Technical Papers
Oct 26, 2012

Multimodel, Multiple Watershed Examination of In-Stream Bacteria Modeling

Publication: Journal of Environmental Engineering
Volume 139, Issue 5

Abstract

Excessive bacteria levels are a major water-quality problem in U.S. water bodies, and this study looked at the use of watershed-scale computer models to predict in-stream bacteria concentrations. The study site was the Little River Experimental Watershed (LREW) in Tifton, Georgia, and fecal coliform fate and transport models were built for four of the LREW subwatersheds over the period January 1996–December 2002. Three models were examined: HSPF, the soil and water assessment tool (SWAT), and the characteristic concentration (CC) model based on the principles of hydrograph separation. It was found that the most sensitive HSPF and SWAT water-quality parameters were associated with the in-stream bacteria processes, whereas parameters relating to terrestrial activity varied from sensitive to completely insensitive. Model performance was evaluated using the Nash–Sutcliffe statistic, and HSPF, SWAT, and the CC model performed comparably while showing distinct performance capabilities.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

Paul Duda of AquaTerra in Atlanta, Georgia, and Tom Jobes of the St. Johns River Water Management District in Paletka, Florida, provided valuable support with the HSPF models. Nancy Sammons and Mike White of the USDA-ARS in Temple, Texas, provided valuable support with the SWAT models. Victor Pestien of the University of Miami helped clarify mathematical concepts used in the Latin hypercube analysis. Chris Hanson of the University of Miami provided valuable support in setting up the GIS components of the models. Shihab Asfour and Khaled Zakaria of the University of Miami graciously provided extra computer resources for the modeling efforts.

References

Abbaspour, K. C., et al. (2007). “Modelling hydrology and water quality in the pre-alpine/alpine Thur watershed using SWAT.” J. Hydrol., 333, 413–430.
Al-Abed, N., and Whiteley, H. (2002). “Calibration of the Hydrological Simulation Program Fortran (HSPF) model using automatic calibration and geographical information systems.” Hydrol. Processes, 16, 3169–3188.
Baffaut, C., and Benson, V. (2009). “Modeling flow and pollutant transport in a karst watershed with SWAT.” Trans. ASABE, 52(2), 469–479.
Baffaut, C., and Sadeghi, A. (2010). “Bacteria modeling with SWAT for assessment and remediation studies: A review.” Trans. ASABE, 53(5), 1585–1594.
BASINS 4.0 [Computer software]. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.
Benham, B., et al. (2006). “Modeling bacteria fate and transport in watersheds to support TMDLs.” Trans. ASABE, 49(4), 987–1002.
Bicknell, B., Imhoff, J., Kittle, J., Jr., and Donigian, A., Jr. (2001). “Hydrological Simulation Program - Fortran (HSPF): User’s manual for release 12.” National Exposure Research Laboratory, Office of Research and Development, U.S Environmental Protection Agency, Athens, GA.
Bosch, D., and Sheridan, J. (2007). “Stream discharge database, Little River Experimental Watershed, Georgia, United States.” Water Resour. Res., 43, W09473.
Bosch, D., et al. (2007a). “Little River Experimental Watershed database.” Water Resour. Res., 43, W09470.
Bosch, D., Sheridan, J., and Marshall, L. (2007b). “Precipitation, soil moisture, and climate database, Little River Experimental Watershed, Georgia, United States.” Water Resour. Res., 43, W09472.
Byappanahalli, M., Fowler, M., Shively, D., and Whitman, R. (2003). “Ubiquity and persistence of Escherichia coli in a Midwestern coastal stream.” Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 69(8), 4549–4555.
Chin, D. A. (2009). “Predictive uncertainty in water-quality modeling.” J. Environ. Eng., 135(12), 1315–1325.
Chin, D. A. (2011). “Quantifying pathogen sources in streams by hydrograph separation.” J. Environ. Eng., 137(9), 770–781.
Chin, D. A. (2012). “The relationship between flow and bacteria in streams.” Water Environ. Res., 84(3), 228–236.
Chin, D., Sakura-Lemessy, D., Bosch, D., and Gay, P. (2009). “Watershed-scale fate and transport of bacteria.” Trans. ASABE, 52(1), 145–154.
Christiaens, K., and Feyen, J. (2002). “Use of sensitivity and uncertainty measures in distributed hydrological modeling with an application to the MIKE SHE model.” Water Resour. Res., 38(9), 1169.
Crowther, J., Kay, D., and Wyer, M. D. (2002). “Faecal-indicator concentrations in waters draining lowland pastoral catchments in the UK: Relationships with land use and farming practices.” Water Res., 36(7), 1725–1734.
Doherty, J., and Johnston, J. M. (2003). “Methodologies for calibration and predictive analysis of a watershed model.” J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 39(2), 251–265.
Feyereisen, G., Lowrance, R., Strickland, T., Sheridan, J., Hubbard, R., and Bosch, D. (2007a). “Long-term water chemistry database, Little River Experimental Watershed, southeast Coastal Plain, United States.” Water Resour. Res., 43, W09474.
Feyereisen, G., Strickland, T., Bosch, D., and Sullivan, D. (2007b). “Evaluation of SWAT manual calibration and input parameter sensitivity in the Little River Watershed.” Trans. ASABE, 50(3), 843–855.
Flores, A. N., Entekhabi, D., and Bras, R. L. (2010). “Reproducibility of soil moisture ensembles when representing soil parameter uncertainty using a Latin hypercube-based approach with correlation control.” Water Resour. Res., 46, W04506.
Haan, C. (1989). “Parametric uncertainty in hydrologic modeling.” Trans. ASABE, 32(1), 137–146.
Hantush, M. M., and Kalin, L. (2008). “Stochastic residual-error analysis for estimating hydrologic model predictive uncertainty.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 13(7), 585–596.
Haydon, S., and Deletic, A. (2006). “Development of a coupled pathogen-hydrologic catchment model.” J. Hydrol., 328, 467–480.
Haydon, S., and Deletic, A. (2009). “Model output uncertainty of a coupled pathogen indicator-hydrologic catchment model due to input data uncertainty.” Environ. Model. Software, 24, 322–328.
Hunter, C., McDonald, A., and Beven, K. (1992). “Input of fecal coliform bacteria to an upland stream channel in the Yorkshire Dales.” Water Resour. Res., 28(7), 1869–1876.
Iudicello, J. J. (2012). “New methods for improving the watershed-scale modeling of in-stream pathogen indicator bacteria.” Ph.D. thesis, Univ. of Miami, Coral Gables, FL.
Jia, Y., and Culver, T. B. (2008). “Uncertainty analysis for watershed modeling using generalized likelihood uncertainty estimation with multiple calibration measures.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 134(2), 97–106.
LaWare, P., and Rifai, H. S. (2006). “Modeling fecal coliform contamination in the Rio Grande.” J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 42(2), 337–356.
McDonald, A., Kay, D., and Jenkins, A. (1982). “Generation of fecal and total coliform surges by stream flow manipulation in the absence of normal hydrometeorological stimuli.” Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 44(2), 292–300.
McKay, M., Conover, W., and Beckman, R. (1979). “A comparison of three methods for selecting values of input variables in the analysis of output from a computer code.” Technometrics, 21, 239–245.
McMurry, S., Coyne, M., and Perfect, E. (1998). “Fecal coliform transport through intact soil blocks amended with poultry manure.” J. Environ. Qual., 27, 86–92.
Moriasi, D., Arnold, J., Van Liew, M., Bingner, R., Harmel, R., and Veith, T. (2007). “Model evaluation guidelines for systematic quantification of accuracy in watershed simulations.” Trans. ASABE, 50(3), 885–900.
Nash, J., and Sutcliffe, J. (1970). “River flow forecasting through conceptual models. Part 1: A discussion of principles.” J. Hydrol., 10(3), 282–290.
Neitsch, S., Arnold, J., Kiniry, J., and Williams, J. (2009). “Soil and water assessment tool theoretical documentation, version 2009.” U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Agriculture Research Service, Grassland, Soil, and Water Research Laboratory, Temple, TX.
Oliver, D. M., et al. (2009). “Scale appropriate modelling of diffuse microbial pollution from agriculture.” Prog. Phys. Geogr., 33(3), 358–377.
Russo, S. A., Hunn, J., and Characklis, G. W. (2011). “Considering bacteria-sediment associations in microbial fate and transport modeling.” J. Environ. Eng., 137(8), 697–706.
Sakura-Lemessy, D.-M. G. (2009). “A multi-model approach to predicting pathogen indicator bacteria loading in TMDL analyses.” Ph.D. thesis, Univ. of Miami, Coral Gables, FL.
Shapiro, S., and Wilk, M. (1965). “An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples).” Biometrika, 52(3–4), 591–611.
Shirmohammadi, A., et al. (2006). “Uncertainty in TMDL models.” Trans. ASABE, 49(4), 1033–1049.
Singh, J., Knapp, H. V., Arnold, J., and Demissie, M. (2005). “Hydrological modeling of the Iroquois river watershed using HSPF and SWAT.” J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 41(2), 343–360.
Sloto, R., and Crouse, M. (1996). “HYSEP: A computer program for streamflow hydrograph separation and analysis.”, U.S. Geological Survey, Lemoyne, PA.
Stein, M. (1987). “Large sample properties of simulations using Latin hypercube sampling.” Technometrics, 29(2), 143–151.
Sullivan, D., Batten, H., Bosch, D., Sheridan, J., and Strickland, T. (2007). “Little River Experimental Watershed, Tifton, Georgia, United States: A geographic database.” Water Resour. Res., 43, W09471.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). (2001). “Protocol for developing pathogen TMDLs.” Technical Rep. EPA-841-R-00-002, Office of Water, Washington, DC.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). (2009). “National summary of impaired waters and TMDL information.” F020 〈http://iaspub.epa.gov/waters10/attains_nation_cy.control?p_report_type=T〉 (Dec. 2011).
Van Liew, M., Arnold, J., and Garbrecht, J. (2003). “Hydrologic simulation on agricultural watersheds: Choosing between two models.” Trans. ASABE, 46(6), 1539–1551.
Vrugt, J. A., Gupta, H. V., Bouten, W., and Sorooshian, S. (2003). “A shuffled complex evolution metropolis algorithm for optimization and uncertainty assessment of hydrologic model parameters.” Water Resour. Res., 39(8), 1201.
White, E., Feyereisen, G., Veith, T., and Bosch, D. (2009). “Improving daily water yield estimates in the Little River Watershed: SWAT adjustments.” Trans. ASABE, 52(1), 69–79.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Environmental Engineering
Journal of Environmental Engineering
Volume 139Issue 5May 2013
Pages: 719 - 727

History

Received: Jan 5, 2012
Accepted: Oct 24, 2012
Published online: Oct 26, 2012
Published in print: May 1, 2013

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Jeffrey J. Iudicello [email protected]
Water Resources Engineer/Modeler, Delaware River Basin Commission, 25 State Police Dr., West Trenton, NJ 08628 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
David A. Chin
F.ASCE
Professor, Dept. of Civil, Architectural, and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Miami, Coral Gables, FL 33124.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share