Technical Papers
Feb 26, 2022

Assessment Framework for Additive Manufacturing in the AEC Industry

Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 148, Issue 5

Abstract

Additive manufacturing (AM), popularly known as three-dimensional (3D) printing, is starting to coexist with conventional manufacturing (CM) in architecture-engineering-construction (AEC) industry. However, AEC practitioners do not have validated systematic means to rapidly and consistently assess AM for the production of building components through transparent metrics such as cost and environmental impact. We developed a semiautomated assessment framework to rapidly and consistently evaluate the applicability (A), schedule (S), environmental impact (E), and cost (C) of AM compared with CM to produce building components. The validation of the framework showed that it reduced the effort required for the ASEC analyses, specifically the time for the assessment by 97%, and provided consistent A, S, and C results in comparison with the assessment without the framework. The consistency of the E results was improved fourfold. An uncertainty source analysis of the E results showed the reduction of inconsistencies by 68% in the formalized assessment and proposed mitigations. Future work includes framework’s further automation such as development of direct links to design and life cycle assessment (LCA) tools.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. Some data used during the study are proprietary and may only be provided with restrictions (Input data for the case studies).

Acknowledgments

This research was conducted with the support of Stanford University, Center of Integrated Facility Engineering (CIFE) at Stanford, and with the support and in collaboration with the Permasteelisa’s R&D Group.

References

Arc. 2021a. “Beyond the geometry plastic 3D printed pavilion/archi-union architects + fab-union.” Accessed August 1, 2021. https://www.archdaily.com/960939/beyond-the-geometry-the-worlds-largest-modified-plastic-3d-printing-architecture-archi-union-architects.
Arc. 2021b. “Icon’s first 3D printed homes for sale in Austin, Texas.” Accessed August 1, 2021. https://www.archdaily.com/958376/americas-first-3d-printed-homes-for-sale-in-austin-texas.
Arc. 2021c. “A robot-3D printed concrete book cabin/Professor Xu Weiguo’s team.” Accessed August 1, 2021. https://www.archdaily.com/959283/a-robot-3d-printed-concrete-book-cabin-professor-xu-weiguos-team.
Arc. 2021d. “Tecla technology and clay 3D printed house/Mario Cucinella architects.” Accessed August 1, 2021. https://www.archdaily.com/960714/tecla-technology-and-clay-3d-printed-house-mario-cucinella-architects.
Arnstein, J., B. Gibbons, A. Hashemi, J. Pratt, and P. Zhu. 2015. Consequential life cycle assessment of conventionally manufactured and 3d-printed curtain wall brackets. Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ.
ASTM. 2018. “Additive manufacturing.” Accessed March 4, 2018. https://www.astm.org/industry/additive-manufacturing-overview.html.
Atkins. 2012. Atkins project: Additive manufacturing; a low carbon footprint. Loughborough, UK: Loughborough Univ.
Baumers, M. 2012. “Economic aspects of additive manufacturing: Benefits, costs and energy consumption.” Ph.D. thesis, Mechanical, Electrical and Manufacturing Engineering School, Loughborough Univ.
Belezina, J. 2012. “D-shape 3D printer can print full-sized houses.” Accessed March 10, 2014. http://www.gizmag.com/d-shape-3d-printer/21594/.
Bousquin, J. 2021. “3D-printed building facade offers insulative properties.” Accessed June 1, 2021. https://www.constructiondive.com/news/3d-printed-building-facade-offers-insulative-properties/596000/.
Capterra. 2018. “Top 20 construction management software 2018—Compare reviews.” Accessed January 10, 2018. https://www.capterra.com/construction-management-software/.
Clayton, M., J. Kunz, and M. Fischer. 1998. The Charrette test method. Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ.
DUSarchitects. 2014. “3D print canal house.” Accessed March 30, 2014. http://3dprintcanalhouse.com/.
Enlighten. n.d. “Enlighten—The supply chain sustainability tool kit | econolyst UK.” Accessed May 26, 2015. http://www.econolyst.co.uk/index.php/home/resources/software/enlighten-the-supply-chain-sustainability-tool-kit.
Fishbowl Manufacturing. 2018 “Fishbowl manufacturing | Free 14-Day Trial.” Accessed January 29, 2018. https://www.fishbowlinventory.com/quick-tour/manufacturing-inventory-software/.
Gandini, A., C. Logan, D. Tse, G. Galante, and R. Coakley. 2015. Aluminum façade frame: Conventional vs. additive manufacturing. Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ.
Gibson, I., D. W. Rosen, and B. Stucker. 2009. Additive manufacturing technologies: Rapid prototyping to direct digital manufacturing. New York: Springer.
IDEF. 1981. “IdefØ—Function modeling method—IDEF.” Accessed March 1, 2014. https://www.idef.com/idefo-functionmodelingmethod/.
ISO. 2006. Environmental management—Life cycle assessment—Principles and framework. Geneva: ISO.
Khoshnevis, B. 2004. “Automated construction by contour crafting—Related robotics and information technologies.” Autom. Constr. 13 (1): 5–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2003.08.012.
Mrazovic, N. 2014. “State of the art of 3D printing/additive manufacturing technologies and their possible future application in the construction industry.” Accessed January 10, 2016. http://www.euroconstruct.org/publications/publications.php.
Mrazovic, N. 2015. A framework for bringing 3D printing into the construction industry | center for integrated facility engineering. Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ.
Mrazovic, N. 2018. “Assessment framework for additive manufacturing in the AEC industry.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Stanford Univ.
Mrazovic, N. 2019. “Feasibility study of additive manufacturing technologies for metallic building components.” M.S. thesis, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Stanford Univ.
Mrazovic, N., D. Mocibob, M. Lepech, and M. Fischer. 2017. “Assessment of additive and conventional manufacturing, case studies from the AEC industry.” In Resilient structures and sustainable construction. Fargo, ND: ISEC Press.
openLCA. 2018. “openlca.org | openlca is a free, professional life cycle assessment (LCA) and footprint software with a broad range of features and many available databases, created by greendelta since 2006.” Accessed January 29, 2018. http://www.openlca.org/.
Primavera. 2018. “Oracle Construction and Engineering.” Accessed February 14, 2018. https://www.oracle.com/applications/primavera/index.html.
Ruffo, M., C. Tuck, and R. Hague. 2006. “Cost estimation for rapid manufacturing—Laser sintering production for low to medium volumes.” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part B: J. Eng. Manuf. 220 (9): 1417–1427. https://doi.org/10.1243/09544054JEM517.
SAGE. 2018. “Sage estimating.” Accessed February 14, 2018. https://www.sage.com/en-us/products/sage-estimating/.
Senvol. 2015. “Data to help companies implement additive manufacturing.” Accessed July 1, 2015. http://senvol.com/.
SimaPro. 2018. “Simapro.” Accessed May 12, 2016. https://simapro.com.
Strauss, H. 2013. “Am envelope. The potential of additive manufacturing for facade constructions.” BE Archit. Built Environ. 3 (1): 1–270. https://doi.org/10.7480/abe.2013.1.
Stucker, B. 2012. Additive manufacturing technologies: Technology introduction and business implications. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
Tao, L. 2004. Research incubator: Combinatorial optimization. New York: Pace Univ.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 148Issue 5May 2022

History

Received: Aug 11, 2021
Accepted: Jan 12, 2022
Published online: Feb 26, 2022
Published in print: May 1, 2022
Discussion open until: Jul 26, 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Postdoctoral Scholar, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Stanford Univ., Jerry Yang & Akiko Yamazaki Environment & Energy Bldg., 473 Via Ortega, Stanford, CA 94305 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8997-153X. Email: [email protected]; [email protected]
Martin Fischer, A.M.ASCE
Director, Center for Integrated Facility Engineering, Stanford Univ., Jerry Yang & Akiko Yamazaki Environment & Energy Bldg., 473 Via Ortega, Stanford, CA 94305; Professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Stanford Univ., Jerry Yang & Akiko Yamazaki Environment & Energy Bldg., 473 Via Ortega, Room 311, Stanford, CA 94305.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Recent Development of 3D-Printing Technology in Construction Engineering, Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction, 10.1061/PPSCFX.SCENG-1278, 29, 1, (2024).
  • Impact of Digital Technology Adoption on the Comparative Advantage of Architectural, Engineering, and Construction Firms in Singapore, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 10.1061/JCEMD4.COENG-13743, 149, 12, (2023).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share