Technical Papers
Aug 11, 2021

Risk-Based Approach to Predict the Cost Performance of Modularization in Construction Projects

Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 147, Issue 10

Abstract

The lack of proper management of the unique modular risks hinders the construction industry from maximizing the potential benefits associated with the use of modularization. Capturing the full cost benefits of modularized processes requires careful consideration of different aspects related to material, design, technology, logistics, installation, and so forth. Although many previous research efforts provided models to assess the feasibility of modularization in construction projects, no previous study developed a risk-based approach to assess the impact of adopting modular approaches on the cost performance of construction projects. This paper fills this knowledge gap. The authors followed an interrelated multistep research methodology. First, 50 modular risks were identified based on an extensive analysis of the literature conducted in a previous research study. Second, an industry survey was conducted in which 48 construction professionals—with an average of 24.25 years experience in construction operations and 13.6 years experience in modular construction—examined and assessed the impact of modular risks on cost performance. Third, integrated statistical and mathematical techniques—including distribution fitting—were utilized to develop a predictive model that (1) maps the 50 modular risks under investigation to cost performance data collected from 56 modular construction projects, and, consequently, (2) computes the associated cost saving and/or growth. The proposed model was verified using extreme condition tests, surprise behavior test, and sensitivity analysis, and was validated by industry experts. The authors provide guidelines for using the proposed model by industry practitioners. The developed model allows for maximized use of available project information to enable a reliable a priori cost assessment for the modularization processes throughout the different project phases. This is particularly important in the case of varying conditions over the project lifecycle. The developed model helps project stakeholders identify cost enablers and barriers that are interrelated with modularization processes. Accordingly, corrective actions and mitigation plans can be established. This research provides improved practices for decision-making, risk management, and project team alignment to maximize the cost benefits of modularization in construction projects.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data, models, and code generated or used during the study appear in the published article.

Acknowledgments

This study was conducted through the financial support provided by the Missouri Consortium for Construction Innovation (MO-CCI) as represented by its member companies, including McCarthy Building Companies, Brinkman Constructors, Arco Construction, Clayco, BJC Healthcare, Alberici, and Greensfelder.

References

Abdul Nabi, M., and I. H. El-adaway. 2020. “Modular construction: Determining decision-making factors and future research needs.” J. Manage. Eng. 36 (6): 04020085. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000859.
Abdul Nabi, M., and I. H. El-adaway. 2021. “Understanding the key risks affecting cost and schedule performance of modular construction projects.” J. Manage. Eng. 37 (4): 04021023. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000917.
Abotaleb, I. S., I. H. El-adaway, M. W. Ibrahim, A. S. Hanna, and J. S. Russell. 2020. “Developing a rating score for out-of-sequence construction.” J. Manage. Eng. 36 (3): 04020013. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000765.
Abotaleb, I. S., I. H. El-Adaway, M. W. Ibrahim, A. S. Hanna, and J. S. Russell. 2019. “Causes, early warning signs, and impacts of out-of-sequence construction: Expert-based survey analysis.” J. Manage. Eng. 35 (6): 04019030. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000724.
AGC (Associated General Contractors of America). 2018. “Eighty percent of contractor’s report difficulty finding qualified craft workers to hire as association calls for measures to rebuild workforce.” Accessed November 7, 2020. https://www.agc.org/news/2018/08/29/eighty-percent-contractors-report-difficulty-finding-qualified-craft-workers-hire.
Al-Bahar, J. F., and K. C. Crandall. 1990. “Systematic risk management approach for construction projects.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 116 (3): 533–546. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1990)116:3(533).
APM (Association for Project Management). 2008. “Interfacing risk and earned value management.” Accessed April 17, 2021. https://www.apm.org.uk/media/7584/irevm-sample-chapter.pdf.
Arashpour, M., B. Abbasi, M. Arashpour, M. R. Hosseini, and R. Yang. 2017. “Integrated management of on-site, coordination and off-site uncertainty: Theorizing risk analysis within a hybrid project setting.” Int. J. Project Manage. 35 (4): 647–655. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2017.02.016.
Assaad, R., I. H. El-Adaway, and I. S. Abotaleb. 2020. “Predicting project performance in the construction industry.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 146 (5): 04020030. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001797.
Azghandi-Roshnavand, A. 2019. “Evaluation of construction contract documents to be applied in modular construction focusing ambiguities: A text processing approach.” Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. of Building, Civil and Environmental Engineering, Concordia Univ.
Azhar, S., M. Y. Lukkad, and I. Ahmad. 2013. “An investigation of critical factors and constraints for selecting modular construction over conventional stick-built technique.” Int. J. Constr. Educ. Res. 9 (3): 203–225. https://doi.org/10.1080/15578771.2012.723115.
Baldwin, A., C.-S. Poon, L.-Y. Shen, S. Austin, and I. Wong. 2009. “Designing out waste in high-rise residential buildings: Analysis of precasting methods and traditional construction.” Renewable Energy 34 (9): 2067–2073. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2009.02.008.
Barbosa, F., J. Woetzel, J. Mischke, M. J. Ribeirinho, M. Sridhar, M. Parsons, M. Bertram, and S. Brown. 2017. Reinventing construction: A route to higher productivity. New York: McKinsey & Company.
Bayraktar, M. E., M. Hastak, S. Gokhale, and B. Safi. 2011. “Decision tool for selecting the optimal techniques for cost and schedule reduction in capital projects.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 137 (9): 645–655. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000345.
Bernstein, H., J. E. Gudgel, and D. Laquidara-Carr. 2011. Smart Market Report: Prefabrication and modularization: Increasing productivity in the construction industry. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Bertram, N., S. Fuchs, J. Mischke, R. Palter, G. Strube, and J. Woetzel. 2019. Modular construction: From projects to products, 1–34. New York: McKinsey & Company.
Castro-Nova, I., G. M. Gad, A. Touran, B. Cetin, and D. D. Gransberg. 2018. “Evaluating the influence of differing geotechnical risk perceptions on design-build highway projects.” ASCE-ASME J. Risk Uncertainty Eng. Syst. Part A: Civ. Eng. 4 (4): 04018038. https://doi.org/10.1061/AJRUA6.0000993.
Chatterjee, C., E. Flugman, F. Jiang, P. Mozumder, and A. G. Chowdhury. 2019. “Insights from a stated preference experiment of Florida residents: Role of information and incentives in hurricane risk mitigation.” Nat. Hazards Rev. 20 (1): 04018029. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000316.
Choi, J. O. 2014. “Links between modularization critical success factors and project performance.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Civil, Architectural and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Texas at Austin.
Choi, J. O., X. B. Chen, and T. W. Kim. 2017. “Opportunities and challenges of modular methods in dense urban environment.” Int. J. Constr. Manage. 19 (2): 93–105. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2017.1382093.
Choi, J. O., J. T. O’Connor, and T. W. Kim. 2016. “Recipes for cost and schedule successes in industrial modular projects: Qualitative comparative analysis.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 142 (10): 04016055. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001171.
Choi, J. O., J. T. O’Connor, Y. H. Kwak, and B. K. Shrestha. 2019. “Modularization business case analysis model for industrial projects.” J. Manage. Eng. 35 (3): 04019004. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000683.
Choi, J. O., B. K. Shrestha, Y. H. Kwak, and J. S. Shane. 2020. “Innovative technologies and management approaches for facility design standardization and modularization of capital projects.” J. Manage. Eng. 36 (5): 04020042. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000805.
CII (Construction Industry Institute). 2011. Transforming modular construction for the competitive advantage through the adaptation of shipbuilding production processes to construction. Austin, TX: CII.
CII (Construction Industry Institute). 2013. IPRA: Integrated project risk assessment. Implementation Resource IR181-2. Austin, TX: CII.
CII (Construction Industry Institute). 2018. Best practices for preventing out-of-sequence construction activities and minimizing their impacts. Austin, TX: CII.
Cochran, W. G. 1977. Sampling techniques. 3rd ed. New York: Wiley.
Converse, J. M., and S. Presser. 1986. “Survey questions: Handcrafting the standardized questionnaire.” In Vol. 63 of Quantitative applications in the social sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Dailey, J. 2014. “Forest City sues Skanska over Atlantic Yards Tower B2.” Accessed April 17, 2021. http://ny.curbed.com/archives/2014/09/02/forest_city_sues_skanska_over_atlantic_yards_tower_b2.php.
Dikmen, I., C. Budayan, M. T. Birgonul, and E. Hayat. 2018. “Effects of risk attitude and controllability assumption on risk ratings: Observational study on international construction project risk assessment.” J. Manage. Eng. 34 (6): 04018037. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000643.
Ehigiator, M. O., and R. Ehigiator–Irughe. 2018. “Formulation and implementation of mathematical models suitable for deformation analysis of structures.” Niger. J. Technol. 37 (2): 294–301. https://doi.org/10.4314 /njt.v37i2.2.
Enshassi, M. S., S. Walbridge, J. S. West, and C. T. Haas. 2019. “Integrated risk management framework for tolerance-based mitigation strategy decision support in modular construction projects.” J. Manage. Eng. 35 (4): 05019004. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000698.
Enshassi, M. S., S. Walbridge, J. S. West, and C. T. Haas. 2020. “Probabilistic risk management framework for tolerance-related issues in modularized projects: Local and global perspectives.” ASCE-ASME J. Risk Uncertainty Eng. Syst. Part A: Civ. Eng. 6 (1): 04019022. https://doi.org/10.1061/AJRUA6.0001036.
Fisher, D. J., and M. J. Skibniewski. 1992. Computerized decision support for modularization of industrial construction. Austin, TX: Construction Industry Institute, Univ. of Texas at Austin.
Fowler, F. J. 1995. “Improving survey questions: Design and evaluation.” In Vol. 38 of Applied social research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Geisser, S., and W. O. Johnson. 2006. Modes of parametric statistical inference. New York: Wiley.
Gibb, A. G. 1999. Off-site fabrication: Prefabrication, pre-assembly and modularisation. Scotland, UK: Whittles.
Haas, C. T., and W. R. Fagerlund. 2002. Preliminary research on prefabrication, pre-assembly, modularization and off-site fabrication in construction. Austin, TX: Construction Industry Institute.
Haider, H., R. Sadiq, and S. Tesfamariam. 2016. “Risk-based framework for improving customer satisfaction through system reliability in small-sized to medium-sized water utilities.” J. Manage. Eng. 32 (5): 04016008. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000435.
Hamzeh, F., O. Abdul Ghani, M. B. Saleh Bacha, and Y. Abbas. 2017. “Modular concrete construction: The differing perspectives of designers, manufacturers, and contractors in Lebanon.” Eng. Constr. Archit. Manage. 24 (6): 935–949. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-11-2014-0148.
Hwang, B.-G., M. Shan, and K.-Y. Looi. 2018. “Knowledge-based decision support system for prefabricated prefinished volumetric construction.” Autom. Constr. 94 (Oct): 168–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2018.06.016.
Jaillon, L., and C. S. Poon. 2008. “Sustainable construction aspects of using prefabrication in dense urban environment: A Hong Kong case study.” Constr. Manage. Econ. 26 (9): 953–966. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446190802259043.
Jang, S., and G. Lee. 2018. “Process, productivity, and economic analyses of BIM-based multi-trade prefabrication—A case study.” Autom. Constr. 89: 86–98.
Kamali, M., and K. Hewage. 2017. “Development of performance criteria for sustainability evaluation of modular versus conventional construction methods.” J. Cleaner Prod. 142 (Jan): 3592–3606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.10.108.
Khodeir, L. M., and A. H. M. Mohamed. 2015. “Identifying the latest risk probabilities affecting construction projects in Egypt according to political and economic variables. From January 2011 to January 2013.” HBRC J. 11 (1): 129–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hbrcj.2014.03.007.
Larsson, J., P. E. Eriksson, T. Olofsson, and P. Simonsson. 2014. “Industrialized construction in the Swedish infrastructure sector: Core elements and barriers.” Constr. Manage. Econ. 32 (1–2): 83–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2013.833666.
Li, Z., G. Q. Shen, and X. Xue. 2014. “Critical review of the research on the management of prefabricated construction.” Habitat Int. 43 (Jul): 240–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2014.04.001.
Liu, G., K. Li, D. Zhao, and C. Mao. 2017. “Business model innovation and its drivers in the Chinese construction industry during the shift to modular prefabrication.” J. Manage. Eng. 33 (3): 04014032. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000501.
Lopez, D., and T. M. Froese. 2016. “Analysis of costs and benefits of panelized and modular prefabricated homes.” Procedia Eng. 145: 1291–1297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.04.166.
Mohamed, M., and Tran, D. Q. 2021. “Risk-based inspection model for hot mix asphalt pavement construction projects.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 147 (6): 04021045. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0002053.
Murtaza, M., D. Fisher, and M. Skibniewski. 1993a. “Knowledge-based approach to modular construction decision support.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 119 (1): 115–130. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1993)119:1(115).
Murtaza, M. B., and D. J. Fisher. 1994. “Neuromodex—Neural network system for modular construction decision making.” J. Comput. Civ. Eng. 8 (2): 221–233. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3801(1994)8:2(221).
Murtaza, M. B., D. J. Fisher, and J. G. Musgrove. 1993b. “Intelligent cost/schedule estimation for modular construction.” Cost Eng. 35 (6): 19.
Nasir, M. K., and B. H. W. Hadikusumo. 2019. “System dynamics model of contractual relationships between owner and contractor in construction projects.” J. Manage. Eng. 35 (1): 04018052. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000666.
NIST/SEMATECH. 2018. “e-handbook of statistical methods.” Accessed December 12, 2020. https://www.itl.nist.gov/div898/handbook/.
O’Connor, J. T., W. J. O’Brien, and J. O. Choi. 2013. Industrial modularization: How to optimize; how to maximize. Austin, TX: Univ. of Texas at Austin.
O’Connor, J. T., W. J. O’Brien, and J. O. Choi. 2014. “Critical success factors and enablers for optimum and maximum industrial modularization.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 140 (6): 04014012. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000842.
O’Connor, J. T., W. J. O’Brien, and J. O. Choi. 2015. “Standardization strategy for modular industrial plants.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 141 (9): 04015026. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001001.
O’Connor, J. T., W. J. O’Brien, and J. O. Choi. 2016. “Industrial project execution planning: Modularization versus stick-built.” Pract. Period. Struct. Des. Constr. 21 (1): 04015014. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)SC.1943-5576.0000270.
Palisade. 2019. “RISK for risk analysis.” Accessed November 17, 2020. http://www.palisade.com/risk/.
Peng, Y., Y. Shi, H. Yan, and J. Zhang. 2020. “Multivariate frequency analysis of annual maxima suspended sediment concentrations and floods in the Jinsha River, China.” J. Hydrol. Eng. 25 (9): 05020029. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001977.
PMI (Project Management Institute). 2008. A guide to the project management body of knowledge. 4th ed. Newton Square, PA: PMI.
Polat, G. 2008. “Factors affecting the use of precast concrete systems in the United States.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 134 (3): 169–178. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2008)134:3(169).
Rahman, M. M. 2014. “Barriers of implementing modern methods of construction.” J. Manage. Eng. 30 (1): 69–77. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000173.
Rajsekhar, D., V. P. Singh, and A. K. Mishra. 2015. “Hydrologic drought atlas for Texas.” J. Hydrol. Eng. 20 (7): 05014023. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001074.
Russell, M. M., G. Howell, S. M. Hsiang, and M. Liu. 2013. “Application of time buffers to construction project task durations.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 139 (10): 04013008. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000735.
Sahin, O., D. Miller, and S. Mohamed. 2018. “Value-based modelling: An Australian case of off-site manufactured buildings.” Int. J. Constr. Manage. 18 (1): 34–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2016.1247774.
Said, H. 2015. “Prefabrication best practices and improvement opportunities for electrical construction.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 141 (12): 04015045. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001018.
Sharafi, P., M. Rashidi, B. Samali, H. Ronagh, and M. Mortazavi. 2018. “Identification of factors and decision analysis of the level of modularization in building construction.” J. Archit. Eng. 24 (2): 04018010. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)AE.1943-5568.0000313.
Song, J., W. R. Fagerlund, C. T. Haas, C. B. Tatum, and J. A. Vanegas. 2005. “Considering prework on industrial projects.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 131 (6): 723–733. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2005)131:6(723).
Sovacool, B. K., P. Enevoldsen, C. Koch, and R. J. Barthelmie. 2017. “Cost performance and risk in the construction of offshore and onshore wind farms.” Wind Energy 20 (5): 891–908. https://doi.org/10.1002/we.2069.
Sudman, S. 1983. “Applied sampling.” In Handbook of survey research, edited by P. H. Rossi, J. D. Wright, and A. B. Anderson. Bingley, UK: Emerald.
Sun, Y., J. Wang, J. Wu, W. Shi, D. Ji, X. Wang, and X. Zhao. 2020. “Constraints hindering the development of high-rise modular buildings.” Appl. Sci. 10 (20): 7159. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10207159.
Tereso, A., P. Ribeiro, and M. Cardoso. 2018. “An automated framework for the integration between EVM and risk management.” J. Inf. Syst. Eng. Manage. 3 (1): 03.
Vaagen, H., M. Kaut, and S. W. Wallace. 2017. “The impact of design uncertainty in engineer-to-order project planning.” Eur. J. Oper. Res. 261 (3): 1098–1109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2017.03.005.
Velamati, S. 2012. “Feasibility, benefits and challenges of modular construction in high rise development in the United States: A developer’s perspective.” Ph.D dissertation, Center for Real Estate Program in Real Estate Development, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Wang, Z. Z., and B. Shi. 2013. “Decision making and economic analysis for accelerated bridge construction.” Appl. Mech. Mater. 423–426: 2178–2183. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.423-426.2196.
Wuni, I. Y., G. Q. Shen, and B.-G. Hwang. 2020. “Risks of modular integrated construction: A review and future research directions.” Front. Eng. Manage. 7 (1): 63–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42524-019-0059-7.
Xiao, L., G. Q. Shen, P. Wu, H. Fan, H. Wu, and Y. Teng. 2018. “RBL-PHP: Simulation of lean construction and information technologies for prefabrication housing production.” J. Manage. Eng. 34 (2): 04017053. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000577.
Yang, Y., M. Pan, W. Pan, and Z. Zhang. 2021. “Sources of uncertainties in offsite logistics of modular construction for high-rise building projects.” J. Manage. Eng. 37 (3): 04021011. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000905.
Yu, H., M. Al-Hussein, S. Al-Jibouri, and A. Telyas. 2021. “Lean transformation in a modular building company: A case for implementation.” J. Manage. Eng. 29 (1): 103–111. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000115.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 147Issue 10October 2021

History

Received: Jan 28, 2021
Accepted: May 28, 2021
Published online: Aug 11, 2021
Published in print: Oct 1, 2021
Discussion open until: Jan 11, 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Mohamad Abdul Nabi, S.M.ASCE [email protected]
Ph.D. Candidate, Dept. of Civil, Architectural, and Environmental Engineering, Missouri Univ. of Science and Technology, Rolla, MO 65409. Email: [email protected]
Hurst-McCarthy Professor of Construction Engineering and Management, Professor of Civil Engineering, and Founding Director of the Missouri Consortium of Construction Innovation, Dept. of Civil, Architectural, and Environmental Engineering and Dept. of Engineering Management and Systems Engineering, Missouri Univ. of Science and Technology, Rolla, MO 65409 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7306-6380. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Quantifying the Impact of Technology Utilization on Schedule and Cost Performance in Construction Projects, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 10.1061/JCEMD4.COENG-14679, 150, 8, (2024).
  • Digital Technologies in Offsite and Prefabricated Construction: Theories and Applications, Buildings, 10.3390/buildings13010163, 13, 1, (163), (2023).
  • Space–Time–Workforce Visualization and Conditional Capacity Synthesis in Uncertainty, Journal of Management in Engineering, 10.1061/JMENEA.MEENG-4991, 39, 2, (2023).
  • Prospects of Promoting MMC across the Public Construction Sector: A Systematic Review against the Diffusion of Innovation Theory, Journal of Architectural Engineering, 10.1061/JAEIED.AEENG-1547, 29, 3, (2023).
  • Research on the Influence of Risk on Construction Project Performance: A Systematic Review, Sustainability, 10.3390/su14116412, 14, 11, (6412), (2022).
  • Exploring the Knowledge Domain of Risk Management in Prefabricated Construction, Buildings, 10.3390/buildings12111784, 12, 11, (1784), (2022).
  • Quantitative Holistic Assessment of Implementing Collaborative Planning Practices, Journal of Management in Engineering, 10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0001032, 38, 3, (2022).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share