1, 2014
Discussion open until: May 30, 2014

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Kevin R. Gilmore [email protected]
P.E.
M.ASCE
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Bucknell Univ., 328 Dana Engineering Building, Lewisburg, PA 17837 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Rebekah L. Hupp
S.M.ASCE
Undergraduate Student, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Bucknell Univ., One Dent Dr., Lewisburg, PA 17837.
Janine Glathar
Geographic Information Systems Specialist, Library and Information Technology, Bucknell Univ., One Dent Dr., Lewisburg, PA 17837.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share