Underdrain Configuration to Enhance Bioretention Exfiltration to Reduce Pollutant Loads
Publication: Journal of Environmental Engineering
Volume 137, Issue 11
Abstract
The bioretention drainage configuration of raising the outlet to create an internal water storage (IWS) layer in the media was originally intended to promote denitrifying conditions. The goal was to reduce nitrate and total nitrogen concentrations in nutrient-sensitive watersheds. Two field studies in the Piedmont region of North Carolina, where the in situ soils typically have high clay content, showed this design feature had potential to enhance exfiltration and reduce drainage from bioretention. Two bioretention cells in Rocky Mount, North Carolina, were monitored for two year-long periods to measure the impact of varying IWS zone depths over sandier underlying soils. Nearly 99% of runoff entering the bioretention cell with sand underlying soil (sand cell) was never directly discharged to the storm water network. However, the hydraulic retention time (contact time) of runoff in the media was less than 3 h, and except for total suspended solids (TSS), minimal pollutant removal was achieved. The other bioretention cell had a sandy clay loam underlying soil (SCL cell); the percentage of runoff leaving via exfiltration and evapotranspiration from this cell was 87% during the monitoring period with a 1.03-m IWS zone depth and 75% when the IWS zone depth was 0.73 m. The underlying soil of the SCL cell had a lower hydraulic conductivity, so water would remain in the IWS zone for up to 7 days. The increased hydraulic retention time in the media resulted in lower outflow concentrations. For events monitored with drainage from the SCL cell, efficiency ratios of all the nitrogen species and TSS exceeded 0.5. As an additional metric of performance, the parking lot runoff and treated runoff from both the SCL and sand cells were compared to concentrations consistent with “good” and “fair” benthic macroinvertebrate health in streams. Using this metric, the parking lot runoff only met the “fair” standard for total nitrogen (TN) and total phosphorus (TP), and treated runoff from the SCL cell achieved the “good” standard for both TN and TP. However, because of the short hydraulic retention time of runoff in the media for the sand cell, this cell only maintained the “fair” standard for TN and did not achieve the “fair” standard for TP.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to acknowledge the Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology (CICEET) for funding this project. Thanks to Dr. Aziz Amoozegar, Dr. Gregory Jennings, and Dr. Wayne Skaggs for their review and input. Finally, thanks to Shawn Kennedy, Bill Lord, and Ryan Smith for assistance in setting up the site and installing monitoring equipment and to Jenny James and Linda Mackenzie for water quality sample analyses.
References
Amatya, D. M., Skaggs, R. W., and Gregory, J. D. (1995). “Comparison of methods for estimating REF-ET.” J. Irrig. Drain Eng., 121(6), 427–435.
Davis, A. P. (2007). “Field performance of bioretention: Water quality.” Environ. Eng. Sci., 24(8), 1048–1064.
Davis, A. P. (2008). “Field performance of bioretention: Hydrology impacts.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 13(2), 90–95.
Davis, A. P., Hunt, W. F., Traver, R. G., and Clar, M. (2009). “Bioretention technology: Overview of current practice and future needs.” J. Environ. Eng., 135(3), 109–117.
Davis, A. P., Shokouhian, M., Sharma, H., and Minami, C. (2001). “Laboratory study of biological retention for urban stormwater management.” Water Environ. Res., 73(1), 5–14.
Dietz, M. E., and Clausen, J. C. (2006). “Saturation to improve pollutant retention in a rain garden.” Environ. Sci. Technol., 40(4), 1335–1340.
Eaton, A. D., Clesceri, L. S., and Greenberg, A. R. (1995). Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association, and Water Environment Federation, Washington, DC.
Emerson, C. H., and Traver, R. G. (2008). “Multiyear and seasonal variation of infiltration from storm-water best management practices.” J. Irrig. Drain Eng., 134(5), 598–604.
Gee, G. W., and Bauder, J. W. (1986). “Particle-size analysis.” Methods of soil analysis: Part 1—Physical and mineralogical methods, A. Klute, ed., Soil Science Society of America, Madison, WI, 383–411.
Hardy, D. H., Tucker, M. R., and Stokes, C. E. (2007). “Crop fertilization based on North Carolina soil tests.” Circular No. 1, North Carolina Dept. of Agriculture and Consumer Services—Agronomic Division, Raleigh, NC.
Hatt, B. R., Fletcher, T. D., and Deletic, A. (2009). “Pollutant removal performance of field-scale stormwater biofiltration systems.” Water Sci. Technol., 59(8), 1567–1576.
Hsieh, C., and Davis, A. P. (2005). “Evaluation and optimization of bioretention media for treatment of urban storm water runoff.” J. Environ. Eng., 131(11), 1521–1531.
Hunt, W. F., Jarrett, A. R., Smith, J. T., and Sharkey, L. J. (2006). “Evaluating bioretention hydrology and nutrient removal at three field sites in North Carolina.” J. Irrig. Drain Eng., 132(6), 600–608.
Hunt, W. F., Smith, J. T., Jadlocki, S. J., Hathaway, J. M., and Eubanks, P. R. (2008). “Pollutant removal and peak flow mitigation by a bioretention cell in urban Charlotte, NC.” J. Environ. Eng., 134(5), 403–408.
Kim, H., Seagren, E. A., and Davis, A. P. (2003). “Engineered bioretention for removal of nitrate from stormwater runoff.” Water Environ. Res., 75(4), 355–367.
Ladson, A. R., Walsh, C. J., and Fletcher, T. D. (2006). “Improving stream health in urban areas by reducing runoff frequency from impervious surfaces.” Aust. J. Water Resour., 10(1), 23–34.
Li, H., Sharkey, L. J., Hunt, W. F., and Davis, A. P. (2009). “Mitigation of impervious surface hydrology using bioretention in North Carolina and Maryland.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 14(4), 407–415.
Lu, J., Sun, G., McNulty, S. G., and Amatya, D. M. (2005). “A comparison of six potential evapotranspiration methods for regional use in the southeastern United States.” J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 41(3), 621–633.
McNett, J. K., Hunt, W. F., and Osborne, J. A. (2010). “Establishing stormwater BMP evaluation metrics based upon ambient water quality associated with benthic macro-invertabrate populations.” J. Environ. Eng., 136(5), 535–541.
McWhorter, D. B. (1971). “Infiltration affected by flow of air.” Hydrology Paper No. 49, Colorado State Univ., Fort Collins, CO.
McWhorter, D. B., and Sunada, D. K. (1977). Groundwater Hydrology and Hydraulics, Water Resources Publications, Fort Collins, CO.
Newman, M. C., Dixon, P. M., Looney, B. B., and Pinder, J. E. (1989). “Estimating mean and variance for environmental samples with below detection limit observations.” J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 25(4), 905–916.
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources. (2009). “Bioretention.” Stormwater best management practices manual, Chapter 12, Division of Water Quality, Raleigh, NC, 12-1–12-30.
Pandit, A., and Heck, H. H. (2009). “Estimations of soil conservation service curve numbers for concrete and asphalt.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 14(4), 335–345.
Passeport, E., Hunt, W. F., Line, D. E., Smith, R. A., and Brown, R. A. (2009). “Field study of the ability of two grassed bioretention cells to reduce storm-water runoff pollution.” J. Irrig. Drain Eng., 135(4), 505–510.
Roseen, R. M., Ballestero, T. P., Houle, J. J., Avelleneda, P., Widley, R., and Briggs, J. (2006). “Storm water low-impact development, conventional structural, and manufactured treatment strategies for parking lot runoff: Performance evaluations under varied mass loading calculations.” Transportation Research Record 1984, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 135–147.
Sharkey, L. J. (2006). “The performance of bioretention areas in North Carolina: A study of water quality, water quantity, and soil media.” M.S. thesis, North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, NC.
Skaggs, R. W., and Khaleel, R. (1982). “Infiltration.” Hydrologic modeling of small watersheds: Monograph No. 5, Chapter 4, American Society of Agricultural Engineers, St. Joseph, MI, 121–166.
State Climate Office of NC (SCO). (2009). “1971–2000 climate normals.” 〈http://www.nc-climate.ncsu.edu/cronos/normals.php?station=317400〉 (Jul. 20, 2009).
Strecker, E. W., Quigley, M. M., Urbonas, B. R., Jones, J. E., and Clary, J. K. (2001). “Determining urban storm water BMP effectiveness.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 127(3), 144–149.
Thornthwaite, C. W. (1948). “An approach toward a rational classification of climate.” Geogr. Rev., 38(1), 55–94.
USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service (USDA-NRCS). (2004a). “Estimation of direct runoff from storm rainfall.” Hydrology: National engineering handbook, Chapter 10, Part 630, Washington, DC.
USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service (USDA-NRCS). (2004b). “Hydrologic soil-cover complexes.” Hydrology: National engineering handbook, Chapter 9, Part 630, Washington, DC.
U.S. EPA. (1983). “Methods for chemical analysis of water and wastes.” EPA-600/4-79-020, Cincinnati.
Walsh, C. J., Fletcher, T. D., and Ladson, A. R. (2009). “Retention capacity: A metric to link stream ecology and storm-water management.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 14(4), 399–406.
Zhang, L., Dawes, W. R., and Walker, G. R. (2001). “Response of mean annual evapotranspiration to vegetation changes at catchment scale.” Water Resour. Res., 37(3), 701–708.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Environmental Engineering
Volume 137 • Issue 11 • November 2011
Pages: 1082 - 1091
Copyright
© 2011 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Jul 26, 2010
Accepted: Jun 2, 2011
Published online: Jun 4, 2011
Published in print: Nov 1, 2011
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.