TECHNICAL NOTES
Jul 24, 2009

Evaluation of Storm-Water Wetlands in Series in Piedmont North Carolina

Publication: Journal of Environmental Engineering
Volume 136, Issue 1

Abstract

Three storm-water wetlands in series were monitored in a heavily urbanized 12.5 ha watershed in Mooresville, North Carolina. Monitoring of this system allowed an examination of the diminishing returns provided by three successive best management practices (BMPs) of a similar type. At least 80% of the total concentration reduction for all pollutants occurred within the first wetland cell. Only the first wetland cell significantly (p<0.05) reduced all pollutants tested. No pollutant was significantly reduced from the outlet of Wetland Cell 2 to the outlet of Wetland Cell 3 (p<0.05) . Median complete system (outlet of Wetland Cell 3) effluent concentrations for total suspended solids, total phosphorus, total nitrogen, and turbidity were 8, 0.09, 0.73 mg/L, and 10 NTU, respectively, which compared favorably to published results. Organic nitrogen generated from wetland vegetation seemed to result in a background source of nitrogen in the wetlands, supporting the idea of an irreducible concentration for nitrogen in these systems. The results indicate that the successive BMPs in a series do not perform as well as the first when each BMP uses similar removal mechanisms.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The writers acknowledge the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program for logistical assistance and funding of this study, the North Carolina Division of Water Quality for their monitoring assistance and sample collection, the Town of Mooresville for their logistical assistance and willingness to provide public land for the project, and Jonathan Smith of Tetra Tech, Inc. for his contributions to the project design, construction, and monitoring setup.

References

American Public Health Association (APHA), American Water Works Association (AWWA), and Water Environment Federation (WEF). (1998). Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 20th Ed., American Public Health Association, Alexandria, Va.
ASCE. (1998). “Urban runoff quality management” ASCE Manuals and Rep. of Engineering Practice No. 87, Reston, Va.
Carleton, J. N., Grizzard, T. J., Godrej, A. N., and Post, H. E. (2001). “Factors affecting the performance of stormwater treatment wetlands.” Water Res., 35(6), 1552–1562.
Cawthorn, J. W., and Jenkins, V. S. (1964). Soil survey of iredell county, North Carolina, USDA–Soil Conservation Service, Washington, D.C.
Clary, J., Urbonas, B., Jones, J., Strecker, E., Quigley, M., and O’Brien, J. (2002). “Developing, evaluating and maintaining a standardized stormwater BMP effectiveness database.” Water Sci. Technol., 45(7), 65–73.
Geosyntec Consultants and Wright Water Engineers, Inc. (GCWWE). (2008). Analysis of treatment system performance: International stormwater Best Management Practices (BMP) database (1999–2008).
Hunt, W. F., Burchell, M. R., Wright, J. D., and Bass, K. L. (2007). Stormwater wetland design update: Zones, vegetation, soil, and outlet guidance, North Carolina Cooperative Extension, Raleigh, N.C.
Kadlec, R. H., and Knight, R. L. (1996). Treatment wetlands, CR, Boca Raton, Fla.
Lenhart, H. A. (2008). “A North Carolina field study to evaluate the effect of a coastal plain stormwater wetland on water quality and quantity and nitrogen accumulation in five wetland plant species in two constructed stormwater wetlands.” MS thesis, North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, N.C.
Mallin, M. A., Ensign, S. H., Wheeler, T. L., and Mayes, D. B. (2002). “Pollutant removal efficacy of three wet detention ponds.” J. Environ. Qual., 31, 654–660.
Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS). (2004). “Estimation of direct runoff from storm rainfall.” Section 10: National engineering handbook, part 620, USDA, Washington, D.C.
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources (NCDENR). (2007). Stormwater best management practices manual, NCDENR, Raleigh, N.C.
Schueler, T. R., and Holland, H. K. (2000). “Article 65: Irreducible pollutant concentrations discharged from stormwater practices.” The practice of watershed protection, The Center for Watershed Protection, Ellicott City, The Center for Watershed Protection, Md., 377–380.
Strecker, E. W., Quigler, M. M., Urbonas, B. R., Jones, J. E., and Clary, J. K. (2001). “Determining Urban Stormwater BMP Effectiveness.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 127, 144–149.
United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). (1983). “Methods for chemical analysis of water and wastes.” Rep. No. EPA 600/4-79/020, Office of Research and Development, Washington, D.C.
United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). (2002). “Considerations in the design of treatment Best Management Practices (BMPs) to improve water quality.” Rep. No. EPA 600/R-03/103, Office of Research and Development, Cincinnati, Ohio.
Urbonas, B. R. (1995). “Recommended Parameters to report with BMP monitoring data.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 121(1), 23–34.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Environmental Engineering
Journal of Environmental Engineering
Volume 136Issue 1January 2010
Pages: 140 - 146

History

Received: Apr 22, 2009
Accepted: Jul 22, 2009
Published online: Jul 24, 2009
Published in print: Jan 2010

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

J. M. Hathaway [email protected]
Graduate Research Assistant, Dept. of Biological and Agricultural Engineering, North Carolina State Univ., P.O. Box 7625, Raleigh, NC 27695 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
W. F. Hunt
Associate Professor and Extension Specialist, Dept. of Biological and Agricultural Engineering, North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, NC 27695.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share