Disposal of Arsenic-Laden Adsorptive Media: Economic Analysis for California
Publication: Journal of Environmental Engineering
Volume 136, Issue 10
Abstract
Due to California’s stringent hazardous waste (HW) classification regulations, high-capacity adsorptive media (AM) used for the removal of arsenic from potable water are likely to be classified as HW if operated to breakthrough. An alternative is to prematurely retire the AM, avoiding generation of HW. The impact of waste classification of spent AM on annual costs for arsenic systems was investigated. For a typical small water system (SWS), the media replacement cost alone was predicted to range from $0.80 to $2.00 per 1,000 L treated, in comparison to the average cost of tap water in the U.S. of $0.53 per 1,000 L treated, highlighting the financial burden for SWS. The costs of media replacement dominated over costs for transport and disposal regardless of whether spent media were designated as HW or non-HW. Media costs and influent arsenic concentration were more significant factors than transport distance or disposal fees. Under typical conditions for SWS, it was found to be cost effective to load the media to exhaustion as long as the arsenic loading at replacement was greater than 560-mg arsenic/kg AM, a situation readily obtained with commercially available high-capacity iron oxide adsorbents.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
Financial support of this research was provided through the California Department of Public Health Safe Drinking Water Revolving Fund Contract No. UNSPECIFIED06-55254. Its content are solely the responsibility of the writers and do not necessarily represent the official views of the agencies. The writers also thank Dr. Thomas Young, Dr. Peter Green, Vu Nguyen, and Elizabeth Hilkert of the University of California at Davis for valuable comments and suggestions.
References
Badruzzaman, M., and Westerhoff, P. (2005). “The application of rapid small-scale column tests in iron-based packed bed arsenic treatment systems.” American Chemical Society Symp. Series, American Chemical Society, Washington, D.C., 268–283.
Blaney, L. M., and SenGupta, A. K. (2006). “Comment on Landfill-stimulated iron reduction and arsenic release at the Coakley Superfund site (NH).” Environ. Sci. Technol., 40, 4037–4038.
California Department of Public Health (CDPH). (2008). “Arsenic in drinking water: MCL status.” California Department of Public Health, ⟨http://www.cdph.ca.gov/certlic/drinkingwater/Pages/Arsenic.aspx⟩ (Apr. 16, 2009).
California Department of Toxic Substances Control (CDTSC). (2006a). “Identification and listing of hazardous waste.” California code of regulations, California Department of Toxic Substances Control, Sacramento, Calif., Title 22, Division 4.5, Chap. 11.
California Department of Toxic Substances Control (CDTSC). (2006b). “Waste extraction test (WET) procedures.” California code of regulations, California Department of Toxic Substances Control, Sacramento, Calif., Title 22, Division 4.5, Chap. 11, Appendix II-1.
CDTSC. (2007a). “California commercial offsite hazardous waste facilities.” California Department of Toxic Substance Control, ⟨http://www.dtsc.ca.gov/HazardousWaste/upload/LIST_HWM_Commercial_Facilities.pdf⟩ (Apr. 16, 2009).
CDTSC. (2007b). “Defining hazardous waste.” California Department of Toxic Substance Control, ⟨http://www.dtsc.ca.gov/HazardousWaste/upload/HWMP_DefiningHW11.pdf⟩ (Apr. 16 2009).
Cornwell, D., MacPhee, M. J., Mutter, R., Novak, J., and Edwards, M. (2004). “Disposal of waste resulting from arsenic removal process.” AwwaRF Rep. 90953F, IWA Publishing, London.
Delemos, J. L., Bosticj, B. C., Renshaw, C. E., Stürup, S., and Feng, X. (2006). “Landfill-stimulated iron reduction and arsenic release at the Coakley Superfund site (NH).” Environ. Sci. Technol., 40, 67–73.
Frey, M. M., MacPhee, M. J., and Bernosky, J. (2003). Arsenic residuals research report: Implications for alternative arsenic MCLs for California water systems, McGuire Environmental Consultant, Inc., Sacramento, Calif.
Ghosh, A., Mukiibi, M., and Ela, W. (2004). “TCLP underestimates leaching of arsenic from solid residuals under landfill conditions.” Environ. Sci. Technol., 38(17), 4677–4682.
Ghosh, A., Mukiibi, M., and Sáez, A. E. (2006). “Leaching of arsenic from granular ferric hydroxide residuals under mature landfill conditions.” Environ. Sci. Technol., 40(19), 6070–6075.
Means, J. L., Smith, L. A., Nehring, K. W., Brauning, S. E., Gavaskar, A. R., Sass, B. M., Wiles, C. C., and Mashni, C. I. (1995). The application of solidification/stabilization to waste materials, Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, Fla.
Nnorom, I. C., and Osibanjo, O. (2009). “Toxicity characterization of waste mobile phone plastics.” J. Hazard. Mater., 161(1), 183–188.
Sandia National Laboratories (SNL). (2007a). Arsenic pilot plant operation and results—Socorro Springs, New Mexico—Phase 1, SAN, Albuquerque, N.M., D2007–D3225.
Sandia National Laboratories (SNL). (2007b). Arsenic plot plant operation and results—Rio Rancho, New Mexico. SAN, Albuquerque, N.M., D2007–D7732.
Sarkar, S., Blaney, L. M., Gupta, A., Ghosh, D., and SenGupta, A. K. (2008). “Arsenic removal from groundwater and its safe contaminant in a rural environment: Validation of a sustainable approach.” Environ. Sci. Technol., 42, 4268–4273.
Severn Trent Services (STS). (2008). Bayoxide arsenic removal media-ferric oxide adsorptive media, Severn Trent Services, Inc., Ft. Washington, Pa., ⟨http://severntrentservices.com/LiteratureDownloads/Documents/565-02003.pdf⟩ (Apr. 16, 2009).
Shaw, J. K., Fathordoobadi, S., Zelinski, B. J., Ela, W., and Saez, A. E. (2008). “Stabilization of arsenic-bearing solid residuals in polymeric matrices.” J. Hazard. Mater., 152(3), 1115–1121.
Simmons, B. (1999). “Overviews of California EPA approach.” Proc., Environmental Protection Agency (EPA): Public Meeting on Waste Leaching, USEPA, Washington, D.C.
Testa, S. M. (1997). The reuse and recycling of contaminated soil, CRC, Boca Raton, Fla.
U.S. Code of Federal Regulation (USCFR). (2008). “Toxicity characteristics.” USCFR, Title 40, Part 216, Subpart C, § 261.24, ⟨http://ecfr.gpoaccess.gov/cgi/t/text/text-idx?c=ecfr&sid=c9c2e14a31f178942ba4a35ed1fc8747&rgn=div5&view=text&node=40:25.0.1.1.2&idno=40#40:25.0.1.1.2.3.1.5⟩ (Apr. 16, 2009).
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). (1992). Test methods for evaluating solid waste, physical/chemical methods: Method 1311, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, USEPA, Washington, D.C., ⟨http://www.epa.gov/epawaste/hazard/testmethods/sw846/pdfs/1311.pdf⟩ (Apr. 16, 2009).
USEPA. (1996). Test methods for evaluating solid waste, physical/chemical methods: Method 3050B, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, USEPA, Washington, D.C., ⟨http://www.epa.gov/epawaste/hazard/testmethods/sw846/pdfs/3050b.pdf⟩ (Apr. 16, 2009).
USEPA. (2000). “Regulation on the disposal of arsenic residuals from drinking water treatment plants.” Rep. No. EPA/600/R-00/025, National Risk Management Research Laboratory, Cincinnati, Ohio.
USEPA. (2005). “What on tap: What you need to know.” Rep. No. EPA 816-K-03-007, Office of Water, USEPA, Washington, D.C., ⟨http://www.epa.gov/OGWDW/wot/pdfs/book_waterontap_full.pdf⟩ (Apr. 16, 2009).
Westerhoff, P., De Haan, M., Martindale, A., and Badruzzaman, M. (2006). “Arsenic adsorptive media technology selection strategies.” Water Qual. Res. J. Canada, 41(2), 171–184.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Environmental Engineering
Volume 136 • Issue 10 • October 2010
Pages: 1082 - 1088
Copyright
© 2010 ASCE.
History
Received: Apr 27, 2009
Accepted: Apr 2, 2010
Published online: Apr 8, 2010
Published in print: Oct 2010
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.