Are Bioretention Cells Being Installed Per Design Standards in North Carolina? A Field Study
Publication: Journal of Environmental Engineering
Volume 138, Issue 12
Abstract
Forty-three bioretention cells (BRCs) throughout North Carolina were assessed for maintenance needs, soil media composition, and as-built surface storage volume to determine whether BRCs are typically constructed per their intended design specifications. Visual inspections identified hydric soils and redoximorphic features (indicators of prolonged anaerobic conditions) and quantified the occurrence of issues requiring maintenance. Particle-size distribution and permeability of soil media were measured at multiple locations within each cell, and topographic surveys were performed to calculate as-built surface storage volumes. Field drawdown tests were used to verify permeability measurements and assess overall BRC function. Of the studied cells, 22% contained redoximorphic features in the upper 30 cm, and 53% were in need of maintenance due to one or more factors. Although 71% of assessed cells failed to meet soil media particle-size distribution specifications, 98% of BRCs contained media with adequate or high permeability. Over half (65%) of cells were undersized vis-à-vis intended design, with 53% exhibiting moderately or severely undersized surface storage capacity. Discrepancies in average ponding depth and incorporation of inspection/maintenance programs significantly influenced the accuracy of as-built BRC storage volume; therefore, it is important for inspectors to verify that the bed elevations of BRCs have been accurately graded. Despite being typically undersized, it was concluded that most observed bioretention cells are meeting the hydrologic goals of North Carolina standards.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
This project was supported by NCDENR-administered 319(h) funding. The authors appreciate the assistance provided by the communities of Apex, Cary, Charlotte, Durham, Gaston County, Greensboro, Hickory, Mecklenburg County, Transylvania County, and Wilson. Finally, many staff and students at NCSU assisted, notably Shawn Kennedy and Will Pluer.
References
Asleson, B. C., Nestingen, R. S., Gulliver, J. S., Hozalski, R. M., and Nieber, J. L. (2009). “Performance assessment of rain gardens.” J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc, 45(4), 1019–1031.
AutoCAD Civil 3D 2010 [Computer software]. Autodesk, San Rafael, CA.
Brown, R. A., and Hunt, W. F. (2011a). “Impacts of media depth on effluent water quality and hydrologic performance of under-sized bioretention cells.” J. Irrig. Drain. Eng., 137(3), 132–143.
Brown, R. A., and Hunt, W. F. (2011b). “Underdrain configuration to enhance bioretention exfiltration to reduce pollutant loads.” J. Environ. Eng., 137(11), 1082–1091.
Carpenter, D. D., and Hallam, L. (2010). “Influence of planting soil mix characteristics on bioretention cell design and performance.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 15(6), 404–416.
Clark, S., and Pitt, R. (2009). “Storm-water filter media pollutant retention under aerobic versus anaerobic conditions.” J. Environ. Eng., 135(5), 367–371.
Davis, A. P., Hunt, W. F., Traver, R. G., and Clar, M. (2009). “Bioretention technology: Overview of current practice and future needs.” J. Environ. Eng., 135(3), 109–117.
Dietz, M. E., and Clausen, J. C. (2006). “Saturation to improve pollutant retention in a rain garden.” Environ. Sci. Technol., 40(4), 1335–1340.
Gee, G. W., and Bauder, J. W. (1986). “Particle-size analysis.” Methods of soil analysis, Part 1, Klute, A., ed., Soil Science Society of America, Madison, WI, 383–411.
Hatt, B. E., Fletcher, T. D., and Deletic, A. (2008). “Hydraulic and pollutant removal performance of fine media stormwater filtration systems.” Environ. Sci. Technol., 42(7), 2535–2541.
Hatt, B. E., Fletcher, T. D., and Deletic, A. (2009). “Hydrologic and pollutant removal performance of stormwater biofiltration systems at the field scale.” J. Hydrol., 365(3–4), 310–321.
Hsieh, C., Davis, A. P., and Needelman, B. A. (2007). “Nitrogen removal from urban stormwater runoff through layered bioretention columns.” Water Environ. Res., 79(12), 2404–2411.
Hunt, W. F., Davis, A. P., and Traver, R. G. (2012). “Meeting hydrologic and water quality goals through targeted bioretention design.” J. Environ. Eng., 138(6), 698–707.
Hunt, W. F., Jarrett, A. R., Smith, J. T., and Sharkey, L. J. (2006). “Evaluating bioretention hydrology and nutrient removal at three field sites in North Carolina.” J. Irrig. Drain. Eng., 132(6), 600–608.
Hunt, W. F., and Lord, W. G. (2006). Bioretention performance, design, construction, and maintenance, North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service, Raleigh, NC.
Klute, A. (1986). “Water retention: Laboratory methods.” Methods of soil analysis, Part 1, Klute, A., ed., Soil Science Society of America, Madison, WI, 383–411.
Li, H., and Davis, A. P. (2008). “Urban particle capture in bioretention media. I: Laboratory and field studies.” J. Environ. Eng., 134(6), 409–418.
Li, H., Sharkey, L. J., Hunt, W. F., and Davis, A. P. (2009). “Mitigation of impervious surface hydrology using bioretention in North Carolina and Maryland.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 14(4), 407–415.
Luell, S. K., Hunt, W. F., and Winston, R. J. (2011). “Evaluation of undersized bioretention stormwater control measures (SCMs) for treatment of highway bridge deck runoff.” Water Sci. Technol., 64(4), 974–979.
Meysman, F. J. R., Middelburg, J. J., and Heip, C. H. R. (2006). “Bioturbation: A fresh look at Darwin’s last idea.” Trends Ecol. Evol., 21(12), 688–695.
Mitchell, A. R., Ellsworth, T. R., and Meek, B. D. (1995). “Effect of root systems on preferential flow in swelling soil.” Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal., 26(15–16), 2655–2666.
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources (NCDENR). (2005). Updated draft manual of stormwater best management practices, Division of Water Quality.
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources (NCDENR). (2009). Stormwater best management practices manual, Division of Water Quality, Raleigh, NC.
Pitt, R., Chen, S., Clark, S. E., Swenson, J., and Ong, C. K. (2008). “Compaction’s impact on urban storm-water infiltration.” J. Irrig. Drain. Eng., 134(5), 652–658.
Roy-Poirier, A., Champagne, P., and Filion, Y. (2010). “Review of bioretention system research and design: Past, present, and future.” J. Environ. Eng., 136(9), 878–889.
SAS Version 9.2 [Computer software]. SAS Institute, Cary, NC.
Stander, E. K., and Borst, M. (2010). “Hydraulic test of a bioretention media carbon amendment.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 15(6), 531–536.
Thien, S. J. (1979). “A flow diagram for teaching texture-by-feel analysis.” J. Agron. Educ., 8, 54–55.
United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). (2003). “Protecting water quality from urban runoff.”, Washington, DC.
Vasilas, L. M., Hurt, G. W., and Noble, C. V., eds. (2010). Field indicators of hydric soils in the United States, 7th Ed., United States Dept. of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, National Technical Committee for Hydric Soils.
Vepraskas, M. J. (2001). “Morphological features of seasonally reduced soils.” Wetland soils: Genesis, hydrology, landscapes, and classifications, Richardson, J. L., and Vepraskas, M. J., eds., CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 163–181.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Environmental Engineering
Volume 138 • Issue 12 • December 2012
Pages: 1210 - 1217
Copyright
© 2012 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Sep 8, 2011
Accepted: Mar 31, 2012
Published online: Apr 10, 2012
Published in print: Dec 1, 2012
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.