Technical Papers
Sep 8, 2012

Bayesian Chemical Mass Balance Method for Surface Water Contaminant Source Apportionment

Publication: Journal of Environmental Engineering
Volume 139, Issue 2

Abstract

A Bayesian chemical mass balance (CMB) source apportionment method is developed using the Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) approach. Compared with deterministic approaches, the Bayesian method is capable of accounting for the measurement errors and the impact of variability of the source elemental compositions resulting from the heterogeneities and estimate the uncertainties associated with the estimated source contributions. The method estimates the joint probability densities and consequently, the credible intervals and correlation matrices of source contributions of various sources into a receiving water using observed elemental profiles of samples from both potential sources and the receiving surface waters. The model is applied to samples collected from possible sources and runoff and stream flow from two stream crossing sites along Highway 89 in the Lake Tahoe Basin. The contributing sources of total dissolved nitrogen, total dissolved phosphorus concentrations, and microparticles (<20μm) from traffic and non-traffic-related sources have been evaluated using the method. The results showed that the model is capable of predicting the source contributions for the dissolved and particulate samples. During both rain events and snowmelt, deicing salt is a major source of dissolved solids whereas vegetation was to be the major source of dissolved nitrogen and phosphorus. Soil was found to be the primary source of microparticles and particulate phosphorus. The method does not definitively show contribution from traffic-related sources; however, in some cases it cannot conclusively rule out a significant contribution from them. The observed credible intervals for dissolved constituents were narrower compared with microparticle samples.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

This research study was partially funded by the Division of Environmental Analysis, California Department of Transportation, through Research Technical Agreement 43A0247. The views expressed by the authors are their own and the California Department of Transportation does not endorse the viewpoint of a publication or guarantee its technical correctness. The authors appreciate the assistance of Chris Alaimo, Dane Anderson, Tatanya Renee Klass, and Hyunmin Hwang for their assistance on sample collection and sample processing. We are also thankful to Drs. Adina Paytan and Peter Green, who supervised nutrient and elemental chemical analysis that was performed at UCSC and UCD, respectively.

References

Billheimer, D. (2001). “Compositional receptor modeling.” Environmetrics, 12(5), 451–467.
Brewer, M. J., et al. (2005). “A hierarchical model for compositional data analysis.” J. Agric. Biol. Environ. Stat., 10(1), 19–34.
Britt, H. I., and Luecke, R. H. (1973). “The estimation of parameters in nonlinear, implicit models.” Technometrics, 15(2), 233–247.
Bzdusek, P. A., Christensen, E. R., Li, A., and Zou, Q. M. (2004). “Source apportionment of sediment PAHs in Lake Calumet, Chicago: Application of factor analysis with nonnegative constraints.” Environ. Sci. Technol., 38(1), 97–103.
Candela, A., Freni, G., Mannina, G., and Viviani, G. (2009). “Quantification of diffuse and concentrated pollutant loads at the watershed-scale: An Italian case study.” Water Sci. Technol., 59(11), 2125–2135.
Carter, E. J., and Borys, R. D. (1993). “Aerosol-cloud chemical fractionation: Enrichment factor analysis of cloud water.” J. Atmos. Chem., 17(3), 277–292.
Caselli, M., de Gennaro, G., and Ielpo, P. (2006). “A comparison between two receptor models to determine the source apportionment of atmospheric pollutants.” Environmetrics, 17(5), 507–516.
Chan, Y. C., Simpson, R. W., Mctainsh, G. H., Vowles, P. D., Cohen, D. D., and Bailey, G. M. (1999). “Source apportionment of visibility degradation problems in Brisbane (Australia) using the multiple linear regression techniques.” Atmos. Environ., 33(19), 3237–3250.
Collins, A. L., Walling, D. E., and Leeks, G. J. L. (1997a). “Fingerprinting the origin of fluvial suspended sediment in larger river basins: Combining assessment of spatial provenance and source type.” Geografiska Annaler Series A-Physical Geography, 79A(4), 239–254.
Collins, A. L., Walling, D. E., and Leeks, G. J. L. (1997b). “Source type ascription for fluvial suspended sediment based on a quantitative composite fingerprinting technique.” Catena, 29(1), 1–27.
Collins, A. L., Walling, D. E., and Leeks, G. J. L. (1997c). “Use of the geochemical record preserved in floodplain deposits to reconstruct recent changes in river basin sediment sources.” Geomorphol., 19(1–2), 151–167.
El-Shaarawi, A. H. (1989). “Inferences about the mean from censored water-quality data.” Water Resour. Res., 25(4), 685–690.
El-Shaarawi, A. H., and Lin, J. (2007). “Interval estimation for log-normal mean with applications to water quality.” Environmetrics, 18(1), 1–10.
Fox, J. F., and Papanicolaou, A. N. (2008). “An un-mixing model to study watershed erosion processes.” Adv. Water Resour., 31(1), 96–108.
Franks, S. W., and Rowan, J. S. (2000). “Multi-parameter fingerprinting of sediment sources: Uncertainty estimation and tracer selection.” Computational methods in water resources, L. R. Bentley, C. A. Brebbia, W. G. Gray, G. F. Pinder and J. F. Sykes, eds., Taylor & Francis, Balkema, Rotterdam, 1067–1074.
Friedlander, S. K. (1973). “Chemical element balances and identification of air pollution sources.” Environ. Sci. Technol., 7(3), 235–240.
Gamerman, D., and Hedibert, F. L. (2006). Markov Chain Monte Carlo—stochastic simulation for Bayesian inference, 2nd Ed., Chapman and Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, FL.
Geman, S., and Geman, D. (1984). “Stochastic relaxation, Gibbs distributions, and the Bayesian restoration of images.” IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Machine Intell., PAMI-6(6), 721–741.
Geweke, J. (1992). “Evaluating the accuracy of sampling-based approaches to the calculation of posterior moments.” Bayesian statistics, J. M. Bernardo, J. O. Berger, A. P. Dawid, and A. F. M. Smith, eds., Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, UK.
Geweke, J., and Tanizaki, H. (2001). “Bayesian estimation of state-space models using the Metropolis—Hastings algorithm within Gibbs sampling.” Comput. Stat. Data Anal., 37(2), 151–170.
Gordon, G. E. (1988). “Receptor models.” Environ. Sci. Technol., 22(10), 1132–1142.
Helsel, D. R., and Cohn, T. A. (1988). “Estimation of descriptive statistics for multiply censored water-quality data.” Water Resour. Res., 24(12), 1997–2004.
Henry, R. C. (1997). “History and fundamentals of multivariate air duality receptor models.” Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst., 37(1), 37–42.
Henry, R. C. (2002). “Multivariate receptor models—Current practice and future trends.” Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst., 60(1–2), 43–48.
Hopke, P. K. (1985). Receptor modeling in environmental chemistry (Chemical analysis: A series of monographs on analytical chemistry and its applications), Wiley-Interscience, New York.
Hopke, P. K. (2003). “Recent developments in receptor modeling.” J. Chemom., 17(5), 255–265.
Imamoglu, I., Li, K., and Christensen, E. R. (2002). “Modeling polychlorinated biphenyl congener patterns and dechlorination in dated sediments from the Ashtabula River, Ohio, USA.” Environ. Toxicol. Chem., 21(11), 2283–2291.
Imamoglu, I., Li, K., Christensen, E. R., and McMullin, J. K. (2004). “Sources and dechlorination of polychlorinated biphenyl congeners in the sediments of Fox River, Wisconsin.” Environ. Sci. Technol., 38(9), 2574–2583.
Keats, A., Cheng, M.-T., Yee, E., and Lien, F.-S. (2009). “Bayesian treatment of a chemical mass balance receptor model with multiplicative error structure.” Atmos. Environ., 43(3), 510–519.
Kelley, D. W., and Nater, E. A. (2000). “Source apportionment of lake bed sediments to watersheds in an Upper Mississippi Basin using a chemical mass balance method.” Catena, 41(4), 277–292.
Limpert, E., Stahel, W. A., and Abbt, M. (2001). “Log-normal distributions across the sciences: Keys and clues.” BioScience, 51(5), 341–352.
Lingwall, J. W., Christensen, W. F., and Reese, C. S. (2008). “Dirichlet based Bayesian multivariate receptor modeling.” Environmetrics, 19(6), 618–629.
Metropolis, N., Rosenbluth, A. W., Rosenbluth, M. N., Teller, A. H., and Teller, E. (1953). “Equations of state calculations by fast computing machines.” J. Chem. Phys., 21(6), 1087–1092.
Miller, M., Friedlander, S., and Hidy, G. (1972). “A chemical element balance for the Pasadena aerosol.” J. Colloid Interface Sci., 39(1), 165–176.
Olmez, I., and Hayes, M. J. (1990). “Identifying sources of groundwater pollution using trace element signatures.” Biol. Trace Elem. Res., 26(1), 355–361.
Paatero, P. (1997). “Least squares formulation of robust non-negative factor analysis.” Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst., 37(1), 23–35.
Paatero, P., and Tapper, U. (1994). “Positive matrix factorization—a nonnegative factor model with optimal utilization of error-estimates of data values.” Environmetrics, 5(2), 111–126.
Pena-Mendez, E. M., Astorga-Espana, M. S., and Garcia-Montelongo, F. J. (2001). “Chemical fingerprinting applied to the evaluation of marine oil pollution in the coasts of Canary Islands (Spain).” Environ. Pollut., 111(2), 177–187.
Shumway, R. H., Azari, R. S., and Kayhanian, M. (2002). “Statistical approaches to estimating mean water quality concentrations with detection limits.” Environ. Sci. Technol., 36(15), 3345–3353.
Soonthornnonda, P., and Christensen, E. R. (2008). “Source apportionment of pollutants and flows of combined sewer wastewater.” Water Res., 42(8–9), 1989–1998.
Su, M. C., Christensen, E. R., and Karls, J. F. (1998). “Determination of PAH sources in dated sediments from Green Bay, Wisconsin, by a chemical mass balance model.” Environ. Pollut., 99(3), 411–419.
USEPA. (1993a). “Determination of nitrate-nitrite nitrogen by semi-automatic colorimetry.” Environmental Monitoring Systems Laboratory, Office of Research and Development, Cincinnati, Ohio.
USEPA. (1993b). “Determination of ammonia nitrogen by automatic colorimetry.” Environmental Monitoring Systems Laboratory, Office of Research and Development, Cincinnati, Ohio.
USEPA. (1993c). “Determination of phosphorus by semi-automatic colorimetry.” Environmental Monitoring Systems Laboratory, Office of Research and Development, Cincinnati, Ohio.
Watson, J. G., Chow, J. C., and Fujita, E. M. (2001). “Review of volatile organic compound source apportionment by chemical mass balance.” Atmos. Environ., 35(9), 1567–1584.
Watson, J. G., Cooper, J. A., and Huntzicker, J. J. (1984). “The effective variance weighting for least-squares calculations applied to the mass balance receptor model.” Atmos. Environ., 18(7), 1347–1355.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Environmental Engineering
Journal of Environmental Engineering
Volume 139Issue 2February 2013
Pages: 250 - 260

History

Received: Oct 27, 2011
Accepted: Sep 6, 2012
Published online: Sep 8, 2012
Published in print: Feb 1, 2013

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Arash Massoudieh [email protected]
M.ASCE
Dept. of Civil Engineering, The Catholic Univ. of America, Washington, DC 20064 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Masoud Kayhanian
M.ASCE
Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of California, Davis, CA.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share